Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status

2002-07-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 00:10, Keith Whitwell wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: Here's my current list of concerns about the state of both the branch and the general CVS support of Radeons (since that's what another user and I are both playing with the most). BSD branch's fault - I haven't

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Tim Smith
On Thursday 04 Jul 2002 12:41 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously: These all seem to relate to the SET_SCISSORS patch that went in recently... It seems that more sychronization is required or the scissors uploaded that way are ignored by the 3d part... Tim? Are you seeing these droppings?

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
Tim Smith wrote: On Thursday 04 Jul 2002 12:41 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously: These all seem to relate to the SET_SCISSORS patch that went in recently... It seems that more sychronization is required or the scissors uploaded that way are ignored by the 3d part... Tim? Are you seeing

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
I've just tried two glxgears at the same time and I am seeing utterly strange behaviour with two glxgears running, where sometimes if I move one it will leave bits of gears behind (sometimes a whole frame), and sometimes corrupt my desktop background image (and I mean really corrupt; not

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Tim Smith
On Thursday 04 Jul 2002 5:28 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously: I've just tried two glxgears at the same time and I am seeing utterly strange behaviour with two glxgears running, where sometimes if I move one it will leave bits of gears behind (sometimes a whole frame), and sometimes

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
Tim Smith wrote: On Thursday 04 Jul 2002 5:28 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously: I've just tried two glxgears at the same time and I am seeing utterly strange behaviour with two glxgears running, where sometimes if I move one it will leave bits of gears behind (sometimes a whole frame),

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Felix Kühling
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 17:19:23 +0100 Tim Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (on my system glxgears behaves quite oddly with pageflipping enabled even with only one; it has brief periods of seeming to animate slowly backwards, but shows no significant change in framerate - it is the only app that

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Tim Smith
On Thursday 04 Jul 2002 7:11 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously: Tim Smith wrote: On Thursday 04 Jul 2002 5:28 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously: I've just tried two glxgears at the same time and I am seeing utterly strange behaviour with two glxgears running, where sometimes if I

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Tim Smith
On Thursday 04 Jul 2002 7:22 pm, Felix Kühling scribed numinously: On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 17:19:23 +0100 Tim Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (on my system glxgears behaves quite oddly with pageflipping enabled even with only one; it has brief periods of seeming to animate slowly backwards,

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Tim Smith wrote: (on my system glxgears behaves quite oddly with pageflipping enabled even with only one; it has brief periods of seeming to animate slowly backwards, but shows no significant change in framerate - it is the only app that I've tried that behaves so

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status -- SET_SCISSORS

2002-07-04 Thread Tim Smith
On Thursday 04 Jul 2002 8:03 pm, Tim Smith scribed numinously: On Thursday 04 Jul 2002 7:22 pm, Felix Kühling scribed numinously: On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 17:19:23 +0100 Tim Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (on my system glxgears behaves quite oddly with pageflipping enabled even with only

[Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status

2002-07-03 Thread Eric Anholt
Here's my current list of concerns about the state of both the branch and the general CVS support of Radeons (since that's what another user and I are both playing with the most). BSD branch's fault - I haven't cleaned up the non-ostemplated driver_drv.c files in linux, which means they will

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status

2002-07-03 Thread Keith Whitwell
Eric Anholt wrote: Here's my current list of concerns about the state of both the branch and the general CVS support of Radeons (since that's what another user and I are both playing with the most). BSD branch's fault - I haven't cleaned up the non-ostemplated driver_drv.c files in