Hi David,
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:36 PM, David Reagan jer...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you find IRC unfriendly? Have you tried using a web based client
like irccloud.com?
I use webchat.freenode.net.
There's a big difference between, Here's our live chat app. and Learn
how to connect to IRC
Worth thinking through, though I doubt we'll action this any time soon.
We're doing our best to maintain good coverage in our IRC channels and
folks would still prefer Elastic employees were around more often. Opening
up yet another chat mechanism seems like a way to make sure even more
Moving away from mailing lists for anything except announcements would be
awesome. Forums are a much better way to have solid discussions with
multiple people in. Email is fine, but when you add in more than a couple
people, it gets confusing fast. Forums are also far more user friendly for
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:26 PM, David Reagan jer...@gmail.com wrote:
Moving away from mailing lists for anything except announcements would be
awesome. Forums are a much better way to have solid discussions with
multiple people in. Email is fine, but when you add in more than a couple
people,
Why do you find IRC unfriendly? Have you tried using a web based client
like irccloud.com?
I use webchat.freenode.net.
There's a big difference between, Here's our live chat app. and Learn
how to connect to IRC in order to use live chat. I actively avoided live
chat for years simply because I
Hi
I agree with Jorge 100%: adopting a license which gives people the freedom
to construct datasets would be great. As I already suggested too to leslie,
I think one of the most interesting things coudl be indeed releasing the
dataset of the conversations, and costruct over there some example
I've long wondered how it is that the ElasticSearch tribe could not build
something within its own community, a platform that uses ElasticSearch to
provide the UX being discussed here (a term occasionally used for that is
eat your own dog food). Just thinkin...
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:18 AM,
This is really important for us in China!!
Please switch to whatever service that is accessible in China.
Thank you.
在 2015年4月2日星期四 UTC+8下午11:36:33，leslie.hawthorn写道：
Hello everyone,
As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to
I believe the best developers are cynics. Never trust someone else's code,
that API, the OS, etc :)
What bothers me about Discourse is that email is an afterthought. They have
not built out that feature yet? For me, and apparently many others, email
is the first concern.
The transition is
What's the missing is a culture in which consumers put questions directly
into documentation for answering by the next person who reads it and knows
the answer.
Note that it's not good enough to implement an append-only authorship for
QAs, the question and the answer need to feed back into a
hi,
Just want to give an example of open source project that use Discourse:
https://discuss.aerospike.com/
NodeBB is probably the closely alternative to Discourse as a modern forum
software
regards,
mingfai
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:16 PM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote:
What's
I believe the biggest impact would be on responsiveness
As another long-timer, and someone who often responds to questions, I will
probably cease to do that if the forum would move to Discourse simply
because it lacks the push style notifications on new questions. Right now
if a question title in
I know I can not influence the decision for Discourse, so here are just my
2 ¢.
The move should also consider that users who register with the new forum
should have the right to export their own contributions to download them
similar to Google takeaway function for Gmail / G+ account.
Also, it
* it lacks the push style notifications on new questions*
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-enGiohVrmdk/VS6lNPnQMbI/A70/fc-SzjQxRlk/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2015-04-15%2Bat%2B1.49.18%2BPM.png
That doesn't seem to be correct to me. Does send me an email for every new
post not cover what you
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ivan Brusic i...@brusic.com wrote:
I should clarify that I have no issues moving to Discourse, as long as
instantaneous email interaction is preserved, just wanted to point out that
I see no issues with the mailing lists.
Understood.
The question is moot
Fair play, will check that out, assuming you can reply to that email to
respond?
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko https://twitter.com/synhershko
Freelance Developer Consultant
Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Glen Smith
Tyler-
Thanks. I hope it's 100% clear to everyone with that concern now.
Regards,
Glen
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 3:06:23 PM UTC-4, ty...@elastic.co wrote:
Glen,
We'll be setting up a dedicated instance of Discourse with the
functionality in question, which is still forthcoming. Once
Glen,
We'll be setting up a dedicated instance of Discourse with the
functionality in question, which is still forthcoming. Once we have that,
we'll be able to provide the information necessary to subscribe to what
you're interested in and reply via email.
We've been beating on Discourse for
I should clarify that I have no issues moving to Discourse, as long as
instantaneous email interaction is preserved, just wanted to point out that
I see no issues with the mailing lists.
The question is moot anyways since the change will happen regardless of our
inputs.
I hope we can subscribe
Thanks for your feedback, Ivan.
There's no plan to remove threads from the forums, so information would
always be archived there as well.
Does that impact your thoughts on moving to Discourse?
Folks, please keep the feedback coming!
Cheers,
LH
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Ivan Brusic
As one of the oldest and most frequent users (before my sabbatical) of the
mailing list, I just wanted to say that I never had an issue with it. It
works. As long as I could continue using only email, I am happy.
For realtime communication, there is the IRC channel. If prefer the mailing
list
Thank you for your feedback, Glen! We're currently planning to use the
hosted platform.
Folks, please keep the feedback coming. We value your opinion.
Cheers,
LH
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Glen Smith g...@smithsrock.com wrote:
+1 for recognizing the challenge, proactively approaching it,
+1 to Glen's reply.
I would build on Glen's comment nobody is ever forever going to invest
anything in improving the user interface
with this question (to the entire group):
What should a user interface for group collaboration be capable of
facilitating?
Cheers
Jack
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:23
+1 for recognizing the challenge, proactively approaching it, clearly
articulating the issues, and proposing a seemingly beneficial solution.
Migrating off of gg would, IMO, be a good thing, for the reasons you
stated, plus numerous consequences of the unsupported state. e.g. nobody
is ever
Thank you for sharing your feedback and experience with Discourse, Jack.
From what I have seen, I agree that Discourse will allow our conversations
to be a bit more structured and we're putting a lot of thought into how to
structure the forum so that topic areas will be intuitive for our users to
Hello everyone,
As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open source
projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution for dealing
with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple mailing
lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to
26 matches
Mail list logo
