On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 01:05:51 -0800 (PST), Julian, G4ILO wrote:
>It might actually be more useful if the equalizer was bypassed when
>LINE IN is used, rather than by mode.
That's a very BAD idea. Equalization often needs to be applied to
Line In audio, both for playback of voice messages and to r
I am also not sure what is done with phase of signal when EQ is in
action...
The equalizer is a constant delay (linear phase) FIR filter, so phase
distortion should not occur.
73,
Lyle KK7P
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.ne
Just short answer for
maybe you could briefly explain why WSJT would benefit from
other than flat eq?
When using some soundcards (it was probably some SoundBlaster not so
bad but not the best one) I used TX EQ for power conformity in all
used tones. Do not remember exactly now but output power
NFIG menu? That said, maybe
you could briefly explain why WSJT would benefit from other than flat eq?
73, Erik K7TV
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandr Kobranov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 TX equalize
would be implemented as a new menu within CONFIG?
73,
Erik K7TV
- Original Message - From: "Alexandr Kobranov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 TX equalizer messes up PSK
You are right, Julian.
So what about t
to the approach with "eq
modes"
I assume that would be implemented as a new menu within CONFIG?
73,
Erik K7TV
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandr Kobranov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 T
just info - no new real "mode" is requested
only internal interpretation in K3 dependent on real MODE and
SOME_OTHER_CONTIDION (eg. MIC port) like only internal "virtual" mode
for deciding which EQ profile will be used
just to prevent misunderstandings :-)
hope not needed but...
L. -dst-
Alex
You are right, Julian.
So what about to keep SSB FP MIc/SSB RP Mic/AM FP Mic/AM RP Mic/FM FP
MIc/FM/RP Mic as "independent modes" keeping their own TX/RX EQ Settings?
So yes, let´s have 10 EQ pre-sets and make table of possible "modes"
to keep information about EQ pre-set. There is no need to l
Alexandr Kobranov wrote:
>
>
> What about to have settings of RX and TX EQ not by mode but as profiles?
>
> let´s have RXEQ1, RXEQ2,,RXEQ5,...
>
> also TXEQ1,.TXEQ5,...
>
> all stored for possible recall
>
> someteimes is good to use more profiles in one mode - other
> headphones,
What about to have settings of RX and TX EQ not by mode but as profiles?
let´s have RXEQ1, RXEQ2,,RXEQ5,...
also TXEQ1,.TXEQ5,...
all stored for possible recall
someteimes is good to use more profiles in one mode - other
headphones, microfone change, other data mode,...
so it will
Julian, G4ILO wrote:
>
>
>
> K7TV wrote:
>>
>> It would be great if the TX equalizer could have separate settings per
>> mode, but I would be happy if just the equalizer were bypassed in DATA A.
>> I think something along these lines should be a high priority.
>>
> It might actually be more
K7TV wrote:
>
> Tonight I was on 40 PSK31 using DATA A. At one point I was wondering why
> in the world I wasn't getting enought power out. It turned out I had
> clicked on a different frequency in the waterfall! Clearing the TX
> equalizer fixed the problem. This is not the first time this has
Tonight I was on 40 PSK31 using DATA A. At one point I was wondering why in
the world I wasn't getting enought power out. It turned out I had clicked on
a different frequency in the waterfall! Clearing the TX equalizer fixed the
problem. This is not the first time this has happened to me. Then whe
13 matches
Mail list logo
