Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-19 Thread John Kitchin
I got icicles via ELPA. The version from describe-package is Version: 20140118.1856. although in icicles.el it says ;; Version: 2013.07.23. Thanks for the tip about the binding variable. I am content with this in my init file: (require 'icicles) ;; reclaim C-c ' for org-mode (setq icicle-top-lev

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-19 Thread Memnon Anon
John Kitchin writes: > I got icicles via ELPA. The version from describe-package is > Version: 20140118.1856. although in icicles.el it says ;; Version: > 2013.07.23. That is the current version. Icicles isn't only icicle.el, Drew has actually a whole bunch of elisp addon packages. Some I use,

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-20 Thread Alan Schmitt
Memnon Anon writes: > Okay. As I said, I found this the only one conflicting with org (or > other packages). Just remember to require icicles at the very end of > your config, and everything should work. I found that "C-`" (which I use to jump to errors when compiling in latex) also conflicts.

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-22 Thread Drew Adams
Someone pointed me to this thread. I am not subscribed to this list, so cc me if you want me to see a reply you write. Wrt some of what I read in the thread: 1. It is not true, (or else it is meaningless, depending on what you mean by that phrase) that "C-c ' is officially an Emacs keybinding".

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-22 Thread Bastien
Drew Adams writes: > * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation >character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major >mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major >mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes. >

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello Drew, Drew Adams writes: > 1d. By default only. It is trivial to customize user option > `icicle-top-level-keybindings', to bind `icicle-occur' to a > different key or to give it no key binding at all. > > (And no, you do not need to fiddle with Lisp to do that - not > even `define-key'.

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> I have an additional question: where does one ask for help about icicle? 1. `M-x icicle-send-bug-report' or menu Icicles > Send Icicles Bug Report or `M-x customize-group Icicles' > click Send Bug Report 2. Emacs Wiki: Bugs: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/IciclesIssues Suggestions: http:/

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> > * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation > >character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major > >mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major > >mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes. > > > > IOW, no

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Bastien
Drew Adams writes: > No major mode should do so. One problem is that Org uses C-c . too ... and some more. Perhaps it's better to report this as an Emacs bug so that we can discuss the issue with Emacs maintainers and see what's really at stake here. For me, the keybindings are already too dee

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> > No major mode should do so. > > One problem is that Org uses C-c . too ... and some more. > > Perhaps it's better to report this as an Emacs bug so that we can > discuss the issue with Emacs maintainers and see what's really at > stake here. I'm not familiar with Org mode. As I said, I don'

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Bastien
Hi Drew, Drew Adams writes: > Since you are familiar with whatever bindings Org sets, and you > have read the key-binding conventions section of the manual, > please file a bug if you think it is appropriate. You are well > placed to give the details. > > [...] > > Consideration of whether to f

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> > > Perhaps it's better to report this as an Emacs bug so that > > > we can discuss the issue with Emacs maintainers and see > > > what's really at stake here. > > > > Since you are familiar with whatever bindings Org sets, and > > you have read the key-binding conventions section of the > > manu

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation > character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major > mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major > mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes. > > That's pretty

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Bastien
Drew Adams writes: > Dunno what that means. It's not a criminal offense, no. Let me quote the manual again: * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha all, Bastien writes: > Drew Adams writes: > >> Dunno what that means. It's not a criminal offense, no. > > Let me quote the manual again: > > * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation > character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major > mo

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-24 Thread Bastien
Hi Thomas, t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > I just checked the Org mode manual and found that it has several entries > that consist of `C-c' followed by a punctuation character. Can we list them in this thread to discuss how bad the situation is for each of these keybindings? > In my qu

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-24 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha Bastien, Bastien writes: > Hi Thomas, > > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> I just checked the Org mode manual and found that it has several entries >> that consist of `C-c' followed by a punctuation character. > > Can we list them in this thread to discuss how bad the situation

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-28 Thread Bastien
Hi Thomas, thanks for starting this list. t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > C-c ! Creating timestamps > C-c . Creating timestamps > C-c # Checkboxes > C-c ' Editing and debugging formulas, literal examples, include files, > editing source code, cooperation > C-c , Priorities > C-c ; Comme

Re: [O] Org Mode new Makefile and el-get

2012-04-21 Thread Achim Gratz
Mike McLean writes: > If anyone uses el-get (https://github.com/dimitri/el-get) the recipe > for building OrgMode broke with the recent Makefile changes. I > submitted a patch to el-get to change the OrgMode build > (https://github.com/dimitri/el-get/pull/719). This is more easily accomplished usi

Re: [O] Org Mode new Makefile and el-get

2012-04-22 Thread Mike McLean
On Apr 22, 2012, at 2:49 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Mike McLean writes: >> If anyone uses el-get (https://github.com/dimitri/el-get) the recipe >> for building OrgMode broke with the recent Makefile changes. I >> submitted a patch to el-get to change the OrgMode build >> (https://github.com/dimitri

Re: [O] Org Mode new Makefile and el-get

2012-04-22 Thread Achim Gratz
Mike McLean writes: >> This is more easily accomplished using the target "oldorg". > > I did see the “oldorg” references in the email thread; my question is > which one is more future proof? I guess (and please tell me if I am > incorrect) that the oldorg build is just there for backwards > compati

Re: [O] Org-mode as a Quantified Self platform

2012-04-30 Thread Zack Mayson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/04/2012 19:03, John Hendy wrote: You might like to checkout worg; it has a few examples of GTD setups (is Quantified Self like GTD? I assume it is). -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http

Re: [O] Org-mode as a Quantified Self platform

2012-04-30 Thread Zack Mayson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/04/2012 19:03, John Hendy wrote: > On to my questions: > -- Has anyone done something like this? I see it as very similar to > habit tracking. To give an example, I've had a bit of a persistent > cough. I developed it when I was sick at one point

Re: [O] Org-mode as a Quantified Self platform

2012-04-30 Thread Eric Schulte
John Hendy writes: > I've really been getting into the Quantified Self movement recently, > and by "getting into," I mean reading and watching videos and > /thinking/ about things I'd like to track about myself. [1] I've been > pondering what kind of "platform" to use for my data collection... >

Re: [O] Org-mode as a Quantified Self platform

2012-04-30 Thread John Hendy
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Zack Mayson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 30/04/2012 19:03, John Hendy wrote: > > > You might like to checkout worg; it has a few examples of GTD setups (is > Quantified Self like GTD? I assume it is). Not really. Quantified Self

Re: [O] Org-mode as a Quantified Self platform

2012-04-30 Thread Achim Gratz
Zack Mayson writes: > (is Quantified Self like GTD? I assume it is). No, Quantified Self is more like how much you weighed before and after GTD. :-) Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ DIY Stuff: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/DIY.html

Re: [O] Org-mode as a Quantified Self platform

2012-04-30 Thread Kyle Machulis
My "Quantified Coder" talk at Google IO last year was going to focus toward emacs and org-mode, actually: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52Ml_zax4A0#t=12m47s Unfortunately I haven't gotten time to actually start on it yet, but I know there's community interest in org-mode and tracking as much as

Re: [O] Org-mode as a Quantified Self platform

2012-05-04 Thread Sacha Chua
John Hendy writes: > 3) The habit family of features -- set up some initial goals > (recurring todo headlines) and then just got to the headline and mark > done (possibly with a note) to record the event. org-agenda is a handy way of marking tasks as complete, too. I have an Org subtree with my

Re: [O] Org-mode as a Quantified Self platform

2012-05-07 Thread Sacha Chua
John Hendy writes: > -- On that note, what's the best way to get data out of > org-habit/headlines and into something a bit more usable like csv? I'm > looking for something more than just looking through headlines for > missed days. I'm going to need full access to the time stamps in a > usable

Re: [O] Org-mode as a Quantified Self platform

2012-06-16 Thread Karl Voit
Hi! * John Hendy wrote: > I've really been getting into the Quantified Self movement recently, Same holds to me. I just wanted to post almost the same things you did. :-) > and by "getting into," I mean reading and watching videos and > /thinking/ about things I'd like to track about myself. [1

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-22 Thread Christopher J. White
Hi Karra, I've been working on org-toodledo.el to perform bi-directional sync of TODO items with the Toodledo server, and faced many of the same issues you raise about figuring out the exact format and grammar of a TODO item. You may find looking at my source useful, either as inspiration, i

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-22 Thread Sriram Karra
Chris, thanks for the pointer to org-toodledo. Does org-toodledo's handle all the options and formats of possible TODOs supported by org mode? Are you yet to implement support for anything that is parsed by the Emacs org-mode? On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Christopher J. White < orgm...@grierwh

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-22 Thread Christopher J. White
Hi Karra, On 6/22/12 8:33 AM, Sriram Karra wrote: Chris, thanks for the pointer to org-toodledo. Does org-toodledo's handle all the options and formats of possible TODOs supported by org mode? That's a loaded question ;-) I'd have to say probably not, but it so far supports all of my TODOs.

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-24 Thread Aurélien Aptel
Hi, I'm working on a bugtracker sync tool for org-mode [1]. I'm using org-element to parse org files, it does everything I need. It turns this * TODO blah <2012-06-25> :PROPERTIES: :foo: bar :END: Foo bar into this: (org-data nil (headline (:raw-value "blah <2012-06-25>"

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-24 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Aurélien Aptel wrote: > Just call org-element-parse-buffer. See also org-element-interpret-data, which lets you write back the structure.

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-24 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Hey Aurélien, This is great. I formerly worked on something similar: http://labs.creativecommons.org/2010/11/10/bridging-public-bugtrackers-and-local-tasklists/ However... my solution was pretty hacky. I'd be interested to see if you come up with a generic solution that could have mapppings fo

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-25 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > http://labs.creativecommons.org/2010/11/10/bridging-public-bugtrackers-and-local-tasklists/ Yes I've already read your post while researching for my project :) > I'd be interested to see if you come up with a generic solution tha

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-25 Thread Sriram Karra
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Christopher Allan Webber < cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote: > Hey Aurélien, > > This is great. I formerly worked on something similar: > > > http://labs.creativecommons.org/2010/11/10/bridging-public-bugtrackers-and-local-tasklists/ Nice color-theme, there. If y

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-25 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Sriram Karra writes: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Christopher Allan Webber > wrote: > > Hey Aurélien, > > This is great.  I formerly worked on something similar: > > > http://labs.creativecommons.org/2010/11/10/bridging-public-bugtrackers-and-local-tasklists/ > >  Ni

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-06-25 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Christopher Allan Webber writes: > Ah, I've stopped using that theme! But it was a small extension to > color-theme-snow. Here it is. :) FYI, the theme I use now is naquadah-theme, which I *highly* recommend. http://git.naquadah.org/?p=naquadah-theme.git;a=summary

Re: [O] org-mode : add note/flag a capture

2012-08-03 Thread Bastien
Hi Richard, Richard Riley writes: > Is it correct that you cant add a note or change a status to a newly > captured item before its been synced into emacs and repulled/synced? AFAIU, this is correct. -- Bastien

Re: [O] Org Mode TOOD two way sync tool

2012-10-07 Thread Jonathan BISSON
Sriram Karra gmail.com> writes: > > > I am the author of ASynK (http://karra-asynk.appspot.com), a PIM sync tool and framework written in python that works across a variety of PIM providers such as Outlook, Google and BBDB. I am considering extending ASynK to do a bi-directional sync of Outlook

Re: [O] org-mode moves point in other window

2012-12-13 Thread Bastien
Hi Thomas, Thomas Koch writes: > I've got a large org-mode (7.9.2, emacs 24.2.1) table and two windows, top > and > bottom. I shrink the upper window to only show the headline of my table and > work in the lower window. > > When I move with tab in the lower window or recalculate the formula,

Re: [O] org-mode moves point in other window

2012-12-17 Thread Thomas Koch
Bastien: > Thomas Koch writes: > > I've got a large org-mode (7.9.2, emacs 24.2.1) table and two windows, > > top and bottom. I shrink the upper window to only show the headline of > > my table and work in the lower window. > > > > When I move with tab in the lower window or recalculate the formu

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello Bastien and Thomas, Bastien wrote: > thanks for starting this list. > > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> C-c ! Creating timestamps >> C-c . Creating timestamps >> C-c # Checkboxes >> C-c ' Editing and debugging formulas, literal examples, include files, >> editing source code, coo

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > What about `C-c {' and such in the tables? (FWIW, that's one of the few keybindings I would not like to change.) > I guess it's better to comply to the Emacs guidelines. That change will > allow us to wake up our neurons and fight against Alzheimer. So, let's > do

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Bastien, Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> What about `C-c {' and such in the tables? > > (FWIW, that's one of the few keybindings I would not like to change.) > >> I guess it's better to comply to the Emacs guidelines. That change will >> allow us to wake up our neurons and fight a

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Is it really important to have a couple less of "not > standard" key bindings, if we still have others which don't comply? I think so, as it reduces the chances of conflicting keybindings from other minor modes. -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Bastien, Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> Is it really important to have a couple less of "not >> standard" key bindings, if we still have others which don't comply? > > I think so, as it reduces the chances of conflicting keybindings from > other minor modes. OK. I (can) agree. B

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Florian Beck
On 28.01.2014 10:08, Bastien wrote: I think most of these keybindings could migrate to a C-c C- version. There is no need for migrating them IMO. The recommendation is: Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation character are allocated for minor modes. Using them

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Nick Dokos
Florian Beck writes: > On 28.01.2014 10:08, Bastien wrote: > >> I think most of these keybindings could migrate to a C-c C- version. > > There is no need for migrating them IMO. > > The recommendation is: > >Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation >character are al

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
Hi Nick, Nick Dokos writes: > I find myself more in agreement with Seb than with Bastien here. The > argument that reducing the number of "bad" bindings reduces the chance > of conflicts does not hold water IMO: we will always have to be looking > in the rear-view mirror for some minor mode that

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Florian Beck
On 29.01.2014 14:16, Nick Dokos wrote: But it's not just a matter of satisfying rules: it's a matter of making it easy on users. That is why I don't recommend satisfying them here. Having a "bad" binding as well as a "good" binding for something would mean that if I load a minor mode that ta

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
Florian Beck writes: > But it is > polite to provide alternatives for bindings that might be shadowed. Indeed. The only problem is C-c ^ since C-c C-^ is already taken. Btw, we could use C-c C-u (currently bound to `outline-up-heading') instead of C-c C-^ (currently bound to `org-up-element')

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Bastien writes: > Florian Beck writes: > >> But it is >> polite to provide alternatives for bindings that might be shadowed. > > Indeed. > > The only problem is C-c ^ since C-c C-^ is already taken. > > Btw, we could use C-c C-u (currently bound to `outline-up-heading') > instead of C-c

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha Seb, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > What about `C-c {' and such in the tables? The syntax table I see in my org file calls `{' an open delimiter character, not punctuation. Of course, I'm assuming that what the syntax table calls punctuation is what the emacs guideline means when it says

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
Hi Thomas, t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Also, this is my first time trying to decode a syntax table, so caveat > emptor. Yes -- when doing C-u C-x on { in fundamental-mode I read Character code properties: customize what to show name: LEFT CURLY BRACKET old-name: OPENING CURLY

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Achim Gratz
Bastien writes: > More precisely, I suggest these rebindings: > > C-c # Checkboxes => C-c C-# > C-c , Priorities => C-c C-, C-, can not be input using an ASCII terminal as it would produce a line control character. > C-c ; Comment lines => C-c C-; > C-c @ Mark subtree => C-c C-@ C-@ m

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha Bastien, Bastien writes: > Hi Thomas, > > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> Also, this is my first time trying to decode a syntax table, so caveat >> emptor. > > Yes -- when doing C-u C-x on { in fundamental-mode I read > > Character code properties: customize what to show >

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Andreas Leha
Bastien writes: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Dokos writes: > >> I find myself more in agreement with Seb than with Bastien here. The >> argument that reducing the number of "bad" bindings reduces the chance >> of conflicts does not hold water IMO: we will always have to be looking >> in the rear-view mir

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Iannis Zannos
Yep, I am also using org-mode with icicles. Made several mods to help with that. I use icicles for searching headers or text content all the time. Interesting is the possibility to open a section (subtree) in an independent buffer after finding it, with one command. I enclose the code here, plus

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Iannis Zannos
Agree. To do my own rebindings i use this kind of code: (eval-after-load 'org '(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-=") 'org-icicle-imenu)) But when re-opening a buffer with desktop after rebooting emacs, the new bindings are not added IZ On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Andreas Leha < and

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Then "punctuation" has two senses, one generic and another specific. To > my mind, the emacs guideline is ambiguous unless there is some > convention about which sense is meant in this case. I guess it would be > possible to look at the code to figure th

Re: [O] org-mode date stamp with just month?

2014-07-06 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
David Rogoff writes: > I can’t see how to insert a datestamp with just year and month. I’m > adding an archive of various past events that I don’t have the exact > date for. Maybe try ,[ C-h v org-time-stamp-custom-formats RET ] | org-time-stamp-custom-formats is a variable defined in `org

Re: [O] org-mode date stamp with just month?

2014-07-07 Thread Grant Rettke
That property then is something that we may set as a buffer local variable set in the file itself for cases where want only months in the entire file? How might we get that form for only parts of a file in which the rest of that file we want the standard date format? Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF,

Re: [O] org-mode date stamp with just month?

2014-07-07 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
Grant Rettke writes: > That property then is something that we may set as a buffer local > variable set in the file itself for cases where want only months in > the entire file? > > How might we get that form for only parts of a file in which the rest > of that file we want the standard date form

Re: [O] org-mode date stamp with just month?

2014-07-07 Thread Alexander Baier
On 2014-07-07 16:40 Grant Rettke wrote: > That property then is something that we may set as a buffer local > variable set in the file itself for cases where want only months in > the entire file? File local variables? HTH, -- Alexander Baier

Re: [O] org-mode date stamp with just month?

2014-07-07 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
Alexander Baier writes: > On 2014-07-07 16:40 Grant Rettke wrote: >> That property then is something that we may set as a buffer local >> variable set in the file itself for cases where want only months in >> the entire file? > > File local variables? ,[ C-h f make-variable-buffer-local RET

Re: [O] org-mode date stamp with just month?

2014-07-07 Thread Nick Dokos
Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Alexander Baier writes: > >> On 2014-07-07 16:40 Grant Rettke wrote: >>> That property then is something that we may set as a buffer local >>> variable set in the file itself for cases where want only months in >>> the entire file? >> >> File local variables? > > ,[

Re: [O] Org-mode/R/Latex treatment of NAs

2014-07-13 Thread Grant Rettke
Just wanting to understand more: Do you equate nil in Emacs Lisp with NA in R or do you equate it some other way? I believe that the data brokering adheres to "expected" mappings as such. Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ “Wisdom b

Re: [O] Org-mode/R/Latex treatment of NAs

2014-07-13 Thread Vikas Rawal
> Just wanting to understand more: > > Do you equate nil in Emacs Lisp with NA in R or do you equate it some other > way? > When I execute my source code block, the NAs show up in the results block as nil. See example below. I would prefer a blank in place of nil. Any idea how to do that?

Re: [O] Org-mode/R/Latex treatment of NAs

2014-07-13 Thread Vikas Rawal
> >> Just wanting to understand more: >> >> Do you equate nil in Emacs Lisp with NA in R or do you equate it some other >> way? >> > > > When I execute my source code block, the NAs show up in the results block as > nil. See example below. > > I would prefer a blank in place of nil. Any id

Re: [O] org-mode date stamp with just month?

2014-07-28 Thread Bastien
Hi David, David Rogoff writes: > I can’t see how to insert a datestamp with just year and month. I’m > adding an archive of various past events that I don’t have the exact > date for. I would simply put an arbitrary date then, because -MM-DD is deep into Org's DNA. -- Bastien

Re: [O] org mode capture to headline at point

2016-05-13 Thread Phil Hudson
On Fri, 13 May 2016 at 4:08:04 pm BST, Xebar Saram wrote: > any one knows how to launch a capture (thats pre defined) but auto refile that > capture to the/beneath the current header at point? Hope I've understood your requirement correctly. I think this will do what you want: If you can redef

Re: [O] org-mode html export background/foreground inconsistency

2016-05-20 Thread Nick Dokos
lad writes: > I attempted to follow this blog to enable a background html export on > org file save: > > http://stephanus-volke.de/posts/2015/Dez/22/org-mode-live-preview-en/ > > I tried adding the following to the top of the org file: > > # -*- after-save-hook: org-html-export-to-html; >

Re: [O] org-mode html export background/foreground inconsistency

2016-05-20 Thread lad
On Fri, May 20, 2016, at 01:14 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: > lad writes: > > > I attempted to follow this blog to enable a background html export on > > org file save: > > > > http://stephanus-volke.de/posts/2015/Dez/22/org-mode-live-preview-en/ > > > > I tried adding the following to the top of the

Re: [O] org mode capture to headline at point

2016-05-24 Thread Ian McB
Xebar Saram gmail.com> writes: > > Hi all > any one knows how to launch a capture (thats pre defined) but auto refile that capture to the/beneath the current header at point? > > thx > > Z > A while back I stumbled onto this thread looking for the same problem. Like Phil Hudson suggested I

Re: [O] org mode capture to headline at point

2016-05-27 Thread Xebar Saram
Thx ian this is very useful! i wonder if any of the elisp gurus would know a workaround the fact that the point needs to be on the starting asterix? it would be cool to just not worry where the point is in the current header and have the capture add another same level header below best Z On Tu

Re: [O] org mode capture to headline at point

2016-05-28 Thread yanmcbe
Thanks! You misunderstood though! Ending up over the asterisk is what my function does (if it works as intended)! So it should work anywhere in the heading?

Re: [O] org mode capture to headline at point

2016-05-29 Thread Xebar Saram
oh yeah i see :) i thought you need to stand on the first asterix in the header for some reason. Cool, i love it thx alot again Z On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 5:00 PM, yanmcbe wrote: > Thanks! > > You misunderstood though! Ending up over the asterisk is what my function > does (if it works as inten

Re: [O] org-mode command in a bash script?

2016-06-02 Thread Robert Klein
Hi, On Fri, 03 Jun 2016 06:36:12 +0100 Sharon Kimble wrote: > > How can I run an org-mode command in a bash script please? > > Specifically 'org-latex-export-to-latex'? > > I'm developing my own modular script to choose between, at present, 3 > tex files which have been pre-exported from org-

Re: [O] org-mode habit consistency graph not displaying

2016-07-07 Thread Josiah Schwab
Hello Brenda, > When I started using org-mode from elpa, the habit consistency graph > stopped showing. I was using a version of org-mode that comes with > debian before, with emacs 23 and the graph showed. When I upgraded to org 8.3, my org-habits did not display correctly, because the PROPERTY

Re: [O] org-mode habit consistency graph not displaying

2016-07-07 Thread Brenda Butler
Thanks for this answer. Unfortunately it didn't work for me. But when I have more time I will investigate further. This gives me a hint as to what (next-single-property-change (point-min) 'org-habit-p)) does and the environment it assumes. bjb On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Josiah Schwab w

Re: [O] org-mode habit consistency graph not displaying

2016-07-11 Thread Brenda J. Butler
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 08:29:44PM -0700, Josiah Schwab wrote: > Hello Brenda, > > > When I started using org-mode from elpa, the habit consistency graph > > stopped showing. I was using a version of org-mode that comes with > > debian before, with emacs 23 and the graph showed. > > When I upgra

Re: [O] org-mode - export as folder structure possible?

2016-11-17 Thread Philip Hudson
Have a look at the docstring for the function `org-element-map'. On 17 November 2016 at 00:00, mcg wrote: > Hello, > > I need to create a rather complex folder structure. > It is OK to create that in dired but I think even nicer and faster it would > be to create an org-mode outline which then ex

Re: [O] org-mode - export as folder structure possible?

2016-11-17 Thread Marco Wahl
Hello, > Hello, > > I need to create a rather complex folder structure. > It is OK to create that in dired but I think even nicer and faster it > would be to create an org-mode outline which then exports this folder > structure to the org document's directory. > > This could even be extended to cr

Re: [O] org-mode - export as folder structure possible?

2016-11-26 Thread Karl Voit
* mcg wrote: > > Hello, > > I need to create a rather complex folder structure. > It is OK to create that in dired but I think even nicer and faster it > would be to create an org-mode outline which then exports this folder > structure to the org document's directory. > > This could even be exte

Re: [O] Org mode clockview links failing with spaces

2017-01-07 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Shawn Way writes: > I have an org file with a clocktable located at the head of the file. > The clocktable is able to pull together a great table, however, the > links on the table do not work, if they have spaces in them. Why do you mean by "do not work". I reproduced your example and c

Re: [O] Org mode clockview links failing with spaces

2017-01-09 Thread Shawn Way
A pop up window appears asking the question: No match - Create this as a new heading? Shawn Way, PE -Original Message- From: Nicolas Goaziou [mailto:m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr] Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2017 9:00 AM To: Shawn Way Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Org mode clockview

Re: [O] Org mode clockview links failing with spaces

2017-01-11 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Shawn Way writes: > A pop up window appears asking the question: > > No match - Create this as a new heading? I cannot reproduce it. Could you double-check with a bare configuration? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] Org mode clockview links failing with spaces

2017-01-11 Thread Shawn Way
I'll do so this evening. Unfortunately, work is interfering with my "work". Shawn Way, PE -Original Message- From: Nicolas Goaziou [mailto:m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:29 AM To: Shawn Way Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Org mode clockview links fai

Re: [O] org mode moves to GNU emacs core

2017-06-29 Thread Rasmus
Uwe Brauer writes: > I am not sure whether I understand that discussion in emacs dev > correctly. Will orgmode be moved into the GNU emacs try as it was done > with gnus? AFAIK, there are no such plans. The *version* of Org shipped with Emacs is being updated to v9, though. But perhaps I misse

Re: [O] org mode moves to GNU emacs core

2017-06-29 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "Rasmus" == Rasmus writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: >> I am not sure whether I understand that discussion in emacs dev >> correctly. Will orgmode be moved into the GNU emacs try as it was done >> with gnus? > AFAIK, there are no such plans. The *version* of Org shipped with Ema

Re: [O] org mode moves to GNU emacs core

2017-07-03 Thread Bastien
Hi Uwe, Uwe Brauer writes: > I am not sure whether I understand that discussion in emacs dev > correctly. Will orgmode be moved into the GNU emacs try as it was done > with gnus? for the record, I would be in favor of this. Why? - Less installation headaches - Less maintainance and backward-c

Re: [O] org mode moves to GNU emacs core

2017-07-03 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "Bastien" == Bastien writes: > Hi Uwe, > Uwe Brauer writes: >> I am not sure whether I understand that discussion in emacs dev >> correctly. Will orgmode be moved into the GNU emacs try as it was done >> with gnus? > for the record, I would be in favor of this. Wh

Re: [O] org mode moves to GNU emacs core

2017-07-03 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Monday, 3 Jul 2017 at 08:33, Uwe Brauer wrote: > But the release cycles are very different, so in order to have always > the latest stable org package, I need to compile and install the whole > GNU emacs beast. I thought the whole idea of a package system is to > avoid this headache. I agree.

Re: [O] org mode moves to GNU emacs core

2017-07-03 Thread Alan Schmitt
"ESF" == Eric S Fraga writes: ESF> On Monday, 3 Jul 2017 at 08:33, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> But the release cycles are very different, so in order to have always >> the latest stable org package, I need to compile and install the whole >> GNU emacs beast. I thought the whole idea of a package system

Re: [O] org mode moves to GNU emacs core

2017-07-03 Thread Phillip Lord
Bastien writes: > Hi Uwe, > > Uwe Brauer writes: > >> I am not sure whether I understand that discussion in emacs dev >> correctly. Will orgmode be moved into the GNU emacs try as it was done >> with gnus? > > for the record, I would be in favor of this. Why? > > - Less installation headaches >

Re: [O] org mode moves to GNU emacs core

2017-07-03 Thread Bastien Guerry
Hi Philip, phillip.l...@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > I presume you do see this as an advantage? The issue is, surely, > that it's too much of a PITA for the advantage that you gain? Well, it's not really about PITA-or-not-PITA, it's just that I want org-mode to be the default mode for

Re: [O] org mode moves to GNU emacs core

2017-07-03 Thread qTim Cross
Just to throw my 2 cents in. While I can understand the benefits of being able to easily install the latest org package via elpa, I think there are some significant benefits to org being a part of core Emacs. I currently find three issues with the current situation which may be somewhat resolved

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >