Hello, Rob or any others familiar with blendmath,
It's really an obstacle to comprehend the functions of blendmath.c.
Is there any explanation or any book introduction about the functions about
blendmath.c?
or the blendmath is done according any reference ?
Thanks.
--
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> From: dgarr...@panix.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 04:33:57 +
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] call for maintainers for keystick and mini guis
>
>
> It doesn't seem productive or motivational to ask users wanting
> a joints_axes merge to wait to a
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> From: marius.alks...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 06:11:23 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] jerk limited trajectory
>
> 12/17/2015 05:40 PM, Viesturs Lācis rašė:
> ...
> > IIRC it has not been implemented in LinuxCNC, because it would not
>
I await the reasons why Jeff or anyone else should expend effort
on keeping and maintaining a gui (keystick) that has been broken
since v2.3x (approximately 6 years ago) -- if anyone used it
wouldn't they have noticed?
It doesn't seem productive or motivational to ask users wanting
a joints_axes
12/17/2015 05:40 PM, Viesturs Lācis rašė:
...
> IIRC it has not been implemented in LinuxCNC, because it would not
> work for spindle-synchronised moves, but I might be totally wrong on
> that :))
>
>
> Viesturs
I see jerk limitation as very nice and important feature to have.
And I would go with
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:13:40AM +, Dewey Garrett wrote:
>
> My contention (see
> http://www.mail-archive.com/emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15454.html)
> is that:
I clearly didn't read that message closely and made an assumption that
the problem was due to JAx. I see in both cas
On 22 December 2015 at 00:13, Dewey Garrett wrote:
> It is curious that there is more interest in two seldom-used guis than
> there is in the long-envisaged joints_axes updates.
I think it might just be that the GUIs are a finite and comprehensible problem.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't
Just a thought but keystick would be useful for testing if you have
graphics problems... I can't think of a reason to use mini. I'm glad to
test anything you need.
JT
On 12/21/2015 6:13 PM, Dewey Garrett wrote:
>> Unfortunately, either of these options starts you off in a fairly deep
>> end of
> Unfortunately, either of these options starts you off in a fairly deep
> end of git arcana particularly if you are a new git user.
My contention (see
http://www.mail-archive.com/emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15454.html)
is that:
1) the mini gui does not work with distros using tk8.6
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 09:57:08AM -0700, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 12/21/15 9:18 AM, Thomas Gambone II wrote:
> > Sebastian,
> >
> > Thank you for clarification.
> > I will take a look at the current state.
> >
> > Am I correct in saying that I will need to do the following:
> >
> > Build, t
Thank you for the clarification!
-Tom
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky
wrote:
> On 12/21/15 11:50 AM, Thomas Gambone II wrote:
>
>> Has the github mirror become the official repo?
>> The source link on the new homepage directs to jepler's github mirror.
>>
>
> The official g
On 12/21/15 11:50 AM, Thomas Gambone II wrote:
> Has the github mirror become the official repo?
> The source link on the new homepage directs to jepler's github mirror.
The official git repo is still git.linuxcnc.org, the github mirror is
just that - a mirror.
> Is it OK to submit pull request
Has the github mirror become the official repo?
The source link on the new homepage directs to jepler's github mirror.
Is it OK to submit pull requests to it, or should the linuxcnc.org one be
used?
Thank you,
-Tom
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky
wrote:
> On 12/21/15 9:1
On 12/21/15 9:18 AM, Thomas Gambone II wrote:
> Sebastian,
>
> Thank you for clarification.
> I will take a look at the current state.
>
> Am I correct in saying that I will need to do the following:
>
> Build, test and perhaps fix the UI's on the master branch.
> Backport this work into joints-axe
Sebastian,
Thank you for clarification.
I will take a look at the current state.
Am I correct in saying that I will need to do the following:
Build, test and perhaps fix the UI's on the master branch.
Backport this work into joints-axes branch, if any issues fix, and retest
on both branches.
Th
On 12/21/15 3:35 AM, Thomas Gambone II wrote:
> What would one need to do the required testing after the maintenance?
I think you should make sure it compiles and runs with some fairly
standard sim configs, and that at least the basic features work (come
out of estop, home, jog, mdi, run program
What would one need to do the required testing after the maintenance?
Thank you,
-Tom
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> In his curent joints-axes branch, dgarr/ja10v2, Dewey Garrett has
> removed the keystick (curses) and mini (sherline tcl/tk) user
> interfaces, because they
When I studied CAGD with Gerald Farin I learned that you can fair
splines with so little movement that they are well within the tolerance
of the measurements (one example limited the jerk and only moved the
control points 0.2"). So I would not put out modifying the
positions, but would abs
18 matches
Mail list logo
