Re: [Emc-developers] 5-axis video at Tormach meet up

2023-05-02 Thread matt
indows and found EMC. During my 'education' installing EMC I discovered EMC2. What a breath of fresh air - made the switch and never looked back. The first version of EMC ran on the Venturecom real time extension for Windows NT 3.51. The GUI was done in Visual B

Re: [Emc-developers] April 2023 LinuxCNC meeting at Tormach headquarters

2023-03-21 Thread matt
e, so (barring some random disaster) we'll see you all there! Thanks, Matt ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Bug#1030304: Licensing & copyright issues

2023-02-02 Thread matt
I want to "Reply All" to this, but I've decided to restrain myself (it's hard...) until I can get some "community input". What do you all think? I'm dying to sink my teeth into this, but I will hold off until I get some feedback... Thanks, Matt On 2023-0

[Emc-developers] Reminder: It's Today! (January 2023 Online Meeting)

2023-01-18 Thread matt
Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 19:00 UTC, 11:00am Pacific Standard Time (California), 2:00pm Eastern Standard Time (New York), 7:00pm London time, 8:00pm Central Europe time: https://meet.jit.si/LinuxCNC-meeting-january-2023 See you there! Thanks, Matt Shaver

[Emc-developers] January 2023 Online Meeting

2023-01-03 Thread matt
discussion takes place in this e-mail, so please "reply all" with agenda ideas. If this date and time is completely unacceptable, please reply with your objection soon so that we can consider alternative times or dates. Otherwise, see you there! Thanks, M

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.9 Release Manager Required.

2022-11-14 Thread matt
, I'd be happy to pay for it, or at least chip in. I can't do much to help, but I can spend money! Thanks, Matt ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Next Linuxcnc Online meeting

2022-08-08 Thread matt
Well, it seems that Eastern Standard Time and Central European Summer Time are somewhat different, maybe next time! :) Thanks, Matt On 2022-08-08 10:01, Rene Hopf via Emc-developers wrote: On 06.08.22 17:58, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: On 8/5/22 05:41, Rene Hopf via Emc-developers wrote

Re: [Emc-developers] Quick update on the status of the Debian package

2022-04-08 Thread matt
I am about the merge into mainstream Linux! Any mention of this on the emc lists makes me smile form ear to ear! Thanks to everyone! Matt ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li

Re: [Emc-developers] chart of arrays

2021-04-28 Thread Matt Shaver
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:19:21 -0500 Jon Elson wrote: > This would be a great tool, maybe somebody has written such > a tool. I haven't looked in a long time, but before 'egypt' was about the closest thing I ever saw. But a long time has pa

Re: [Emc-developers] chart of arrays

2021-04-28 Thread Matt Shaver
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:27:35 +0100 andy pugh wrote: > Have you found this (simplistic, out of date, stuff?) > > http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.8/html/code/code-notes.html Yep! I need a project that will get me back into this again! Tha

Re: [Emc-developers] chart of arrays

2021-04-28 Thread Matt Shaver
too! I've never been really comfortable with "what does what"... Perhaps this could be generated by some analysis tool like this: https://www.gson.org/egypt/ I think I tried this some years ago without much luck, but I think this is the sort of stuff Stuart is looking for if I read

Re: [Emc-developers] Withdraw Pi support?

2021-01-19 Thread Matt Shaver
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:05:19 -0800 (PST) "Peter C. Wallace" wrote: > The 7C80 (and 7C81) are SPI interfaced devices Sorry, I confused the two, but SPI is what I meant! :) The whole PiMesa setup seems like a really good way to go for a control...

Re: [Emc-developers] Withdraw Pi support?

2021-01-17 Thread Matt Shaver
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 14:08:05 -0500 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 17 January 2021 12:06:42 Matt Shaver wrote: > > > On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 15:17:57 + > > > > andy pugh wrote: > > > The current linuxcnc-served Raspberry Pi realtime kernel does not &g

Re: [Emc-developers] Withdraw Pi support?

2021-01-17 Thread Matt Shaver
se. In my own experience the Pi3 works well, the Pi4 seems kind of shaky... Thanks, Matt ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] CNC Controller

2020-10-16 Thread Matt Shaver
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 08:10:31 +0200 "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" wrote: > Which company do you represent? "> > >On 10/14/2020 9:02 AM, jdsmoti...@gmail.com wrote:" >From the e-mail address, I would guess: http://www.jdsmotion.com/ ___ Emc-developers maili

Re: [Emc-developers] Mesa 7i80 and dual Y axis

2014-03-29 Thread Matt Westveld
Thank you, that helps! -Original Message- From: Michael Haberler [mailto:mai...@mah.priv.at] Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 2:28 AM To: EMC developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Mesa 7i80 and dual Y axis Am 28.03.2014 um 14:40 schrieb Matt Westveld : > Anyone get a chance to

Re: [Emc-developers] Mesa 7i80 and dual Y axis

2014-03-28 Thread Matt Westveld
Anyone get a chance to try this? -Original Message- From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:51 PM To: EMC developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Mesa 7i80 and dual Y axis On 17 March 2014 16:28, Matt Westveld wrote: > Is there a way to

Re: [Emc-developers] Question on 14.04 LTS

2014-03-25 Thread Matt Westveld
/14 14:14 , Matt Westveld wrote: > This is how I got it working - > > I followed Andy's post: > http://linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/27-driver-boards/27253-7i8 > 0-and- > 7i77?limitstart=0 > > Also: > http://static.mah.priv.at/public/rt-preempt/README That

Re: [Emc-developers] Question on 14.04 LTS

2014-03-25 Thread Matt Westveld
This is how I got it working - I followed Andy's post: http://linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/27-driver-boards/27253-7i80-and- 7i77?limitstart=0 Also: http://static.mah.priv.at/public/rt-preempt/README -Original Message- From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.com] Sent: Tuesday

[Emc-developers] Mesa 7i80 and dual Y axis

2014-03-17 Thread Matt Westveld
I have a hefty servo machine with dual Y axis, I'd really like to use the Mesa 7i80 for it. (+ 7i53, 7i83, 7i70, 7i71) Testing has gone fairly well so far - running Ubuntu 12.04-32, 7i80-ubc3 and 3.10.4-rt1mah as described in Andy's post here: http://linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/27-driver-

Re: [Emc-developers] Progress on Rockhopper and friends

2013-11-09 Thread Matt Shaver
John, I'm pretty sure Peter doesn't read this list, and I'm not sure about Tom Easterday (I think he did, but may not anymore). I'll contact these folks and get you a more definite answer, but I don't think there has been any further development sin

Re: [Emc-developers] installing xenomai

2013-08-03 Thread Matt Shaver
oprietary 'Cedarview' drivers. Then you can boot the Xenomai kernel and X will work. Thanks, Matt -- Get your SQL database under version control now! Version control is standard for application code, but d

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-26 Thread Matt Shaver
more, mostly concerned (I think) with doc building. I'm running 'make' now, so we'll see what happens :) If it fails to build all the way, I'll install the packages recommended by Seb's test. Thanks, Matt On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:52:14 -0600 Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:

Re: [Emc-developers] status update: unified build/new RTOS support

2013-07-25 Thread Matt Shaver
nomai+_0.2_i386.deb. Should I be using the 0.4 version? I had trouble when I tried 0.4, but that could be due to some graphics drivers issues, so if 0.4 is an improvement over 0.2, I could go back and try that.) Do I need to tack something extra onto my LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Any other ideas on what cou

Re: [Emc-developers] Vote Seb for 2.6 Release Manager!

2013-07-10 Thread Matt Shaver
ne can give an accurate answer, but is this still the best estimate for a released version that can run on Ubuntu 12.04? Thanks, Matt -- See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-t

Re: [Emc-developers] "Open" Development

2013-07-07 Thread Matt Shaver
to maintain the spindle-to-Z-axis position relationship which is critical since they are now _mechanically_ interlocked through the tap and it's threads in the workpiece. > Interesting discussion. Yes! Thanks, Matt --

Re: [Emc-developers] git.linuxcnc.org vs github vs. agile development

2013-07-03 Thread Matt Shaver
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:32:34 -0400 Ian McMahon wrote: > Beautiful! > > On Jul 2, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Chris Radek wrote: > > I had > > not done this on ours, but I have now; thanks for the reminder. See, the system does work, at least somet

Re: [Emc-developers] toolstore discussion notes: Andy/mhaberler

2013-07-01 Thread Matt Shaver
nsibility is (perhaps) the biggest problem with the way things are currently structured. If you can solve this you will have made another big accomplishment! Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Re: [Emc-developers] toolstore discussion notes:

2013-07-01 Thread Matt Shaver
s: https://plus.google.com/112934420478303755238/posts/HydJ4UoAAea http://areino.com/blog/hackeando/ Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p

Re: [Emc-developers] toolstore discussion notes: Andy/mhaberler

2013-07-01 Thread Matt Shaver
You did make the connection in your previous e-mail that: "the way I envisage it to be is to be rather pythonic than c-ish, namely using name/value pairs as arguments rather than say positional arguments" That's

Re: [Emc-developers] git.linuxcnc.org vs github vs. agile development

2013-07-01 Thread Matt Shaver
ork with branches", but I suspect more people are in > that boat than you might imagine :) I'm terrible with Git. At the CNC Workshop in Ann Arbor in 2011 (I think) Seb spent thousands of calories trying to educate me on Git and its ways and uses. It did some go

Re: [Emc-developers] Advice Needed on Wiki & File Hosting

2013-07-01 Thread Matt Shaver
I need to be able to put (ftp?) files that are too big for the upload mechanism (for example: http://www.mattshaver.com/NGC_document.pdf) < this is genuine historical stuff! Please? Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net

Re: [Emc-developers] git.linuxcnc.org vs github vs. agile development

2013-06-30 Thread Matt Shaver
a "home". That "home" is linuxcnc.org, and the associated e-mail lists at Sourceforge, and the IRC channels to a lesser extent. It may be that we should open up commit access to any and all comers and then deal with the problems as (or if) they occur. In my experience, people are remarkab

Re: [Emc-developers] git.linuxcnc.org vs github vs. agile development

2013-06-29 Thread Matt Shaver
restricted to their respective release managers. Maybe there's even some add-on program you can get for a git server that facilitates collaboration and implements a "pull request" type system for the local developers. Does anyone know if that's possible? Thanks, Matt -

[Emc-developers] Meeting on IRC - NOW!!!

2013-06-29 Thread Matt Shaver
I hope we announced this sufficiently in advance, but there's a meeting on IRC now (Saturday the 29th of June, 2013 - 4:00pmGMT/9:00amEST). Come help us argue! :) Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Wi

Re: [Emc-developers] Meeting on IRC - OOPS

2013-06-29 Thread Matt Shaver
So, I made a mistake here I think. 9:00amEST is really 1:00pmGMT, so the meeting is in three hours, not right now. You know what? I'm not sorry! Point your IRC client to irc.freenode.net and /join #linuxcnc-meet. Do it now! Panic early, avoid the rush! Don't be late! :) Thanks, Matt

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

2013-06-26 Thread Matt Shaver
stuff that predates Sourceforge. Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Emc-developers mailin

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

2013-06-26 Thread Matt Shaver
the EMC project, so his involvement in this thing might be just as long as mine. Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

2013-06-25 Thread Matt Shaver
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:57:50 -0500 TJoseph Powderly wrote: > On 06/25/2013 12:08 AM, Jon Elson wrote: > > So, now the question is, what do I do with them? > maybe you & matt can compare notes I've got a bunch of historical stuff and so does Jon, and probably others do

[Emc-developers] Advice Needed on Wiki & File Hosting

2013-06-25 Thread Matt Shaver
her :) Interestingly, this is exactly how Fred Proctor would give me a new EMC1 back in the day, on sets of 3.5" floppies... Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored

Re: [Emc-developers] Vote Seb for 2.6 Release Manager!

2013-06-25 Thread Matt Shaver
ence of RTLinux made possible the first Linux based version of EMC, so they have some "good will" on deposit with the linuxcnc project if they need it. > Best of luck to you Seb! Ditto. Thanks, Matt -- T

Re: [Emc-developers] Finally, A Proposal

2013-06-14 Thread Matt Shaver
some code. I won't forget that ;) Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Emc-de

Re: [Emc-developers] Finally, A Proposal

2013-06-14 Thread Matt Shaver
rk so far (and a coffee cup). I'll bring any old CDs I can find too. Individually, no one thing looks that impressive, but all of it together might be revealing. Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Window

Re: [Emc-developers] Finally, A Proposal

2013-06-14 Thread Matt Shaver
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:40:06 -0600 Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > We have this (slightly out of date, and doesn't cover all the info > Matt listed): > > http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/html/code/Code_Notes.html#_architecture_overview This, but at multiple complexity levels. W

Re: [Emc-developers] Radical Ideas

2013-06-14 Thread Matt Shaver
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:44:57 -0400 Matt Shaver wrote: > I HAVE TO GET UP EARLY, SO I'LL CONTINUE THIS TOMORROW WITH DETAILS ON > HOW I THINK WE SHOULD HANDLE THE MORE SERIOUS THREAT DESCRIBED IN #2A > ABOVE. ALSO, I WILL PREDICT THE FUTURE. So, this is where I left off the other d

[Emc-developers] Finally, A Proposal

2013-06-14 Thread Matt Shaver
and when we achieve world domination that I'm concerned about ;) The above is certainly enough to keep me busy for a week (at least). I have to start forming up my pile of junk next to the front door of my house so that when Steve shows up I can throw my stuff in the van and go. To the othe

Re: [Emc-developers] Something else to possibly play with in Wichita.

2013-06-13 Thread Matt Shaver
;t read the writing... Thanks, Matt P.S. Schematic? P.P.S. I really like that method of attaching a DB connector to a PCB. The result is both very cheap and very strong. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Buil

Re: [Emc-developers] Radical Ideas

2013-06-12 Thread Matt Shaver
ake appropriate steps regarding licensing, to > maximize adoption by commercial users - that is, companies whose > revenue depend on LinuxCNC remaining freely available. > > Besides other obvious advantages, that has the

Re: [Emc-developers] Radical Ideas

2013-06-12 Thread Matt Shaver
ntirely exploratory in nature; totally in the vein of 'what if'. I am seeking a very simple, unobtrusive, non-intrusive, low key, barely visible, yet bulletproof solution to these problems. I promise you that I won't advocate for any compl

Re: [Emc-developers] Radical Ideas

2013-06-12 Thread Matt Shaver
So there > is not much point in worrying about this. I'm hoping to do better in finding a solution to this. I know how you feel, but this thing is like Dracula, or the monster in almost any "B" horror movie: It keeps coming back until you kill it good, st

[Emc-developers] Poll Question for the List (1)

2013-06-11 Thread Matt Shaver
If this is true, and we can prove it, we should _ _ _ _ _____ Thank You! Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Wind

Re: [Emc-developers] Radical Ideas

2013-06-11 Thread Matt Shaver
he majority wants is a useless idea though. Thanks, Matt -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___

[Emc-developers] Radical Ideas

2013-06-10 Thread Matt Shaver
opportunity cost) and providing you with the greater satisfaction resulting from being able to slide the dagger between their ribs personally, rather than via a proxy like your lawyer. As for myself, despite all my tough talk, I actually prefer

Re: [Emc-developers] LinuxCNC as a "Brand" (Was Re: Licensing Questionaire)

2013-06-10 Thread Matt Shaver
.org/wiki/Tux ) was created by Rab Gordon ( http://www.rainnea.com/portfo.htm see the bottom of this page ). I don't know whether we have a license to use this at all, but AFAIK Rab is a good guy so if we asked, he probably would be generous :) Thanks, Matt -

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire

2013-06-09 Thread Matt Shaver
d to know that. We also might want to be able to get small ad hoc groups together for the specific purpose of answering a question, like say we put three guys on a two week project to figure out what options we have with respect to . Thanks, Matt

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing

2013-06-09 Thread Matt Shaver
> project, but it is at least good to know what the status of this is! I don't know Jon, this may not be bad news either. I could live with public domain. It's the deal I've already got :) Does it hurt you or Pico Systems

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing

2013-06-09 Thread Matt Shaver
mail because I might have to send you a file or URL. Thanks, Matt (about 31 minutes over all for this message, I probably could have spoken it in 2...) -- How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A clou

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing

2013-06-08 Thread Matt Shaver
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:45:37 -0500 Jon Elson wrote: > Matt Shaver wrote: > > MH wrote me recently to ask if I had fixed the licensing problem > > yet... ಠ_ಠ <...> > Michael actually asked if you'd "FIXED" the licensing issue? > That can't be true.

Re: [Emc-developers] Rockhopper revisited

2013-06-07 Thread Matt Shaver
ated with the unused components will eliminate their time consumption in your servo-thread. Thanks, Matt -- How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and

[Emc-developers] Licensing

2013-06-07 Thread Matt Shaver
er possible, and "GPLv2 or later" otherwise. Note that this will mean a rewrite of the NIST code, but so will almost any plausible solution to our copyright/licensing problem, except perhaps "extre

Re: [Emc-developers] HAL web visualisation (was: Rockhopper)

2013-06-07 Thread Matt Shaver
f this means there are people out there who will never use this stuff no matter what, on principle. Thanks, Matt -- How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transit

Re: [Emc-developers] Rockhopper revisited

2013-06-07 Thread Matt Shaver
sic problems are, adjustments or options could be built into the basic hal components themselves to supply the behavior you want. Your hal files would then be greatly simplified. Thanks, Matt -- How ServiceNow helps IT peo

Re: [Emc-developers] Wear Offsets (was lathe-style tool patch)

2013-05-17 Thread Matt Shaver
esire at this point is to have some long thoughtful conversations with you (Micheal, et al) about the future direction of the project when we get together in Wichita next month. We're in a much better position now than we were back in 2004, and this may be the opportu

[Emc-developers] Lucid Lynx Support Ends Today

2013-05-09 Thread Matt Shaver
running the Server edition? This might get us updates for basic network-y things (bind, DNS, etc) and security-ish type things. Thanks, Matt -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databas

Re: [Emc-developers] The arm excrement has I believe, intersected with the air mover

2013-05-05 Thread Matt Shaver
ose in authority", and "May you find what you are looking for" are supposed to be ancient Chinese curses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_you_live_in_interesting_times or, possibly not: http://www.chin

[Emc-developers] Fw: SourceForge project upgrades start April 22

2013-04-05 Thread Matt Shaver
Will this cause us any problems? Everything I read about this is long on "announcement" and short on "details I can use". :) Thanks, Matt Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:38:07 + From: "SourceForge.net Team" To: m...@mattshaver.com Subject

Re: [Emc-developers] LinuxCNC week at MPM/SFI

2013-04-02 Thread Matt Shaver
ere. Looking forward to seeing everyone. Barring unforeseen circumstances, I plan to be there. Thanks, Matt -- Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn

Re: [Emc-developers] Motherboard Suggestions Needed

2013-03-30 Thread Matt Shaver
2.0 motherboard. I am very grateful to Alexey & Peter for their suggestions! Thanks, Matt -- Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compe

Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2 over spi

2013-03-16 Thread Matt Shaver
like a UART with a 64 byte receive buffer (I think). I know there are other folks working on using the PRU(SS) to do step pulse generation, and they've been reporting some success. I'm liking the RPi, both for its extreme low price and because they've made about 1,000,000 of

Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2 over spi

2013-03-16 Thread Matt Shaver
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:38:33 -0600 Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > Matt Shaver wrote: > > >Is anyone else working on hostmot2 over spi? If not, does anyone have > >any advise or pointers on how to go about this? > > > >My best guess is to look at the difference betwe

[Emc-developers] hostmot2 over spi

2013-03-16 Thread Matt Shaver
of the SPI on the RPi. Is anyone else working on hostmot2 over spi? If not, does anyone have any advise or pointers on how to go about this? My best guess is to look at the difference between hm2_pci and hm2_7i43 and then insert some SPI related code to change the physical interface. Any tho

Re: [Emc-developers] License Compatibility Question

2013-03-13 Thread Matt Shaver
to your version of the library. I hope this helps, being included in the actual distributed source code. Thanks, Matt -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDyn

Re: [Emc-developers] Implementation of LCNC Copyright and licensing terms

2013-03-13 Thread Matt Shaver
trying to document "why things are the way they are now". If you think this is a waste of time, let me know why. I really respect your opinions! Thanks, Matt -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make you

Re: [Emc-developers] License Compatibility Question

2013-03-12 Thread Matt Shaver
laints by these other projects, if any. If need be, you can blame all this on me :) I'm happy to act as the "complaint department" if that will move things forward. If I get any complaints, I'll let you know and we can figure out what to do at that time. No complaints = No worries

Re: [Emc-developers] License question - code piece for HAL

2013-03-10 Thread Matt Shaver
least problematic license to combine with other GPL licenses. If it's totally, completely _not_ a library, then "GPLv2 or later" would be a good way to go. The most important part of this is, as we've seen over the last few days, the "or later" part :) Thanks, Ma

Re: [Emc-developers] License Compatibility Question

2013-03-10 Thread Matt Shaver
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:01:24 -0600 EBo wrote: > Looks like we need to email EFF or GNU for a determination. Matt > what you say is that 0MQ allows linking to anything, but GPLv2 > requires that anything linked must then convey GPLv2, then GPL is the > problem and LCNC cannot use 0M

Re: [Emc-developers] License Compatibility Question

2013-03-10 Thread Matt Shaver
e and beyond those defined in the LGPLv3, to link their library with even closed source code. See these pages: http://www.zeromq.org/area:licensing and http://www.zeromq.org/area:faq#toc0 Thanks, Matt -- Symantec Endpoint

Re: [Emc-developers] Feasibility of license change to GPLv2+

2013-03-09 Thread Matt Shaver
expected to have ascertained the meaning of "and other rights" before committing valuable work. Once this text was removed, contributors could reasonably be expected to have committed their work under the remaining (GPLv2) license terms. Maybe tomorrow (Sunday) I can look into this stuff some

Re: [Emc-developers] License Compatibility Question

2013-03-09 Thread Matt Shaver
r wrote: > Yes, linking is needed. Why? How? We need to be able to tell the 0MQ folks what we need that is not currently on offer so they can make it possible for you to use 0MQ by just calling their library as allowed by their license. Thanks, Matt --

Re: [Emc-developers] License Compatibility Question

2013-03-09 Thread Matt Shaver
The Official Response: On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Matt Shaver wrote: > "I have asked the ZeroMQ steward, Pieter Hintjens, wrt to > compatibility of a GPL2only project and ZMQ, and his answer was a > straight '

[Emc-developers] License Compatibility Question

2013-03-08 Thread Matt Shaver
ew feature to zeromq, we would contribute them back upstream under the terms of your LGPLv3 licensing. So, are we allowed to use zeromq in this way? Thanks, Matt Shaver -- Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A

Re: [Emc-developers] Feasibility of license change to GPLv2+

2013-03-08 Thread Matt Shaver
track the responses. First though, we need to decide on exactly what we would propose. Thanks, Matt -- Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and &quo

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing

2013-03-08 Thread Matt Shaver
o my stuff (tiny though it is) is "Public Domain". Before you go and do a bunch of changes and commits, maybe we should have a discussion about what everyone else thinks. Someone might come up with some other brilliant idea! Anyone? Agree? Disagree? Don't car

Re: [Emc-developers] Where does HAL persistence belong? (was: re: GladeVCP Persistence On_Destroy sensitivity on -users)

2013-03-08 Thread Matt Shaver
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 06:39:25 +0100 Michael Haberler wrote: > Am 08.03.2013 um 04:06 schrieb Matt Shaver: > > 4. According to this page: > > http://www.zeromq.org/area:licensing > > they say: > > *** > >

Re: [Emc-developers] Where does HAL persistence belong? (was: re: GladeVCP Persistence On_Destroy sensitivity on -users)

2013-03-07 Thread Matt Shaver
s is the problem, let's figure out which are the actual "roadblock" files. If this is not the problem, or if there are other licensing issues, please let me know. Thanks, Matt -- Symantec Endpoint Protection 12

Re: [Emc-developers] Where does HAL persistence belong?

2013-03-07 Thread Matt Shaver
rigidly, so there may be a need for read/write signals (or R/W and LE) to the memunit, or it may be possible to otherwise economize on the scheme I've described. There may also be horrible unintended consequences which are glaringly obvious to ev

Re: [Emc-developers] Where does HAL persistence belong?

2013-03-07 Thread Matt Shaver
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 14:06:14 -0500 Gene Heskett wrote: > Now, separate item, but same subject, the .var and .txt files. If you will send me your .ini, and any .hal files (and .xml files if using pyvcp) that you are using for your setup, I'll take a look at these issues. Than

Re: [Emc-developers] Where does HAL persistence belong?

2013-03-07 Thread Matt Shaver
ata store rather than integral to the HAL component itself. Thanks, Matt -- Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice&

Re: [Emc-developers] Where does HAL persistence belong? (was: re: GladeVCP Persistence On_Destroy sensitivity on -users)

2013-03-07 Thread Matt Shaver
pened to all the really cool ideas about redis and 0MQ? I was pretty jazzed about those things, and I think the answer to some of the issues you raise (persistence) could be addressed in redis with a messaging system to transpo

Re: [Emc-developers] Input Devices

2013-03-04 Thread Matt Shaver
parent, so a HAL component is the right idea. Thanks, Matt P.S. This may all be a statement of the obvious, but there it is! -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Do

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.5.2?

2013-03-04 Thread Matt Shaver
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:35:21 -0700 Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > On 3/4/13 09:48 , Matt Shaver wrote: > > A fellow on -users said 2.5.2 was released without any announcement > > on the lists. > > The announcement went out this morning: >

[Emc-developers] 2.5.2?

2013-03-04 Thread Matt Shaver
A fellow on -users said 2.5.2 was released without any announcement on the lists. Whoever did the release: Check your e-mail for a bounced e-mail to the lists. I've been having problems sending mail to -developers lately, so maybe your announcement got bounced back to you! Thanks,

Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2-firmware build problem

2013-02-28 Thread Matt Shaver
try again later And now, on with the show... On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:33:29 + David Armstrong wrote: > On 28/02/13 02:25, Matt Shaver wrote: > > What am I doing wrong? > Matt, > which dist or git repro are you using , i

Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2-firmware build problem

2013-02-27 Thread Matt Shaver
get through the whole build, then re-run with tighter version specs in build.py. I guess the Spartan2 files should be built with 10.1, and the rest with the latest version available? At least that's what I can try next :) Thanks, Matt ---

Re: [Emc-developers] hostmot2-firmware build problem

2013-02-27 Thread Matt Shaver
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:10:00 -0700 Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > On 02/27/2013 07:25 PM, Matt Shaver wrote: > > What am I doing wrong? > > The 3x20 uses an FPGA that's too fancy for version 10 of ISE, you > need version 13 or better. OK, I also have 14.4 installed in /op

[Emc-developers] hostmot2-firmware build problem

2013-02-27 Thread Matt Shaver
tmp/hm2fQc9g4 # ghdl -a -fexplicit '--ieee=synopsys' IDROMConst.vhd idrom_tools.vhd PIN_SV24_144.vhd x20_1000card.vhd pinmaker_SV24_144.vhd # exited with 127 make: *** [fw/3x20-1/SV24.PIN] Error 127 What am I doi

Re: [Emc-developers] Motherboard Suggestions Needed

2013-02-27 Thread Matt Shaver
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:11:10 +0400 Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Linux f1200 2.6.32-122-rtai #rtai SMP Tue Jul 27 12:44:07 CDT 2010 > i686 GNU/Linux -- it's the standard kernel from Live CD. Ordering one today! I wonder what's going on with these things.

Re: [Emc-developers] Unifying error message reporting in LinuxCNC

2013-02-26 Thread Matt Shaver
(and status) to the relevant GUCM sockets/channels. If not, into the kernel log they go via printk. Thanks, Matt -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics

Re: [Emc-developers] Motherboard Suggestions Needed

2013-02-26 Thread Matt Shaver
t the 2.6.23-122 kernel. Do you still have a machine with this ASUS motherboard? If so, can you pull up a terminal and type 'uname -a' and tell me the output? I'm hoping it's something like: Linux 2.6.32-122-rtai #rtai SMP Tue Jul 27 12:44:07 CDT 2010 i686 GNU/Linux Thanks, Ma

Re: [Emc-developers] Motherboard Suggestions Needed

2013-02-24 Thread Matt Shaver
(Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H): http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128555 and a Celeron CPU. A technician will test this on Monday, but I wondered if the inability to boot the 2.6.32-122 kernel was directly caused by having the C-state functions enabled in the BIOS.

  1   2   >