On Friday 03 October 2014 19:01:29 andy pugh did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On 3 October 2014 20:24, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > This is one item I agree with, but the limiting factor I haven't
> > figured out is how to store those remaps, they should be in a
> > separate subdir of nc_files, nameable
On 3 October 2014 20:24, Gene Heskett wrote:
> This is one item I agree with, but the limiting factor I haven't figured
> out is how to store those remaps, they should be in a separate subdir of
> nc_files, nameable not in the config, but in the gcode file itself.
I disagree, the remap is part o
On Friday 03 October 2014 11:08:30 andy pugh did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On 3 October 2014 16:01, Dave Cole wrote:
> > Is this the best docs to reference on remapping?
> > http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/remap/structure.html#_introduction_exte
> > nding_the_rs274ngc_interpreter_by_remapping_code
On 10/3/2014 11:08 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 October 2014 16:01, Dave Cole wrote:
>
>> Is this the best docs to reference on remapping?
>> http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/remap/structure.html#_introduction_extending_the_rs274ngc_interpreter_by_remapping_codes
> Yes, though while reading through it
On 3 October 2014 16:01, Dave Cole wrote:
> Is this the best docs to reference on remapping?
> http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/remap/structure.html#_introduction_extending_the_rs274ngc_interpreter_by_remapping_codes
Yes, though while reading through it to see what _can_ be done, bear
in mind that
I really don't understand the re-map process and I should.
Is this the best docs to reference on remapping?
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/remap/structure.html#_introduction_extending_the_rs274ngc_interpreter_by_remapping_codes
Thanks,
Dave
On 10/3/2014 5:14 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 2 October 2
On 2 October 2014 22:47, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> Anyway, inserting those G41.1/G42.1, when jet-on and G40 on jet-off
> moments seems like the easiest way.
You could, potentially, re-map M31 and M32 to be spindle-on-with compensation.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifix
2014-10-03 5:00 GMT+03:00 Dave Cole :
> Yes. This water jet has two heads and 4 valves to control the two jets
> and two abrasive feed valves. They switch between them.
Ok, got it . Thanks!
Viesturs
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 C
On 10/2/2014 5:47 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> 2014-10-03 0:29 GMT+03:00 Dave Cole :
>> I'm using M64 P0 to turn on the waterjet and M65 P0 to turn it off.
> Any particular reason not to use M3/M5 commands? At least I did that
> on my waterjet, customer never commented about that. It just seems
> li
2014-10-03 0:29 GMT+03:00 Dave Cole :
> I'm using M64 P0 to turn on the waterjet and M65 P0 to turn it off.
Any particular reason not to use M3/M5 commands? At least I did that
on my waterjet, customer never commented about that. It just seems
like common sense - tool on and tool off, whatever is
Yes, I think that a G41.1 or G42.1 will need to be invoked at the
beginning of each cut depending on travel direction and then a G40 will
need to be used at the end of each cut so the
travel direction can be changed for the following cut.
Lead ins are used to start all cuts so I am hoping I can
Turning
> 734-279-1831
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sam sokolik [mailto:sa...@empirescreen.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 11:27 AM
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Table and Wear offset Table
>
> are you saying have a g41.1 on
> On
Jeff Johnson
john...@superiorroll.com
Superior Roll & Turning
734-279-1831
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:john...@superiorroll.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 12:10 PM
To: 'EMC developers'
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Table and Wear offset Tabl
pers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Table and Wear offset Table
are you saying have a g41.1 on
On 10/2/2014 10:07 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
> On 10/2/2014 10:46 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 2 October 2014 15:40, Dave Cole wrote:
>>> They would like to be able to adjust th
wow - didn't mean to send that..
well to finish my thought - would you put g41.1 at the begining of every
part/shape? I could see that working very well.
sam
On 10/2/2014 10:26 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> are you saying have a g41.1 on
> On 10/2/2014 10:07 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
>> On 10/2/2014 10
are you saying have a g41.1 on
On 10/2/2014 10:07 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
> On 10/2/2014 10:46 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 2 October 2014 15:40, Dave Cole wrote:
>>> They would like to be able to adjust the jet size (think tool diameter)
>>> on the fly
>> This is probably most easily done with G42.1 a
On 2 October 2014 16:07, Dave Cole wrote:
> So perhaps if I had the tool/jet diameter in a hal float pin, I could
> use that along with the analog input function in Gcode to grab the hal
> value and then assign it via an invocation of G42.1 or G41.1 ?
>
> Does that sound possible/reasonable?
>
> S
On 10/2/2014 10:46 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 2 October 2014 15:40, Dave Cole wrote:
>> They would like to be able to adjust the jet size (think tool diameter)
>> on the fly
> This is probably most easily done with G42.1 and G41.1, though the
> G-code would have to actually stop and look for new va
On 2 October 2014 15:40, Dave Cole wrote:
> They would like to be able to adjust the jet size (think tool diameter)
> on the fly
This is probably most easily done with G42.1 and G41.1, though the
G-code would have to actually stop and look for new values from an
input source.
Any change of tool
LLC.
>> PH: 734-279-1831
>> www.superiorroll.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 12:46 PM
>> To: EMC developers
>> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Table and Wear offset Ta
tools,
10-29 for lathe tools. Wish list... ;-)
> Rick Lair
> Superior Roll & Turning LLC.
> PH: 734-279-1831
> www.superiorroll.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 12:46 PM
> To: EMC developers
sage-
From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 8:04 AM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Table and Wear offset Table
On 6 August 2014 12:40, Rick Lair wrote:
> The guys tried running a program last night, and as soon as it gets
On 6 August 2014 12:40, Rick Lair wrote:
> The guys tried running a program last night, and as soon as it gets to the
> tool call in the program, the gcode for the program disappears and the
> subroutine pops up in the window, and the gremlin backplot jumps from the
> picture of the part and goes
odge...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 12:46 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Table and Wear offset Table
On 5 August 2014 17:36, Rick Lair wrote:
> Apparently I spoke too soon, but I swear it was working properly
yesterday,
> when I did the update.
>
&
For testing is a set of two patches (apply to current git master):
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] lathe-fanucy: conform for pickconfig
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tooledit: allow specification of toolno range
-
New options for tooledit (-min, -max):
On 5 August 2014 17:36, Rick Lair wrote:
> Apparently I spoke too soon, but I swear it was working properly yesterday,
> when I did the update.
>
> The original toolchange.ngc file you wrote works fine, what we modified it
> too doesn't. For some reason it is not reading/using the tool data in th
Apparently I spoke too soon, but I swear it was working properly yesterday,
when I did the update.
The original toolchange.ngc file you wrote works fine, what we modified it
too doesn't. For some reason it is not reading/using the tool data in the T1
locations in the tool table. The wear offsets
The normal tool location data is stored in the the T1 numbers, the wear
offset data is in the T10001 numbers.
Here is copy of a tool table from one of the turning centers
T10001 P21 X-0.0004 Y0.0 Z0.0013 A0.0 B0.0 C0.0 U0.0 V0.0 W0.0 D0.0 I0.0
J0.0 Q0.0 ;comment
T10002 P22 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0 A0.0 B
On 5 August 2014 14:56, Rick Lair wrote:
> One of the few things we have been wondering about though is if there is an
> ability to make a separate table/tab to be able to put those wear offsets in
> instead of the main tool table
I am still not sure how you are using the tool table, if you are
Hello Guys,
Trying not to push the envelope too far,
We have implemented Andy's Fanucy tool remap into our configuration on one
of our turning centers, and it is a tremendous improvement in regards to
some of the things we have been pushing since the inception of LinuxCNC in
our shop. It wi
30 matches
Mail list logo
