On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:34:32PM -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:
> I have noticed a few other items in UBC3.
>
> * autoconf fails on hardy, but no one is committed to resolving this.
>I think this directive in configure.in needs to be bumped to get a
>better error (i.e., "won't work, so sad"):
I have noticed a few other items in UBC3.
* autoconf fails on hardy, but no one is committed to resolving this.
I think this directive in configure.in needs to be bumped to get a
better error (i.e., "won't work, so sad"):
AC_PREREQ(2.53)
but I did not determine what version was n
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
> Am 13.09.2013 um 16:54 schrieb Jeff Epler :
>
> > I strongly wish to see at least a notice of copyright and terms in each
> > new file, not least because it is the advice of the FSF given in the GPL
> > itself. It avoids doubt about
Am 13.09.2013 um 16:54 schrieb Jeff Epler :
> I strongly wish to see at least a notice of copyright and terms in each
> new file, not least because it is the advice of the FSF given in the GPL
> itself. It avoids doubt about the status of each specific file, and the
> only costs identified so fa
I strongly wish to see at least a notice of copyright and terms in each
new file, not least because it is the advice of the FSF given in the GPL
itself. It avoids doubt about the status of each specific file, and the
only costs identified so far are the author's time to insert the notice
and a few
Am 11.09.2013 um 21:34 schrieb Jeff Epler :
> I inspected the list of files added in the ub3 branch for potential
> problems. Unfortunately, I have found some. The most serious
> categories are: Files with an "All Rights Reserved" copyright notice,
> files with no copyright or license declarati
the classicladder crash has been fixed:
https://github.com/mhaberler/linuxcnc/commits/unified-build-candidate-3
Jan - thanks for the report and testing the patch!
- Michael
Am 12.09.2013 um 14:31 schrieb Jan Binder :
> Am Mittwoch, 11. September 2013, 20:51:00 schrieb Michael Haberler:
>> Am 1
Dave,
I am not sure of the current status of the license code cleanup, but
this is something that has plagued the group for a decade or more. I
for one will scream if after the cleanup we have more than 1 license
variant in the code base. I do support the LGPL/GPL distinction for
libraries,
Thanks for the pointer.
To summarize: if an author modifies a work covered by GPL , and that
author chooses not to distribute the modification, there is no
obligation for the change to "come back". If the author does choose to
distribute the mod, then the source is "requestable" by those that w
Am Mittwoch, 11. September 2013, 20:51:00 schrieb Michael Haberler:
> Am 11.09.2013 um 17:57 schrieb Jan Binder :
> > Log is at
> > http://intern.sfz-bw.de/~jan.binder/linuxcnc-debug/DEBUG5-linuxcnc.log
>
> ha, overwhelming detail now
>
> per log, it's apparently a classicladder startup issue and
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:53:42PM -0700, David Bagby wrote:
>
> It seems to me that if everyone that made a change to those *had* to
> contribute it back (due to GPL), we'd just get a bunch of patches
> [...]
This is a misunderstanding of the GPL, so beware any conclusions
drawn from it. See
On 9/11/2013 1:14 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Thanks for looking through the files! Several of them are mine, and I
> just missed adding the license header. I'm willing to license the
> files GPLv2+ or whatever works best for the project, including public
> domain or even something like M
On 11 September 2013 21:14, Charles Steinkuehler
wrote:
> Several of the listed files are from me. I can't push anything to the
> LinuxCNC repository
That seems like an omission.
Heck, they let _me_ push stuff!
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
---
On 9/11/2013 3:33 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:14:17PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> Several of the listed files are from me. I can't push anything to the
>> LinuxCNC repository, but I'm willing to clean up my files and commit
>> them. I have a github clone of the Li
Am Dienstag, 10. September 2013, 20:17:53 schrieb Michael Haberler:
> Jan,
>
> Am 10.09.2013 um 17:13 schrieb Jan Binder :
> > Am Montag, 9. September 2013, 17:04:36 schrieb Michael Haberler:
> >> Jan,
> >>
> >> Am 09.09.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Jan Binder :
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I have been running my mi
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:08:18PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> I also wasn't aware the python code could be compiled like a
> conventional HAL module. Pretty nifty! :)
Calling it "compiling" is a bit of a misnomer. Mostly that makefile
fragment does two things: first, makes sure the fi
Am 11.09.2013 um 17:57 schrieb Jan Binder :
> Log is at
> http://intern.sfz-bw.de/~jan.binder/linuxcnc-debug/DEBUG5-linuxcnc.log
ha, overwhelming detail now
per log, it's apparently a classicladder startup issue and everything else goes
from there - not unlikely, since we dont have a most basi
Several of the listed files are from me. I can't push anything to the
LinuxCNC repository, but I'm willing to clean up my files and commit
them. I have a github clone of the LinuxCNC repository where I can push
changes to the ubc-3 branch and send a pull request, or would you prefer
a different w
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:14:17PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Several of the listed files are from me. I can't push anything to the
> LinuxCNC repository, but I'm willing to clean up my files and commit
> them. I have a github clone of the LinuxCNC repository where I can push
> changes
Jeff,
Am 11.09.2013 um 21:34 schrieb Jeff Epler :
> I inspected the list of files added in the ub3 branch for potential
> problems. Unfortunately, I have found some. The most serious
> categories are: Files with an "All Rights Reserved" copyright notice,
> files with no copyright or license dec
I inspected the list of files added in the ub3 branch for potential
problems. Unfortunately, I have found some. The most serious
categories are: Files with an "All Rights Reserved" copyright notice,
files with no copyright or license declaration, and files not "in the
preferred form for modificat
Jan,
Am 10.09.2013 um 17:13 schrieb Jan Binder :
> Am Montag, 9. September 2013, 17:04:36 schrieb Michael Haberler:
>> Jan,
>>
>> Am 09.09.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Jan Binder :
>>> Hi,
>>> I have been running my mill on the rtos-integration-preview3 and
>>> rtos-integration-preview3-merged-into-mas
Am Montag, 9. September 2013, 17:04:36 schrieb Michael Haberler:
> Jan,
>
> Am 09.09.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Jan Binder :
> > Hi,
> > I have been running my mill on the rtos-integration-preview3 and
> > rtos-integration-preview3-merged-into-master branches on Debian Jessie for
> > some time with the
Jan,
Am 09.09.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Jan Binder :
> Hi,
> I have been running my mill on the rtos-integration-preview3 and
> rtos-integration-preview3-merged-into-master branches on Debian Jessie for
> some time with the xenomai kernel 3.5.7 from the machinekit.net repository
> and
> they work.
Hi,
I have been running my mill on the rtos-integration-preview3 and
rtos-integration-preview3-merged-into-master branches on Debian Jessie for
some time with the xenomai kernel 3.5.7 from the machinekit.net repository and
they work.
Now I built the unified-build-candidate-3 branch and all 129 t
Thanks, it seems to work now (I tried with make -j4, as before)
I do get this on closing AXIS, but that has been there before and is not
unified-build related I guess:
scripts/linuxcnc: line 717: 24725 Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$EMCDISPLAY -ini "$INIFILE" $EMCDISPLAYARGS $EXTRA_ARGS
dm
Hi guys,
On 09/03/2013 12:33 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> issue identified
>
> please do not use parallel make ('make -j') until further notice
>
> the configure/build process per se is fine, there is some make dependency
> missing
Thanks for the report, Anders.
Jeff spotted my brain-dead mi
issue identified
please do not use parallel make ('make -j') until further notice
the configure/build process per se is fine, there is some make dependency
missing
-m
Am 03.09.2013 um 19:07 schrieb Michael Haberler :
>
> Am 03.09.2013 um 17:38 schrieb Anders Wallin :
>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 201
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> I dont want to read this darn documentation, just try it
>
> cd src && ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make && sudo make setuid && .
> ../scripts/rip-environment && linuxcnc
>
should
Am 03.09.2013 um 17:38 schrieb Anders Wallin :
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
>> I dont want to read this darn documentation, just try it
>>
>> cd src && ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make && sudo make setuid
I now tried:
$ make clean
$ ./configure --with-posix
$ make
but I get the same error (below) as before.
Anders
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Anders Wallin
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
>> I dont want to read this darn documentation, just try it
>>
Am 03.09.2013 um 12:10 schrieb Anders Wallin :
>> what it does:
>> =
>> build LinuxCNC such that it runs unchanged on any kernel found on the
>> build platform (even multiple versions): RTAI, Xenomai, RT-Preempt, or
>> vanilla - only reboot into new kernel required. No configuration c
> what it does:
> =
> build LinuxCNC such that it runs unchanged on any kernel found on the
> build platform (even multiple versions): RTAI, Xenomai, RT-Preempt, or
> vanilla - only reboot into new kernel required. No configuration changes to
> existing configs should be necessary. Runs
We're happy to announce the "Unified Build" branch for general testing. This
branch has been in limited preview for a while, and numerous positive reports
have come in, so we think it is good to go for wider evaluation.
We consider this a merge candidate for the 2.6 release.
In a nutshell:
34 matches
Mail list logo
