Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-21 Thread Jeff Epler
I have noticed a few other items in UBC3. * autoconf fails on hardy, but no one is committed to resolving this. I think this directive in configure.in needs to be bumped to get a better error (i.e., won't work, so sad): AC_PREREQ(2.53) but I did not determine what version was

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-21 Thread Jeff Epler
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:34:32PM -0500, Jeff Epler wrote: I have noticed a few other items in UBC3. * autoconf fails on hardy, but no one is committed to resolving this. I think this directive in configure.in needs to be bumped to get a better error (i.e., won't work, so sad):

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-13 Thread Michael Haberler
Am 11.09.2013 um 21:34 schrieb Jeff Epler jep...@unpythonic.net: I inspected the list of files added in the ub3 branch for potential problems. Unfortunately, I have found some. The most serious categories are: Files with an All Rights Reserved copyright notice, files with no copyright or

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-13 Thread Jeff Epler
I strongly wish to see at least a notice of copyright and terms in each new file, not least because it is the advice of the FSF given in the GPL itself. It avoids doubt about the status of each specific file, and the only costs identified so far are the author's time to insert the notice and a

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-13 Thread Michael Haberler
Am 13.09.2013 um 16:54 schrieb Jeff Epler jep...@unpythonic.net: I strongly wish to see at least a notice of copyright and terms in each new file, not least because it is the advice of the FSF given in the GPL itself. It avoids doubt about the status of each specific file, and the only

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-13 Thread John Kasunich
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Michael Haberler wrote: Am 13.09.2013 um 16:54 schrieb Jeff Epler jep...@unpythonic.net: I strongly wish to see at least a notice of copyright and terms in each new file, not least because it is the advice of the FSF given in the GPL itself. It avoids

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-12 Thread David Bagby
Thanks for the pointer. To summarize: if an author modifies a work covered by GPL , and that author chooses not to distribute the modification, there is no obligation for the change to come back. If the author does choose to distribute the mod, then the source is requestable by those that wish

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-12 Thread EBo
Dave, I am not sure of the current status of the license code cleanup, but this is something that has plagued the group for a decade or more. I for one will scream if after the cleanup we have more than 1 license variant in the code base. I do support the LGPL/GPL distinction for libraries,

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread Jeff Epler
I inspected the list of files added in the ub3 branch for potential problems. Unfortunately, I have found some. The most serious categories are: Files with an All Rights Reserved copyright notice, files with no copyright or license declaration, and files not in the preferred form for

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread Michael Haberler
Jeff, Am 11.09.2013 um 21:34 schrieb Jeff Epler jep...@unpythonic.net: I inspected the list of files added in the ub3 branch for potential problems. Unfortunately, I have found some. The most serious categories are: Files with an All Rights Reserved copyright notice, files with no

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread Jeff Epler
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:14:17PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Several of the listed files are from me. I can't push anything to the LinuxCNC repository, but I'm willing to clean up my files and commit them. I have a github clone of the LinuxCNC repository where I can push changes to

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Several of the listed files are from me. I can't push anything to the LinuxCNC repository, but I'm willing to clean up my files and commit them. I have a github clone of the LinuxCNC repository where I can push changes to the ubc-3 branch and send a pull request, or would you prefer a different

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread Michael Haberler
Am 11.09.2013 um 17:57 schrieb Jan Binder wh...@herr-der-mails.de: Log is at http://intern.sfz-bw.de/~jan.binder/linuxcnc-debug/DEBUG5-linuxcnc.log ha, overwhelming detail now per log, it's apparently a classicladder startup issue and everything else goes from there - not unlikely, since we

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread Jeff Epler
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:08:18PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: I also wasn't aware the python code could be compiled like a conventional HAL module. Pretty nifty! :) Calling it compiling is a bit of a misnomer. Mostly that makefile fragment does two things: first, makes sure the file

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread Jan Binder
Am Dienstag, 10. September 2013, 20:17:53 schrieb Michael Haberler: Jan, Am 10.09.2013 um 17:13 schrieb Jan Binder wh...@herr-der-mails.de: Am Montag, 9. September 2013, 17:04:36 schrieb Michael Haberler: Jan, Am 09.09.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Jan Binder wh...@herr-der-mails.de: Hi,

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
On 9/11/2013 3:33 PM, Jeff Epler wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:14:17PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Several of the listed files are from me. I can't push anything to the LinuxCNC repository, but I'm willing to clean up my files and commit them. I have a github clone of the LinuxCNC

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread andy pugh
On 11 September 2013 21:14, Charles Steinkuehler char...@steinkuehler.net wrote: Several of the listed files are from me. I can't push anything to the LinuxCNC repository That seems like an omission. Heck, they let _me_ push stuff! -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it.

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-11 Thread David Bagby
On 9/11/2013 1:14 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Thanks for looking through the files! Several of them are mine, and I just missed adding the license header. I'm willing to license the files GPLv2+ or whatever works best for the project, including public domain or even something like

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-10 Thread Jan Binder
Am Montag, 9. September 2013, 17:04:36 schrieb Michael Haberler: Jan, Am 09.09.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Jan Binder wh...@herr-der-mails.de: Hi, I have been running my mill on the rtos-integration-preview3 and rtos-integration-preview3-merged-into-master branches on Debian Jessie for some

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-10 Thread Michael Haberler
Jan, Am 10.09.2013 um 17:13 schrieb Jan Binder wh...@herr-der-mails.de: Am Montag, 9. September 2013, 17:04:36 schrieb Michael Haberler: Jan, Am 09.09.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Jan Binder wh...@herr-der-mails.de: Hi, I have been running my mill on the rtos-integration-preview3 and

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-09 Thread Jan Binder
Hi, I have been running my mill on the rtos-integration-preview3 and rtos-integration-preview3-merged-into-master branches on Debian Jessie for some time with the xenomai kernel 3.5.7 from the machinekit.net repository and they work. Now I built the unified-build-candidate-3 branch and all 129

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-09 Thread Michael Haberler
Jan, Am 09.09.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Jan Binder wh...@herr-der-mails.de: Hi, I have been running my mill on the rtos-integration-preview3 and rtos-integration-preview3-merged-into-master branches on Debian Jessie for some time with the xenomai kernel 3.5.7 from the machinekit.net repository

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-04 Thread John Morris
Hi guys, On 09/03/2013 12:33 PM, Michael Haberler wrote: issue identified please do not use parallel make ('make -jnumcores') until further notice the configure/build process per se is fine, there is some make dependency missing Thanks for the report, Anders. Jeff spotted my brain-dead

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-04 Thread Anders Wallin
Thanks, it seems to work now (I tried with make -j4, as before) I do get this on closing AXIS, but that has been there before and is not unified-build related I guess: scripts/linuxcnc: line 717: 24725 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $EMCDISPLAY -ini $INIFILE $EMCDISPLAYARGS $EXTRA_ARGS

[Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-03 Thread Michael Haberler
We're happy to announce the Unified Build branch for general testing. This branch has been in limited preview for a while, and numerous positive reports have come in, so we think it is good to go for wider evaluation. We consider this a merge candidate for the 2.6 release. In a nutshell:

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-03 Thread Anders Wallin
what it does: = build LinuxCNC such that it runs unchanged on any kernel found on the build platform (even multiple versions): RTAI, Xenomai, RT-Preempt, or vanilla - only reboot into new kernel required. No configuration changes to existing configs should be necessary. Runs on

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-03 Thread Michael Haberler
Am 03.09.2013 um 12:10 schrieb Anders Wallin anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com: what it does: = build LinuxCNC such that it runs unchanged on any kernel found on the build platform (even multiple versions): RTAI, Xenomai, RT-Preempt, or vanilla - only reboot into new kernel required.

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-03 Thread Anders Wallin
I now tried: $ make clean $ ./configure --with-posix $ make but I get the same error (below) as before. Anders On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Anders Wallin anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.atwrote: I dont want to read

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-03 Thread Michael Haberler
Am 03.09.2013 um 17:38 schrieb Anders Wallin anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote: I dont want to read this darn documentation, just try it cd src ./autogen.sh

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-03 Thread Anders Wallin
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote: I dont want to read this darn documentation, just try it cd src ./autogen.sh ./configure make sudo make setuid . ../scripts/rip-environment linuxcnc

Re: [Emc-developers] Unified Build/ new RTOS work: general availability for testing

2013-09-03 Thread Michael Haberler
issue identified please do not use parallel make ('make -jnumcores') until further notice the configure/build process per se is fine, there is some make dependency missing -m Am 03.09.2013 um 19:07 schrieb Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at: Am 03.09.2013 um 17:38 schrieb Anders Wallin