[PSES] FCC plan to open New 5GHz band for WiFi

Folks,   I saw the comments below in FCC Jan 9, 2013 news?  "Chairman Genachowski said that the FCC will take the first steps next month to unleash up to 195 megahertz of spectrum in the 5 gigahertz band. This would be the largest block of unlicensed spectrum to be made available for expansion of

[PSES] Conflict Minerals Due Diligence Webinar

Dear members Regret delay in informing you on this informative webinar tomorrow 9:00 am PST Registration link on my website. www.goglobalcompliance.com/news_and_events Sent from my iPhone Peter S. Merguerian pe...@goglobalcompliance.com Go Global Compliance Inc. www.goglobalcompliance.com (40

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

In message <617eb8c8634c9149aa66c853d7b8ac53d...@by2prd0310mb389.namprd03.prod.outlo ok.com>, dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013, "Crane, Lauren" writes: I very quickly learned that law makers do not have any obligation to understand in depth the industry/ies they may be impacting. Most of them have onl

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

John, I share your hope. I have the fortunate experience of doing some policy advocacy on RoHS2 and WEEE2 face to face with members of Parliament and Council and I very quickly learned that law makers do not have any obligation to understand in depth the industry/ies they may be impacting. Most

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

Thanks Lauren, I appreciate your insight as it is always tricky business interpreting what the regulator's intended when they wrote the Directives. Hopefully this is not what the powers that be intended because, as John pointed out, it is easier and less expensive to create paperwork then it is

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

In message , dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013, John Woodgate writes: n message <021c01cdf279$f5b33720$e119a560$@acbcert.com>, dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Michael Derby writes: I believe one of the situations that arises from the NLF is that the requirements of each Directive are being harmonised. This o

Re: [PSES] user's group ??

Sorry, I forgot to mention that TILE! also has a LinkedIn site. Go to LinkedIn and search “TILE!”. Glen Watkins Global Marcom Director ETS-Lindgren 1301 Arrow Point Drive Cedar Park, Texas 78613 p: 1+512.531.6414 f: 1+512.531.6514 glen.watk...@ets-lindgren.com

[PSES] Risk Assessments in the EU

Hi, We're looking for someone in the Netherlands to review a client's product safety and risk assessment process. Please reply to my direct email. Thanks, John Allen President Product Safety Consulting, Inc. 605 Country Club Drive, Suites I & J Bensenville, IL 60106 P - 630 238-0188 / F - 630

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

In message <021c01cdf279$f5b33720$e119a560$@acbcert.com>, dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Michael Derby writes: I believe one of the situations that arises from the NLF is that the requirements of each Directive are being harmonised. This often means looking at all the Directives, finding the 'most s

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

I think that's part of the history, John. I believe one of the situations that arises from the NLF is that the requirements of each Directive are being harmonised. This often means looking at all the Directives, finding the 'most strict requirement' and then applying it to all the others. So, y

Re: [PSES] user's group ??

There is a TILE! user group that meets every year at the IEEE EMC Symposium. There is also a TILE! users web portal https://support.ets-lindgren.com/TILE/pages/home.aspx Glen Watkins Global Marcom Director ETS-Lindgren 1301 Arrow Point Drive Cedar Park, Texas 78613 p: 1+512.531.6414 f: 1+512.

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

Thanks John and all for your comments. There is a persistent problem knitted into this issue regarding the meaning of 'product'. Most inquiries to the Commission tend to end up clarifying that 'product' means a particular unit and not a model line or type. This is particularly true when strugg

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

In message , dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" writes: You can make fun of it, but all these things have been introduced with the goal of creating a better level playing field, thus making possible to find, an pursue those manufacturers that spoil the mar

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

The Toy Safety Directive already has the picture requirement on the D of C. John C -Original Message- From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl] Sent: 14 January 2013 14:37 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Un

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

You can make fun of it, but all these things have been introduced with the goal of creating a better level playing field, thus making possible to find, an pursue those manufacturers that spoil the market by selling untested, possible unsafe cheap rubbish. Customs are better able to simply stop pro

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

In message <64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB0262C6D0@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local>, dated Mon, 14 Jan 2013, "Kunde, Brian" writes: As far as the color picture, well, that?s just stupid. Why not ask for a hologram of the product? A fully working full-size model would be even better. But for s

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

I agree with John. We went through this when the new Machinery Directive came out a few years back. The directive itself only said, "description and identification of the machinery, including generic denomination, function, model, type, serial number and commercial name;", but the guide said, "A

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

COM(2011)773 final is the proposal from the Commission to the Council and Parliament. It does not represent a final draft of the directive. This and proposals for other directives are currently under discussion between all three institutions of the EU and are subject to further modifications a

Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!

The new DoC concept for the LVD says in COM2011-0773 (referring to 768/2008) ANNEX IV [Annex III of Decision No 768/2008/EC] EU DECLARATION OF CONFORMITY 1. No xx (unique identification of the electric equipment): 2. Name and address of the manufacturer or his