In message
!!AAAYAEGjmYsMtGZAuvo7rFLQ++figAAAELUXfMusF3RGmHp9E
2mI4mMBAA==@blueyonder.co.uk, dated Tue, 31 Mar 2015, John Allen
john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk writes:
And so what has actually changed with today's get rich quick senior
managers of both types in the last
Hello All,
We have had an enquiry from a customer about testing their special copper foam
material which is used as a heat sink and also doped with some ferrous
materials to improve RF absorption. I realise copper doesn't have great
properties as an RF absorber as standard.
We have no
In message
D7E9B3C7419B3F41B63AB79347D7D6C768C910BD3D@HEMC08.hemcs.local, dated
Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Julian Jones ju...@hursley-emc.co.uk writes:
We have had an enquiry from a customer about testing their special
copper foam material which is used as a heat sink and also doped with
some ferrous
I recall most if not all of the Acme products were delivered by USPS. I
believe Wile E had an Amazon account.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 2:12 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Basic
In message 006001d06c0b$4a2bd110$de837330$@cox.net, dated Tue, 31 Mar
2015, Ed Price edpr...@cox.net writes:
I beg to differ with you when you say that a conviction of technical
superiority is a 50-year old dinosaur attitude .
I don't think you do disagree about the nature of the attitude.
In message 005401d06c08$335793a0$9a06bae0$@cox.net, dated Tue, 31 Mar
2015, Ed Price edpr...@cox.net writes:
Yet it must be noted that Mr. Coyote never brought suit against the
Acme Company, despite a long history on non-compliant and generally
unsuitable products whose use often resulted in
The standard calls for IEC 60417 for the symbols. Currently there are 3
symbols to serve different purposes.
1. IEC 60417 - 5017: General earthing
2. IEC 60417 - 5018: Functional earthing
3. IEC 60417 - 5019: Protective earthing
5017 is being proposed to be withdrawn according to IEC
In message 93c5791b-7130-4436-a0a5-0c79f441e...@gmail.com, dated Wed,
1 Apr 2015, Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com writes:
The standard calls for IEC 60417 for the symbols. Currently there are
3 symbols to serve different purposes.
1. IEC 60417 - 5017: General earthing
2. IEC 60417 - 5018:
EN 60204-1:2006 and EN 60950-1:2006 define requirements for the use of those
symbols (and the two are not entirely consistent). So if you are applying
those standards I'd assume the symbol usage will still apply as stated until
those standards are revised, regardless of what the IEC does.
In message
bn3pr0801mb0979b779f7547b8b2a22ea6385...@bn3pr0801mb0979.namprd08.prod.o
utlook.com, dated Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Nyffenegger, Dave
dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com writes:
EN 60204-1:2006 and EN 60950-1:2006 define requirements for the use of
those symbols (and the two are not entirely
There is a general safety lesson to be learned, which needs to be
applied to every risk analysis. An irrecoverable situation (flight deck
door locked from inside and opening denied) cannot be accepted even if
the probability of a bad result appears vanishingly small.
This post is not meant to
Since its not difficult to map all the world on a single USB card
(including height information)
the plane itself might have enough information to simply refuse to be
led to ground under uncontrolled
circumstances.
Drones (even below 1000 USD) do autonomously return to their point of
departure
John:
could those in the cabin area be provided with a system whereby, in cases
where the cockpit gets taken over, it could allow them to communicate with
the someone somewhere to alert them of the problems
Hmm, like posting a sign on the bulkhead something like 1-800-gutentag?
Ed
Or lockout should be impossible unless there are two officers on the
flight deck (two security codes needed, not a toggle switch!).
That would be simple: to momentary switches to be actuated at the same
time
with enough physical distance between them
Gert Gremmen
-Oorspronkelijk
These type doors became mandatory after 9/11. Boeing was sued after 9/11
because these type doors had not been installed.
What is the manufacturer to do?
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Reply-To: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Date: Wed, 1 Apr
To all, thank you for some great input.
Many of you explained the science behind protecting a transformer from
overheating but unfortunately the CSA inspector don't care, nor has the
authority to make a decision or ruling; he can only apply what the CEC says in
this case, which really limits
In message edc30b20-1d80-413d-9ca1-1c9a16fdb...@gmail.com, dated Wed,
1 Apr 2015, Scott Xe scott...@gmail.com writes:
I received the attached IEC info for 5017 and wondering if it is also
outdated.
Of course; it is 13 years old and is only a liaison document from TC16
to TC3, not a TC3
In message d1418932.6b4da%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com, dated Wed, 1
Apr 2015, Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com writes:
These type doors became mandatory after 9/11. Boeing was sued after
9/11 because these type doors had not been installed.
What is the manufacturer to do?
I feel that
In message
64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB026D7789@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local,
dated Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:
It would seem our only option is to add overcurrent protection to the
secondary side of the transformer so we can size the Primary OPD so not
to
Doors should be opened by ground control officers via radio.
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sendt: 1. april 2015 18:38
Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Emne: Re: [PSES] Germanwings crash
These type doors became mandatory after 9/11. Boeing
In message 01d06ca9$c89b05e0$59d111a0$@westin-emission.no, dated
Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Amund Westin am...@westin-emission.no writes:
Doors should be opened by ground control officers via radio.
Or lockout should be impossible unless there are two officers on the
flight deck (two security
In another life, long ago, in a galaxy far away, was a member of a squadron
that frequently deployed detachments to isolated and not nice places. Our
security model was based 99% on exogenous events/effects. The only internal
influence considered was weapons proficiency and material assignment
In message
blupr02mb116c0fcff82f2c7c839ec69c1...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook
.com, dated Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
Is the failure of internal personel an extension of 'forseeable misuse'
?
It's foreseeable, but I leave it to Mr. Nute to say
In message
!!AAAYAEGjmYsMtGZAuvo7rFLQ++figAAAEIikrBPlu6RNlut8A
ucpoOcBAA==@blueyonder.co.uk, dated Wed, 1 Apr 2015, John Allen
john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk writes:
you think they could conceivably operate consistent and reliable
systems whereby a pilot says I need a
John
You do have a point - but, actually, there is a much wider one that IACO
could consider: that is, in such cases, could those in the cabin area be
provided with a system whereby, in cases where the cockpit gets taken
over, it could allow them to communicate with the someone somewhere to
Ken et al,
John has made a good point here. Ken's question points to the need
for backup measures which seem to be process oriented. In the USA the
requirement is reported to be that there always be two people in the
cockpit; when one pilot leaves then one of the cabin staff steps
In message
!!AAAYAEGjmYsMtGZAuvo7rFLQ++figAAAEFC36QsFDqtAlNsc1
kQ8nscBAA==@blueyonder.co.uk, dated Wed, 1 Apr 2015, John Allen
john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk writes:
Not realistic for a huge raft of reasons: air-to-ground-to-air
time-delays, comms issues, EMI issues,
John
Military drones analogy? - I don't think so!
In those cases you have dedicated (at least) two-man teams flying 1 drone
each on a specific operation.
In the real-life civil aviation industry, you have thousands of simultaneous
flights from here to there controlled by hundreds of
Not realistic for a huge raft of reasons: air-to-ground-to-air time-delays,
comms issues, EMI issues, language issues, situational awareness issues -
need I go on? !! L
-Original Message-
From: Amund Westin [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no]
Sent: 01 April 2015 19:29
To:
29 matches
Mail list logo
