I would strongly suggest that you go to the Standards Council of Canada
site at www.scc.ca wherein all that you are talking about will be come
clear. Look under accreditation and standards or do a search on the
site. In summary ULC is the following:
1) Now fully owned by Underwriters Laboratories
Documents scanning can be pretty tedious and as you have mentioned not always
resulting in what you want. I'm currently working on a trial test on document
scanning with a specialist in the field, Arimtec International. The web site
address is
http://www.arimtec.ca; and the president's name is
CSA sales can give you the most recent standards. You can reach them via their
web. I understand that the latest edition of the binational CSA/UL 950 can be
ordered. If you want to see the work programme for all of the SDO's in Canada
including CSA and then link to CSA start at http://www.scc.ca
To Phrase this differently CEN signed the Vienna Agreement with ISO and CENELEC
signed the Dresden Agreement with IEC. You can find copies and details on these
on many sites include ANSI. These have been the topic of
some recent discussion. CENELEC does try to follow IEC numbering and text where
Vitaly, your comment regarding CSA is incorrect. CSA is an NRTL just like the
others. CSA has a mark for NRTL approval.
Regards
G. Rae Dulmage
Gorodetsky, Vitaly wrote:
George,
You have overlooked MET, NTS, WYLE, SWRI and others. For a complete list
and the scope of recognition, go to
Carlos,
the answer to your first question is no. You will need to get approval for
your
products in Mexico. Their specifications are IEC derived in most cases. You
will need to obtan national approval through a Mexican agency or the Mexican
office of a Certifying organization such as UL, TUV
Dear Paul,
For the Japanese EMI requirements go to the VCCI website and look up their
information. Some is free and some has to be ordered. They are pretty responsive
people when asked a question. The Website address is:
http://www.vcci.jp/vcci/vccie/. For safety Japan follows the CB scheme
Douglas,
The IEEE Spectrum May 1999 issue pages 45-52 had an excellent article on
Fuel
Cells by Ronald H. Wolk. It gave a number of web site addresses for more
information about fuel cells as follows:
http://www.fetc.doe.gov
http://www.dodfuelcell.com
http://www.nfcrc.uci.edu
When I was the VP of Certelecom Laboratories I specified and purchased the
Com-Power probes and pre-amp. I did quite an extensive search and a lot of
phone calling before settling on this make. They certainly were very useful. We
also
had Electro-Metrics probes but tended to use the Com-Power
Lisa,
I don't think so. If you had the cable built with the ferrite included or the
ferrite
was sleeved in such a way that it was not removeable and your equipment was
supplied with this you can then provide a full declaration of conformity
provided
that you advise that they must use the cable
Yes India does have regulations. I have an extensive set of them in my office.
What do you want to know exactly and I will see if I can give some help.
Regards
G. Rae Dulmage, B. Comm.,
President
TelApprove Services Corporation
(613) 257 3015
http://www.angelfire.com/on/telapprove
George,
?
===
===
Graham Rae Dulmage grdulm...@sympatico.ca on 06/17/99 12:08:00 AM
Please respond to t...@world.std.com
To: t...@world.std.com
cc:(bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject: Re: Korean approvals
Bill,
If you
Kevin,
There was a list in the 1997 Compliance Engineering Reference that covered
Europe. I had worked out one for a number of other requirements for radio
services Worldwide and have them filed away in my office so I will look through
these and let you know what I find. I also found some on
In respect of type approval the Canada/Korea MRA for telecom and EMC does
not require a local distributor/applicant.
Regards
G. Rae Dulmage, B. Comm.,
President: TelApprove Services Corporation
(613) 257 3015
http://www.angelfire.com/on/telapprove
sb...@ctlsg.creaf.com wrote:
Hi David,
David,
The safety authority in Korea is Kaitech. In North America there is one
lab which
is approved to do Korean Telecom and EMC plus Radio testing and
approval.
This is KTL Canada in Ottawa. They also handle the safety side as well.
Suggest
you contact Ms. Ruth Varley at 1-800-563-6336 Ext.
John,
If I recall these items are classified as telephone accessories. Such companies
as
Leviton, Virginia Plastics etc. have listings for these. The concern is not
with the
overvoltage tests as much as with plastic rating, flamability, plating,
insulation
etc.
I don't recall any application
Both responses given so far are correct. It would be nice if we all eventually
come
to common technical agreement on common technical ground overtime. I worry
that we sometimes push the technical aside and rush in with alternate opinions.
In
this
case I see a lot of danger in shipping the
Dear All,
You may be interested in the Standards Council of Canada Export Alert
Service. This is a subscribable( no charge) service for WTO/GATT notices
via e-mail
and the provision by return request of the standards/regulations that
are being proposed or passed by various countries. The Web
Dear Jim,
Bruel and Kjaer http://www.bk.dk/; has over the years published a lot of
articles
on these kind of tests. In many cases they wrote or drove the test method
and/or
the standard. You can enquire of them what technical articles they have on
test
methods. They have offices around the world
Dear Eric,
I have a list in English of items requiring Chinese approval. I will pull
it
out of my files and check it after the Easter Holidays.
Regards
G. Rae Dulmage, B. Comm.,
President TelApprove Services Corporation
(613) 257 3015
http://www.angelfire.com/on/TelApprove;
Henning, Eric
Erik,
My own understanding of localized on-site operation is that this refers to a
factory
complex or compound and also to within a large building. In some cases this
might
result in outdoor use but this should not be taken as unrestricted outdoor use.
Given
the concern about Spread Spectrum use
Dear All,
Having been management for many years I'm not sure how to take that comment.
However let me jump into the fray a bit. I think we discussed this issue some
months
ago as part of a different topic. When I was at Certelecom we settled for a
number
of years on using DEC PC platforms for
Doug,
Tegam, Fischer and Pearson all make what would be called a current clamp
as did Stoddard and Empire Devices when they were around. Absorption
clamps such as Rohde and Schwarz and Schwarzbeck are not
the same as the above products in the sense that they are measuring
radiated emisssions
Lisa,
This depends on who was the tester and issuer of your 61010 report.
If it was your own company then CSA will need to retest. Your report
will be of use. If however it is an agency such as UL or TUV
or ETL etc. this may be treated differently provided that the product
is the same in all
Dear Mike,
If you are talking about MITI of Japan it is likely that it is only
a reference to a general requirement that is actually overseen by
a different group, for example JIS, JETRO or VCCI, etc. I've also seen
some Japanese manufacturers domestic purchase requirements for
EMI/EMC/ESD and
Scott,
Rough Translation is as follows:
Electronics
Acoustics and ElectroAcoustics
Electronic Apparatus
Information Technology Equipment
Audio and Video Equipment
Incubators
Vehicle Movement Speed Meters(this one can be translated different
ways)
---BeginMessage---
Dear Jason,
The Korean EMI standard is CISPR 22 based. The test site must be
10 metres. IBM had a number of test sites approved for Korean
EMI testing. Otherwise there is only 1 lab outside of Korea that
is accredited for Korean EMI, EMC and Telecommunications approval.
That is
27 matches
Mail list logo
