---
From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: 11 February 2016 23:05
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] NRTL invoices
Refusal to pay for any audit services rendered that the NRTL deems necessary
will result in suspension of right to apply their mark to any pro
> - Asia site - auditor writes variation notice
because hi-
> pot test level is too high. Their agency
required 2500V,
> another wanted 3kV.
> - Asia site - auditor writes variation notice
because
> product is being hi-potted twice during
production
> process, and because one test level is a bit
h
> - U.S. customer site - auditor arrives 0930,
inspects
> units that do not bear his agency's marks (and
have
> never been assessed by any NRTL), writes
variation
> notice, then leaves about 1100.
Why was the inspector allowed to inspect units
that do not bear his certification house's mark?
Do no
> Refusal to pay for any audit services rendered
that the
> NRTL deems necessary will result in suspension
of right
> to apply their mark to any products.
Pay for services rendered. If no service is
rendered, then don't sign that there was service
(and indicate at that time that there was no
serv
ement in the construction
report.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:27 PM
To: Brian O'Connell; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] NRTL invoices
When I was hosting the FUS, I had a rule that
inspection
Original Message-
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: 11 February 2016 22:27
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] NRTL invoices
When I was hosting the FUS, I had a rule that inspection would not interrupt
or disrupt production. I insisted that the inspector identify
sent managers
to oversee the inspections. Zero variances.
Rich
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian O'Connell
> [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 11:47 AM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [PSES] NRTL invoices
>
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:47 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] NRTL invoices
Generally good advice, and that was the first thing looked at -> just generic,
vague stuff about fe
ell; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] NRTL invoices
Check your contract!
> -Original Message-
>
> Starting last year, noticed that some NRTLs are
charging
> twice for same audit. For example - same
equipment
> category, same file reference, but getting
charged
Check your contract!
> -Original Message-
>
> Starting last year, noticed that some NRTLs are
charging
> twice for same audit. For example - same
equipment
> category, same file reference, but getting
charged
> factory FUS audit fees for both audit of
products in
> production and 'Produc
Starting last year, noticed that some NRTLs are charging twice for same audit.
For example - same equipment category, same file reference, but getting charged
factory FUS audit fees for both audit of products in production and 'Production
Ready'. Previously, was charged for PR audit only when no
11 matches
Mail list logo
