Even though it wasn't you point, Daniel, it should be noted that the CB
Scheme provides for participating NCBs to accept one anothers' test data,
but by no means guarantees that an NCB reviewing a CB Scheme Test Report
will not ask to perform some testing. The testing might be required by an
NCB
From: Robert F. Martin ITS/QS-Box r...@itsqs.com
Subject: RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 14:40:19 -0400
To: Laurie Mead lm...@qualmark.com, emc-p...@ieee.org emc-p...@ieee.org
Laurie- not one, but TWO advertisements in the same day!? tsk, tsk
Less seriously, I still favour the proposal to use DIC (drive-in
certification) in WC (World Certification mark), that some twit suggested
in this forum early last April.
Egon :-)
__
Egon H. Varju, PEng
E.H. Varju Associates Ltd.
North Vancouver, Canada
Separator _
Subject: RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Author: Knighten Jim knigh...@exchange.sandiegoca.ncr.com at INTERNET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:9/10/98 1:15 PM
Dan,
At NCR, we would vote for World Mark, which is the product
-3788
--
From: ron_pick...@hypercom.com
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 1998 5:06 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; knigh...@exchange.sandiegoca.ncr.com
Subject: Re[2]: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Jim
, 1998 9:07 AM
To: 'mmert...@modicon.com'; 'emc-pstc'
Subject: RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
We use the CB Scheme, and it does work to our advantage to a certain
extent. I only have to do the testing once and the other CB Scheme
countries have to accept the data
Well, not to be left out of the fray, I already have started my little
piece of the anarchy. I am down to two marks on the cert. label. I still
pay two agencies, only because I don't want to take on more work than I
already have. I do one test one time and, if needed, pass those results to
the
: Re[2]: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Dan et al,
Yes, OM, WM, or any other single mark would be much preferred over
the current
system.
But, let's keep things in perspective. Years back (well, maybe not
that far
back), it seemed that every counrty had its own unique approval
://www.qualmark.com/qht.html
--
From: UMBDENSTOCK, DON umbdenst...@sensormatic.com
To: 'emc-pstc' emc-p...@ieee.org; 'Dan Mitchell'
dmitch...@eoscorp.com
Subject: RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Date: Thursday, September 10, 1998 7:28 AM
Another slant -- it may be your
--
From: Laurie Mead lm...@qualmark.com
To: UMBDENSTOCK, DON umbdenst...@sensormatic.com; 'emc-pstc'
emc-p...@ieee.org; 'Dan Mitchell' dmitch...@eoscorp.com
Subject: Re: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Date: Friday, September 11, 1998 9:30 AM
Sounds crazy to have so many
To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'; 'dmitch...@eoscorp.com';
'ron_pick...@hypercom.com'
Subject:RE: Re[2]: Are all these agencies really
necessary?
Greetings,
A few years ago at a NEMKO seminar I attended, there was a
presentation on the key mark. Because
The company I work for routinely requests that I get certifications through
the following safety agencies:
UL, VDE, SEMKO, DEMKO, NEMKO, FIMKO, EZU, QAS, GOST and
ad nausium.
My question is this; Are all these agencies necessary? If you get a base
safety certification from
PSNet Dan,
The OM (Overall Mark) is a good idea that continues to be promoted
by industry, especially multinational businesses. Oh that they had control
to proscribe it... Remember that the underlying basis for all of this is a
political issue in that nations want to control commerce
...@majordomo.ieee.org
To: 'emc-pstc'
Cc: Dan Mitchell
Subject: Are all these agencies really necessary?
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wednesday, September 09, 1998 5:26PM
The company I work for routinely requests that I get certifications through
the following safety agencies:
UL
, 1998 6:50 AM
To: Dan Mitchell
Subject:Re: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Actually, there is such a system, of sorts. It's called the CB Scheme.
Various countries have banded together and agreed to accept each
others' certification marks. Unfortunately, there aren't all
...@compuserve.com]
Reply To: Peter E. Perkins
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 1998 11:57 PM
To: Dan Mitchell
Cc: PSNetwork
Subject: Are all these agencies really necessary?
PSNet Dan,
The OM (Overall Mark) is a good idea that continues to be promoted
by industry
Subject:RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Would someone please explain the OM (Overall Mark)?
Thank you
Charles Grasso
(Captain Hook)
EMC Engineer
StorageTek
2270 Sth 88th Street
Louisville CO 80027 MS 4262
gra...@louisville.stortek.com
Tel:(303)673-2908
Fax(303)661-7115
To: dmitch...@eoscorp.com
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 1998 11:52 AM
To: Grasso, Charles (Chaz); 'emc-pstc'
Subject: RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
The OM was just an example for purposes of illustration. A better name
for
such a hypothetical beast would
From: Peter E. Perkins peperk...@compuserve.com
Subject: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 01:57:41 -0400
To: Dan Mitchell dmitch...@eoscorp.com
Cc: PSNetwork emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
PSNet Dan,
The OM (Overall
-2537
Fax: 619-485-3788
--
From: Dan Mitchell
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 1998 10:53 AM
To: 'Grasso, Charles (Chaz)'; 'emc-pstc'
Subject: RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
The OM was just an example for purposes
ron_pick...@hypercom.com
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
Author: Dan Mitchell dmitch...@eoscorp.com at INTERNET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:9/10/98 10:52 AM
The OM was just
21 matches
Mail list logo
