ary 21, 2002 4:41 PM
Subject: SV: Company close down due to EMC phenomena
|
| To all of you who responded, here is the latest info.
|
| I have picked up the following:
| 1. 15000 units have been placed on the marked and 2 complains
have been
| reported to the Telecommunications Authorities. They c
mission.no
Sendt: 16. januar 2002 21:17
Til: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Emne: Company close down due to EMC phenomena
Well, this might be the reality in a case I have been introduced to lately.
Case:
A company are manufacturing PowerLine Communication products. They
communicate via the power l
is well below the threshold of sensitivity of the ADF radio connected to the
ADF loop.
--
>From: Mike Hopkins
>To: "'Ken Javor'" , am...@westin-emission.no,
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>Subject: RE: Company close down due to EMC phenomena
>D
g
Subject: Re: Company close down due to EMC phenomena
A technical response from an American. I sympathize with the viewpoint that
the duty cycle is very low and the on-time is very low and the potential for
mischief is near nil. I would add a further argument. 55022 CE limits
protect AM radio r
gt;
> NetTest | 6 Rhoads Drive, Utica, NY 13502 | USA
> web www.nettest.com | tel +1 315 797 4449 |
>
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: am...@westin-emission.no [SMTP:am...@westin-emission.no]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:17 PM
>> To: emc
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:39 AM
> To: Chris Maxwell; am...@westin-emission.no;
> emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: RE: Company close down due to EMC phenomena
>
> Guys,
> I don't think we want to forget that just one of these units will be
&g
amateur call: KB5UKT
-Original Message-
From: ext Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:19 AM
To: am...@westin-emission.no; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Company close down due to EMC phenomena
It sounds as though...
The ins
MTP:am...@westin-emission.no]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:17 PM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Company close down due to EMC phenomena
>
>
> Well, this might be the reality in a case I have been introduced to
> lately.
>
> Case:
> A com
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in ) about 'Company close down
due to EMC phenomena', on Wed, 16 Jan 2002:
>Questions:
>1. Is it possible to have different approaches within EU ?
No.
>2. Since PLC/PLT is "quite new" technology and since w
Close down? That's alarming. And probably not what needs to happen.
Power Line communication is controversial at the moment, especially with trials
underway in the Netherlands and some
deployments in Germany which generated high levels of RFI. (And appear to have
been exceedingly vulnerable to
e-
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:53 PM
To: am...@westin-emission.no; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Company close down due to EMC phenomena
A technical response from an American. I sympathize with the viewpoin
Hi Amund:
I suggest you and your client and the regulatory
authority meet to address the situation.
Here are the issues as I understand them from your
message:
1. In idle mode, the emissions are comfortably
below the maximum allowed emissions.
2. In transmit mode, the emissions exc
gt;To:
>Subject: Company close down due to EMC phenomena
>Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2002, 2:17 PM
>
>
> Well, this might be the reality in a case I have been introduced to lately.
>
> Case:
> A company are manufacturing PowerLine Communication products. They
> communicat
Well, this might be the reality in a case I have been introduced to lately.
Case:
A company are manufacturing PowerLine Communication products. They
communicate via the power lines and a typical link is between a consumer
residence and the nearest power station. The products can of course also
co
14 matches
Mail list logo
