I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris
wrote (in ) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Thu, 23 Aug 2001:
>ps there's no need to shout :)
Since it was the third time that I'd made the point, I felt that some
emphasis could be excused.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO -
-Original Message-
From: raymond...@omnisourceasia.com.hk
[mailto:raymond...@omnisourceasia.com.hk]
Sent: 23 August 2001 15:13
To: kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
I just found out the notes about the hipot testing. The standar
Subject: RE: Manufacturing
Hipot Testing
Raymond,
I'm curious...which standard were you reading?
Regards,
Kaz Gawrzyjal
Dell Computer Corp.
-Original Message-
From:
Just a viewpoint from one of those commercial test houses.
In Europe the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive are that a product
must be safe, be constructed in accordance with good engineering practice
and comply with the principal elements of the safety objectives detailed.
It does not say
ssage-
> From: John Woodgate [SMTP:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
> Sent: 22 August 2001 11:31
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
>
>
> I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris
> wrote (in ) about
> 'Manufacturing Hipot Testing
I read in !emc-pstc that raymond...@omnisourceasia.com.hk wrote (in
) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Wed, 22 Aug 2001:
>I have read one BSEN standard suggesting not to perform hipot testing at
>the test voltage, 3kV, 1.25kV or 3.75kV in mass production.
Which on
Raymond,
I've been in such a position where we contested hi-pot
testing each and every AC power cable which was sent
with every product during production line testing. There
were two basic reasons: one, for the reason you've suggested
possibly introducing a failure. Second, the time constr
hk'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
I don't see where that proves anything ( 1/2 voltage testing)
using voltage applicable to product is required.
Testing for one second checks for shorts and miswiring
or spacings that may have b
ymond...@omnisourceasia.com.hk
[mailto:raymond...@omnisourceasia.com.hk]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:26 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
Dear All,
I have read one BSEN standard suggesting not to perform hipot testing at
the
I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris
wrote (in ) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Wed, 22 Aug 2001:
> " Well, you have come to the right conclusion but for two wrong
>reasons.
>
>> In Europe, there are no longer any 'national approvals' like
...@interlock.lexmark.com
To: emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com
cc: owner-emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com (bcc: George
Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Re: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
Dear All,
I have read one BSEN standard suggesting not to perform hipot testing at
@majordomSubject: Re:
Manufacturing Hipot Testing
o.ieee.org
" Well, you have come to the right conclusion but for two wrong
reasons.
> In Europe, there are no longer any 'national approvals' like the old
> SEMKO etc. There is ONLY the Low Voltage Directive, and the European
> Standards (ENs) that have been 'notified' in the Official Journal as
> p
I read in !emc-pstc that Doug McKean wrote (in
<001001c12a54$2b315f80$3e3e3...@corp.auspex.com>) about 'Manufacturing
Hipot Testing', on Tue, 21 Aug 2001:
>IMHO, if I were to address the initial question regarding
>manufactoring
>testing of a product bound for Europe
The following is strictly opinion ...
I may be sticking my neck way out here, but it is my understanding
that any required manufacturing hi-pot test, with regard to UL-1950,
is contractual between the mfr of said device and the testing NRTL.
To my knowledge, there is no *requirement* within the s
: To: emc-p...@ieee.org
owner-emc-pstc@majordomcc:
o.ieee.org Subject: Re:
Manufacturing Hipot Testing
n.co.uk, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent by: cc:
owner-emc-pstc@majordomSubject: RE:
Manufacturing
owner-emc-pstc@majordom Subject: Re:
Manufacturing Hipot Testing
Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:49 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
I read in !emc-pstc that Peter Merguerian wrote
(in <2D1037012914D4118DB8204C4F4F50202D5CD4@ITLLTD01>) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing&#
I read in !emc-pstc that Peter Merguerian wrote
(in <2D1037012914D4118DB8204C4F4F50202D5CD4@ITLLTD01>) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Mon, 20 Aug 2001:
>Production - Line Tests (usually Dilectric Strength and Earth Continuity and
>in some cases like medical equipm
I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Maxwell wrote
(in <83d652574e7af740873674f9fc12dbaa675...@utexh1w2.gnnettest.com>)
about 'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Mon, 20 Aug 2001:
>I believe that it matters. For instance, in EN 61010-1 (Safety of Test
>& Measurement Equipmen
-(0)54-838175
-Original Message-
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:47 PM
To: don_macart...@selinc.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
Hi Don,
I'm curious
Which safety standard to yo
gt; NetTest Optical Division
> email chris.maxw...@nettest.com
> phone +1 315 266 5128
> fax +1 315 797 8024
> NetTest
> 6 Rhoads Drive,
> Utica, NY 13502 USA
> web www.nettest.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: don_macart...@selinc.com [SMT
ark.com
cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
Dear Group:
A Hipot standard which we must run for CE compliance requires that
circuit-to-circuit and circuit-to-ground testing be performed on a routine
basis. The test is applied for 10s. The products I deal
richard.pa...@tektronix.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:47 AM
To: don_macart...@selinc.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
Hi Don,
I'm curious
Which safety standard to
inal Message-
> From: don_macart...@selinc.com [SMTP:don_macart...@selinc.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:13 PM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
>
>
>
>
> Dear Group:
>
> A Hipot standard which we must run for CE com
I read in !emc-pstc that don_macart...@selinc.com wrote (in <88256AAB.00
640e1a...@edison.selinc.com>) about 'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on
Fri, 17 Aug 2001:
>A Hipot standard which we must run for CE compliance requires that
>circuit-to-circuit and circuit-to-ground tes
: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
Dear Group:
A Hipot standard which we must run for CE compliance requires that
circuit-to-circuit and circuit-to-ground testing be performed on a routine
basis. The test is applied for 10s. The products I deal with have many
circuits (Inputs, outputs, etc.) so test
Dear Group:
A Hipot standard which we must run for CE compliance requires that
circuit-to-circuit and circuit-to-ground testing be performed on a routine
basis. The test is applied for 10s. The products I deal with have many
circuits (Inputs, outputs, etc.) so test time is excessive . To spe
29 matches
Mail list logo
