RE: definition of manufacturer

*pymail error code parse 0AE Double woot points for Mr Crane - a response with actual code text. You are the engineer/man... Brian From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of lauren_cr...@amat.com Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 9:21 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE

RE: definition of manufacturer

A recent Council Decision which is part of the new CE framework triad gives some insight on the latest expectations for distributors. CE Framework Triad = Council Decision 768/2008/EC and regulations 764&765/2008/EC Some excerpts. Recital 23 The distributor makes a product availabl

RE: definition of manufacturer

:38:05 PM: > [image removed] > > Re: definition of manufacturer > > John M Woodgate > > to: > > emc-pstc > > 04/27/2010 05:35 PM > > Sent by: > > > > In message <213049.95688...@web36202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, > "gdstuyvenb...@

Re: definition of manufacturer

mc-p...@ieee.org cc Subject Re: definition of manufacturer In message <213049.95688...@web36202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, "gdstuyvenb...@yahoo.com" writes >Suppose company A manufactures, assembles, tests and CE marks a product

Re: definition of manufacturer

Isn't the company that places it on the Market responsible? Bob Heller 3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01 St. Paul, MN 55107-1208 Tel: 651- 778-6336 Fax: 651-778-6252 = wrote on 04/27/2010 03:38:05 PM: > [image removed] > > Re: definition of manufacturer >

Re: definition of manufacturer

In message <213049.95688...@web36202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, "gdstuyvenb...@yahoo.com" writes >Suppose company A manufactures, assembles, tests and CE marks a product >for available sale.  As a courtesy to customers, Company B makes the >product available by giving it a company B part number for t

RE: definition of manufacturer

PM To cc Subject RE: definition of manufacturer My experience with importing components and end products to the EU is BOTH -> especially if both are external to the EU and/or if company 'B' has applied the CE mark to its end-use box. And if others say no to the above

RE: definition of manufacturer

My experience with importing components and end products to the EU is BOTH -> especially if both are external to the EU and/or if company 'B' has applied the CE mark to its end-use box. And if others say no to the above - give me a good reference that can be inserted in the left nostril of vari

RE: Definition of system integrator

14, 2008 1:14 AM To: Grasso, Charles Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org; monrad.mon...@sun.com Subject: Re: Definition of system integrator In message , dated Sun, 13 Jan 2008, "Grasso, Charles" writes: >Thank you John and Monrad. I wonder though how this clinical definition >applies in th

Re: Definition of system integrator

In message , dated Sun, 13 Jan 2008, "Grasso, Charles" writes: >Thank you John and Monrad. I wonder though how this clinical definition >applies in the PC marketplace? > >Who is the "manufacturer" when an external USB drive is purchased >(by a consumer) and then attached to -  say - a laptop B

RE: Definition of system integrator

3 fax rpick...@rpqconsulting.com www.rpqconsulting.com <http://www.rpqconsulting.com/> _ From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Grasso, Charles Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 4:28 PM To: John Woodgate; emc-p...@ieee.org; monrad.mon...@sun.com Subject: RE:

RE: Definition of system integrator

w does the "manufacturer" of the laptop prove that his product complies with the EMC Directive with the plethora of peripherals available to the everyday consumer? Chas From: emc-p...@ieee.org on behalf of John Woodgate Sent: Sat 1/12/2008 1:49 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Definition of s

Re: Definition of system integrator

In message <4787e8ae.6020...@sun.com>, dated Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Monrad Monsen writes: >The same is true for Europe.  The "Guide for the EMC Directive >2004/108/EC (22nd March 2007)" does not use the term "system >integrator", but the guide does describe the system integrator role and >states that

Re: Definition of system integrator

The same is true for Europe. The "Guide for the EMC Directive 2004/108/EC (22nd March 2007)" does not use the term "system integrator", but the guide does describe the system integrator role and states that for the purpose of the EMC Directive that entity that combines/designs/puts together the sy

RE: Definition of system integrator

With respect to the FCC the following may be helpful: Title 47 CFR Part 2 Subpart J § 2.909 Responsible party. If the above hyperlink does

Re: Definition of "sanitisation" as defined in NSF/ANSI 184

In message , dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Kevin Chu writes: >Does anyone know where I can find the definition of "sanitisation" as >defined in NSF/ANSI 184? Two fifteen-minute sessions with Google and >nsf.org etc. just provide me with information on where I can buy the >standard, and I don't wa

Re: Definition of Residual Current

In message , dated Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jim Eichner writes >John: Are "such words of explanation" allowed in an IEC standard, or do >the standards have the same limitation applied to them as the IEV has? The same limitation. The IEV is largely derived from definitions in standards. Explanation ca

Re: Definition of Residual Current

In message , dated Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Ralph McDiarmid writes >Perhaps "resultant current" or "net RMS current" would have been better >than "vector sum". A vector sum implies to me, drawing the vectors and >adding them graphically, or adding their real & imag rectangular >components. Vector s

RE: Definition of Residual Current

e intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:35 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Definition of Residual Current

RE: Definition of Residual Current

ring Group Xantrex Technology Inc. From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:35 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Definition of Residual Current In message , dated Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jim Eichner writes >I am working on

Re: Definition of Residual Current

In message , dated Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jim Eichner writes >I am working on a standard for which a definition of Residual Current is >needed. I don't own any other standard that defines it, and I don't >subscribe to the IEC electrotechnical vocabulary (perhaps I should). At >any rate, I could use

Re: Definition of accessible terminals

In message , dated Fri, 20 Jan 2006, iun...@servomex.com writes >Are terminals on the rear of equipment intended to be rack mounted >considered to be 'accessible' under electrical safety standards such as >EN 61010-1, or its North American equivalents? The problem with 'such as' and 'North Am

Re: Definition of accessible terminals

Ian, You need to consider that there are open racks, ie with covers and doors and closed racks with keylock accessible only by service personnel. Also, even if closed, you need to consider that these terminals may be interconnected to other equipment that is user accessible and out of the control

RE: Definition of accessible terminals

Ian, Can the equipment only ever be used in a rack, which can be guaranteed to provide restriction of access or interlocked operation? If the answer to all of that is YES, then the terminals can be considered not accessible. If, however, the equipment could be used on the bench, or could be insta

RE: Definition of Telecommunication port

Paolo, I agree with you that ethernet port shall be tested for Cond. emission but it is strange to see that the immunity standard CISPR24/EN55024 only requires SURGE testing on telecom ports connected to outdoor cabling while EN301489-1 makes no differences between telecom ports connected to indoo

RE: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ?

: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:01 AM To: douglas_beckw...@mitel.com; John Woodgate Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ? even better Nice toque, Eh? -Original Message- From: owner-emc-p

RE: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with curre nt thread Re: Definition ?

p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with curre nt thread Re: Definition ? They've been listening to too much Max Webster, Eh. I think they need a little Moosehead and a beaver tail. Peter L. Tarver peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.

RE: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with curre nt thread Re: Definition ?

They've been listening to too much Max Webster, Eh. I think they need a little Moosehead and a beaver tail. Peter L. Tarver peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com > -Original Message- > From: kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com > > > What's that all aboot? > -

RE: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with curre nt thread Re: Definition ?

n - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ? Back in March 2000, I wrote the following piece for The Rochester Engineer magazine. I think it fits in nicely with the current "Definition ?" thread contrasting English English with American English. Regards, Jacob Z

English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with curre nt thread Re: Definition ?

I read in !emc-pstc that Pettit, Ghery wrote (in ) about 'English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with curre nt thread Re: Definition ?' on Fri, 25 Oct 2002: >Not to mention the lack of agreement on how to spell certain words that are >used on both sides. Color

RE: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with curre nt thread Re: Definition ?

rrent thread Re: Definition ? even better Nice toque, Eh? -Original Message- From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of douglas_beckw...@mitel.com Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:53 AM To: John Woodgate Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.iee

RE: Definition ?

Sys, GE Interlogix)" To: robert.s...@flextronics.com, chris.col...@tagmclaren.com, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc:(bcc: Don Borowski/SEL) Subject: RE: Definition ? For those telecom folks out there, how about the word 'butt' - the British term for test-set. The first

RE: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ?

. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ? Eh? John Woodgate @majordomo.ieee.org on 10/25/2002 11:01:45 AM Please respond to John Woodgate Sent by: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc: Subject: Re: English vs. American

Re: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ?

Eh? John Woodgate @majordomo.ieee.org on 10/25/2002 11:01:45 AM Please respond to John Woodgate Sent by: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc: Subject: Re: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition

RE: Definition ? Brit response from USA.

Ted, I think that what you meant to say was "Strangler than Diction"! G - VA -Original Message- From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Ted Rook Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:15 AM To: < Subject: Re: Definition ?

RE: Definition ?

me?" John A. Juhasz GE Interlogix Fiber Options Div. Bohemia, NY -Original Message- From: robert.s...@flextronics.com [mailto:robert.s...@flextronics.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:59 AM To: chris.col...@tagmclaren.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Definition ? I

RE: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with curre nt thread Re: Definition ?

Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:02 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ? I read in !emc-pstc that Jacob Schanker wrote (in <001301c27c1f$b550d880$6401a8c0@net1>) about 'English vs. Ame

Re: English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ?

I read in !emc-pstc that Jacob Schanker wrote (in <001301c27c1f$b550d880$6401a8c0@net1>) about 'English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ?' on Fri, 25 Oct 2002: >Back in March 2000, I wrote the following piece for The Rochester En

RE: Definition ?

Original Message- >> From:Ken Javor [SMTP:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] >> Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:48 AM >> To: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >> Subject: Re: Definition ? >> >> >> Screen is the Queen&

RE: Definition ?

And keep the blue side up in normal operations! -Original Message- From: jestuckey [mailto:jestuc...@micron.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:04 AM To: 'Chris Maxwell'; 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' Subject: RE: Definition ? And above the undercarriage of t

RE: Definition ?

October 25, 2002 4:21 AM To: 'EMC-PSTC List' Subject: RE: Definition ? "One that I especially like is the name for that little butterfly valve in a carburetor; we call it a "choke", but the British call it a "strangler."" In nearly 30 years of fi

English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ?

from a Brit in response to Jacob Schanker: A good, read :D My family always knew waterproof rubber footwear as Wellington Boots. The English vernacular being "Where are my Wellies?". This variety extends to just below the knee and are the standard footwear for outdoor workers. This contrasts

Re: Definition ? Brit response from USA.

Agree, in another lifetime of car tinkering never heard of a strangler under the bonnet !. >>> John Woodgate 25-Oct-02 9:01:29 AM >>> I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris wrote (in ) about 'Definition ?' on Fri, 25 Oct 2002: >In nearly 30 years of fiddling around with motorbikes engines,

RE: Definition ?

This is an interesting Friday morning diversion. On the bottom of most US auto down draft carburetors is a "throttle plate," that has a "throttle shaft" run transversely through it with a "butterfly valve" for each "barrel." The term "butterfly" has also been applied to the choke leaf. A side d

Re: Definition ?

I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris wrote (in ) about 'Definition ?' on Fri, 25 Oct 2002: >In nearly 30 years of fiddling around with motorbikes engines, racing cars >and more recently learning about aircraft piston engines for my private >pilots licence I've never heard the term "strangler" u

English vs. American - very off topic, but in line with current thread Re: Definition ?

Back in March 2000, I wrote the following piece for The Rochester Engineer magazine. I think it fits in nicely with the current "Definition ?" thread contrasting English English with American English. Regards, Jacob Z. Schanker, P.E. 65 Crandon Way Rochester, NY 14618 Tel: 585 442 3909 Fax: 585

Re: Definition ?

I read in !emc-pstc that Grasso, Charles wrote (in <70B321FEC75C704A846DEE3D856ACB1108418437@riv- exch2.echostar.com>) about 'Definition ?' on Thu, 24 Oct 2002: >And don't forget to put on your plimsols Now archaic. >when you want to jog, take >a bumbershoot Now archaic. >in case it rains

Re: Definition ?

I read in !emc-pstc that Price, Ed wrote (in ) about 'Definition ?' on Thu, 24 Oct 2002: >There seems to be more than a few instances of odd differences in British >and American technical terms. One that I especially like is the name for >that little butterfly valve in a carburetor; we call it a

RE: Definition ?

"One that I especially like is the name for that little butterfly valve in a carburetor; we call it a "choke", but the British call it a "strangler."" In nearly 30 years of fiddling around with motorbikes engines, racing cars and more recently learning about aircraft piston engines for my private

Re: Definition ?

I read in !emc-pstc that Ted Rook wrote (in ) about 'Definition ?' on Thu, 24 Oct 2002: >gearstick gearlever -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEAS

RE: Definition ?

TP:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] >> Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:48 AM >> To: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >> Subject: Re: Definition ? >> >> >> Screen is the Queen's English for what Americans call >shield.

RE: Definition ?

Email: charles.gra...@echostar.com; Email Alternate: chasgra...@ieee.org -Original Message- From: Ted Rook [mailto:t...@crestaudio.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:04 PM To: < Subject: RE: Definition ? Yep, and that's in front of the boot. The gearstick and accel

RE: Definition ?

> From: Ken Javor [SMTP:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:48 AM > To: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Subject: Re: Definition ? > > > Screen is the Queen's English for what Americans call shield. As

RE: Definition ?

10:42 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Definition ? The "windscreen"? Isn't that right behind the "bonnet"? Chris > -Original Message- > From: Ken Javor [SMTP:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:48 AM >

RE: Definition ?

Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:42 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Definition ? The "windscreen"? Isn't that right behind the "bonnet"? Chris > -Original Message- > From: Ken Javor [SMTP:ken.

RE: Definition ?

And significantly ahead of the "boot". Ghery -Original Message- From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:42 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Definition ? The "windscreen"? Isn't that right be

RE: Definition ?

The "windscreen"? Isn't that right behind the "bonnet"? Chris > -Original Message- > From: Ken Javor [SMTP:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:48 AM > To: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ie

Re: Definition ?

Thank you all for the response to "screened" / sheilded cable.. I think I got it now ; - } --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/e

RE: Definition ?

Hi Lisa, I believe a "screened cable" would be a shielded cable. Bill Fleury -Original Message- From: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com [mailto:lisa_cef...@mksinst.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:15 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Definition ? Hi all, Could anyone

Re: Definition ?

Screen is the Queen's English for what Americans call shield. As in Brit usage windscreen for American windshield. -- >From: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com >To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >Subject: Definition ? >Date: Thu, Oct 24, 2002, 8:15 AM > > > Hi all, > > Could anyone explain the defi

Re: Definition ?

What the Brits call a "screened cable", we 'Merkins call a "shielded cable". lisa_cef...@mksinst.com on 10/24/2002 06:15:18 AM Please respond to lisa_cef...@mksinst.com To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc:(bcc: Don Borowski/SEL) Subject: Definition ? Hi all, Could anyone explai

RE: Definition ?

Shielded. John A. Juhasz GE Interlogix Fiber Options Div. Bohemia, NY -Original Message- From: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com [mailto:lisa_cef...@mksinst.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:15 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Definition ? Hi all, Could anyone explain the d

Re: definition of "off"

Hi Chris: > What is clear from IEC60065 is that if a product is capable of being > switched on or off or both by a timer or a data link, a front panel > mechanically operated switch is not required. What is not clear is the > definition of off. Hmm. For me, the question is: What i

Re: definition of "off"

circuitry shall be disconnected and the input power in the off state shall be less than 15W. Ed     >From: "Lou Aiken" >Reply-To: "Lou Aiken" >To: "Colgan, Chris" , "'Emc-Pstc' (E-mail)" >Subject: Re: definition of "off" >

Re: definition of "off"

According to my understanding of 950, which is much better than 65, I believe a product must be safe, "within the meaning of the standard" during unattended operation and also when unattended in so-called "off" mode. Consequently, the status of the product when in the off mode, should be det

RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component

Dear Colleagues, One year ago I put together some information regarding this subject; (I have as well the Bibliography for it). In my opinion, all the participants at this discussion, made very useful observations. Respectfully yours, Constantin Constantin Bolintineanu P.Eng. DIGITAL SECURI

Re: Definition for Safety Critical Component

. Doug Beckwith geor...@lexmark.com on 10/31/2001 08:40:17 AM Please respond to geor...@lexmark.com To: emc-p...@ieee.org cc:(bcc: Douglas Beckwith/Kan/Mitel) Subject: Re: Definition for Safety Critical Component There are at least two possible definitions of this term. Under t

RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component

--Original Message- From: geor...@lexmark.com [mailto:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: 31 October 2001 13:40 To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Definition for Safety Critical Component There are at least two possible definitions of this term. Under the 60950 standards, these would be the components listed b

RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component

Division Bracknell, UK -Original Message- From: oover...@lexmark.com [mailto:oover...@lexmark.com] Sent: 31 October 2001 12:43 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component Gregg brings up a good point. I haven't followed all of this thread and I

RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component

27;; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component Hi Folks A few words of warning on the context of the above Most of the definitions or descriptions for "safety critical component" given so far are reasonably accurate and straightforward in the context of st

Re: Definition for Safety Critical Component

There are at least two possible definitions of this term. Under the 60950 standards, these would be the components listed by an approving agency deemed to be "safety critical". The other is any part, listed or not, that contributes to the overall safety of the device. For example, a metal hou

RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component

nt those of my employer. "Gregg Kervill" on 10/30/2001 11:25:48 PM Please respond to "Gregg Kervill" To: "'Doug McKean'" , emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee....@interlock.lexmark.com cc:(bcc: Oscar Overton/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: Definition for Sa

RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component - Safety Critical Fe atures

Hi Folks This is sent separately to my reply regarding IEC 61508 etc., as it addresses an entirely different issue. The decision as to what should be classified as a safety critical component ("SCC") in the context of 60950 (etc.) should take into account the overall construction and use of the

RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component

Hi Folks A few words of warning on the context of the above Most of the definitions or descriptions for "safety critical component" given so far are reasonably accurate and straightforward in the context of strict compliance with IEC/EN/UL EQUIPMENT safety standards such as 60335, 60950 61010

RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component

emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Doug McKean Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:43 PM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Definition for Safety Critical Component Definition for Safety Critical ComponentI'll add to Richard's definition by saying a &

Re: Definition for Safety Critical Component

Definition for Safety Critical ComponentI'll add to Richard's definition by saying a "Safety Critical Component" is a component necessary for the safety approval of the product. It's a component that prevents a person (end user or service person) from being exposed to a hazardous condition either

RE: Definition for Safety Critical Component

A safety critical component is a component were the failure during normal use, forseeable misuse and fault conditions is likely to result in a hazardous condition for the operator and/or service person (includes maintenance). Richard Woods Sensormatic Electronics -Original Message-

Re: definition of "type" certification

Susan, Simply put, a "type" certification is a 100% test by an independent certification agency against the applicable standard, of a single sample unit representative of future production units. The key words are "single sample". Typically, forthcoming production units are tested during manu

RE: Definition of Residential location

George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: Definition of Residential location There is a further issue because the generic emissions standard EN 50081-1 covers the "Residential, Commercial and Light Industrial" environment, i.e. the only one it does not cover is the real industria

RE: Definition of Residential location

There is a further issue because the generic emissions standard EN 50081-1 covers the "Residential, Commercial and Light Industrial" environment, i.e. the only one it does not cover is the real industrial (EN 50081-2). This means that all normal commercial applications require EN 50081-1 which s

Re: Definition of Residental location

EN 50081-1 specifically gives examples of residential locations as "houses, apartments, etc...". However, the standard lumps these clearly residential locations in with commercial and light industrial locations to create a single broad category characterized as all locations, indoors and outdo

RE: Definition of Residential location

Richard, There's a note in EN55022 after paragraph 4.1 which reads as follows: "NOTE - The domestic environment is an environment where the use of broadcast radio and television receivers may be expected within a distance of 10 m of the apparatus concerned." Jack Cook Xerox Corp.

RE: Definition of hold-up time

Dan, In my experience the hold-up time is that period of time where during a power outage the product continues to operate within specified limits. Of course the specified limits are determined as a part of the contractual agreement between the supplier and the user. Some people like to speci

Re: Definition of hold-up time

Hello, >From Keith Billings "Switchmode Power Supply Handbook": One of the major advantages of switchmod supplies is their ability to maintain the output voltages constant for a short period after line failure. This "holdup time" is typically 20ms minimum, but depends on the part of the input

Re: Definition of hold-up time

I wasn't sure about this, but went on the web to check. Power One's on-line glossary uses "within regulation" as their criteria. See: http://www.power-one.com/tech/glossary.html Regards, Doug On Fri, 28 Aug 1998, Dan Mitchell wrote: > I have a collegue that would like a definition of H