st?
Dave Spencer
EMC Engineer
Xerox Corp.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Rudd,
Adam
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 1:05 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: New Product Proposal
A little further investigation and I found this on the FDA/CDRH website.
Rudd
EMC Engineer
NCR Corporation
phone:770.495.2825
adam.r...@ncr.com | www.ncr.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Rudd, Adam
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:52 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: New Product Proposal
You can find the parts for
this
individual was reported to them? Would the FDA even bat an eye over an
individual?
Adam Rudd
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ted Eckert
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 11:23 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: New Product Proposal
This
From: Derek Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 8:40 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: New Product Proposal
Hi Ted,
now you knew this was coming
We discuss regulation, that INCLUDES OVER REGULATION. List server
members contribute to committees
: Thursday, February 05, 2009 8:46 AM
To: Derek Walton; Ted Eckert
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: New Product Proposal
Speaking of water, check www.dhmo.org for the straight scoop on this
dangerous chemical. Talk about something that need regulating! :-)
Ghery Pettit
From: emc-p
Definitely a new RoHS candidate...
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pettit,
Ghery
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:46 AM
To: Derek Walton; Ted Eckert
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: New Product Proposal
Speaking of water, check www.dhmo.org for the
-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: New Product Proposal
Hi Ted,
now you knew this was coming
We discuss regulation, that INCLUDES OVER REGULATION. List server
members contribute to committees that determine regulations and hearing
too many Nanny state opinions sways the regulation process
Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:57 AM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: New Product Proposal
>
> Hi Lee,
>
> I disagree: this list addresses regulations, and discussing excessive
> regulation is totally appropriate. You cant s
do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.
From: Derek Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:57 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: New Product Proposal
Hi Lee,
I disagree: this list addresses regulations, and discussing excessive
regulation
t; I have been in houses where mains cable has been nailed along the
>> skirting board and round door frames to feed wall additional sockets in
>> rooms, or in one case a power shower - that owner was actually proud of
>> such handi-work.
>>
>> C
>>
>>
&
r - that owner was actually proud of
> such handi-work.
>
> C
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Derek Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
> Sent: 05 February 2009 15:00
> To: James, Chris
> Cc: Taylor, Michael; Oscar Overton; emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: New
t owner was actually proud of
> such handi-work.
>
> C
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Derek Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
> Sent: 05 February 2009 15:00
> To: James, Chris
> Cc: Taylor, Michael; Oscar Overton; emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: New Product Pro
> -Original Message-
> From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf
> Of James, Chris
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:20 AM
> To: Derek Walton
> Cc: Taylor, Michael; Oscar Overton; emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: New Product Proposal
>
&g
additional sockets in
rooms, or in one case a power shower - that owner was actually proud of
such handi-work.
C
From: Derek Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: 05 February 2009 15:00
To: James, Chris
Cc: Taylor, Michael; Oscar Overton; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: New Product Proposal
hi
s were bad enough...
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Taylor,
> Michael
> Sent: 04 February 2009 19:36
> To: Oscar Overton; emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: New Product Proposal
>
> Doesn't th
: RE: New Product Proposal
Doesn't this dumb smuck realize he is liable under CFR 21: (sub J),
1040 for selling a class 3B laser that could toast some one's eye ???
I'm sure CDRH would love to see the Craigslist and the video.
// Michael Taylor
Loveland, CO
From: emc-p...@ieee.or
Oscar et al,
I looked at the video but I didn't see the required hazard marking
'Danger, laser lite, don't look into the laser with the remaining good eye'.
Br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Consultant
Tigard, ORe 97281
503/452-1201fo
Did you see the number of YouTube videos on this subject? YIKES!
Here's the link to the first guy's video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A69LTL7qb0Q
--
Doug Nix, A.Sc.T.
IEEE PSES
Toronto Section, Ontario, Canada
d...@ieee.org
mobile (519) 729-5704
fax (519) 653-1318
Find me LinkedIn at htt
.@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf
> Of Taylor, Michael
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:36 AM
> To: Oscar Overton; emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: New Product Proposal
>
>
> Doesn't this dumb smuck realize he is liable under CFR 21:
> (sub J), 1040
Doesn't this dumb smuck realize he is liable under CFR 21: (sub J),
1040 for selling a class 3B laser that could toast some one's eye ???
I'm sure CDRH would love to see the Craigslist and the video.
// Michael Taylor
Loveland, CO
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of O
20 matches
Mail list logo
