2011/6/7 Viesturs Lācis :
>> Try setting TYPE = LINEAR for [AXIS_0] - [AXIS_2] sections.
>> Probably EMC2 is considering them angular and limiting their jog speed
>> correspondingly.
> I will think about this. Thanks!
Actually some of [AXIS_0-5] parameters are world XYZABC settings -
velocities an
2011/6/7 Andrew :
>> I have a suspicion that problem lies in the fact that I have only 1
>> linear joint and 5 rotary joints in the arm. Could that be true? If
>> yes, how can I solve that?
>
> Yes, that's the key.
> I suspect that you have fast jogging only for X axis, don't you?
> Then the proble
> I have a suspicion that problem lies in the fact that I have only 1
> linear joint and 5 rotary joints in the arm. Could that be true? If
> yes, how can I solve that?
Yes, that's the key.
I suspect that you have fast jogging only for X axis, don't you?
Then the problem is caused by mixing axes/j
2011/6/7 Andrew :
> 2011/6/7 Viesturs Lācis :
>> I would prefer not touching this setting, because then it is very
>> difficult for operator to decrease override from 100 to 80% or some
>> other not-so-large increment, thus I find it not safe or at least not
>> good for quality of produced parts.
>
2011/6/7 Viesturs Lācis :
> I would prefer not touching this setting, because then it is very
> difficult for operator to decrease override from 100 to 80% or some
> other not-so-large increment, thus I find it not safe or at least not
> good for quality of produced parts.
>
> So are there no other
W dniu 07.06.2011 21:20, Viesturs Lācis pisze:
> 2011/6/7 Claude Froidevaux:
>> Le 07.06.2011 07:54, Viesturs Lācis a écrit :
>>> Hello, gentlemen!
>>>
>>> It seems to me that I am making another trivial mistake, I just do not
>>> understand, where and how.
>>> The thing is that on the robot max jo
2011/6/7 Claude Froidevaux :
> Le 07.06.2011 07:54, Viesturs Lācis a écrit :
>> Hello, gentlemen!
>>
>> It seems to me that I am making another trivial mistake, I just do not
>> understand, where and how.
>> The thing is that on the robot max jogging speed in is 60 mm/min. If I
>> set speed overrid
I found this message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg19677.html
and am very interested on what happened.
I am in a similar predicament, I purchased a EMCO PC MILL 50 without the
EMCO proprietary RS485 board and would love to get this thing working. I am
trying to lo
2011/5/31 Igor Chudov
> I am aware that this is a "can of worms". I will ask, nevertheless.
>
> I am becoming constrained by my approach of "just write G code for anything
> I want".
>
> Is there an inexpensive CAD/CAM package that is EMC2 compatible, designed
> to
> work with milling operation (
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 09:56:59 AM Kent A. Reed did opine:
> On 6/3/2011 3:41 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> > Hello, gentlemen!
> >
> > I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
> > g-code for a single-time situation:
> > The part consists of 3 pieces of tubes - 2 of them
2011/6/7 Kent A. Reed :
>
> I was away from my email when you started this thread. It doesn't look
> like you received much actionable information.
>
> Did you solve your problem?
Oh, yes, I have a g-code to play with! All the credit goes to Stuart Stevenson!
Viesturs
---
On 6/3/2011 3:41 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> Hello, gentlemen!
>
> I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
> g-code for a single-time situation:
> The part consists of 3 pieces of tubes - 2 of them need to be welded
> to main piece.
> What I need is to get a g-code that de
Le 07.06.2011 07:54, Viesturs Lācis a écrit :
> Hello, gentlemen!
>
> It seems to me that I am making another trivial mistake, I just do not
> understand, where and how.
> The thing is that on the robot max jogging speed in is 60 mm/min. If I
> set speed override to 200%, then I get 120 mm/min.
> I
13 matches
Mail list logo
