On Wednesday 15 October 2014 12:00:38 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 10/15/14 4:07 AM, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
I was so annoyed that the estimates for my 3d printing jobs were so
far off (estimated 2 hours, took 8) that I modified the axis code.
It looks at the
Yeah, I don't have the latest trajectory planner. 3d_chips was one of my
test files and came out ok without G64 settings.
Any suggestions on how to estimate with G64?
-Original Message-
From: Todd Zuercher [mailto:zuerc...@embarqmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2014 3:16 AM
On Wednesday 15 October 2014 17:06:57 John Kasunich did opine
And Gene did reply:
I just remembered that I had a detailed drawing of what I did. A
picture is worth a thousand words. See attached.
This was a test fixture for a small PC board. The main part of
the fixture was a board on the
I just used a standard IDC connector and a bit of PCB to keep the 0.1
spacing...
http://www.franksworkshop.com.au/images/pogo_icp.jpg
-Original Message-
From: Kirk Wallace [mailto:kwall...@wallacecompany.com]
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2014 6:51 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller
OT == Other Technology ? ;-)
On 15.10.14 12:50, Kirk Wallace wrote:
I recall some connectors used to connect board to board, where header
pins from the bottom board pass through the bottom of the top board and
into a connector on top. Does anyone have a link to such connectors?
Hi Kirk,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014, at 02:23 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
John, the connector on the DUT board, in red in that .pdf, a molex part
I have to assume although there are probably other makers, is, if used for
board interconnect in the real world, is a time bomb with about a 1 year
length fuse.
http://www.wired.com/2014/10/code-published-for-unfixable-usb-attack/
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push
On 15.10.14 16:45, Kirk Wallace wrote:
The example pin beds I have found on the Net have used vero(?) boards
which have .1 spacing, but the spacing I need is 5mm and .15 and I
don't have time to make up a custom PC board.
Ah, that's a lot harder, but you'd have 5.08mm pitch when using every
The probe sockets are designed to be press-fit into a CNC drilled
plastic or bakelite plate. The drawing even tells you what size holes
to use for a couple different plate materials. The plate determines
the mechanical location of the pins, then depending on which socket
you use you can wire
Guys,
Anyone have information on the above servo systems from siemens and
integrating to Linuxcnc
and reference material etc , at the moment i'm not sure these are analog or
digital
thanks Guys
Dave
--
Comprehensive
On 16 October 2014 16:01, David Armstrong cncbas...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone have information on the above servo systems from siemens and
integrating to Linuxcnc
JT has them on his Bridgeport.
But I don't _think_ that machine runs LinuxCNC.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
On 10/16/14 12:22 AM, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
Yeah, I don't have the latest trajectory planner. 3d_chips was one of my
test files and came out ok without G64 settings.
Any suggestions on how to estimate with G64?
You'd need to duplicate the functionality of the trajectory planner to
get G64P
The 611 only is analog and the 611D are digital .
Do you have the complete code for that servo drive ?
I do believe that with the Siemens product code you should be able to find
the PDF documentation on the net .
I used this servo system in the past years and it's quite similar to other
servo
There were several different versions of the 611 drives.
Most of them were velocity mode drives with analog inputs.
I have some old ones (1992 vintage) on a lathe that runs LinuxCNC.
They could be purchased with encoder or resolver feedback and a host of
other options.
Do you know how old they
The 611D's were also available with analog (+/- 10V) inputs. (many options)
Dave
On 10/16/2014 11:26 AM, alex chiosso wrote:
The 611 only is analog and the 611D are digital .
Do you have the complete code for that servo drive ?
I do believe that with the Siemens product code you should be
Yes Dave you are right .
The D should mean (digital) the technology used on the control boards .
Alex
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Dave Cole linuxcncro...@gmail.com wrote:
The 611D's were also available with analog (+/- 10V) inputs. (many
options)
Dave
On 10/16/2014 11:26 AM, alex
David this
http://www.automation.siemens.com/doconweb/pdf/840c_1101_e/611a_iaa.pdf?p=1
is the user manual of Simodrive 611 analog.
As I told you if you can get the Siemens product code you will find all the
docs you need . :-)
Alex
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:41 PM, alex chiosso achio...@gmail.com
Thanks Andy , i'll contact J T and ask
On 16 October 2014 16:07, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 October 2014 16:01, David Armstrong cncbas...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone have information on the above servo systems from siemens and
integrating to Linuxcnc
JT has them on his
I never did find really good info on the 611 drives. I have one on my BP
308 and if your using a RPC it better be a big one. The other thing I
can recall from memory is both my Siemens drives use the same terminal
number for the analog signal 56 or 58 I can't recall for sure. I think
Robh sent
On Thursday 16 October 2014 09:23:00 John Kasunich did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014, at 02:23 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
John, the connector on the DUT board, in red in that .pdf, a molex
part I have to assume although there are probably other makers, is,
if used for board
On Thursday 16 October 2014 09:31:08 kqt4a...@gmail.com did opine
And Gene did reply:
http://www.wired.com/2014/10/code-published-for-unfixable-usb-attack/
Loverly, just fscking luverly. The race between better mice better
mousetraps continues apace, but I think the mice are the leaders, and
Hi to all.
Wondering why the GOTO feature is a bad thing to have I was reading a USA
brand CNC manufacturer (Delta Tau PMAC-NC Pro2
http://www.deltatau.com/manuals/pdfs/PMAC-NC%20Pro2.pdf) and they use
GOTO as a standard function for the NC program control into parametric
programming FANUC style .
Hi
i did mistake -instead F0 i should say G0 and G1.
sorry.
i can see that G0 and G1 not remappable
but G code from ---14.2. Currently unallocated G-codes:
can be remap.
am i right?
thanks
aram
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:56 AM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 October 2014 18:23, a
in addition
when machine will read
G0.1 or G0.2 etc unallocated G-codes---
will system generate Error - unrecognized code or simply skip them and move
to the next ?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:13 PM, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
i did mistake -instead F0 i should say G0 and G1.
sorry.
On 16 October 2014 21:24, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
in addition
when machine will read
G0.1 or G0.2 etc unallocated G-codes---
will system generate Error - unrecognized code or simply skip them and move
to the next ?
If the code doesn't exist, that is an error.
If you have created
25 matches
Mail list logo
