> On Nov 20, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>
> Here's the report from my older Siig card :
> 04:02.0 Parallel controller: Siig Inc CyberParallel (2-port)
> (prog-if 02)
> Subsystem: Siig Inc CyberParallel (2-port)
> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV-
> VGASnoop- Par
On 11/20/2015 06:56 PM, jeshua wrote:
>>
> So I have installed the card, see that it has the parport_pc kernel
> registered, but cannot get it to go to epp.
>
> 08:00.0 Parallel controller: Oxford Semiconductor Ltd OX9162 Mode 0 (parallel
> port) (prog-if 03 [IEEE1284])
> Subsystem: Siig In
> On Nov 20, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
>
> On 11/20/2015 11:19 AM, Sarah Armstrong wrote:
>> i have quite a collection of parallel port cards that don't work with
>> Linuxcnc both pci & pcie
>> the only ones so far i have found to work are the startech ( after patching
>> the epp ) &
Do what the big companies do. Make up a big sign or list of things you
need to do and put it over your lathe..
You need to get tougher on yourself! ;-)
Actually a procedural checklist might make sense.
Dave
On 11/20/2015 1:48 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 18:10, Les Newell
> On Nov 20, 2015, at 11:46 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>
> n 18 November 2015 at 17:49, Jeshua Lacock wrote:
>> Long story short; I had to install a new PCI Parport card and I am trying to
>> figure out what address to use for my hal configuration file for Axis. The
>> card has the same CH382L chip
On Friday 20 November 2015 13:10:05 Les Newell wrote:
> > I wonder how a hall effect might work, to sense the chucks jaws
> > going by when it gets too close? I think I'd boost the length of its
> > output pulse with a one shot to make sure its triggering wasn't
> > missed though when the servo th
On Friday 20 November 2015 12:06:23 Jon Elson wrote:
> On 11/19/2015 11:24 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Did I see the number 9815 in the chipset someplace back in
> > the beginning of this thread? IIRC thats a netmos number,
> > and is known to not work at this location from several
> > years ago.
On Friday 20 November 2015 10:47:15 andy pugh wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 15:30, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I have probably worn off an eighth of an
> > inch off the nose of the compound feed since it usually hangs out in
> > front of the saddle. Just one of the reasons I have considered
> > re
thats exactly the cards i have here Andy
if you want a bin full , i can send you a few more !
On 20 November 2015 at 18:46, andy pugh wrote:
> On 18 November 2015 at 17:49, Jeshua Lacock wrote:
> > Long story short; I had to install a new PCI Parport card and I am
> trying to figure out what ad
On 20 November 2015 at 18:10, Les Newell wrote:
> What is wrong with having a switch on the saddle that trips
> when it hits an adjustable stop?
That requires me to remember to set the adjustable stop. If I can
remember to do that, then I can remember to check the soft limits.
--
atp
If you ca
Just thinking out loud here.
I have seen table saws that have emergency stop systems that use
capacitance (I believe) to sense when something (a finger) touches the
blade. The touch sensor trips a brake that stops the blade virtually
instantly.
I was thinking something similar could be used t
On 18 November 2015 at 17:49, Jeshua Lacock wrote:
> Long story short; I had to install a new PCI Parport card and I am trying to
> figure out what address to use for my hal configuration file for Axis. The
> card has the same CH382L chip listed in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/
On 11/20/2015 11:19 AM, Sarah Armstrong wrote:
> i have quite a collection of parallel port cards that don't work with
> Linuxcnc both pci & pcie
> the only ones so far i have found to work are the startech ( after patching
> the epp ) & one's with Oxford semi chipsets
> are the only ones so far i
> On Nov 19, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>
> On 11/19/2015 10:20 PM, Jeshua Lacock wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Todd Zuercher wrote:
>>
>>> Are you sure that is actually the right listing for your pci card?
>>
>> Hi Todd,
>>
>> Yes, I am sure, if the card isn’t in the machi
> I wonder how a hall effect might work, to sense the chucks jaws going
> by when it gets too close? I think I'd boost the length of its output
> pulse with a one shot to make sure its triggering wasn't missed though
> when the servo thread is the only one, no base thread to read it every
> 30
I am using two Netmos cards on two installs (one is a 9815 and the other is a
9865), and haven't had any trouble with either one. But I am not using either
one in EPP mode. I am using the ports with X-mode in Linuxcnc witch requires
the ports to be set to SPP mode.
- Original Message ---
i have quite a collection of parallel port cards that don't work with
Linuxcnc both pci & pcie
the only ones so far i have found to work are the startech ( after patching
the epp ) & one's with Oxford semi chipsets
are the only ones so far iv'e found to work just about out the box .
all the cheap
On 11/19/2015 11:24 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Did I see the number 9815 in the chipset someplace back in
> the beginning of this thread? IIRC thats a netmos number,
> and is known to not work at this location from several
> years ago. I then bought a StarTech card, which did work.
> But that wh
On 20 November 2015 at 15:30, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I have probably worn off an eighth of an
> inch off the nose of the compound feed since it usually hangs out in
> front of the saddle. Just one of the reasons I have considered removing
> it and replacing it with a block of steel
Right and belo
On Friday 20 November 2015 07:58:20 Les Newell wrote:
> On 20/11/15 12:30, andy pugh wrote:
> > One concern with any such idea would be that swarf might trip the
> > sensor. Some super-clever frequency analysis might be needed (3x or
> > 4x spindle speed) to tell the difference.
>
> A mechanical s
On Friday 20 November 2015 07:30:49 andy pugh wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 11:50, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Chuck strikes would seem to be so "tool mounted" a variable as to be
> > unsolvable.
>
> I don't see why. The same area of the saddle is likely to be at risk
> of hitting the chuck jaws in
On 20 November 2015 at 12:58, Les Newell wrote:
> A mechanical switch is probably best in this application. Swarf is
> unlikely to provide the solid push needed to operate a switch
The danger there seems to be that the chuck jaws might simply shorten
the plunger by a small amount each time, with
On 20/11/15 12:30, andy pugh wrote:
> One concern with any such idea would be that swarf might trip the
> sensor. Some super-clever frequency analysis might be needed (3x or 4x
> spindle speed) to tell the difference.
A mechanical switch is probably best in this application. Swarf is
unlikely
On 20 November 2015 at 11:50, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Chuck strikes would seem to be so "tool mounted" a variable as to be
> unsolvable.
I don't see why. The same area of the saddle is likely to be at risk
of hitting the chuck jaws in must setups.
I am not trying to protect lathe tools or the chuck
On Friday 20 November 2015 06:29:18 Les Newell wrote:
> I have a Denford Orac with a switch on the saddle and an adjustable
> stop that clamps on the bed. I also use another machine that has a
> fixed switch on the headstock and is an adjustable rod on the saddle
> to set the trip point. These has
On Friday 20 November 2015 06:00:00 andy pugh wrote:
> Has anyone ever tried embedding proximity sensors in their lathe
> saddle to protect against chuck-strikes or backing up against the
> tailstock?
>
> If so, any "lessons learned" about where to put the sensors?
Chuck strikes would seem to be
I have a Denford Orac with a switch on the saddle and an adjustable stop
that clamps on the bed. I also use another machine that has a fixed
switch on the headstock and is an adjustable rod on the saddle to set
the trip point. These has saved the machines from damage a couple of
times and I hav
I have the mechanical version on one of the lathes too, it is job
specific I dont see how a proximity switch could know all possible
errors of eg hitting jaws, chuck body or work or even the headstock.
The little denford cnc lathe has the electrical stop movable on the
bed.
Dave
-
On 20 November 2015 at 11:13, John Thornton wrote:
> My Samson lathe has an adjustable kick out for the saddle feed. I can
> move it along the Z axis to where I need the feed to kick out. It is
> under the saddle, I don't have a photo of it atm. You could do the same
> with a prox or switch.
That
My Samson lathe has an adjustable kick out for the saddle feed. I can
move it along the Z axis to where I need the feed to kick out. It is
under the saddle, I don't have a photo of it atm. You could do the same
with a prox or switch.
JT
On 11/20/2015 5:00 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> Has anyone ever
Has anyone ever tried embedding proximity sensors in their lathe
saddle to protect against chuck-strikes or backing up against the
tailstock?
If so, any "lessons learned" about where to put the sensors?
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
--
31 matches
Mail list logo
