Gentlemen,
Upon finding the Dahlih running the version 2.3 I updated the operating
system to the latest 8.04 and compiled 2.5 and made sure 2.5 was running.
Result - no more problems.
thanks for the suggestions and reminders
Stuart
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> Stuart St
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
> It seemed to have skipped the G2/G3 and moved in a straight line from the
> start point of the radius to the end point of the radius
>
Hmmm, well, as far as I know, I have never seen EMC do that. If you are
running a "stable
release" of EMC there, then I might run a
I will confirm this tomorrow. I am sure it is the current master as I
downloaded it yesterday. I will make sure what is really running.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Chris Radek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:00:55PM -0500, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
> > It seemed to have skipped the G2/
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:00:55PM -0500, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> It seemed to have skipped the G2/G3 and moved in a straight line from the
> start point of the radius to the end point of the radius
I believe this behavior was fixed in Dec 08 and/or Jan 09. The
commits are
7bb23946b541d7dfb
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> > Gentlemen,
> > Clyde just came in to tell me the Dahlih truncated a circle this
> > afternoon. This is during a program run that has made multiple parts over
> > the last two days. Does anyone remember the reason it
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
> Clyde just came in to tell me the Dahlih truncated a circle this
> afternoon. This is during a program run that has made multiple parts over
> the last two days. Does anyone remember the reason it did the same thing a
> while back?
>
Truncated? As in lef
Gentlemen,
Clyde just came in to tell me the Dahlih truncated a circle this
afternoon. This is during a program run that has made multiple parts over
the last two days. Does anyone remember the reason it did the same thing a
while back?
thanks
Stuart
--
dos centavos
On Monday 08 December 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 08 December 2008, Chris Radek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:25:43PM -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
Gentlemen,
The Dahlih cut the corners of a mill path. I had described this
previously. Clyd
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 08 December 2008, Chris Radek wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:25:43PM -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>>> Gentlemen,
>>>The Dahlih cut the corners of a mill path. I had described this
>>> previously. Clyde, the operator, told me he ran the path .005 deep and
On Monday 08 December 2008, Chris Radek wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:25:43PM -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>> Gentlemen,
>>The Dahlih cut the corners of a mill path. I had described this
>> previously. Clyde, the operator, told me he ran the path .005 deep and
>> it showed the path good.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Chris Radek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:25:43PM -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>> Gentlemen,
>>The Dahlih cut the corners of a mill path. I had described this
>> previously. Clyde, the operator, told me he ran the path .005 deep and
>
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:25:43PM -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>The Dahlih cut the corners of a mill path. I had described this
> previously. Clyde, the operator, told me he ran the path .005 deep and
> it showed the path good. He moved the Z down .8, reran the program and
> it
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> good idea Jon
> I will try that
> although the program doesn't just move to the end of the g2 line - it
> skips the g2 line completely and move directly to the end of the g1
> line that follows the g2 line
>
OK, now that you point that out, I see what you mean. Still,
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 08:34 -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Let me know what {and how :) }to do this.
Maybe start EMC from a terminal:
$ emc 1>1.txt 2>2.txt
This should redirect stdout and stderr to files. You can later look at
them in an editor, or view them as they are created in another term
good idea Jon
I will try that
although the program doesn't just move to the end of the g2 line - it
skips the g2 line completely and move directly to the end of the g1
line that follows the g2 line
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jon Elson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>>
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> when the machine enters this state it will repeat the incorrect behavior
>
>
Maybe you need to find out what programs and operating steps your
operator was doing before the problem happened. Perhaps running the
same programs in sequence will cause it to get in the sa
Gentlemen,
Now would be the time to set the debug level where we want it. We
should be able to send the output to a log file, create a cron job to
(maybe tar and ) purge the log file and capture all events until the
next occurence. Hopefully the next occurence will 'occur' soon.
Let me know w
> If it ever happens again, crank up the debug level and run it again. It
> would be good to know if the arcs don't get sent or if they just don't
> get executed.
>
Also, in order for that to bring a usefull result, please remember to run
emc2 from a terminal
(I think even if you run it from a s
On Friday 05 December 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The part looks exactly like the motion trace not the preview - at all
> overrides. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Ok. so much for that idea, I'll go quietly now.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap
when the machine enters this state it will repeat the incorrect behavior
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Stephen Wille Padnos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
>>memtest?
>>
>>
> It wouldn't hurt, but I'm not so sure it'll help either.
>
> Chris found a screenshot of the same
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>memtest?
>
>
It wouldn't hurt, but I'm not so sure it'll help either.
Chris found a screenshot of the same problem from some time ago (a
couple of years I think). I'm bummed that I didn't think to ask you to
turn up debugging and re-run the code. I guess I didn't re
On Dec 5, 2008, at 10:16 PM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> memtest?
Better ask someone that knows which memory tester really wrings out
the memory and is most likely to find the
different kinds of errors. I'm certainly no expert on this. I've not
run memory exercisers since my PDP-11 days.
Da
memtest?
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Dave Engvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
>>The machine was restarted and the very same program is running
>> correctly now
>>Unless during the program load something was corrupted in a
>> hi
On Dec 5, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>The machine was restarted and the very same program is running
> correctly now
>Unless during the program load something was corrupted in a
> hidden fashion
>
Have you run memory diagnostic on that machine?
Dave
>
> On Sat, Dec 6,
The machine was restarted and the very same program is running correctly now
Unless during the program load something was corrupted in a hidden fashion
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Jon Elson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
>> Hmmm. Can you post a snippet of the
On Dec 5, 2008, at 9:57 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>> Stephen,
>>I don't want to imply that I think the Z level affected the motion
>> - just passing along all the information given to me.
>>The motion is as if the g2 is g1.
>>
> Barring a completely flukey software bu
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> Hmmm. Can you post a snippet of the code that does this (at least the
> offending line)? If there are any #variables in use, can you check
> their values? I don't have anything specific in mind, but I can see how
> an arc with some wacky IJ or R value could be alm
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Stephen,
>I don't want to imply that I think the Z level affected the motion
> - just passing along all the information given to me.
>The motion is as if the g2 is g1.
>
Barring a completely flukey software bug, I doubt that is what
happened. Was this a heavy
The part looks exactly like the motion trace not the preview - at all overrides.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:10:27
To: Enhanced Machine Controller \(EMC\)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] dahli
On Friday 05 December 2008, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>Gentlemen,
>
>screenshot is here - http://imagebin.ca/view/7sXPYvWb.html
>
And that looks exactly like what a very slow axis screen update would do, cuz
it doesn't get to sample it often enough to draw a good follow. Are you sure
the part itse
i just copied dahlih.var to dahlihvar.txt - try it
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Chris Radek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 02:32:31PM -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>> Gentlemen,
>>
>> screenshot is here - http://imagebin.ca/view/7sXPYvWb.html
>>
>> all the configuration f
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 02:32:31PM -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> screenshot is here - http://imagebin.ca/view/7sXPYvWb.html
>
> all the configuration files are in the directory www.mpm1.com:8080/dahlih/temp
When I try to download dahlih.var or dahlih.var.bak, I get an
internal
do those corners work if done as R's rather than I,J?
On Dec 5, 2008, at 12:50 PM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> all of the g2's - the screenshot shows the path correct but shows the
> motion not following the path
> all three passes run incorrect
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Dave Engvall <
all of the g2's - the screenshot shows the path correct but shows the
motion not following the path
all three passes run incorrect
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Dave Engvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All of the G2's or just the one block?
>
> Dave
> On Dec 5, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Stuart Steven
All of the G2's or just the one block?
Dave
On Dec 5, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> screenshot is here - http://imagebin.ca/view/7sXPYvWb.html
>
> all the configuration files are in the directory www.mpm1.com:8080/
> dahlih/temp
>
> TRUNK - updated approx 30 days ag
Gentlemen,
screenshot is here - http://imagebin.ca/view/7sXPYvWb.html
all the configuration files are in the directory www.mpm1.com:8080/dahlih/temp
TRUNK - updated approx 30 days ago (unless time has flown a lot)
(relatively recent)
I think Clyde just ran the program .005 deep to test it. Edit
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:25:43PM -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>The Dahlih cut the corners of a mill path. I had described this
> previously. Clyde, the operator, told me he ran the path .005 deep and
> it showed the path good. He moved the Z down .8, reran the program and
> it
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>Stephen,
> I don't want to imply that I think the Z level affected the motion
>- just passing along all the information given to me.
>
>
OK, no problem there :)
> The motion is as if the g2 is g1.
>
>
Hmmm. Can you post a snippet of the code that does this (at le
Stephen,
I don't want to imply that I think the Z level affected the motion
- just passing along all the information given to me.
The motion is as if the g2 is g1.
thanks
Stuart
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Stephen Wille Padnos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
>>Ge
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>Gentlemen,
> The Dahlih cut the corners of a mill path. I had described this
>previously. Clyde, the operator, told me he ran the path .005 deep and
>it showed the path good. He moved the Z down .8, reran the program and
>it cut across the g2 corners. It is sitting in th
Gentlemen,
The Dahlih cut the corners of a mill path. I had described this
previously. Clyde, the operator, told me he ran the path .005 deep and
it showed the path good. He moved the Z down .8, reran the program and
it cut across the g2 corners. It is sitting in the state. Is there
something I
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:26:02 -0800
> From: Kirk Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Dahlih with EMC2
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> Message-ID: <
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 10:38 -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
> Update.
> Clyde complained last week about the Dahlih shutting down
> unexpectedly. The screen would shut off sometimes and wouldn't return.
> The computer would shut down completely sometimes. All of this at
> random
Gentlemen,
Update.
Clyde complained last week about the Dahlih shutting down
unexpectedly. The screen would shut off sometimes and wouldn't return.
The computer would shut down completely sometimes. All of this at
random times.
I tried to address the screen problem by disabling the scre
Gentlemen,
Day three - success
I will stop posting the successes today.
From now on I will only post the problems.
Anders Wallin posted pictures on his blog
http://www.anderswallin.net/2007/08/dah-lih-emc2-conversion/
Many thanks to the developers at the workshop in
Stuart,
Outstanding! Please, pics
Mark
At 05:10 PM 8/1/2007, you wrote:
>Gentlemen,
> Day two - more chips - parts good - conclusion - success
>agian - many thanks
>Stuart
>
>-
>This SF.net email is sponsor
Congratulations Stuart. Would you happen to have pictures of your
project?
Kirk Wallace
~~
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:10 -0500, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
> Day two - more chips - parts good - conclusion - success
> agian - ma
Gentlemen,
Day two - more chips - parts good - conclusion - success
agian - many thanks
Stuart
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log event
48 matches
Mail list logo
