Hi Peter,
I just figured out how to get it working again.
The patch seems to be based on a snapshot of the master branch
somewhere at the end of January.
On my machine I can reproduce the (very nice) results with these commands:
git checkout dcbaa105aaa5494ba5eea296ca66df893bd5c9b6 -b
cutter.
Regards Peter
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael Abel [mailto:c...@quasiinfinitesimal.org]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Februar 2012 11:17
An: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Martin Krüger
Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] Control a hot wire foam cutter using LinuxCNC?
Hi Peter,
I just
Thank you Andy, I will follow your instructions .
Regards Peter
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andy Pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2012 23:27
An: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] Control a hot wire foam
cutter using LinuxCNC
On 1 Feb 2012, at 19:03, Peter Georgi georg...@bluewin.ch wrote:
I found the file with the
patch from Lothar and downloaded it. So far so
good. But I do not have any idea how to install
it. Is their any procedure or just copy it into
the Axis directory and rename it?
I am in a hotel on my
Hi Peter,
unfortunately I didn't find time yet to work on my LinuxCNC foam cutter.
Mr. Sammel implemented exactly what I was looking for
a while. I manly use the cutter for wing panels
for model air planes.
I downloaded the patch. But how to install it,
that it runs inside Axis? Any
to install it,
that it runs inside Axis? Any hint or help are
very welcom.
Regards Peter
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ben Jackson [mailto:b...@ben.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Januar 2012 20:03
An: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] Control a hot wire foam
cutter using
Hi
I'll go to the workshop later an take a few pictures.
I just realised we had a photo on our website. It's only a low
resolution image, but I think it clearly shows the two vertical portals
(the blue frames) and the rotary table in the centrer and a block of
foam on it.
On 21 January 2012 15:26, Florian Rist fr...@fs.tum.de wrote:
A nice feature of this machine is, that is uses a strain gauge to
measure the tension of the cutting wire and to control a motor to
automatically adjust the wire length to maintain a certain tension.
I wonder if you could monitor
2012/1/20 Florian Rist fr...@fs.tum.de:
Hi Viesturs
Do I understand correctly that actual layout of the joints in Your
machine is that rotary table rotates around vertical axis, but portals
are alligned so that XY and UV planes are vertical and Z is
horizontal?
I opened the link
Hi
Could You, please, draw and paste somewhere a sketch? I kind of
understand, but am not sure.
I'll go to the workshop later an take a few pictures.
Does anyone know how axis might be used to visualise the tool path and
the machine?
See you
Flo
On 20 January 2012 15:14, Florian Rist fr...@fs.tum.de wrote:
Does anyone know how axis might be used to visualise the tool path and
the machine?
Sammel has been working on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWOzqALWa3c
patch:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 03:32:24PM +, andy pugh wrote:
Sammel has been working on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWOzqALWa3c
patch:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4F154BE7.4010702%40gmx.deforum_name=emc-developers
You can set [TRAJ]COORDINATES to limit
2012/1/19 Florian Rist fr...@fs.tum.de:
Hi,
has anyone ever used LinuxCNC to control a 5axis (two x/y-portals and a
rotary table )hot wire cutter?
I own one of these machines:
http://en.step-four.at/hp2/index.php?action=450
And I'd like to overcome some of the limitations of the
Hi Viesturs
Since both of these options are possible, I think that the choice depends on:
1) Your skill and will to work on kinematics module;
Hmm... I one compiled the millkins kinematics module (trivial kinematics
extended by XY skew correction), and I'm more or less familiar whit C/C++.
On 19 January 2012 21:14, Florian Rist fr...@fs.tum.de wrote:
What would you think makes more sense as tool path specification, a x/y
positions and three angels or two x/y positions and one angel?
I would go for XY and angles. You can't do (G3, G2) curves in UV, and
using angles instead
Hi Andy
What would you think makes more sense as tool path specification, a x/y
positions and three angels or two x/y positions and one angel?
I would go for XY and angles. You can't do (G3, G2) curves in UV, and
using angles instead probably bypasses that difficulty.
Ah, OK. Most probably
2012/1/19 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
On 19 January 2012 21:14, Florian Rist fr...@fs.tum.de wrote:
What would you think makes more sense as tool path specification, a x/y
positions and three angels or two x/y positions and one angel?
I would go for XY and angles. You can't do (G3, G2)
2012/1/19 Florian Rist fr...@fs.tum.de:
Hi Andy
What would you think makes more sense as tool path specification, a x/y
positions and three angels or two x/y positions and one angel?
I would go for XY and angles. You can't do (G3, G2) curves in UV, and
using angles instead probably bypasses
Hi Viesturs
Do I understand correctly that actual layout of the joints in Your
machine is that rotary table rotates around vertical axis, but portals
are alligned so that XY and UV planes are vertical and Z is
horizontal?
I opened the link You posted in first message, but I saw some
19 matches
Mail list logo
