Re: [E-devel] Source tree - tidyup for 1.0 ?

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
On 12/20/2010 02:26 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Dear Kim, > > I very much like your idea, but I think it can be done after the > release. And since svn doesn't like moving files around, it will be a > pain to do it now. > > Many people have many local changes to most of the core libs (waiting to > mer

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/e/src/modules/gadman

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
On 12/20/2010 12:15 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:19:47 -0500 > Christopher Michael wrote: > >> On 12/19/2010 05:06 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:36:28 -0800 >>> "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: >>> Log: fixes a segv when trying to add systra

Re: [E-devel] Source tree - tidyup for 1.0 ?

2010-12-19 Thread Tom Hacohen
Dear Kim, I very much like your idea, but I think it can be done after the release. And since svn doesn't like moving files around, it will be a pain to do it now. Many people have many local changes to most of the core libs (waiting to merge them upstream after the release), and as I said, svn d

Re: [E-devel] Using bold fonts in Edje

2010-12-19 Thread Tom Hacohen
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 11:03 +0900, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > Hello, > Olivier Duclos, this is what we talked about earier. > and it looks like evas doesn't support this feature :( > > I faced the same problem and I'm using separate bold fonts. > At this moment it is required to use bold fonts. >

Re: [E-devel] elm_label patch(ellipsis, sliding)

2010-12-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:46:24 +0900 Hyoyoung Chang said: ok. here's some feedback. 1. 0001 and 0002 are really the same patchset. so in future just send those as 1 patch. 2. it's an improvement on what was there, but the more i lok at it, the more this needs to move into edje. it's too inefficien

Re: [E-devel] [Patch] elm_genlist multi-touch smart callbacks added

2010-12-19 Thread Jeonghyun Yun
Hello, I modified name and added doxyen. Please refer to below. "multi,swipe,left" - This is called when the genlist is multi-touch swiped left. "multi,swipe,right" - This is called when the genlist is multi-touch swiped right. "multi,swipe,up" - This is called when the genlist is multi-touch swi

Re: [E-devel] [Patch] elm_genlist multi-touch smart callbacks added

2010-12-19 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
Hello, How about using below names for smart callbacks? "multi,swipe,left" - Genlist has been multi-touch swept left. "multi,swipe,right" - Genlist has been multi-touch swept right. "multi,swipe,up" - Genlist has been multi-touch swept top. "multi,swpie,down" - Genlist has been multi-touch swept

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/e/src/modules/gadman

2010-12-19 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:19:47 -0500 Christopher Michael wrote: > On 12/19/2010 05:06 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:36:28 -0800 > > "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > > > >> Log: > >> fixes a segv when trying to add systray gadget to desktop; someone who > >> knows gadman modul

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] elm scroller, scrolled entry: events propagation, min size

2010-12-19 Thread Myungjae Lee
Thank you, Raster. I'll keep your advices in mind. :) -Original Message- From: Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [mailto:ras...@rasterman.com] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 7:47 PM To: Myungjae Lee Cc: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] elm scroll

[E-devel] [Patch] elm_map module patch

2010-12-19 Thread sangho park
Dear all, This is a patch for elm_map module. when app developers or companies want to use specific license map (i.e google map), module is needed. - add new map provider for module "ELM_MAP_SOURCE_MODULE". - add test_map module. - add test code for module provider. - add my name to AUTHORS. Inde

[E-devel] Order saving

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
SEB, W/ this commit, http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/54232/trunk/e/src/modules/conf_applications, you broke Order File Saving.. I'll fix if you don't have time ... ? dh -- "If C gives you enough rope to hang yourself, then C++ gives you enough rope to bind and gag your neighborho

Re: [E-devel] how to do ecore_con_url POSTs?

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
On 12/19/2010 08:13 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > At Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:24:12 +, > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: >> >> Em 17-12-2010 15:51, Raphael Kubo da Costa escreveu: >>> Yes, I think so. My concern now is how you're going to decide whether to >>> send >>> a GET or a POST depending

Re: [E-devel] Webkit Efl

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
On 12/19/2010 06:53 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:33:24 -0500 Christopher Michael > said: > >> Hi All, >> >> Was just wondering ... does the efl port of WebKit support editing yet ? >> >> Thanks, >> dh > > i don't think so :( i think that would be needed to be

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] elm box: extended mode added

2010-12-19 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
Hello, For these two APIs, 'elm_box_pack_start / evas_object_box_prepend', 'elm_box_pack_end / evas_object_box_append', it looks like evas_object_box APIs are more general compared to other elementary API names. Why elm_box is so different? I have the same question with Myungjae Lee. Thanks. Dani

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
On 12/19/2010 06:52 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:29:36 +0100 Thomas Sachau said: > >> Am 19.12.2010 14:16, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): >>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau said: >>> Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Hai

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/e/src/modules/gadman

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
On 12/19/2010 05:06 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:36:28 -0800 > "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > >> Log: >> fixes a segv when trying to add systray gadget to desktop; someone who knows >> gadman module please review! >> >> Author: discomfitor >> Date: 2010-12-19 1

Re: [E-devel] configure.ac change proposal

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
That's git's problem, yea ? dh On 12/19/2010 04:32 PM, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:18 -0500, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote : >> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:36:57 -0500 >> Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >> >>> Currently we use some really ugly shell scripting to grab the svn revision >>> of >>

Re: [E-devel] configure.ac change proposal

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
On 12/19/2010 03:36 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > Currently we use some really ugly shell scripting to grab the svn revision of > our packages. I propose that we change this to what I have been using with > the > darkness theme for some time: > > current: > (svnversion "${SVN_REPO_PATH:-.}" | gr

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] elm box: extended mode added

2010-12-19 Thread Myungjae Lee
Hi, Gustavo. Thank you for your opinion. First, I'd like to ask one thing. Why does elm_box use its own layout function instead of one of the evas_object_box layout functions? Because I don't know the history fully, can you or anybody here explain it to me briefly? When I implemented some box r

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Mike McCormack
On 12/19/2010 09:26 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > test the package. As already said, tests should not require external services > like X to run and if > some tests need such a service, they should be skipped or there should be an > option to skip them. You want to verify EFL, which is all about gr

Re: [E-devel] Using bold fonts in Edje

2010-12-19 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
Hello, Olivier Duclos, this is what we talked about earier. and it looks like evas doesn't support this feature :( I faced the same problem and I'm using separate bold fonts. At this moment it is required to use bold fonts. We may add bold feature to evas someday :) Thanks. Daniel Juyung Seo (Seo

Re: [E-devel] how to do ecore_con_url POSTs?

2010-12-19 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
At Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:24:12 +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > Em 17-12-2010 15:51, Raphael Kubo da Costa escreveu: > > Yes, I think so. My concern now is how you're going to decide whether to > > send > > a GET or a POST depending only on data's value. > > It's a bad assumption all arou

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:01:30 +0100 Albin Tonnerre said: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:14 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote : > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:28:20 +0100 Albin Tonnerre said: > > > > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : > > > > tests are for developpers, not packagers > > >

Re: [E-devel] Webkit Efl

2010-12-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:33:24 -0500 Christopher Michael said: > Hi All, > > Was just wondering ... does the efl port of WebKit support editing yet ? > > Thanks, > dh i don't think so :( i think that would be needed to be added. -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:02:54 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri said: > > more answers > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : > >> tests are for developpers, not packagers > > > > That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuite

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:29:36 +0100 Thomas Sachau said: > Am 19.12.2010 14:16, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau said: > > > >> Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > >>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Tho

Re: [E-devel] configure.ac change proposal

2010-12-19 Thread Michael Jennings
On Sunday, 19 December 2010, at 23:47:43 (+0100), Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > The spec files use: > > > > svnversion | sed 's/[^0-9].*$//' || echo > > > > which is portable. > > One important differences is that it picks up M if you have any local > changes. Check again. :) Michael --

Re: [E-devel] configure.ac change proposal

2010-12-19 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 02:20:21PM -0800, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Sunday, 19 December 2010, at 22:30:18 (+0100), > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > "grep -o" is not portable. Can't you do: > > > > svnversion -n "${SVN_REPO_PATH:-.}"| sed 's,^\([0-9]*\).*$,\1,' > > The spec files use: >

Re: [E-devel] configure.ac change proposal

2010-12-19 Thread Michael Jennings
On Sunday, 19 December 2010, at 22:30:18 (+0100), Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > "grep -o" is not portable. Can't you do: > > svnversion -n "${SVN_REPO_PATH:-.}"| sed 's,^\([0-9]*\).*$,\1,' The spec files use: svnversion | sed 's/[^0-9].*$//' || echo which is portable. Michael -- Mi

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/e/src/modules/gadman

2010-12-19 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:36:28 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > Log: > fixes a segv when trying to add systray gadget to desktop; someone who knows > gadman module please review! > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2010-12-19 13:36:27 -0800 (Sun, 19 Dec 2010) > New Revision: 55647 > T

Re: [E-devel] configure.ac change proposal

2010-12-19 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 03:36:57PM -0500, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > changed: > svnversion -n "${SVN_REPO_PATH:-.}"|grep -Eo "^[0-9]+" "grep -o" is not portable. Can't you do: svnversion -n "${SVN_REPO_PATH:-.}"| sed 's,^\([0-9]*\).*$,\1,' for much the same result? Joerg --

Re: [E-devel] configure.ac change proposal

2010-12-19 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:18 -0500, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote : > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:36:57 -0500 > Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > Currently we use some really ugly shell scripting to grab the svn revision > > of > > our packages. I propose that we change this to what I have been using with > > t

Re: [E-devel] configure.ac change proposal

2010-12-19 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:36:57 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > Currently we use some really ugly shell scripting to grab the svn revision of > our packages. I propose that we change this to what I have been using with > the darkness theme for some time: > > current: > (svnversion "${SVN_REPO_PAT

[E-devel] configure.ac change proposal

2010-12-19 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
Currently we use some really ugly shell scripting to grab the svn revision of our packages. I propose that we change this to what I have been using with the darkness theme for some time: current: (svnversion "${SVN_REPO_PATH:-.}" | grep -v export || echo 0) | awk -F : '{printf("%s\n", $1);}' | tr

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:02 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : > >I understand users not listening or unwilling to fix the suite to fit their > >needs is a pain, but let's not make it an even greater pain for people who > >just > >want to use it and manage to. Things have improved a lot as far as packagin

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:49 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : > > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > > >On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : > >>tests are for developpers, not packagers > > > >That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple > >reaso

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Vincent Torri
more answers On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : >> tests are for developpers, not packagers > > That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason: > as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code, t

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : >> tests are for developpers, not packagers > > That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason: > as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code, that will neve

[E-devel] Webkit Efl

2010-12-19 Thread Christopher Michael
Hi All, Was just wondering ... does the efl port of WebKit support editing yet ? Thanks, dh -- "If C gives you enough rope to hang yourself, then C++ gives you enough rope to bind and gag your neighborhood, rig the sails on a small ship, and still have enough rope to hang yourself from the ya

[E-devel] Source tree - tidyup for 1.0 ?

2010-12-19 Thread Kim Lester
Coming from the outside the SVN trunk seems like, how can I put it nicely, a mess. No offence I know it's a working thing but can I suggest for 1.0 that we tidy it up. I don't mind helping. In my simple world view there are two main things I might expect to check out (with the option of doing

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment web site - please review

2010-12-19 Thread Kim Lester
My thoughts take them constructively :-) Overall the pages look nice - good job. I have some small points of feedback: 1) http://e-www.thecharbneaus.com/p.php?p=contribute&l=en "See our Ecoding and Guidelines articles for more information." a) I've been cleaning up the web site a bit. May I su

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 19.12.2010 14:16, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau said: > >> Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): >>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau said: >>> >> packagers should test the package, before

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:14 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote : > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:28:20 +0100 Albin Tonnerre said: > > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : > > > tests are for developpers, not packagers > > > > That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:26:21 +0100 Thomas Sachau said: > Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau said: > > > >> Attached is a build log with the failures. > > > > ok. since your position is that tests should work even

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:28:20 +0100 Albin Tonnerre said: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : > > tests are for developpers, not packagers > > That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason: > as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code,

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 19.12.2010 04:51, schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:14:02 +0100 Thomas Sachau said: > >> Attached is a build log with the failures. > > ok. since your position is that tests should work even if u enable them and > they cant connect to a display, or that we nee

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: rfonseca trunk/SCRIPTS

2010-12-19 Thread Tom Hacohen
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 13:12 +0100, Dave Andreoli wrote: > Sorry, but I disagree with this commit, there are better scripts for > doing this (easy_e17, reasy and the one raster have on his site). none > of the 3 was never begun the 'official' one. Putting your in svn make > it > more official. > >

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: rfonseca trunk/SCRIPTS

2010-12-19 Thread Dave Andreoli
2010/12/17 Enlightenment SVN : > Log: > Add a simple script to compile EFL. > >  This script is intended for newcomers to compile all the main libraries and > e17 >  desktop. > >  To avoid issues mixing different compiled versions, at each execution the >  script will make the instalation in a dir

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:11 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote : > tests are for developpers, not packagers That is terribly wrong. Packagers care about testsuites for one simple reason: as thoroughly as developers may be testing the code, that will never guarantee proper behaviour on the system on which th

Re: [E-devel] Failed to add poll on fd 18 (errno = 17)!

2010-12-19 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:33:52 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:25:54 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz > said: > > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:11:27 +0100 > > Cedric BAIL wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz > > > wrote: > > > > On Sat,

Re: [E-devel] Using bold fonts in Edje

2010-12-19 Thread Tom Hacohen
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 09:35 +0100, Olivier Duclos wrote: ... > style { > name: "cool_button"; > base: "font=TomsonTalks:style=Bold font_size=40"; > } > > The font TomsonTalks.ttf is embedded in the .edj file. > > The problem is, when I run my application, t

Re: [E-devel] Enlightenment web site - please review

2010-12-19 Thread Jesse Charbneau
On Dec 19, 2010, at 1:21 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, Jesse Charbneau wrote: > >> >> On Dec 17, 2010, at 6:08 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Fri,

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Kim Lester wrote: > All, > > I've not been around here long enough to know/care _where_ tests are located. > Nor have I studied the tests in question (so I probably don't know what I'm > talking about :-) ) > > However I have been a developer long enough to know that ideall

Re: [E-devel] ecore tests fail with beta3 tarballs

2010-12-19 Thread Kim Lester
All, I've not been around here long enough to know/care _where_ tests are located. Nor have I studied the tests in question (so I probably don't know what I'm talking about :-) ) However I have been a developer long enough to know that ideally all tests should be self contained. Tests should ne