Re: [E-devel] change e background via eesh

2004-12-16 Thread BAM
st 512" # use a defined background eesh -e "use_bg NAME 0" (these are undocumented, AKAIK) -- BAM - "It seems like once people grow up, they have no idea what's cool." -- Calvin --- SF email is spo

Re: [E-devel] Re: Checking out e17 from cvs???

2004-12-01 Thread BAM
edb file and puts it somewhere else than /etc (say /var/cache > > for instance). > > ooh yay! 2 configuration files and not knowing which one is actually being used. Right, and then somebody can write e17keyedit, which changes the cached config and not the real one! (Though till's

Re: [E-devel] members-only: question

2004-03-13 Thread BAM
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 09:20, Jose O Gonzalez wrote: > If subscribing to this list qualifies one as a "member", is it possible > to obtain a free catalogue of E paraphernalia, e.g. E Tshirts, Coffee > Mugs, etc... ? Some E Tshirts were printed up many years ago. They are no longer available.

Re: [E-devel] [e16 bug report] xclock escapes manual window placement

2003-11-15 Thread BAM
mouse to move the terminal *and* xclock windows. When xclock is closed, so is the terminal. Starting more xclock sessions from the same terminal works, but starting a new terminal and running xclock produces the wrong behavior again. -- BAM - Are you

Re: [E-devel] E16 - what next?

2003-11-11 Thread BAM
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 15:16, Kim Woelders wrote: > Alan Schmitt wrote: > > I'm thinking of looking at that iconified window patch thingie (the one > > that adds an option to add iconified windows to the alt-tab list for all > > desktops). > Maybe BAM has an updated

Re: [E-devel] small misfeature in e16 focus settings ?

2003-11-07 Thread BAM
o big to make 16.6[1]. If you do all the work and post a patch, he might consider it. Of course, I can't volunteer him. :) [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00945.html -- BAM - I have an inferiority complex. But it's not a very good one.

Re: [E-devel] Trying to build E16.6-pre8, imlib problem

2003-11-02 Thread BAM
you have the one with the dash, too? Are the headers and libraries where it says they are? -- BAM - The Easter Bunny. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help

Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-28 Thread BAM
;s a bug in my implementation. > - An example somewhere would be nice. ??? I gave 3 examples: programs that have this feature already (pekwm and Emacs), and code to put in a keybindings.cfg for E. -- BAM - "Life is polynomial time." -- Laszlo Babai ---

Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-27 Thread BAM
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 16:46, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:54:08 -0500 BAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > Due to E16's poor support for Xnest (read: X crashes), I found myself > > using pekwm. > > i might be inclined to rephrase that

Re: [E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-27 Thread BAM
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 08:43, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 27 October 2003 07:54, BAM wrote: > > Due to E16's poor support for Xnest (read: X crashes), I found myself > > using pekwm. > > i use xnest over here w/out any bugs ... > -mike I don't use debian,

[E-devel] E16.7 Proposed Feature: Keychains

2003-10-27 Thread BAM
PRESS __ACTION __A_FOCUS_NEXT Result: F2 will only change focus if you hit F1 first. F1 then F12 does nothing. -- BAM - Open head, insert foot. diff -ruwN e.orig/src/E.h e.chains/src/E.h --- e.orig/src/E.h 2003-10-27 02:38:45.0 -0500 +++ e.chains/src/E.h 2003-10-27 07:45:37.000

Re: [E-devel] Hi my name is Marcos and I have a doubt about enlightenment

2003-09-28 Thread BAM
that KDE and GNOME and ICEWM has? E16.6 includes tools to convert the new menu formats. Anything that installs standard menus for KDE3/GNOME2 should work once you use them. -- BAM - "What happens if you get scared half to death twice?" -- Steven Wright --

Re: [E-devel] E16 Focuslist Bug

2003-08-28 Thread BAM
und on screen. I guess there were memleaks or something? -- BAM - "Genius does what it must, and Talent does what it can." -- Owen Meredith --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welc

Re: [E-devel] E16 Focuslist Bug

2003-08-28 Thread BAM
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 19:48, BAM wrote: > Anyway, it's just a demonstration of what I'm talking about, not ready > to be committed at all. I forgot: if you try this patch you have to edit ~/.enlightenment/...e_session-XX before you can go back to the "real" e16. Just

Re: [E-devel] E16 Focuslist Bug

2003-08-27 Thread BAM
; desktops instead of desktops, viewports, workspaces, etc. On a unrelated note: does anybody remember the move/resize demo patch? It was commented out before 0.16.5. How hard would it be to get it in shape for 0.16.6? -- BAM - A classic: that which is guaranteed to be studied long after anyon

Re: [E-devel] E16 Focuslist Bug

2003-08-27 Thread BAM
s. If it's on, windows show up in the focuslist and iconbox regardless of where they were iconified and de-iconify the way they do now. When it's off it works the *your* gnome-pane works (the default). -- BAM - "I replaced the headlights on my car with strobe lights. Now it looks li

[E-devel] E16 Focuslist Bug

2003-08-26 Thread BAM
top. 4. Bring up the focus list again. The iconified window isn't there. 5. Switch back to the original desktop. 6. The iconified window is back in the focus list. In other news, thank you Mark C. Langston for E-Wireless. -- BAM - "Ev

Re: [E-devel] evas and gtk?

2003-08-25 Thread BAM
lt policies attached, for example, a double click or drag policy." You can download it from e's sf site. -- BAM - "Excuse me. I have to go towel off my extremities." -- Opus --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:

Re: [E-devel] X wont load with enlightenment

2003-08-21 Thread BAM
... Load"dri" The flatpanel thing is a red herring. My guess is your distro's default xinitrc loads this stuff, so it's missing when you override the system default. -- BAM - "Pure as the driven slush" --

Re: [E-devel] stacking problem w/pre4

2003-07-10 Thread BAM
dows. I suggest to > report further problems to the mplayer people. Thanks. Any thoughts about my ipc patch? (The one to get a layer through eesh.) -- BAM - Receiving a million dollars tax free will make you feel better than being flat broke and having a stomach ache. -- Dolph Shar

Re: [E-devel] stacking problem w/pre4

2003-06-27 Thread BAM
I noticed eesh doesn't have an option to get a window's layer. Did I miss it? Anyway, this patch lets you do win_op layer ? like you can do with desktop, move, or resize. -- BAM - Are you a turtle? diff -ruN e16.orig/e/src/ipc.c e16/e/src/ipc.c --- e16.orig/e/src/ipc.c 2003-0

Re: [E-devel] stacking problem w/pre4

2003-06-25 Thread BAM
it mysteriously stacks under the old one. 4. Set the old Eterm to Normal stacking. Problem fixed... for now. So now the question is, what does mplayer do? -- BAM - The Easter Bunny. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attentio

[E-devel] stacking problem w/pre4

2003-06-24 Thread BAM
open for days. This might be hard to test because it required windows to be left open a long time. -- BAM - There's always free cheese in a mousetrap. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Cons

Re: [E-devel] While we await E17...

2003-03-19 Thread BAM
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 11:52, Kim Woelders wrote: > The patch also includes BAM<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'s fix to configure.in to get > auto* going. Just for the record, I've tried this with automake 1.4/autoconf 2.13 and it looks OK. If somebody with a distro that actually us

Re: [E-devel] While we await E17...

2003-03-17 Thread BAM
t breaks? More distros have switched to the latest autoconf since this was last discussed, so a lot of people will need something like this. -- BAM - "The only skills I have the patience to learn are those that have no real application in life." -- Calvin diff -ruN e16.orig/e/

Re: [E-devel] While we await E17...

2003-03-16 Thread BAM
nd right now is: http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/6973/2002/9/0/9665542/ gnome 2 and KDE 3 share menus somewhat. -- BAM - "If something is so complicated that you can't explain it in 10 seconds, then it's probably not worth knowing anyway." -- Calvin -