Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2008-01-13 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 05:39:52 GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: I should add that I hope you suceed with this effort, one way or another. An edje-editor is a very important thing to have, and should be a top priority for an efl based project. I'm curious though..

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 04 January 2008, at 00:01:32 (+), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you just do this or have you had this before? Very nice. It's been around since 2000. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2008-01-03 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 07:49:35 (+), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cvs, svn, git, twit,... It's all weird mojo. Maybe Michael could write an eterm 'module' of some sort that would feature nice, friendly, easily understood commands for interfacing with any of these - ones where it

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2008-01-03 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Michael Jennings wrote: On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 07:49:35 (+), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cvs, svn, git, twit,... It's all weird mojo. Maybe Michael could write an eterm 'module' of some sort that would feature nice, friendly, easily understood commands for

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2008-01-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cvs, svn, git, twit,... It's all weird mojo. Maybe Michael could write an eterm 'module' of some sort that would feature nice, friendly, easily understood commands for interfacing with any of these - ones where it doesn't matter which one is really being used.

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-08 Thread Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave wrote: Hi all, Just two words to make you inform the new edje_editor status. I have now reach a first stable version of the patch to edje (bugzilla #294). In my opinion this version is ready to be committed to the edje cvs, but I didn't get any devs

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-08 Thread Dave
Michael Jennings ha scritto: On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 09:13:38 (+0200), Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: he have to cvs add it, not available in some cases (anoncvs). He's a developer. He doesn't use anoncvs. Also, having an weird interface that nobody uses it make it

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-08 Thread Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Dave wrote: Hi all, Just two words to make you inform the new edje_editor status. I have now reach a first stable version of the patch to edje (bugzilla #294). In my opinion this version is ready to be committed to the edje cvs, but I didn't get any

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-08 Thread Dave
Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer ha scritto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave wrote: Hi all, Just two words to make you inform the new edje_editor status. I have now reach a first stable version of the patch to edje (bugzilla #294). In my opinion this version is ready to be

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I should add that I hope you suceed with this effort, one way or another. An edje-editor is a very important thing to have, and should be a top priority for an efl based project. I'm curious though.. What do other 'WYSIWYG' editors that deal with similar doc based things do? eg,

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave wrote: Hi all, Just two words to make you inform the new edje_editor status. I have now reach a first stable version of the patch to edje (bugzilla #294). In my opinion this version is ready to be committed to the edje cvs, but I didn't get any devs opinion :( At

[E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-06 Thread Dave Andreoli
Hi all, Just two words to make you inform the new edje_editor status. I have now reach a first stable version of the patch to edje (bugzilla #294). In my opinion this version is ready to be committed to the edje cvs, but I didn't get any devs opinion :( In brief: the patch add the ability to

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-06 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 04:11:54 (+0200), Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: to avoid this copies, just diff -ur /dev/null your-new-file patch, CVS sucks, I know :-P cvs diff -Nu works just fine. Ignorance of CVS does not cause *it* to suck. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-06 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 09:13:38 (+0200), Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: he have to cvs add it, not available in some cases (anoncvs). He's a developer. He doesn't use anoncvs. Also, having an weird interface that nobody uses it make it suck, see? Sorry, but there's nothing weird

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-06 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Dec 7, 2007 5:27 AM, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 04:11:54 (+0200), Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: to avoid this copies, just diff -ur /dev/null your-new-file patch, CVS sucks, I know :-P cvs diff -Nu works just fine. Ignorance of CVS

Re: [E-devel] Edje Editor digest

2007-12-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
he have to cvs add it, not available in some cases (anoncvs). He's a developer. He doesn't use anoncvs. Also, having an weird interface that nobody uses it make it suck, see? Sorry, but there's nothing weird about diff -Nu since it's exactly the same options normal diff takes.