On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:38:42 +0100 Marcel Hollerbach said:
> Hello,
>
> On 03/19/2018 04:44 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:56:20 -0400
> > Cedric Bail wrote:
> >>
> >> The CMake build never reached maturity and no further attempt
On Tuesday, 20 March 2018 02:20:32 ACDT, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:55:59 +1030
> Simon Lees wrote:
>
>> On 19/03/18 15:26, Cedric Bail wrote: ...
>
> That is even messier. Removing cmake build system, but leaving cmake
> artifacts for others using
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:38:42 +0100
Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> If you find anything that breaks your meson build script, notify the
> meson devs, they will fix things super fast, happened to me once for
> external projects, and it was fixed within the next release. Same for
>
Hello,
On 03/19/2018 04:44 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:56:20 -0400
Cedric Bail wrote:
The CMake build never reached maturity and no further attempt to
improve it is planned. I am actually thinking of removing the build
support from the tree (Not
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:52:52 +
Stephen Houston wrote:
> Mason Efl is more complete than cake EFL and will be merged soon.
> It's in a branch in the EFL tree.
Good to know thanks! I still do not see the benefit of meson over
cmake, having used both. Meson seems like a
Mason Efl is more complete than cake EFL and will be merged soon. It's in a
branch in the EFL tree.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 10:45 AM William L. Thomson Jr. <
wlt...@obsidian-studios.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:56:20 -0400
> Cedric Bail wrote:
> >
> > The CMake build never
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:55:59 +1030
Simon Lees wrote:
> On 19/03/18 15:26, Cedric Bail wrote:
> > On March 17, 2018 2:29 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> > wrote:
> >> I see EFL has a CMakeLists.txt in git. I am curious as to the
> >> current state of
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:56:20 -0400
Cedric Bail wrote:
>
> The CMake build never reached maturity and no further attempt to
> improve it is planned. I am actually thinking of removing the build
> support from the tree (Not the installed cmake helper to link against
> EFL) for next
On 19/03/18 15:26, Cedric Bail wrote:
> On March 17, 2018 2:29 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> wrote:
>> I see EFL has a CMakeLists.txt in git. I am curious as to the current
>> state of that. It seems like it is for past versions, 1.18.99.57967.
>> Also does not
On March 17, 2018 2:29 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> I see EFL has a CMakeLists.txt in git. I am curious as to the current
> state of that. It seems like it is for past versions, 1.18.99.57967.
> Also does not allow build from git.
>
> Background
>
> I was
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:32:52 +1030
Simon Lees wrote:
>
> While efl doesn't generally build with cmake, its shipped all the
> macro's required to build efl apps with cmake for years so you should
> be fine to use cmake as your build system for apps, I have in the
> past.
Seems
On Sunday, 18 March 2018 07:59:53 ACDT, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> I see EFL has a CMakeLists.txt in git. I am curious as to the current
> state of that. It seems like it is for past versions, 1.18.99.57967.
> Also does not allow build from git.
>
> Background
>
> I was looking at updating
I see EFL has a CMakeLists.txt in git. I am curious as to the current
state of that. It seems like it is for past versions, 1.18.99.57967.
Also does not allow build from git.
Background
I was looking at updating autotools build for elogind rather than
systemd. Since systemd is required for
13 matches
Mail list logo