On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Youness Alaoui
kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100
Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:57:23 -0500 Youness Alaoui
kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100
Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:57:23 -0500 Youness Alaoui
kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
Only two are listed as an author
for epp, might be easier to get epp license changed? Though this might
make things hard (from epp) -
* Copyright (C) 1995 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
* Written by Per Bothner,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:48:34 +0100
Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
Only two are listed as an author
for epp, might be easier to get epp license changed? Though this might
make things hard (from epp) -
Good point about the authors.. There are 22 total who contributed to
edje_cc* files and only 6 to edje_cc.c specifically.
git log edje_cc* | grep Author | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq | wc
22
I definitely agree that it would be stupid to change the other libs or even
edje itself to GPL, and I
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com said:
Hey
as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to
execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input
and create a preprocessed buffer as ouput ? Imho, it would be cleaner.
Hey
as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to
execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input
and create a preprocessed buffer as ouput ? Imho, it would be cleaner.
Vincent
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri
vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to
execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input
and create a preprocessed buffer as ouput ? Imho, it would be cleaner.
I
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri
vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to
execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input
and
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100
Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent
11 matches
Mail list logo
