On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri said:
> Hey
>
> as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to
> execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input
> and create a preprocessed buffer as ouput ? Imho, it would be cleaner.
does it really matte
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:51, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> I don't consider anything I've done there worth attribution.
Same for me.
--
Boris Faure
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Registe
Good point about the authors.. There are 22 total who contributed to
edje_cc* files and only 6 to edje_cc.c specifically.
git log edje_cc* | grep Author | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq | wc
22
I definitely agree that it would be stupid to change the other libs or even
edje itself to GPL, and I wo
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:48:34 +0100
Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, David Seikel wrote:
>
> > Only two are listed as an author
> > for epp, might be easier to get epp license changed? Though this might
> > make things hard (from epp) -
> >
> > * Copyright (C) 1995 Free
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> Only two are listed as an author
> for epp, might be easier to get epp license changed? Though this might
> make things hard (from epp) -
>
> * Copyright (C) 1995 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> * Written by Per Bothner, 1994-95.
> * Co
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:33 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:57:23 -0500 Youness Alaoui
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
>> michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100
>> > Vincent Torri wrote:
>> >
>> >
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:57:23 -0500 Youness Alaoui
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
> michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100
> > Vincent Torri wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM, David Seikel
> > > wrote:
> >
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Youness Alaoui
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
> michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100
>> Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM, David Seikel wrote:
>> > > On Sun, 15
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100
Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri
> > wrote:
> >
> >> as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to
> >> execute it, instead of having a function
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>
>> as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to
>> execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input
>> and create a preprocessed buffer as ou
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri
wrote:
> as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to
> execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input
> and create a preprocessed buffer as ouput ? Imho, it would be cleaner.
I suspect the epp licence is
Hey
as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to
execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input
and create a preprocessed buffer as ouput ? Imho, it would be cleaner.
Vincent
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
