In a message dated 6/23/2004 3:05:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>
> Ah, but you DID sell off the Sigmas didn't you. What did
> you replace the
> Sigma lenses with?
>
>
> Cheers/Chip
Hi Chip,
Actaully - I didn't replace them with anything. Reason I sold them is - I d
In a message dated 6/21/2004 8:39:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> and it
> >never goes into circulation. Also, the resale value is so low that
> >many times it just doesn't make sense to try to sell them.
>
> That last line says it all. A good used Canon lens will get
In a message dated 6/17/2004 4:14:12 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> The Bronica was a good camera - had some faults like most others, but was
> still was an excellent camera. 'Glad you haven't had any problems with Sigma.
> I personally know some who have, was at a wedding
In a message dated 5/26/2004 2:06:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> I was wondering, are we allowed to post this kind of post here? I am about
> to sell off some of my Canon gear, and I was wondering if this is allowed in
> this list?
>
> Also, George, why did you leave o
Hi All,
I'm getting out of my semi -pro photography, just will be doing stuff for myself.
So I have some things to sell. And before I got on Ebay - I thought I'd offer them
here.
1. EOS 3 body - very good condition - no focus or exposure issues. No box, no original
Canon strap - i put a better
In a message dated 5/13/2004 3:48:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> What I find really funny, is that while all three of you (Gary, Rober
> and Tom) all praised the Kenko Pro/Tamron SP TCs highly (Are they by
> the same manufacturing process, or are they just similar in
>
Hi All,
What do you think about flashes out there, other than Canon ones, to use with 10d?
Like Sigma, Metz, etc. Any experience with those? How's e-ttl in those compares with
Canon's own? Wireless capabilities?
Any advice? Or Canon 550ex is the best choice still - there have been some compains I
In a message dated 1/25/2004 7:30:11 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> How about a 10d with ECF and faster file saving?
I'll take faster file saving, but don't really need ecf. I'd take a fine spot meter
instead, and/or bette low light AF.
George
*
***
In a message dated 1/23/2004 12:24:08 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Simple solution:
> Get a medium format digital back! :)
> See Ya
> Javier
Not so simple - at $12000 each, and that's just a D.back. Add cost of the lenses,
body, etc and you can buy a house.:o)
That's t
Hi All,
I was just wondering if anyone had a chance to get their hands on either Sigma 12-24
EX or 80-400 IS (or whatever they use for Image Stabilization feature)? Any
impressions? Comments?
George
*
***
***
* For list instruction
In a message dated 1/9/2004 4:42:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> That sounds reasonable enough.
> BTW: Between a 10d and a D60
> Which shoul I go for. Common sense sez the 10d
> has to be more sophisticated but then again ...
> Javier
Hi All,
I was just wondering, why i
In a message dated 11/30/2003 8:29:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> I sent my 10D back to Canon several months ago for them to fix the focus--it
> was focusing consistently behind the subject at all ranges. The said they
> fixed it, but it still does the same thing and it
Hi All,
I'm thinking on going on a rafting trip. Can anyone advice as to - what waterproof
gear I need , so I can use my 1n or 3 ? And is it a good idea to take a camera there
to begin with? What's the cheapest but safest gear? Any other thoughts are welcome.
Thanks,
George
*
***
**
In a message dated 12/8/2002 1:42:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> As I'm a rare specimen of user having Canon, Nikon and Leica equipment and
> therefore you can see now three folders in photo.net that independing of
> their photographic quality, if any, have the rare part
In a message dated 12/2/2002 2:36:07 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Looking for a Sigma 8mm circular fisheye, EOS Mount.
> Anyone got one for
> sale or trade?
>
> Let me know, if so.
>
> Thanks! ;-)
>
> Al Ruscelli
Hi All,
Sorry Al, no 8mm, but I do have a Sigma
In a message dated 11/18/2002 12:12:26 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm working on some projects with the local schools doing sports motion
> sequence photos. Because of the potential volumn of work, I'm looking
> for a backup body, maybe even two. Definitely need them
HI All,
Could someone tell me ifI need to dial an exposure compensation when using
Beattie screens? Or will camera do it on it's own?
Thanks,
George
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a
Hi ALL,
Does anyone use those Brightscreen screens or Beattie screens on you camera? Do the
really work/worth the money?
I seem to find not so favorable reviews of those. Any opinions?
George
*
***
***
* For list instructions, incl
Hi all,
While I never used this lens on EOS bodies, I have a friend who has this lens
for his Nikon and I got to use it on it. What can I say - optics -good, but
not great, Huge and heavy lens (And I use a lot of Pro glass, including Mad.
format), Large filter size - 82mm I think, and TERRIBLE
Hi All,
Well, those lenses are interesting. And like someone said - I wonder what
will the optics be like as far as quality. Prices would be interesting too.
One thing makes me wonder though. When it comes to Image Stabilization, only
Canon was the one to add it to many lenses - consumer and P
Hi All,
What I need is to find out if a lens hood from either Canon 70-200L 2.8 or
maybe Canon 28-70L will fit a Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX. I lost one for my sigma
and while I can get a new one from them - it seem easier and less expensive
to get a Canon one used.
All these lenses are 77mm. Only que
Hi All,
First of all, thanks to all of you , who answerd my P&S question. I still
have some things to consider to make a descision, but major requirments for
the P&S for me would be - high quality lens - 24-to 40mm fixed is fine, and
for it to be very portable.
Now, another question and a favo
Hi All,
Sorry for the OT question. What would you recomend as a small P&S camera to
carry around when there is no room to carry SLR body. Portable, with a high
quality lens, possibly many controls for AF, shutter speed and/or apperture,
flash.
I was thinking Ricoh GR1. Maybe something cheaper?
Hi All,
As many of you may remember talk about discontinuing the EOS 5/ A2E body been
going on for a while. And EOS 3 being a replacement. But from what I can tell
- it's still advertised and is selling pretty strong. So, does anyone know
for sure what's going to happen with it? Soon? Same goes
Hi,
Did anyone here ever use a Canon 50-200L lens? Sounds like an interesting
one, but is it worth the money - I've seen them for $500-600. I think it's
similar to Canon 100-300L 5.6 in construction. Does it have same slow and
noisy AF motor. How about image quality? Any feedback on this one?
G
Hi All,
What lens would you guys recommend for going super wide? I already have a
Canon 20-35L 2.8. I was thinking of one of the following - Sigma 14mm EX,
Sigma or Canon 15mm (I don't mind a fish eye, as long as it's a full frame
one), or the one I find very interesting new lens - Sigma 15-30
In a message dated 12/19/01 11:30:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I'd like to get a teleconverter for an old 80-200 2.8L. From
what I understand the Canon one's won't work. Does anyone have
any experience with one's that do? Kenko, Tokina, Vivitar, etc. ???
Will the
In a message dated 12/19/01 7:30:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< > Also a zoom TC -- at least 1 to 1.5x, ideal 1 to 2x.
Now there's a cool idea!
JCDoss >>
how about TC with IS?
George
*
***
***
* For
In a message dated 12/19/01 12:44:52 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< Also, a GOOD, faster version of the 28/2.8. After all, they have
proven they can do better than the old 28/1.8L (24/35 L lenses). Then, a 17mm
lens, good AND affordable please :-). >>
HI,
Speaking of
Hi All,
I thought I'd ask everybody here about what they whould want Canon to
introduce next year, and maybe Canon people will hear us and fulfill our
desires.
I'd personally like to see that old 50-200L lens, at maybe like f4 all the
way, with close focus and USM ring motor. I wonder, actual
In a message dated 12/14/01 2:21:01 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Evrim and George
Thanks for your posts...I ordered the 28-80 this afternoon after reading
the reviews from you and the ones refered to in your posts.
There is no dealer anywhere near me for me to lo
In a message dated 12/13/01 5:10:18 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< George,
A lot of the reviews say the 28-80 is soft at 80 wide open...have you
noticed this?
I saw no posts like that about the 28-70...but there are some things I
liked about the 28-80 better, like
In a message dated 12/13/01 2:43:13 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Thanks to the responses to my question on the Tamron lens. After looking
at those review sights it seems like the two Tokinas, the 28-80 2.8 and
the 28-70 2.6-2.8 are far better. Has anyone here used e
In a message dated 12/11/01 9:52:37 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
OK, so you like the lens you own.
The question was have you actually used the Tamron lens and compared?
I have used both although not side by side. Compare any lens tests and
I think you would be su
In a message dated 12/9/01 10:07:13 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Do you know any store that still has this lens new for sale?
B&H sold last ones about last Tuesday.
Rodrigo Gimenez >>
I Don't know if they do indeed have one, but try Adorama.com - they seem to
have
In a message dated 12/7/01 10:01:20 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I also thought the following is interesting since there are people who
might
find this useful:
( http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=001nra )
not to propagate rumour (though I guess
In a message dated 12/1/01 12:39:06 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Personally I'd rather drive an M3, but given a choice of a 100 Chevys or
>one
>740i, I'd take the BMW thank you.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Chip Louie
>
more so if it's 740iL ...
>>
So, Maybe it's time
In a message dated 11/26/01 2:06:24 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Optically they are very good. I have the pictures to prove that.
Mine is in EOS mount (No M42 adapter needed).
Since I wanted to upgrade to Sigma's AF fisheye I am willing
to sell my 2.8/16mm Zenitar fi
In a message dated 11/25/01 3:50:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I just bought one of those Russian lenses (16mm fisheye). There is more
info
on how to use them here:
http://teladesign.com/photo/manual-lenses.html
and here
http://teladesign.com/photo/zenitar.ht
Hi All,
I was wondering, does anyone on the list use any Russian all manual lenses
via EOS to M42 (?) adapter, and if so - what is your feedback on them? I saw
some 8mm, 16mm, and remember hearing about either Tilt or Shift one availible
as well. So, any users of those or any others? What abou
In a message dated 11/20/01 11:21:21 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< If you can't afford a longer lens (and I can't), I think the 100-400L IS
is
a great compromise (for those whose budget stretches even that far). As for
the other lenses that you mentioned, I'll leave
In a message dated 11/19/01 7:11:43 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Hi,
I'm thinking of buying a second camera body for using beside my EOS 50e. As
I'm a bit disappointed in the EOS 30, I consider buying a pro-range camera
second hand.
Now a second hand EOS 1 is with
Just re-checked - adorama.com lists one for $1949 or so.
George
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
I think Adorama has one - check www.adoramacamera.com
George
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
es - feel free to
ask - I'll be glad to help if I can.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
In a message dated 9/19/01 7:00:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< I bet that the Sigma 50 2,8 EX Macro is
> better optically.
Wouldn't bet a cent on that.
And with the various compatibility problems in
firmware I'd be rather reluctant to buy Sigma.
Do you know t
In a message dated 9/8/01 1:01:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Users who shoot negative film will get good results out of any of the three
cameras reviewed here, though the EOS3 would be most likely to give a bit
more colour saturation due to increased exposure."
Hi all,
I have following items for sale before they go on Ebay.:
EOS Elan body (original) in very good condition (no box or manual though).
Works and looks very good, just sliding eye-cup (flat one) is a bit loose.
With a Tokina 35-300 lens, original Tokina hood for this lens(sold separatly
In a message dated 9/5/01 1:01:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Anybody aware of such a (new) product? Someone told me he ordered one for
use with his 70-200.. I've not heard of it.
Jaco >>
I think I saw it at www.thkphoto.com - go to What's New section.
George
*
***
Hi,
I have following items for sale before they go on Ebay.:
EOS Elan body (original) in very good condition (no box or manual though).
Works and looks very good, just sliding eye-cup (flat one) is a bit loose.
With a Tokina 35-300 lens, original Tokina hood for this lens(sold separatly
for $26
the side, so it's more likely that sensors will "see"
what to focus on. Your 100Macro is a faster lens, - 2.8 vs 4.0 so AF may work
differently.
Hope this helps
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
**
b page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
In a message dated 8/30/01 12:50:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< The trouble is I still am unsure what to do!
The advice falls into two camps:
1) Don't buy a 5 - too many command dial problems
>>
HI,
I wonder if EOS 5 and A2/A2E (US version) have same number of
s pretty good. I never tried it
personally, so can't really tell, not advice one way or another. Just another
piece of information.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For l
In a message dated 8/21/01 8:12:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< The Rebel 2000 doesn't have any way to explicitly switch between one-shot
and servo mode. But it does have servo mode...so how do you activate it? I
know it's used in the Sports PIC mode, but is there a
lly - switch lens itself to MF, or
try swithing to Servo mode - that should get you better results.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsu
camera, but EF-M. As far as A2E (EOS 5) - it doesn't
work only when used with TCs (this applys to 100-400L IS lens - faster
lenses, like 300L IS 2.8 may be different), if your camers was sold before
fall od 1993. - from the 100-400L IS manual.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbc
s well as before. So, be careful
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
IS L lens - it's my most favorite lens! And it
keeps surprising me more and more. Just plain -- awesome.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubs
wish Canon had, but when it comes to IS vs VR lenses (not
the technology, as it's very similar but how they are executed in practice -
final lens product) there is no comparison, not yet anyway.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
In a message dated 8/2/01 1:54:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< Speaking of modest budgets, I'm kind of puzzled as to the excitement
over the 70-200 IS lens. I mean, sure - it sounds fabulous and I'd
love to own one. But is everyone here really that rich? Frankly, t
In a message dated 8/2/01 5:51:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< If I go for the 70-200 IS, I'd sell my current 70-200,
so net cost wouldn't be much different than the
100-400. And I do prefer the 2 rings of the 70-200 to
the single ring design of the 100-400. But I'
b page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
In a message dated 7/31/01 1:23:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< C'mon Guys and Gals,
>
> Where's all the questions? What price, Henry? Have
you any stock, Henry?
> Who's got the best price? What's the weight? What
colour is it?
>
> You have all been waiting fo
In a message dated 7/30/01 10:46:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Also the pattern of the EOS 50e
> (Elan IIe) is such that
> the outhermost large are covers both the sky and the
> ground in landscapes
> and that's why, IMHO, it does not expose even the
> simplest l
In a message dated 7/30/01 9:55:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
Yes, the longer focal length lens's light will strike the viewing screen
at different angles than a shorter lens, therefore showing different
brightness qualities.
Jim Davis >>
HI,
That's probably
y this.
Thanks,
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
MC haze filter on it, while Tamron has none. Maybe I should take
the filter off and see what it does? But I didn't think it would be an issue,
would it?
Any ideas?
Thanks,
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMC
,
I'm not sure if they have them, but did you try Adorama at
www.adoramacamera.com and B&Hphoto.com - used departments.
They often have a good selection and trustworthy to deal with.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XM
ges. So, it could have been done
better, so it wouldn't move with MF ring, but...Canon didn't think of it, or
it would be more expensive to make.
So, I learn to live with this little annoyance.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.c
o slides vs prints, Tokina
produces better images for me. So, its a matter of taste and your shooting
style.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, includin
's nice about miniTrekker - it
fits just right under the seat on the plane.
You can read more about it on my web site in reviews section.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
*
enough mine does the same, small but it's there.
Typical or not?
Regards.
Robin Johnston. >>
Hi,
I think it's tipical with many lenses. My 100-400L IS lens does it too on
1n. Just a little, but it's there.
I wouldn't worry about it.
George
My web
In a message dated 7/6/01 2:52:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< It's over at Jul Loke's web-site... Yes, it's a cool pic...
>>
what's the address?
George
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsu
In a message dated 7/6/01 3:25:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< He must be a really big guy (Venus is over 6') and has some awfully big
hands, cause the body and lens he was holding were dwarfed by those hands.
It really looked a Rebel, it was so small in his hands. I
non even gave him that as a present. :o)
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
ends
on the light and body you use it on.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
blem? Not happening
anywhere else so I don't think it's my connection.
Ken Durling >>
HI Ken,
It's you, alright. Well, your connection. :o) I just checked and it's working
fine.
George
My web page:
http://
,
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
ppreciated.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
tp://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
i.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
In a message dated 6/26/01 10:39:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< Why not a 28-80 2,8 ! :) But who knows the Canon's desire ! :)
And some people would like a 24-70 2,8L, or a 24-80 2,8, all with of course
high performances...
It's never stop !
I think that a 24-7
orge
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
In a message dated 6/25/01 5:18:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Cause the non L 20-35 tests sharper than the L,
and it has USM. >>
Hi,
I'm not sure about the tests - as all lenses are different a bit, but I tried
non-L version before I got 20-35L and from my experien
SM to be
great - I find it much more useful on a long lens - like my 100-400L vs
20-35L. Would I like to have it on my 20-35L - yes! But the fact that it's
not there doesn't make me want to sell it to get either 20-35USM non L nor
more expensive 17-35L USM.
George
My web
ter all, I personally went
for a Canon 100-400 IS L lens anyway.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag
ad there is no vertical grip for those 6xx series bodies.
If you have any specific questions - let me know.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsu
n
the same league with BMW, AUDI and Porsche.
So, I'd compare that Tamron with Canon 75-300 USM and maybe IS version,
Canon 100-300 USM instead.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
ln Cathedral in Lincoln England. I used my EOS 3, 17-35L, and
> Fuji Provia 100F film.
Would you pass some of these throught the scanner and let us peek at them
:-) ?
Greetings,
Gerard. >>
Hi,
I'll second that - I'd love to see your photos too.
George
My web page:
h
engths beyond 400mm,
the 100-400 works with TCs, too (at least with the 1.4x
it's performs quite well), although with the 1n you'd lose
autofocus.
--
Tapani Tarvainen
* >>
HI,
Thanks for your advice.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Y
In a message dated 6/12/01 1:35:48 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< What shade does this lens use?
Snorre >>
HI,
Mine came with EW-75 Canon lens hood.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/Entra
In a message dated 6/11/01 1:46:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< So, for what it's worth, I'd steer you away from the 75-300 IS.
--Ian
>>
HI Ian,
Thanks for the advice.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Y
get away with Canon
75-300 USM IS - I rarely blow up my photos above 11x14inch.
If anyone else on the list has any comments/ideas - please do tell.:o)
Thanks
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
y web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
HI,
Does anyone use Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX HSM with non -Sigma TCs? Kenkos or
Tamrons? What are the results? Any problems?
Thanks.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list
. So, I'd try adjusting the F.screen.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
n
28-135 IS comes very close to it.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
90 problems - if any, but
check out this site - it may have some info:
http://www.photographyreview.com/reviews/
all the other info you can get at www.Tamron.com. As to this lens in general
- I have older one and it's great.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Y
e a Tokina 300/4.0 ATX lens that is only 187mm long. And it's not even
DO. But it does have SD elements. So I guess it's even more possible to make
a "long" lens shorter.
George
My web page:
http://memb
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
