I have one (BikeE) laced radial on the non-drive side and it is fine. I was
misremembering that it was radial on both sides. The drive side on both my
BikeEs are 1 cross pattern and the one without radial lacing is 1 cross on
both sides. It may be necessary to use a drill to angle the rim holes
I have seen very little evidence of such. Most people are still driving their
conversions BMS or not. My vehicle has over 20,000 miles on it with no sign
of capacity loss.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 13, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Lee Hart wrote:
>
> paul dove via EV
The 42 x 60Ah thundesky pack in my vectrix was originally installed in 2010
It's done 105'000km, and around 1100 cycles equivalent
capacity is down to 45Ah
The e-rider's lack of BMS is likely what killed the first 4 cells
For your application, the e-rider continuous discharge rate may be a
A tandem three wheeler like the Greenspeed. Low the the ground and good aero.
First dam off the front with a good fairing then build a frame work to support
the panels. At this point if it is stiff enough to resist the wind, ala the
Elf,one might think about some sort of under cover and
On 08/13/2016 04:29 PM, ken via EV wrote:
I have a Bike E with 20" back wheel . Where can I find a reasonably
priced wheel thats desgined to be effeient for that RPM / 20- 25 mph
and 36 volts.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=20%22+ebike+conversion+kit
I have a Bike E with 20" back wheel . Where can I find a reasonably
priced wheel thats desgined to be effeient for that RPM / 20- 25 mph
and 36 volts.
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
On 8/13/2016 11:29, Lawrence Rhodes via EV wrote:
It's a matter of money. I am thinking of using a tandem recumbent bicycle with
20" wheels. This should support 750watts of solar. With a 7.5kw battery it
will charge in 10 sunny hours. As a moped class vehicle it will have a very long
paul dove via EV wrote:
Why would you say that? Li FePO4 has one of the largest cycle life of any of
them.?2000+ cycles. The Mitsubishi i-MiEV uses LiFePO4 cells. Maybe go with a
larger Ah capacity to increase current limits. They only do 3C continuous. So
that would be 180 Amps for a 60Ah
Lawrence Rhodes via EV wrote:
It's a matter of money.
You can be pretty tricky to build it on a budget. Dave Cloud, Cedric
Lynch, and Jerry Dycus have all built examples of very efficient
vehicles on tiny budgets. They may look a bit funky, but it's a
prototype! :-)
I am thinking of
.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/
> group/NEDRA)
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/p
rid at the same time for under 10% of
>their
>dirty costs. So it is not the other rate payers that are complaining,
>it
>is the dirty fossil fuel peaking plans using the good name of "other
>rate
>payers" to divide and conquer us.
>
>Bob Bruninga, WB4APR
>
Why would you say that? Li FePO4 has one of the largest cycle life of any of
them.?2000+ cycles. The Mitsubishi i-MiEV uses LiFePO4 cells. Maybe go with a
larger Ah capacity to increase current limits. They only do 3C continuous. So
that would be 180 Amps for a 60Ah cell.
Sent from my iPhone
Since David hasn't started playing whack-a-mole on this, I'll pretend
that it is semi on topic. It seems reasonable to discuss the source of
energy used to drive our EVs.
I visited Las Vegas (for the first time) this past December. I was
struck by two situations that offended my delicate
David,
It's a matter of money. I am thinking of using a tandem recumbent bicycle with
20" wheels. This should support 750watts of solar. With a 7.5kw battery it
will charge in 10 sunny hours. As a moped class vehicle it will have a very
long range. I will probably make use of Zzipper
On 08/13/2016 12:03 PM, Robert Bruninga via EV wrote:
The grid will actually need less spinning reserves with solar than they
have now. When we think solar is "variable" then we are ignoring the fact
that when a coal or nuke or gas plant drops off line due to any number of
*routine* causes,
off the grid. The sooner the better.
>>
>> Sure we need peaking plants, But we do not need to cry over them when
>> solar can provide power to the grid at the same time for under 10% of
>> their
>> dirty costs. So it is
WB4APR
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20160813/10f2361b/attachment.htm>
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/l
On 08/13/2016 07:32 AM, Cruisin via EV wrote:
None of the Chinese LifePO4 cells will last long. How many electric cars use
that chemistry?
YMMV
I have a ~10 year old ThunderSky LFP pack that has given me more than
50k miles; about 5 of the 48 cells have been replaced. The pack is
still at
sil fuel peaking plans using the good name of "other
rate
payers" to divide and conquer us.
Bob Bruninga, WB4APR
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20160813/10f2361b/attachment.htm>
_
On 08/13/2016 07:32 AM, Cruisin via EV wrote:
None of the Chinese LifePO4 cells will last long. How many electric cars use
that chemistry?
My perception is that LFP is not very popular due to relatively low
energy density. Also, I think LFP may be a little higher cost. I think
Nissan went
None of the Chinese LifePO4 cells will last long. How many electric cars use
that chemistry?
--
View this message in context:
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/Which-one-china-lifepo4-60-Ah-tp4683272p4683273.html
Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing
Hi,
I have china e-bike "Zapp" (www.erider.cn), 2,5 kW / 60V engine and 19s
(40 Ah) LiFePO4, without BMS. Oryginal cells (from 2007) were made by
Thundersky.
After about a year of use, the 4 cells (from 19) were dead and I stop to
use e-bike.
Now I started to "repair" this e-bike. I order the
22 matches
Mail list logo