I invite you to discover my paper "How Self-Reference Builds the World"
which is the theory of everything that people searched for millennia. It
can be found on my philpeople profile:
https://philpeople.org/profiles/cosmin-visan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
I used Claude Sonnet to summarize your paper. Tell me if any of this misses
the mark, but the paper appears to posit *self-reference* as fundamental,
upon which all other aspects of reality are derived.
If so (this is me now), my first thought is that self-reference cannot be
fundamental, because
The proper understanding happens by reading the paper, not by using
hallucinatory objects to give you a devoid of meaning shortcut.
On Tuesday 25 June 2024 at 16:42:11 UTC+3 Terren Suydam wrote:
> I used Claude Sonnet to summarize your paper. Tell me if any of this
> misses the mark, but the pa
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, 9:09 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I invite you to discover my paper "How Self-Reference Builds the World"
> which is the theory of everything that people searched for millennia. It
> can be found on my philpeople profile:
When will that day come when people actually first read the papers and then
comment ? Oh, God!
On Tuesday 25 June 2024 at 19:18:25 UTC+3 Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, 9:09 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
> everyth...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> I invite you to discover
I read enough to confirm that you postulate self-reference as fundamental -
the entity upon which everything else can be built. I'm wondering how that
can be fundamental if it requires two components (self, and the ability to
reference).
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:32 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everythi
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:54 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> When will that day come when people actually first read the papers and
> then comment ? Oh, God!
>
I read your paper. I am sorry if you did not find my comments or references
helpful.
@Jason. You say:
""Every rule has an exception"
This is a self referential sentence"
But from my paper:
"In “This sentence is false”, a 3rd person “sentence” is imagined to exist,
and to that imagined
“sentence”, the property of “is false” is added, and a weird combination of
3rd person entity
@Terren. There is no "self" and "ability to reference". There is just
self-reference. You can call it hampty-dampty if you want.
On Tuesday 25 June 2024 at 20:01:24 UTC+3 Terren Suydam wrote:
> I read enough to confirm that you postulate self-reference as fundamental
> - the entity upon which e
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:01 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> @Jason. You say:
>
> ""Every rule has an exception"
> This is a self referential sentence"
>
> But from my paper:
>
> "In “This sentence is false”, a 3rd person “sentence” is imagined to
@Jason. Let's make it as clear as possible: Sentence doesn't exist.
"Sentence" is just an idea in consciousness. More examples:
Physical doesn't exist. "Physical" is just an idea in consciousness.
Brain doesn't exist. "Brain" is just an idea in consciousness.
Santa Claus doesn't exist. "Santa Clau
>From your paper, you define self-reference as: "Let self-reference be the
entity with the property of looking-back-at-itself."
Your definition invokes the concepts *entity*, *property*, *looking-back*,
and *itself*. That's a lot of complexity for something that is
fundamental. It's easy for me t
@Terren. That's why is crucial to fully read the papers. By reading the
papers, you will come across paragraphs like this:
"Correctly, self-reference cannot be spoken of.
But even saying “self-reference cannot be spoken of” is an utterance about
it, so not even such a
sentence can be uttered. Ev
@CosminVisan
I’ve just read part one of your paper
I can now see more clearly how a scripture-less, secular, scientific, and
philosophical, view of the world has repeatedly led to a polytheistic world
view of several ‘I am’.
Poet-philosopher Muhammad Iqbal has written extensively on ‘Khudi’.
14 matches
Mail list logo