Ex 5.5 STD -> Enterprise.... Here I go Again...

2001-09-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm upgrading my Server which is running W2K SP1 with MSEXCHANGE 5.5 Standard SP4 --> to MSEXCHANGE 5.5 Enterprise SP4, because my Priv EDB is about 16GB and there is a limitation of the standard version (wich I've discoverd in the HARD WAY) The problem is, when

RE: Ex 5.5 STD -> Enterprise.... Here I go Again...

2001-09-12 Thread Don Ely
Hey boss, Did you reboot after the uninstallation of the AV software? Check the registry for any remains of your AV software. Remove any entries that remain and reboot and try again. Make sure any and all AV software is not installed or running. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Calendar of user causes hanging

2001-09-12 Thread Vuyk, Wim
We tried this, but when we export the calendar en try to open it in a PST file Outlook will hang again. So it does not matter is the Calendar is on PST or Exchange, the result stays the same. During export I do have a impression the export speeds up to fast on the last half of the process. It end

new IMS ex 5.5

2001-09-12 Thread Wood, Harriet [CCS]
I have exchange 5.5 sp4 on nt4 and want to create a second internet mail service (different server, same site) Is there a way of cloning the properties of the existing one? Harriet _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/re

OT: To all the list members that is affected from the yesterdays tragedy!!

2001-09-12 Thread Kuminda Chandimith
Dear friends I have seen and heard the horror that the our American friends going through. I have seen and experienced the affects of terrorism in my country (Sri Lanka) and know how shocking The situation is... But as Buddhist I would ask you to stay calm, try to understand the truth. Person

DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread kumar
Hi all, How do I add the Disclimer massege to each mail which is going out from my exchange server, (Exchange 5.5 SP4) thanks UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Don Ely
FAQ See bottom of email -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of kumar Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DISCLAIMER Hi all, How do I add the Disclimer massege to each mail which is going out from my

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Kuminda Chandimith
Before everyone come and flame you.. Take my advise...go to http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp Other wise your (apparently) first day in the list will not be a pleasant encounter at all.. good luck Kuminda Chandimith Sr. Technical Consultant Ducont.com FZ-LLC Tel: + 971-4-391300

RE: Calendar of user causes hanging

2001-09-12 Thread Dinkins, Tra L.
Try opening the mailbox with the Exchange 5.0 client. After doing so you will notice that all the appointments in the calendar folder are messages. This will allow you to remove several appointments at one time. Since reoccurring meetings/appointments are really one message it shouldn't take to lo

IMS wont run - problem with Exchange or the Server?

2001-09-12 Thread .DL Helpdesk
Gents, I have a problem with our Exchange Server sp 5.5 on NT4.0 srv sp6a. The microsoft exchange internet mail service won't run. The error message in the event log is... The registry checkpoint for cluster resource Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service could not be restored to registry key

RE: IMS wont run - problem with Exchange or the Server?

2001-09-12 Thread .DL Helpdesk
Sorry - Ladies and Gents...! -Original Message- From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:IMS wont run - problem with Exchange or the Server? Gents, I have a problem with our Exchange

Re: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread kumar
Disclaimer should add automatically for all the users in my exchange server, when ever they send a mail. - Original Message - From: "Kuminda Chandimith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:21 PM Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread .DL Helpdesk
Ummm, Did you read Kumindas comments or are you just a bit cold? JJ -Original Message- From: kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: DISCLAIMER Disclaimer should add automatically for all the

Re: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread kumar
I only see useful info in mail not junk - Original Message - From: ".DL Helpdesk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:42 PM Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER > Ummm, > > Did you read Kumindas comments or are you just a bit cold

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Kuminda Chandimith
At leaset I warned him... Kuminda Chandimith Sr. Technical Consultant Ducont.com FZ-LLC Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237 Fax: +971-4-3913001 http://www.ducont.com -Original Message- From: kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 13:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: R

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread .DL Helpdesk
Demand back your subscription fee. JJ -Original Message- From: kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: DISCLAIMER I only see useful info in mail not junk - Original Message - From: ".D

RE: new IMS ex 5.5

2001-09-12 Thread Mark Harford
Imccopy.exe? This is one of the \support\utilities on the install cd for 55. check the service pack cd for an updated version though. Best to have two admin sessions running side by side and do it all by hand though so that you are double-checking all the entries and rethinking the logic behind

RE: Analysis (was: Terrible disasters...)

2001-09-12 Thread Cebuly, John
I see no reason to beg here, Daniel... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Analysis (was: Terrible disasters...) I beg to differ with your narrow analysis. For the US, this

RE: Urgent!

2001-09-12 Thread Pelfrey, Paul
Guns: Guns are an excellent tool to solve a multitude of issues, given the proper parameters and in the right hands. The air marshal program was enabled by the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, the Anti-hijacking Act of 1947 and the International Security and Development Act of 1985. http://www.al

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Couch, Nate
Here n Texas the Governor and the State Attorney General have both stated that they will prosecute anyone found guilty of gouging during this time. So far I have not seen anyone raising their prices in our area - North Dallas. Exxon and BP have both stated they are freezing their prices too so

reccommendations for NOT putting exchange on any domain controlle rs on network.

2001-09-12 Thread .DL Helpdesk
Listers, I know you're not supposed to put Exchange on a DC, complicates backup and restore procedures in the event of disaster recovery. However I am sure that there are other reasons. Can anyone recommend where I can find a list of what these problems are. Yes - I have someone who is running

Re: reccommendations for NOT putting exchange on any domain controlle rs on network.

2001-09-12 Thread Martin Tuip
Performance and what would you do if your PDC crashes and you don't have a BDC? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- - Original Message - From: ".DL Helpdesk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discuss

RE: reccommendations for NOT putting exchange on any domain contr olle rs on network.

2001-09-12 Thread .DL Helpdesk
They have a bdc - this is not a concern.. I'm looking for other black and white problems like the issues with disaster recovery. JJ -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Org connection and mail relays...

2001-09-12 Thread Bourque Daniel
Funny, after taking the time to compose the original post (in fact, taking the time to organise the facts and to think about the environnment, not the solution), I just recommended to included those guys to our Org (with their own site/IMS)... There will be no problem to split them off except if

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Osborn, Joel
Come on folks, a little respect. This is, after all the "Brain Behind the Intelligent Enterprise" (from http://www.indbrain.com/) ...Joel -Original Message- From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: D

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Matt Hoffman
Same here, except for a few stations trying to gouge the public. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: God Bless America Not here - $1.89 just like yesterday and the day before th

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Chinnery Paul
In my small town in western Michigan, the gas was $1.649 in the morning. In the evening, it had shot to $2.00. It's now down around $1.90. -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: G

RE: God Bless America (way OT)

2001-09-12 Thread Joe Pochedley
Here in Cleveland, OH gas went from about $1.699 to $1.799 overnight... One local business owner made the point (on a radio program this morning) that if the prices the gas station owners pay for gas do go up, they've got to replace the stock in the ground now with higher priced gas... They need

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
I would expect to see price controls instituted today or tomorrow if it continues. T. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: God Bless America I heard it gas up to $5/gallon in

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Barry Patterson
Ditto, here in Mississippi. Governor declared state of emergency so that they would have the power to stop price gouging. They had one report that an oil company told their gas stations to raise pump prices $0.25 every hour till the end of yesterday! I think it should be considered an act of tre

Change Exchange IP

2001-09-12 Thread Van Huissteden, Adriaan
Has any one ever done this with out a problem? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: US Nightmare

2001-09-12 Thread Velazquez, Carlos F
Time for "Rainbow Six". -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: US Nightmare Yes; Debt of Honor. I'm a big Clancy fan and have read it and Executive Orders several times thi

RE: Change Exchange IP

2001-09-12 Thread Mark Harford
Yes, but only when our DNS admins were doing what they were told and when! Also research anyone or any server that may be using host or lmhost files. -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Urgent!

2001-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
Umm nice. How long until you care enough about your late lamented friend to find out that Mogadishu isn't in Ethiopia? Your geopolitical insights seem to jive well with your geopolitical knowledge. -Original Message- From: Pelfrey, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesd

RE: IMS wont run - problem with Exchange or the Server?

2001-09-12 Thread Dinkins, Tra L.
It sounds like you have a permissions problem. Try reinstalling your current service pack. Tra -Original Message- From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS wont run - problem with Exchange or the S

RE: Ex 5.5 STD -> Enterprise.... Here I go Again...

2001-09-12 Thread Kevin Miller
Read what Martian wrote.. Backup | upgrade | don’t restart the service | apply SP4 | run the optimizer | then restart the services. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Laercio_SantosJr@Intervale Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:31 AM To:

RE: new IMS ex 5.5

2001-09-12 Thread Kevin Miller
What are you trying to do? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wood, Harriet [CCS] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: new IMS ex 5.5 I have exchange 5.5 sp4 on nt4 and want to create a second inter

RE: Change Exchange IP

2001-09-12 Thread Kevin Miller
Many times. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Van Huissteden, Adriaan Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Exchange IP Has any one ever done this with out a problem? Thanks Adriaan Van Hui

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread .DL Helpdesk
Sorry Sir. -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: DISCLAIMER Come on folks, a little respect. This is, after all the "Brain Behind the Intelligent Enterprise" (f

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Paul Bouzan
~ndi Yeah, and what about the "...able-bodied workforce and top-notch professionals at the helm..." We are not worthy...! PBB -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 13:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER *** WARN

Change IP when you have 2 servers in the Site..

2001-09-12 Thread Van Huissteden, Adriaan
I had some very interesting problems... Bye -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 12 September 2001 11:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change Exchange IP Many times. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMA

RE: Urgent!

2001-09-12 Thread Ian Midgley
Trouble is they always get into the wrong hands. I am horified at what has happened, was appalled at what happened in Somalia in 1993, and was nearly blown to bits by an IRA bomb in 1996. I agree that that no matter how many terrorists are killed there are always more to step into the void, but th

RE: Change Exchange IP

2001-09-12 Thread Barry Patterson
I imagine the only problems would stem from NAME > IP resolution. Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Van Huissteden, Adriaan Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Exchange IP Has any o

RE: new IMS ex 5.5

2001-09-12 Thread Ian Midgley
I would suggest that you fully document the first IMS, validate the configuration against your requirements and then apply to the new server. I'm guessing that if you are setting up a second IMS in the same site then you are doing it for redundancy. I think there is a reskit tool that might be use

RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...

2001-09-12 Thread Joel Noble
At 12:14 PM 9/11/2001 +0100, Norman wrote: > > So, masters and apprentices, which is it? >Neither. > >Use of the BCC field simply tells the *sending* client to not put those >recipient addresses in the RFC822 headers. > >The addresses only go in the transient SMTP envelope(s) which won't be seen b

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Tyler Kownacki
While I was in line for gas at 6pm last night, the owner of a BP here in Michigan raised prices $.35/gallon. When I asked him how he could raise prices on gas he already paid for? He answered with a smirk "Because I can!". Needless to say I had a few choice words for him as I exited. Now I kn

RE: Encryption

2001-09-12 Thread McKnight, Charles
why would you need a secure method of exchanging keys for a Public Key encryption product like PGP? The entire point of Public key encryption is that it doesn't matter who has your public key as they can only verify signatures or encrypt something that then only you could decrypt with your private

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Drewski
Kumar. GO READ THE FAQ. It has the information you need for this. FAQ. Read it. Love it. Live it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.out

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Barry Patterson
Report them to the authorities... Call your attorney general's office. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tyler Kownacki Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: God Bless America While I was in line

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Drewski
You should pass that mental note along to the BP corporate office, as well as local officials. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp P

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread McKnight, Charles
same here in Arkansas.. the governor was very upset in a speech last night.. I noticed several stores were back down in price today.. one was almost 2.50 yesterday and was back down to 1.60 today.. Charles Charles F. McKnight PC/Lan Specialist Mercy Health System - NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: Encryption

2001-09-12 Thread John Matteson
PGP uses a "key server" to distribute and pick up public keys. If this server is compromised, it's not secure, and therefore, the keys it contains are not trustworthy. A SECURE method of key transfer may be as simple as packing a floppy disk with a key and mailing using (in the USA anyway) "Regis

Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread North Martin
When you recieve an SMTP message with your address specified in the cc field the inbox forwarding rule does not work. I have checked this out on the MS Technet/web site and found one reference in Q195583. This states the problem was fixed in Service Pack 2 , however I am on Exchange 5.5 spk 4 and

RE: Change Exchange IP

2001-09-12 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
changing the IP address of an exchange box has no effect on it's operation, but you should bear in mind: - DNS you may need to add a new MX record in your external DNS and it will take a day or two to propogate out around the world. usually this is not an issue because there will be a firewall

Re: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Martin Tuip
Still nothing compared to the 5 dollars we pay per gallon in Europe. Makes you wonder why SUVs are rare here. Martin - Original Message - From: "McKnight, Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:37 PM Subject: RE:

RE: Global Address Question

2001-09-12 Thread Scharff, Chris
Import & Export. Takes about 30 seconds to change 10k entries in excel. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread Ewins, James
What does the rule say? -Original Message- From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] When you recieve an SMTP message with your address spec

RE: Change IP when you have 2 servers in the Site..

2001-09-12 Thread Kevin Miller
Like what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Van Huissteden, Adriaan Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change IP when you have 2 servers in the Site.. I had some very interesting problems... B

RE: reccommendations for NOT putting exchange on any domain contr olle rs on network.

2001-09-12 Thread Scharff, Chris
Archives cover this topic in detail. I have many customers running Exchange on domain controllers and I was responsible for configuring more than one of them that way. > -Original Message- > From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 6:51 AM > To:

Outlook 2000 Client Hanging

2001-09-12 Thread Kuske, Barry
We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT SP6. The client is Outlook 2000 running on W2K Prof. When the user is typing in the To: Address, the client will sometimes hang for about 10 - 15 seconds. Any ideas? Thanks, Barry Kuske _ List

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread Scharff, Chris
Only when it's related to user error in the design of the rule. > -Original Message- > From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] > > > When you recieve

More Advice...Upgrading server

2001-09-12 Thread Bean, Rick
Thanks for all the help on my last post. We have an older server that we want to Upgrade with new hardware. The server is currently running Exchange 5.5 SP2 and IIS 4 Fully patched. The new configuration we want is to have Exchange 5.5 SP4 on the new server by itself and a separate server wi

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Benjamin Winzenz
I live in Michigan as well, and all yesterday, I didn't see prices raise. I think they are up a bit this morning, but not all places. It's really sick how people can try and make a profit from tragedies like this. Makes me want to puke. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine

RE: God Bless America

2001-09-12 Thread Drewski
remember, your gallons are bigger than ours... :P Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.

RE: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

2001-09-12 Thread John Allhiser
Update: It appears that someone is going after "Xinoehpoel" on that Google newsgroup. Posts are disappearing, and it seems that some new posts are being used as bait. http://groups.google.com/groups?start=50&hl=en&group=alt.prophecies.nostrada mus&selm=dfffe69f.0109112343.3e2e5df8%40posting.googl

RE: Outlook 2000 Client Hanging

2001-09-12 Thread Hurst, Paul
Yes, Probably you have a out-of-date contacts in your OAB service, remove, re-add restart to correct. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Kuske, Barry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sen

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread North Martin
The rule simply forwards the mail on to another external smtp address Regards Martin > -Original Message- > From: Ewins, James [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 12 September 2001 15:46 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] > > W

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread Scharff, Chris
No... "What does the rule say". > -Original Message- > From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] > > > The rule simply forwards the mail on to ano

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread North Martin
thr rule is the simple check box to forward mail to an external smtp address Martin > -Original Message- > From: Scharff, Chris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 12 September 2001 15:58 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] > >

RE: More Advice...Upgrading server

2001-09-12 Thread Martin Blackstone
You do not need IIS on you Exchange server if you are going to put OWA on a separate box. Only the server running OWA will need IIS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bean, Rick Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discus

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread North Martin
The rule is done from exchange client ver 5 and is a check box -it does not use a rule wizard as in outlook. the rule is to forward all messages to the nominated user. Have tried various combinations of the "cc" box only and "addressed to directly to me" and none seem to work > -Original Me

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread Scharff, Chris
Hmmm, your version of Outlook must be different than mine. I don't have anything which says "simple check box to forward to an external smtp address". What /exactly/ does the rule say? > -Original Message- > From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread Scharff, Chris
Ok. Details are a nice thing. Now, what is the exact combination you are using at this very second?[1] Don't generalize when you can be specific. [1] I actually know the answer to your question, and have known it since your first post... but this is now a fishing lesson. > -Original Message

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread Ewins, James
I admire your patience, you've outlasted me by 4 vague and unhelpful posts JDE -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [

RE: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

2001-09-12 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
could someone explain exactly what this xinoephoel stuff was all about? all the posts seem to have been wiped off now. the bits i did manage to read didn't make much sense either. can anyone clarify what was said and what it has to do with the terrible events of yesterday? it all seems kind of s

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread North Martin
The rule is currently set that all messages received should be forwarded to the new address > -Original Message- > From: Scharff, Chris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 12 September 2001 16:10 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread Ewins, James
Do you have a rule set to send the same answer? E X A C T L Y what does it say? Example: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to "random list" move it to the "random list" folder Now you try -Original Message- From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wedne

Re: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

2001-09-12 Thread Martin Tuip
Copies can be found at: http://www.k2games.net/sept11/ Martin (that ain't my site) - Original Message - From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:18 PM Subject: RE: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread Scharff, Chris
No... If that's what the rule said it would work. Your rule says something else. The group isn't sure what it says as vague generalities have been used where details are required[1]. Pretend I'm an idiot and walk me step by tedious step through the process used to set up this rule. [1] Though gen

RE: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

2001-09-12 Thread Drewski
I saw it yesterday, before it was pulled. Xinoephoel made a profecy about a week ago that "something horrible would happen tomorrow". When it didn't happen the next day, he/she said "In a week, a big thing will happen, and then I will not be here any more." Then yesterday, he/she posted again,

RE: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

2001-09-12 Thread Chinnery Paul
Thanks, Martin. That is rather disturbing, isn't it. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Along the lines of a Clancy plot Copies can be found at: http://www.k2games.net/sept11

RE: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

2001-09-12 Thread Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
That's some creepy sh*t.Thanks for the link Martin. >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:35 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: Re: Along the lines of a Clancy plot >>> >>> >>>Copies can be found at: >>>

Re: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

2001-09-12 Thread Martin Tuip
Scary yeah. Anyways .. my advice is to try and return to normal activities. Earlier this year I have witnessed enormous fire in my town which killed lots of teenagers. One of the lessons is to try and pick up life and don't point fingers at persons before the real cause/reason has been found out.

RE: Encryption

2001-09-12 Thread Jon Lucas
Well, since it appears this thread has taken a turn for the obscure, I will respond to your original post. I usually just listen to this list, but this is actually something of which I have some level of knowledge. I won't discuss my affiliation with VeriSign except to say that I do not work for

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Ewart, Vicki L.
I'm sure you all think this is very good advice, but I couldn't find anything about adding disclaimers or a global signature line by typing in either of those phrases into the search box. I guess you have to know the "secret code" to get any of these search engines to cough up the information you

RE: Along the lines of a Clancy plot

2001-09-12 Thread John Allhiser
I agree wholeheartedly. Finger pointing is not my job, nor my inclination. The recent news has the FBI following many clues that do all the pointing. We are mainly an insurance company.(reinsurance actually) Our parent corporation is Generali in Italy. A couple of our divisions here are mutual f

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread John Allhiser
Try: IMSEXT.DLL -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER I'm sure you all think this is very good advice, but I couldn't find anything about adding disclaimers or a g

Anonymous Posting to Public Folder

2001-09-12 Thread Lynne July
I have done some research on setting up a public folder to allow users to post anonymously for a specific survey. In Paul Robichaux's book, Managing MS Exchange Server, he gives detailed instructions on how to set this up; however the utility he refers to does not exist on my Exchange Enterprise

RE: Along the lines of a Clancy plot: another one

2001-09-12 Thread John Allhiser
http://acapella.harmony-central.com/Forum16/HTML/021559.html I haven't checked out the validity of this yet. Possibly a sickening coincidence. John Allhiser MCSE CCNA Network Engineer Business Men's Assurance -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wedn

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Scharff, Chris
The secret pass phrase is "disclaimer" for the 5.5 faq @ swinc.com and searches for Exchange 5.5 & 2000 @ support.microsoft.com. It also works with the home edition of the archives, available for less the cost of a Madonna tour t-shirt. > -Original Message- > From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Ewart, Vicki L.
Tried that. Got a bunch of jibberish. ve -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DISCLAIMER The secret pass phrase is "disclaimer" for the 5.5 faq @ swinc.com and searches for

RE: Rejected Message

2001-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
You didn't filter out the other 'joke's in the message, Les. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Les Bessant Sent: Tuesd

RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]

2001-09-12 Thread North Martin
Ok lets try again, This is done in exchange client 5 NOT outlook. >From the menu bar select :- tools, inbox assistant, add rule A dialogue box open with numerous options** , leave them all empty except for the forward entry, here we put a tick in the box and enter the address you want to forward

RE: reccommendations for NOT putting exchange on any domain controllers on network.

2001-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
This is not an unsupported configuration. It should work. The generally accepted arguments against doing this are: 1. It complicates disaster recovery, especially if it is the only domain controller for a domain. Even if it is not, it still complicates disaster recovery. Since you can really

RE: Rejected Message

2001-09-12 Thread Barry Patterson
Wee cld all start tlkng N cod. Remove as many vowels as possible... Or type backwards? "...uoy rof ekoJ a si sihT" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
It's FAQ4.1. That FAQ is available in downloadable PDF format, and should be required reading for anyone who even TOUCHES an exchange box. 4.1 Q: How do I add legalese, footers, or disclaimers to all my messages? A1:http://www.dbsinyc.com/DBSI/exchange A2: MIMESweeper A3: MMS http://www.tumblew

RE: Global Address Question

2001-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
There's nothing wrong with your answer except that it technically changes each and every entry, which was specifically ruled out in the question. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- F

RE: More Advice...Upgrading server

2001-09-12 Thread Ed Crowley
That is true for Exchange 5.5 (and that is the case here). But IIS is required for Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Scharff, Chris
Tried what? A search for "disclaimer" at the location of the FAQ yields 2 hits. One relates to some MailMover product and the other is in the Exchange 5.5 FAQ. At support.microsoft.com a search on 'Exchange 5.5 and earlier versions' for the same term yields 3 hits. 1 related to 128 bit encrypt

Email Attachments Disappearing

2001-09-12 Thread Ray Beckwith
I have a single user who is having a strange problem that has me completely stumped. This user will send out attachments to recipients outside our organization and 2 of the recipients either get no attachment or they are unable to open the attachment they receive. If his assistant sends the attach

  1   2   3   >