Hello:
There are several page file tweaks to be used if all you care about
is optimizing page file performance. Forgive me if my suggestions are "page
file"-centric. If there are other Exchange concerns that would over-ride
these, then ignore them:
Set the page file at RAM+ eno
The Women of Simpler-Webb. That sounds like a feature in Playboy Magazine.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October
Tony Redmond recommends physical RAM + 125MB. Not that you are wrong.
I've also heard it recommended that you set the minimum equal to the maximum
page file size to reduce chances for fragmentation.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All you
True in Exchange 5.5, false in Exchange 2000.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky
Sent: Friday, October 1
I disagree with spreading the page file over several disks. I believe it
should be on your system disk. If the system disk goes down, you're toast
anyway, so spreading across disks does nothing for robustness over putting
it on the system disk. As to performance, if page file performance become
If I were you, I'd test installing it on your lab server to make sure you
don't break anything before installing it the same way on your production
server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Mess
If this is an Exchange Server generating the message, then routing is
enabled in the IMS, but the specified e-mail domain 63.230.xx.xx is not
recognized as an inbound domain.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
Your presumption that the perpetrator would require a lot of time to write
correct prose is rather presumptive.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EM
He left his box accessible. Well, McDonald shares in responsibility then.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Exchange 5.5 or 2000? OWA is very different between them and the
ramifications are too.
I don't see much point in putting a front-end OWA server in the DMZ for
either version, though. Just open port 443 to the Exchange OWA box inside
your intranet, or, better, implement a VPN solution.
Q1 and
FAQ Appendix B.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Lambert
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:45 AM
To: Exchange D
And how would you know?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:04 AM
To: E
Why, does that check tip over every month?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2
There used to be companies that claimed such. May I suggest you check out
http://www.slipstick.com and see if Sue has anything posted there?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks. Now I won't bother decoding it. My wife doesn't let me read such
things.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of D
I think it's a safe bet that someone has used it before.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Thursd
It's cheaper to place a Post-It Note over the place where that stupid dialog
appears.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O
Authentica has a product that does that.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:
AS a warning, she left out the instructions to sacrafice the chicken. Very
important step, sacraficing the chicken.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Ori
Yup... That means that the address in the To field of this message was the
return address on a message to your organization which was misaddressed. In
turn, the original message has a reply to address that you can't deliver to,
for what could be a number of reasons - DNS resolution or transient de
Its by design, RFC 821 I believe. NDRs should always be generated from a
null address, which causes MTAs to not generate an NDR in the case said NDR
is not deliverable.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Syst
Yep. That's the fact, jack.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, Oct
Not necessarily. If its a regular occurance that the user (McDonald) leaves
his machine for extended periods (meetings, etc) without locking it, its
just a bit of social engineering to identify when those times are.
>From there, the initial message could be crafted days ahead of time, and
saved a
Depending on the versions of Exchange and Outlook, yes, it can be bad.
Technet has at least one article about issues with Ol2k on Exchange 5.5
boxes
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
htt
Hello.
Do you have some norton vs trend compare docs?
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 19-Oct-01 17:16
Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change
>
> Well, first off, you can scan with more than one engine when using
Antig
Why would Sybari want to write a doc comparing Norton to Trend? *confused*
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 1:48 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: AntiVirus Change
>
>
> Hello.
>
> Do you have some norton
Just answer my question!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change
Why would Sybari want to write a doc comparing Norton to Trend? *confused*
> -Original Message
The "Comparing Whitepaper" is from Compaq...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 21:46
An: Exchange Discussions
Betreff: RE: AntiVirus Change
Just answer my question!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [m
Why u no post link??
-Original Message-
From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AW: AntiVirus Change
The "Comparing Whitepaper" is from Compaq...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andy David [ma
Cause I only have the PDF handy...sorry mate...
But the title is:
Anti-Virus Solutions for Microsoft Exchange Server (11FU-1299A-WWEN)
and it's from December 1999!!!
Ricki
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Oktober 2001 23:56
An:
Thank u.
U much nicer than inner circle...
-Original Message-
From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AW: AntiVirus Change
Cause I only have the PDF handy...sorry mate...
But the title is:
Anti-Vir
So you have fallen victim to the inner circle have you?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change
Thank u.
U much nicer than inner circle..
Yeah, but given the changes in technology since 1999, that whitepaper isn't
terribly useful IMHO other than as a guide on how to perform testing to
answer your own question.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message
2 years in IT is like going back to the stoneage :)
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 2:51 AM
Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change
Yeah, but given the changes in technology sinc
Hi All
MSX5.5+SP4+NT4+SP6a
Have you ever make a configuration to let exchange that already uses
properly a IMC to manage at the same time an ETRN queue?
I am going to set this and want to know if somebody can share his/her
previous experience on this.
Rgds,
-ER
___
Hi
Has anyone played with MailEssentials and MimeSweeper for SMTP ?
What are your impressions ?
Are both doing about the same thing or one of those product is doing
everything the other is doing and more ?
What about Stability ?
THANKS a lot for your input.
JF
_
It probably doesnt even cover AVAPI or ESE based scanning.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AntiVirus Change
Yeah, but given the changes in tec
I have also heard the min = max theory for page files, and I would never
disagree with anyone who wanted to do it that way (I generally do). I've
heard some good theories for and against, so I usually chalk that one up to
personal preference.
I would agree with Tony's recommendation (if nothing
Well, it covers the use of ESE scanning by one company at a time when
Microsoft was none to happy with the idea. My how times have changed.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [m
39 matches
Mail list logo
