What are you talking about?
Please be sure to include the message you are replying too as well.
-Original Message-
From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA change password option
We are using IIS 4.0 and no
We are using IIS 4.0 and no there are no local accounts.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PR
I don't have a 5.5 server handy, but this is a setting in the IMS. It's
pretty obvious when you see it.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:42 PM
Subject: Display Names
I had a user ask
I'm officially punishing myself. I found the answer (Q257891) at
Microsoft PSS.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Liona
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA problem in 1of my 2 domains
I've got a 2 domain (separate tree) forest with an E
ISA may provide something. There is nothing in IIS that I know of since E2K
does not use sessions. Also, Check out SecureLogoff for OWA 2000 by
Messageware:
www.messageware.com
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: OWA Time-out
I have been searching for info on timing out OWA se
I had a user ask me if I control how their email sent to another company
was displayed. They want their Display name to show up in the from field
not [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could someone educate me on how this resolution
occurs.
Thanks
_
ISA may provide something. There is nothing in IIS that I know of since E2K
does not use sessions. Also, Check out SecureLogoff for OWA 2000 by
Messageware:
www.messageware.com
- Original Message -
From: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Seon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
You can have your mailboxes on one server,and spec it for high
availability (ie redundant power, redundant Nic's, etc)but you may only
achieve around 99% availabiltiy, unless you look at clustering.
Without picking a brand of server you will probably need a quad processor
server, with 1.5Gb to
I am having some issues with our Organizational forms.
I have 5 libraries in there and not sure how. I found an article that
matches my problem almost exactly. Q272187
But we are a single site with 17 server and many of the servers have no
forms at all.
My questions are:
1. How or should I d
None that I know of without an add-on. I think I read something about
an add-on to do it but I don't recall the details.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
Do you by chance have a local account on the OWA server, as referenced in
Q190433?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA change password option
What version of IIS are
What version of IIS are you using?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA change password option
I am having some trouble with this so I thought I would throw this out to
everyone. He
I am having some trouble with this so I thought I would throw this out to
everyone. Here is my situation:
Exchange 5.5 SP4 with dedicated OWA servers. About a year ago we had the
issue described in Q238444 (Password is going to expire in 0 days). We
decided at the time to change the entry i
So it is made that way by design? There is no way to work around this?
Lou
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Time-out
They won't.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech
As I understand it, but you can confirm this with Microsoft, is that a
license for Outlook is included with an Exchange 2000 CAL. An Exchange
2000 CAL is the same price regardless of which client you use, OWA
included.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporati
They won't.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Louanne
Fournier
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:49 AM
T
> >> OWA CAL versus Outlook CAL
> -- Same cost.
> Right, its just the cost of Outlook, which includes a CAL so
> something like $60 Outlook versus $20 OWA, dependent on order
> quantities and licensing programs?
To the best of my knowledge[1] in Exchange 5.5 at least there is no need to
purchas
Yeah, install MercuryMail on their workstations.
Have you reminded them that Sendmail is merely a shadow of what Exchange
can do? I mean, shoot, I can't go off-roading in my Ferrari like I did
in my Jeep Wrangler. Can you jack up my Ferrari and put big knobby
wheels on it?
-Original Mess
>> Bandwidth of Outlook versus OWA
-- How much does bandwidth cost?
Depends, I guess we need to know the avg utilization of Outlook in kpbs
versus OWA in kpbs. I suppose this will also be dependent on Outlook 97
versus 2000 versus XP.
Serdar says:
We have done a network utilization comparison be
I have been searching for info on timing out OWA session in Exchange 2000. The only
reference I can find is to settings in IIS. This is set to 900 seconds. My user
sessions aren't timing out. A user can come back a day later and still access
everything without having to re-authenticate. Do
More comments inline
..
>>How about the tangible fixed costs like:
>> OWA CAL versus Outlook CAL
-- Same cost.
Right, its just the cost of Outlook, which includes a CAL so something like
$60 Outlook versus $20 OWA, dependent on order quantities and licensing
programs?
>> Bandwidth of Outlo
This is going to sound like a silly question, but bear with me... Is the
attachment saved directly to the public folder, or do you have to open a
post before you can open the document?
If the latter, what happens if you drag the document from the post and drop
it in the folder? Can your users mo
It is just when it is a document. Office documents are the only things we
use in public folders, and they are the only cuplrits.
-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder
You said it happens every time. Does it even happen with a simple post, or
only when you've got a Word document, Excel file, or some other attachment
saved to the folder?
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchan
Ahh ok, got ya.
I'm going to go play around with a few users Outlook clients and see what
happens.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes re
You can also configure mail-enabled users or contacts and route mail to
those who insist on keeping procmail instead of giving them a mailbox.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Messag
Comments inline.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Rotman
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:56 AM
That's my point. Do all the domain admins get it as editable? Do all
domain users get it as read-only? Does the behaviour change if you give one
of the users higher rights temporarily?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:
I've got domain admin rights myself. And admin rights on the exchange
server as well. But testing it with other users, still comes up read only.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I'm not a good person to test because I have domain admin rights, so that
could be why I can't repro it here. What domain rights do you have? What
rights do you have on the Exchange server?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2
H.
Well I've got a few Office 2k and some XP installs as well. I've got office
2k on my machine and the same exact thing happens. So it doesn't seem to
matter what version of Office or Email client we have.
BTW, All the folders I've tried this on the user, or users have had either
owner or
Yep, I think you're right. But if you have your IMS on another server, you
still might have to wait for the address to update in the directory on that
box.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
S
Try
Default: contributor
Anonymous: none
Worked for me.
-Yanek.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: send mail from external sources into public folders
>
>
> How long
Considering that the Outlook Rules Wizard is merely a shadow of what
procmail can do, I suggest setting up a separate sub-domain with its own MX
and routing mail there on a per user basis. That system can continue to use
Sendmail.
Dunno your environment/infrastructure though so it may not work w
How long did you wait?
-Original Message-
From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 6:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: send mail from external sources into public folders
I am having troubles send mail from external sources into public fold
Check connectivity and name resolution between clients and servers.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John
I can't reproduce it here, but this bank at least bought us Office97. How
are they saving it there?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes rea
I've got a 2 domain (separate tree) forest with an E2K server in each
domain. The root domain E2K is at SP1 and OWA works just fine. The other
domain is at SP2 and OWA gives me a 'File not found' error after I
authenticate with it. The logs show me a 401 error right before the 404
error so I've ch
I am having troubles send mail from external sources into public folders.
I have set thepermissions for anonymous user to contributer as per Q300221
but the mail still stalls in our inbound gateway Q. Any ideas.
_
List posting FAQ:
Gurus,
We have moved our messaging environment from Sendmail to Exchange and
lot of unix users believe that they have lost capability of procmail in
new environment . The Procmail is used to preprocess the email or
trigger any programs on arrival of email .Alternatively it is used for
filtering
Not a bank :)
Anyways, does anyone have any suggestions on this? This one has got me
baffled.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes read onl
That was my point exactly.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 20
We do have VPN's into these remote offices. I was just wondering if a FE
server would use the bandwidth more efficiently than 30-odd client
connections.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job wi
Have you verified the smtp address of the folder?
-Original Message-
From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 6:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder
I am experiencing the exact opposite problem, interna
LOL!! Oy!!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes read only.
Well, if I didnt know any better, it sounds as if you work for a bank! ;)
-
I think your client using POP3 and you didn't configure it properly as
incoming & outgoing server address.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/s
I am experiencing the exact opposite problem, internal users can send mail
to public folders and external can't. Any ideas?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swyn
I agree with Missy. While E2K's front-end server arrangement requires
you to open fewer ports than with Exchange's 5.5 equivalent, you still
have to open more than if you just allowed HTTP SSL across the WAN.
I still think a VPN is a superior alternative.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tec
How about the tangible fixed costs like:
OWA CAL versus Outlook CAL
Bandwidth of Outlook versus OWA
Hardware requirements of Outlook versus OWA (scalability)
VPN costs for Outlook
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1
Well, if I didnt know any better, it sounds as if you work for a bank! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes read only.
Yes...
Windows
Yes...
Windows 95 workstations, Office 95 and some people still use the Exchange
client that came from Exchange 4.0, but mostly Outlook 98 for mail.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Office 95?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes read only.
I don't no.
Most of the users having problems with this are using Microsoft
I don't no.
Most of the users having problems with this are using Microsoft Office 95
and Outlook 98without the security patch.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folde
Just turn it off in Outlook. The your users can whine because OL isn't
responding.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: Fw: Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchan
I think I found what might be wrong. I checked the differences between a
working public folder and a non working one using ADSI Edit. It seems the
working one has the HomeMDB set and the others didn't. With Microsoft's
help I am rebuilding my RUS and let's hope this takes care of it..
Thanks e
I continue to get this message, see Subject line. I am lost at this point. I
have checked the performance on the server, Processor, memory, network
communications.
Even checked Queues. Everything looks good. Including no error inthe Event
log at all.
But users continue to get the popup message "Re
Thanks Missy. I wasn't sure if connections to the backend server would be
aggregated, making it more efficient or not.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
-Original M
Can anyone tell me if the InterOrg Synchronization Tool works in conjunction
with an Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0 Cluster? I am currently doing some planning &
testing toward synchronizing with another Exchange organization who are
running a cluster. I don't have any cluster-capable hardware abailable fo
I'd put the FE server with the BE server. Connections for mail will, in the
end, be across the WAN either way...
- Original Message -
From: "John Matteson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Design Question
I'm not sure how one would quantify those things in hard dollars. What cost
would one assign to the inability to create note objects via OWA? If you
don't need them, there's $0 cost associated with the inability to create
them and if you do need them then there's a non $0 cost which could be
anywh
Did you install ADC before running /ForestPrep and then when running
/ForestPrep specify that your Exchange 2000 server would be in the
existing Exchange 5.5 organization? If not, you aren't in the same
organization and as far as I know you can't use Move Mailbox without
some drastic surgery to y
You're saying that Word says "Read Only" in the title bar when you open
the document? That's not a problem with Exchange, but with Office. In
fact, Exchange 5.5 doesn't support object permissions, just folder
permissions. Do you have that damnable Outlook security patch
installed?
Ed Crowley M
The Q article is for Outlook. Yes, it should work.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange
Newsgroups
Maybe you did something wrong in the process.
You should review your ADC setup. If all else fails you can use the Exchange Migration
Wizard.
Amit Zinman
MCSE,
Project Manager
Professional Services Group
Getronics (Israel)
Tel: +972-3-5127306
Mobile: +972-53-570139
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found that the Q article is for Exchange 5.5. Will this also work for
Exchange 2000?
Thanks
Saul
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:35 PM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Retention period in Public Fol
It told me I had to set it up one way only because the Exchange 5.5 server
was not in the same organization.
However, the Exchange 2000 server and the Exchange 5.5. server are both
listed in the same site and organization under the Exchange 5.5.
administrator program.
The Exchange 2000 server wa
How much does each cost you? What is the additional cost of the reduced
function?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
I've put it up in a "test" environment on several of my production Exchange
5.5 servers.
There isn't anything you can do with MOM than you can't do with Perfmon
while running on NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5, the remote management capabilities
just aren't there.
With Exchange 2000 and Win 2000 the man
This may be a stupid question, but here goes anyways.
Anytime anyone saves anything to a public folder the document becomes read
only. And the people that are doing this are either owners, or publishing
editors and have the proper permissions. Am I missing something?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Winnt SP6
Recently we have been experiencing stability issues with one of our
Active/Active clusters once it was updated to SP2. The store appears to
hang and ultimately the server has to be powered down to resolve the
user mode hang.
Reviewing the times of the crashes it appears to happen frequently nea
Somebody was looking for ChargeBack info. Here's an article -
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=9582
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.sw
Did you set up the Connection Agreement (CA) on ADC for both ways? Or
just one way only?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: ToddMicro, Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, February 21, 2002 8:44 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: How to m
I know a former Enron accountant looking for work, what would you like the
ROI numbers to say?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, Februar
Doh!
Hmm..what can I say! I try to keep ontop of things...better late than
never!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 February 2002 10:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Survey; Support vs No. or users/servers
You'd learn a lot quicker
I read the article, but on my setup, you can see the Exchange 5.5 accounts
showing in the AD, but Mailbox Store is blank because it is an Exchange 5.5.
account.
If you select, "Exchange Tasks" on these accounts, Move Mailbox is not an
option.
I read somewhere that this is because the Active Dire
Export to pst and send it to them. Then they can import into the final
destination.
Tom Mezyk
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward mail already in mailbox?
Duh - I didn
All,
Does anyone have data on or know of public data on the ROI/Reduced costs of
OWA versus Outlook/VPN solutions?
Thanks,
Mark
http://www.messageware.com
Plus Pack for OWA 2000
SecureLogoff for OWA 2000
_
List posting FAQ:
Duh - I didn't read carefully enough. I'll go punish myself.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward mail a
You should find out why you need a hosts file.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Halliday S
(ISeLS)
Sent:
How does that forward the mail already in the mailbox?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent:
Is there any way to tweak the amount of time (or number of retries)a Routing
Group Connector is willing to go through before giving up on a message and
generating an NDR? The general SMTP settings do not seem to apply.
/Gordon
___NOTICE__
You can filter the users by using the "find" command and then move them.
See my article on http://www.msexchange.org for details.
Amit
-Original Message-
From: ToddMicro, Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2002 3:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Ho
How about you create a DL that has all of your users in it and
A. Give Read Only rights to that DL and deny posts
OR
B. Create a Folder Assistant rule that deletes all incoming mail from those
people and responds with a template "you've gotta send mail to the list not
here"
OR
C. Create
It's a "standard" for exchanging calendar items across dissimilar systems.
Exchange/Outlook uses one form by default, but the *nix world seems to be
running with the Anything-but-Microsoft iCalendar. Outlook2000 and later
(definitely in XP) will send in iCal format.
If you have OutlookXP, open a
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a
Having read something similar in another thread, I must ask...
Mail sent to mailing list (currently using ReddfishListServer) is sent to
all recipients specified for that list including PF & Solaris server running
Mailman for web archives. This works pretty well -- pe
Write [EMAIL PROTECTED] and tell them about the problem. They know it
exists, but say it's "by design". Maybe if enough people complain...
In the meantime, check www.cdolive.com for a possible solution.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "David Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange D
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned using an Alternate Recipient and
creating a Custom Recipient. Setting this up should keep the sender intact
- the mail is redirected to the custom recipient, which would be the e-mail
addy of the POP account. Anything rules to do with forwarding are likely
Its probably Tumbleweed MMS.
www.tumbleweed.com
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MMS Notification
What the heck is an MMS Notification, and why am I getting one for a
They want the mailboxes moved to different storage databases on a cluster
server based on certain attributes.
There are 10 of 1000s of mailboxes.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February
This is a known "feature" of E2k. The only workarounds I know of are
3rd party, such as PostToNote here:
http://victori.hypermart.net/
Maybe Siegfried will chip in here with an alternative offering...
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For En
I have 5.5 SP4 on NT server and E2K SP2 on another server. All mailboxes
and PFs are homed on the latter. The last thing I have to do before
decommissioning the 5.5 server is to route Internet mail via E2K. At the
moment I have everything going out through E2K but everything coming in to
5.5.
Sorry, I was going to do that after I skimmed the 9,770 hits that google
returned.
But seriously, the Microsoft site does not play well with non-MS browsers, so I
tend to look there last.
AW
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, you wrote:
> Doesn't anyone know how to do research anymore? Putting in "icalendar"
YES !!!
Thanks a lot. That did the trick.
Knowledge is power. And You people got it.
Regards,
Ronny
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne av Irfan Malik
Sendt: 21. februar 2002 12:03
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: Advanced Que
This is one for the books & it was never Scanmail. Apparently OfficeScan by Trendmicro
is the product that effects browsing.
Anyway, the real problem & solution:
I am using a tool, namely Scriptlogic, for various things. One such task was to
automatically fill the "comment" or "srvcomment
And it was working before.
SYMPTOMS
Inbound messages to an Exchange 2000 Server domain may not be delivered. The sender
may also receive one of the following non-delivery reports (NDRs):
* Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: Test Message
Sent: 11/01/2
Yes !
We have an MX-record pointing in to my server.
Ronny
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne av Irfan Malik
Sendt: 21. februar 2002 11:31
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: Advanced Queue Failed to
Is any MX record pointing to your m
Is any MX record pointing to your mail server?
-Original Message-
From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Advanced Queue Failed to
Well,
we do not have an SMTP connector.
We also
Well,
we do not have an SMTP connector.
We also do not have any routing group.
(maybe we should)
That leavs out:
* DNS returned an authoritative host that was not found for the domain.
* An SMTP Protocol error occurred
We are running an standalone Exchange Installatin. win2kSP2 and E2kSP2
The q
Not really, as AppManager doesn't do Event Viewer consolidation
Amit Zinman
MCSE,
Project Manager
Professional Services Group
Getronics (Israel)
Tel: +972-3-5127306
Mobile: +972-53-570139
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Troubleshooting: Correct or add an address space of type SMTP with asterisk (*) value
to one or more SMTP connectors; verify that DNS is working; make sure that routing
groups have connectors connecting them. Also, if not on Exchange 2000 Service Pack 1,
apply Service Pack 1 to narrow the issue
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
