AR
Dang Hardening an IIS server book . ..
You must have File and Printer Sharing on for the SMTP or NNTP modules to
appear in the IIS MMC console and function properly.
Thanks for any help that may have been under way!!
Chris
This is SMTP Service in IIS in Windows 2000 Server . . .
Everything was running fine and I decided to move on and "harden" my server
as described in the O'Reily book about building Windows 2000 Bastion Hosts.
I went through and disabled all un-needed services as prescribed and
rebooted.
The SMT
Indeed. Those databases will always grow, eventually colliding with the home
directories.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Diskkeep
Yep.
Or, to be precise, when you see me, you'll be in hell.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leo Ballester
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: backup failure
I will see you in HELL :-)
Read them and see if any are usable for blackmailing.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 6:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messages sent to bogus domains like "aol"
> Any ot
You can always initiate a self-punishment session at any time.
And, yes, it's pronounced the way it's spelled. It sounds like a universe
being sucked backwards through a flexi-straw into a tailpipe somehow capable
of saying "Jones" at the end, with a slight Welsh accent.
(:=
-Original Messa
I adjusted the content filtering to skip this list. I already had an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] alias setup. I did add an alias for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for any nuisance on the list.
~Mark Fay
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04
> Any other ideas?
Ignore it.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List adm
Hi all.
I have a bunch of messages sitting in the queues that people sent to someone@aol or
someon@yahoo (no .com or .net or .org, etc)
I am trying to figure out if there is a way to automatically reject such messages,
short of writing an SMTP sink.
My first thought was to change the address
Anyone seen this ADC error before?
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: MSADC
Event Category: Replication
Event ID: 8294
Date: 8/23/2002
Time: 9:49:24 AM
User: N/A
Computer: NTS336
Description:
The homeMTA attribute is not present on the import object
You left space for Serious Sam, I hope
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience
And 4 years ago Microsoft told you running Exchange aware
And 4 years ago Microsoft told you running Exchange aware AV on your boxes
was a big no no. Ideal configurations and reality often have little
correlation. (Says he who just installed AD and E2K on a laptop)
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
And that is a BIG NO NO! Exchange Server should not be used for a file
server. Microsoft will tell you nothing but Exchange should be on the
Server. Except maybe AV software for Exchange.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
I guess you bought the spin. What I said was correct.
R1 did not do anything to which a gateway could be attached.
Mary McCarthy gave lots of pitches wherein LMS was clearly described as a
combination message store and MTA common to both Notes and cc:Mail, and it
did not get built because the t
Well if this server was only for exchange I'd say no. But the reality is
that this server is also used as file server.
Jim Liddil
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:46 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject:
Exchange offline defrags are rarely if ever necessary. Is there a compelling
reason to have diskkeeper within 100 miles of the server?
> -Original Message-
> From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject:
Well I once told Wal-Mart's (Exchange 5.5) Senior Exchange man that defrag
wasn't really necessary unless there where performance issues or temp. disk
space issues. Well he said that MS says run it so that's what they do. I was
interviewing for the job and he said anyone who doesn't run Defrag on
If you can look in your Event Viewer and see that the online defrag Exchange
does overnight will give you back 20-30GB of space, go for it. Run the
eseutil /d utility. But if you are only seeing MBs of space you would
regain, forget about it. It's not worth the time nor is it worth the
resource
As noted before I found my store.exe at 500,000 K this morning ( An exchange
server for 25 people) and the CPU at 100%. Restarting IS fixed the memory
usage but not the CPU usage. So I killed DiskKeeper 7 which I had running
in "smart schedule" mode. But it took me a few hours to figure that i
Reboot then it will come back..
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: securing OWA
Yep that is correct. Found the article on how to change the server name in
the regristery off of technet.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
You can generate your own digital certificates but no one will automatically trust
them. Everyone trusts SSL certificates from Verisign.
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Securing OW
There is a Q article on MS site that tells exactly how to setup. Also if it
is a SSL from Verisign or some other vendor, they should have sent the step
by steps along with the SSL. I have used Verisign in the past with excellent
results. just follow their steps and related Q article and you will b
I guess it is better to run OWA on thin air
-Original Message-
From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Securing OWA
IIS Lockdown is a utility from Microsoft that will (based on what you
choose) make an I
Not exactly sure of your setup. But in general terms 5.5 OWA works OK with
E2K. E2K OWA however does not work with Exchange 5.5 boxes.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exc
I don't get much SPAM at the work address.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Tuip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 13:29
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday
> Hotmail?
>
> --
> Martin Tuip
> MVP
I have an Exchange 2000 SP2 box, fresh install onto Win2k SP2.
The M drive doesn't show in explorer, etc, as expected after SP2.
However, I have installed an SSL certificate on IIS, and I want to turn
on the secure channel required option for the Exchange VD, but I can't,
because when I select t
Please excuse the accidental double negative, I meant to say that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not recommended by the RFC. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter
Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:16 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Attn: FAY.COM admin
Subject: RE: Attn: FAY
Actually, it doesn't seem that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not one of the
standard mailbox names recommended by RFC-2142. Hostmaster, Webmaster,
and a few others should be considered before that.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 04,
Do you have to do something besides install the Adobe PDF Ifilter to add
PDF files to that list?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:01 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Full Text Indexing
Subject: RE: Full T
Hotmail?
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: "Steven A. Christensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROT
I'am about ready to disconnect my last/first exchange 5.5 server in my 5.5
site. Reason of servers are running
Ex2000. I know that my OWA 5.5 server will connect to my Ex2000 mailbox at
the present time. But, what will
happen when I shutdown the last 5.5 server. Will my 5.5 OWA still be able
You can throw a rock from where the pony express starts and hit Kansas. Tie
the telegram to it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
>
>
> As soon
Very polite, you don't see that much round these parts.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 13:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: backup failure
Pauli:
This is the second post you've made today with very
Wilco.
> --
> From: Tom Meunier
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2002 12:27
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
>
> Whatever you're reading, you should be using to wrap fish or line
> birdcages.
..And I always pronounced it as hoe-neez. Like "cahones" without the "ca".
Must I wait for direct order before whipping myself with frayed cat5
cabling, or do I start now?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:35
I just posted this a couple of days ago, but here it is again. It labels
whatever tape is in the drive and does a backup to it.
Use the GUI to create the backup selection file "everything.bks". Obviously,
you want this file to include your Exchange information stores.
Change the "BNCHMARK DLT1
MSFT came back with a solution. In ISM on each node, I went to the
properties of Exchange Virtual Server | Exchweb | bin. In the Application
Settings section of the Virtual Directory tab, I clicked on the Create
button and hit OK. When both nodes were done, I went to cluster admin and
cycled th
>Not only is your content filter set to some ridiculous parameters
Agreed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Attn: FAY.COM adm
Not only is your content filter set to some ridiculous parameters, but
you should ask your email admin to set up a [EMAIL PROTECTED] account.
Do an [EMAIL PROTECTED] and a [EMAIL PROTECTED] while you're at it.
Jeesh. Nice to get an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] telling me there's
no such user in r
Great. Gives me something to start with. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
No, there's no "must be a simple way" about it. There's not.
As soon as the pony express gets there, they will send a telegram to take
care of it.
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday
lol - Kansas
- Original M
lol - Kansas
- Original Message -
From: "Ali Wilkes (IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:42
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
what state? I have a greivance. My change of address hasn't gone
through yet (two 1/2
It's pronounced JONES, like cones, but with a J.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To "Great Cthulhu Jones"
Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name
Oh, that is pronounced: 'jOnz
That one stumps me on occasion as well.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To "Great Cthulhu Jones"
Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the la
Do you mean the one after Windows 3.1 ME 2000 SE?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
It's the version of windows before Windows NT 2000.NET
Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name...
Thanks...Ray
Quote of the day:
When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him.
-- Thomas Szasz
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: W
Whatever you're reading, you should be using to wrap fish or line
birdcages.
What's Windows NT 2000?
> -Original Message-
> From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:59 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: NT 2000 backu
You pronounce it the same way it is spelled.
Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1]
[1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Disc
I just did an install of win2k server, then sp3 and any critical
windowsupdates, then installed exchange 5.5 and then sp4 for exchange. I
then (manually) used the "built-in" backup program of win2k to backup the
exchange server. There is a separate exchange "branch" in the explorer
interface tha
A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring
and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the
correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by
mispronouncing it when paying homage.
You are correct. The following file types, up to 16mb in size by
default, change-able with a reg hack:
.doc, .xls, .ppt, .html, .htm, .asp, .txt, and .eml
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:40 AM
> Poste
>From what I have been reading the Windows NT 2000 version of ntbackup.exe is
not Exchange aware.
I know they tell you to to use the Exchange 2000 version for MS Exchange
2000 Server. Admittedly, I don't recall anything about using it with MS
Exchange 5.5.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
> --
No, there's no "must be a simple way" about it. There's not. But here's
a good article that solved this problem for me, and taught me a little
bit about RSM and NTBACKUP and scripting, too:
http://www.jsiinc.com/sube/tip2200/rh2265.htm
> -Original Message-
> From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PF
what state? I have a greivance. My change of address hasn't gone
through yet (two 1/2 weeks ago).
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:03 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Haiku
And done full backups?
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:02 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Win2K SP3 good to go?
Subject: RE: Win2K SP3 good to go?
Go for it & apply Exchange SP3 as well
If you apply a SP for the OS, you then re-apply the last SP for the
application running on the machine.
So, in your situation, yes, reapply the Exchange sP after the OS SP.
John M.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 8:45 PM
To: Exc
1. Micromended[1] (adj); Something that has been recommended by
Microsoft; usage: "Win2k SP3 is Micromended".
[1] credit to my coworker, Boyd[2], who combined the two.
[2] Boyd, eh,
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/re
Maybe look at Q269289 and Q184718.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Shed some light on 501 5.5.2
I got this error returned from a user:
Subject: Mail delivery failu
Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2.
Well we have our first 2000 server up running Exchange 5.5 SP3. I'm trying
to get the backups to run similar to what I had with NT 4.0. With the 4.0
version I had the cmd set to initialize any tape in the drive, backup and
eject and mail the logs for verific
The Technology that Notes is built on has allowed it to be resilient and
morph it self to an ever changing market conditions. It was declared dead
at the start of the Internet revolution but with the help of IBM was able to
quickly deliver a decent HTTP server in R4 and native SMTP transport whic
I got this error returned from a user:
Subject: Mail delivery failure
Sent >>> .
Received <<< 501 5.5.2 there is a stray LF character in the message
Could not deliver mail to this user.
* End of message ***
Looking in the KB and on Technet all I found was a reference
Perhaps custom configuration will need to be done on the HTTP Virtual Servers on the
back-end that represent your front-ends.
On theback-end, drill into Server/Protocols/HTTP
You have
Exchange Virtual Server
[Front-end Server name]
right?
Go to the properties of the [Front-end Server name].
My impression has been that Exchange 2000 indexing searches within attachments
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing
Err on earl
Turns out DiskKeeper got stuck on even though it is in auto mode. Or so it
would seem at this stage.
Jim
> -Original Message-
> From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:28 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
>
>
Agreed. If you have AV software it might be scanning your mailbox stores
(especially considering the fact that you stopped and restarted the
store.exe).
You might see if it is setup on a schedule of some sort.
What other processes are running and which ones are taking the most CPU
time?
N
Uninstall the one of them which is Exchange aware and make sure the other is
not scannign the Exchange directories... Any change?
> -Original Message-
> From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:24 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE:
I cant say for your setup ..since I have not gone the upgrade way yet... but
if it where my 55 on NT4..
I might...look at the taskmgr and see what process is consumming all the
CPU.
with regard to memory... 55 is designed to be a pig...and slim down on
request.
2 cents
bill
-Original Messag
Already tried that. Stop both the McAffee and Trend Micro. No effect.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
>
>
> You have AV software run
Correct, well almost MS does have a couple of solutions. Really I was just
hoping someone has implemented something to meet this need, and might have
an opinion. I am going to have to evaluate any solution(s) and was just
hoping to reduce the number of evaluations and or stay away from any PIG
a
You have AV software running on this machine? You might look the way of
your AV software.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Desperate Newbie
W2K SP3,E2K SP3, AD
W2K SP3,E2K SP3, AD. I noticed my store.exe using almost 500,000 K and the
CPU pegged at 100%. This is a dual 866 processor box with 1 gig of RAM. I
stopped and restarted the IS and this clear the memory usage problem. But
the CPU is still pegged at 100%. I don't want to reboot as of yet. I a
Err on earlier response. You would need 3rd party app. to search
attachments.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Full Text Indexing
My email packrats (err users) have asked for t
Go for it & apply Exchange SP3 as well.
You have tried it in your labsright ??
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 15:53 pm
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Win2K SP3 good to go?
Has the smoke s
It is the desire to search Attachment content that they really want. All of
the products I have looked at report the ability to search most MS Office
formats, .txt, some .zip etc etc. Plus an indexing feature would greatly
increase the speed of the search, some of my users are 600+MB packrats.
Doesn't look inside attachments, need something like KVS but for live Email
not just Archived messages.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 0
What's wrong with using find under tools? This will allow them to search
their own mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Full Text Indexing
My email packrats (err users)
Has the smoke settled...with Win2K SP3 O.K. to apply?
TIA,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site:
__
My email packrats (err users) have asked for the ability to do full text
searches against mail messages and attachments. I would appreciate any
feedback on available products, hopefully use/don't use.
Slipstick has a number of options and I have also read "Integrating
Microsoft Site Server Searc
You can use deleted item recovery, by selecting the parent folder (assumes
you had it set)
Neil
- Original Message -
From: "Aamir Hanif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:33 PM
Subject: Recovering Deleted Public Folde
you are backing up mailboxes, not the information stores. Check your
documentation, or see the FAQ.
- Original Message -
From: "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: backup failure
Hi,
My backup have f
Thanks all.
I got it.
Aamir.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Recovering Deleted Public Folder
Recover deleted items should work if you have it enabled. There's a Q
ar
Ouch. Guess who I'm working for...
- Original Message -
From: "Sander Van Butzelaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 06:54
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Maybe Swink has been bought out by the Post Office:-)
-O
Recover deleted items should work if you have it enabled. There's a Q
article on how to do this for a PF.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Aamir Hanif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:33 AM
Subject: Recovering Dele
If the same user tried to log into the backend server directly using OWA,
are they successful?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/4/2002 8:10 AM
Subject: OWA Problem in forntend/backend setup
anyone here experienced this kind of problem. i'd set
>>You probably did but did you check the box that says this is a front end
server?
yes i did check that box and restarted the server.
>>Also why can't you put them both on the same port?
because ISA server is also setup on the frontend server and its using the port 80,
this box is already i
Certain of that. The biggest problem has been getting the SQL databases and
the system state on one of the servers to backup correctly. The Exchange
backup has gone pretty well.
Bill Kuhl
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04,
Are you sure you don't have those products switched around?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: backup failure
We switched from Arcserve 2000 to Veritas and getting Veritas to ma
We switched from Arcserve 2000 to Veritas and getting Veritas to make a
clean backup with no errors has not been a piece of cake. After getting the
bug fixes and getting the backup accounts setup just right, it is getting
close to working 100 percent.
Bill Kuhl
_
Why didn't you do a backup last night?
Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813
-Original Message-
From: Aamir Hanif [mailto:[EMA
Guys:
Someone at our office deleted a Public Folder this morning. Unfortunately,
this folder was created yesterday and we did not do a backup last night. I
have set the properties on the Public Folders so that they are not
permanently deleted.
Does anyone know how I can recover the folder?
Than
I will see you in HELL :-)
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: backup failure
Well done, Leo. You have single-handedly pissed off at least 17 secret
cabals who are now p
Just did... Feel much better thank you...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: backup failure
It may be time for you to get back on your medicine.
-Original Message-
Fro
That is a good idea But I think you are bias... "Chris the Crusher" ???
I don't like mine! Can you change it please? We can make some money here...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subje
So is me??? I'm the bad guy here? I'm sure you will I know your type.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: backup failure
Ah Leo, still as charming as ever. No need to come
You probably did but did you check the box that says this is a front end
server? Also why can't you put them both on the same port? When you
the client goes to the address are they putting the x.com:8080/exchange?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
S
anyone here experienced this kind of problem. i'd setup OWA using the frontend/backend
technology the frontend server is used for OWA access only using port 8080 in
communicating with the client requests and the backend server is configured to use
port 80 in communicating with the frontend serv
Pauli:
This is the second post you've made today with very little information. You may have
noticed the responses you got were about as informative as the question you asked.
Please include your version of Exchange, the name and version of your backup software
and other things such as your
That should fix it. Some people really have a problem with c*k*s and the
like.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 13:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: backup failure
Well, heaven forfend we should discuss setting up Ex
Well, heaven forfend we should discuss setting up Exchange for a neo-Nazi
pro-abortion anti-homosexual terrorist organization funded by cocaine sales,
prostitution networks, and bake sales. That would set off a few filters.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PR
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
