You might also want to set folder visible tick box off under contributor (if
the emails are confidential).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2002 19:54
To
Boss got a flyer in the mail. Is talking to sales rep. Wants me to
produce an opinion from experienced E2K Admin(s).
Anyone?
www.allocity.com
__
Paul E. Pelfrey, MCSE, MCP, A+
Messaging Engineer, Cardinal Health, Inc.
7000 Cardinal Place, Dublin, OH 43017
:614.7
Was this the only server in the site?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore problem
Tried both
Constantly get permissions problems (access denied)
-Original Message-
It is so limited that you have to leave it in the CD jewel case.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
I thought I heard there was a really limited fe
OK. Anonymous = yes with 2000, not needed with Exchange 5.5.
Thanks!
Robert
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Cameron [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos
>
> in e2k, you *do* have t
Excellent idea. Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hurst, Paul [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:32 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos
>
> You might also want to set folder visible tick box off under contributor
> (if
Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO
replies/autoresponders to the internet on a "per mailbox" basis?
I have been looking through the marketing fluff but have not seen it
mentioned.
TIA
Chris
_
List postin
Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server SP3.
Hi All,
My attempt to add a disclaimer to my outbound mail using the SMTP
transport event sink failed.
Basically followed all directions in Article Q317680 and Q288756. Does
it really work? Or should I just go buy a 3rd party product? Any
suggestions?
Thanks
Third-party products are cheaper than programmers, if it's a one-time
deal and you don't have the in-house expertise.
http://www.netal.com/default.htm?disclaimit.htm
http://www.exclaimer.co.uk
> -Original Message-
> From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Thursday, Sept
How about http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q322051?
Was posted as a possible answer by an MS guy in the newsgroups to a similar
sounding issue.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 2:40 AM
> To: Exchan
Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted
e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for
window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to
filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too.
Tony
Hello Everyone,
There are two domains with two different exchange orgs. One is exchange 2000
(xxx.com), one is 5.5 (yyy.com).
We are in the process of migrating users from the 5.5 domain/org to the 2000
domain/org. We have an SMTP connector setup currently to send all emails to yyy.com
f
You cannot.
- Original Message -
From: "CHRIS H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM
Subject: Exchange 2000 Features
Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO
replies/autoresponders to the inte
Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1.
When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up that new-mail
notification icon.
However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- are delivered to
a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification.
Without re-writi
Mail server down is not.
UTP cable unplugged it is.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
You must give in to th
Whan a user in Exchange Organization A send a meeting request to users in
her Exchange Organization and Exchange Organization B, the users in her
Exchange Organization receive the meeting request without any problem, but
the users in Exchange Organization B receive it as a regular email message
wi
A user sends a meeting request to several different individuals. Some are
in the same Exchange Organization, some are in another Exchange
Organization. The recipientes in the same Exchange Organization receive
the requests without any problems. Those recipients in the "Other"
Exchange Organizati
Has it(Event sink-VB Script) worked for anyone? Does the server need to
be rebooted for it to take effect, although the q article does not say
so?
TIA.
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
There's no way to do this without rewriting code. Good request, though.
Have you tried sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Levis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: E
I promise that posting the same question using two different accounts will
not make the answer to your question show up twice as fast.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:02 AM
Subject: Meeting
As as 10 seconds from now, I have.
> -Original Message-
> From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:50 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification
>
>
> There's no way to do this without rewriting code. G
I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss
replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management
is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software
is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is
not good enough, and that's the only product
The SMTP service needs to be restarted. Does it work? Yes, to the extent
that the code is developed. It won't add disclaimers to MSTNEF messages
though unless the samples have been changed (haven't checked).
> -Original Message-
> From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thur
There are a number of high availability solutions listed at
www.mail-resources.com in the weblinks section including EMS. What are the actual requirements and how does DoubleTake not meet
those?
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
> -Original Message-
try www.mail-resources.com
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recommendation please
Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter
the un-wanted
e-mail like porn an
We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recommendation please
Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the
Is there a way using Exchange 5.5 on a NT4 platform (current with all
service packs) to monitor the activity of a mailbox? If not, is there 3rd
party software available to do this? Management is looking for a count of
emails daily in and out of users mailboxes. I'm sure that more information
th
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help
me out...
I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch
2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes?
I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it
'from the horse's mouth'
thanks
Ro
When getting the bounce message which email address is the sender using?
yyy.com or xxx.com
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: need help with setting up a recipient policy
Hel
I will give it another whirl tonite before heading out the door. The one
thing I did not do was restart the SMTP service from services.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Su
There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it
nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 P
So you think the release notes are lying?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: sp3 revisited
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help
me out...
I'd b
My thoughts exactly.
Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth?
But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my
knowledge - cumulative.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that
it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost?
- Karen
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote:
> There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it
> nicely. There are other possible
Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :)
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: sp3 revisited
My thoughts exactly.
Also - isn't *MS* the
MS Office SP2 requires SP1...
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: sp3 revisited
>
>
> Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :)
>
>
> ---
Office XP, that is.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: sp3 revisited
>
>
> MS Office SP2 requires SP1...
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailt
Are any of the Office SRs cumulative?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: sp3 revisited
Office XP, that is.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL
There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also
evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the
report format that management wanted.
dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2
Service packs are most always cumulative, most, if not all of the time.
That is except during leap years.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: sp3 revisited
Office XP, that is.
I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its
transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing this
simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is unreliable and is
simply, IMO, asking for at trouble. There is no product out there today
that can
Just one.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:30 PM
Subject: RE: sp3 revisited
Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :)
-Original Message-
F
>>So you think the release notes are lying?
er no, but ms have been know to get things wrong ;-0)
>>Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth?
no, not really (cue flames...) but I'm not going to discuss this any
further!
Anyway, thanks for confirming.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [m
Just looked it up. SP3. You're right. I was thinking SP2 as well, but it was
cumulative.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: sp3 revisited
Just one.
- Original Message -
I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself.
The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC
SAN/ Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based on
the understanding that the replication is a "best effort" process
and is not guaranteed. According to EMC, Mir
It's not worth the huge chunk of money they're asking, or tons of
organizations would be happy with the solution. I've tested most of these
solutions in the past, and the only one that made me even think about
deployment was the solution from Marathon Technologies.
Missy
- Original Message -
Follow up answer to this problem:
It turns out to be a "bug" in the Outlook client. If you give additional rights
beyond "Editor" to any DL or Default then the Outlook client will produce the below
listed errors. So, you should only grant Editor and Author rights when using the
direct bookin
I agree. We use Promodag. It's excellent. Not too expensive, either.
There is a listing in the faq's...we use Promodag..I like it...I also
> evaluated app analyzer from net iq...it was sweet, but didn't provide the
> report format that management wanted.
> dave
>
> -Original Message--
Hello.
I need to list all permissions applied to all folders in all mailboxes on
Exchange 5.5 server.
Can any one recommand on a tool or product to do it?
Thanks,
Mark.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/e
have you upgraded your Promodag to the newest version, 5? It is much faster
spitting out reports than the previous.
Dave Stevens
IT Network Support- Mail Administrator
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, Septemb
David, there is a fine article at www.exchangeadmin.com by Joseph Neubauer
in this months issue (oct2002) entitled Using and Configuring Outlook Direct
Booking, article number is 26184.
john
-Original Message-
From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12,
Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server for a user
through IMAP? I tried adding the contacts folder as a subscribed IMAP
folder but that just displayed it as an email folder.
Thanks,
Mike
_
List posting FAQ:
Well, obviously this is an area I've looked into quite a bit.
My major issue with replication is bandwidth, in a large distributed
Exchange organizations there are in some cases sites which don't have (and
can't obtain) sufficient bandwidth for complete replication. A solution
which used snapsh
There is if you use Ximian Evolution.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IMAP Contacts
>
>
> Is there any way to view the contacts on the exchange server
> for a user t
Did you re-apply the same Exchange SP to your workstation as what is on the
Exchange Server?
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect
Except in Microsoft's Office Suites. Don't know about the new ones, but the
old ones you could not jump to SP3 from SP1 without applying SP2. I
remember doing this some years ago. Maybe 3 years. So maybe it was
Office98??? IDR.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle
So we've finally started our migration to 2000.
The environment:
w2k native mode - e2k mixed mode.
a 2 way ADC connecting 5.5 to e2k.
After I run the ADMT, perform the ADclean, and then move the mailbox from
5.5 to 2000, the display name of the mailbox (AD user) changes. Instead
of taking the
yes we have upgraded and it is much better with a bunch of more options
for reports. However, it removed all of my scheduled reports which was a
huge hassle to recreate. But it's done now, and before I do another
upgrade, I'll ask first what and how I need to back this stuff up.
There is a lis
I had copied my scheduled reports off the server and then onto a new
server... the .pro extensions...worked like a champ.
Dave Stevens
IT Network Support- Mail Administrator
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
865-576-8898
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Se
Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper.
-Original Message-
From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: recommendation please
We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good.
hey how about that Legato (former Vinca) CoStandby? has anyone ever had any good
experience with it? They have been around for a long time too.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: R
I did not have to do that. But as someone suggested on this list I made sure that
Exchange Event service would use a service account (which has Exchange full admin
rights) instead of System.
-Original Message-
From: DWYER Brian (Powerlink) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, Jul
Minesweeper: Start > Programs > Accessories > Games > Minesweeper and
hit F1.
Mimesweeper: http://www.mimesweeper.com might have something.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 02:27 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mai
Google.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:26 PM
Subject: RE: recommendation please
Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper.
-Original Message-
Fro
um. No.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:34 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 HA
hey how about that Legato (former Vinca) CoStandby? has anyone ever had any
good experience wi
Or read the book Mien Kompf
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: recommendation please
Google.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchan
Good point.
- Original Message -
From: "EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: recommendation please
Or read the book Mien Kompf
-Original Message-
Fro
you cannot even set it on an administrative group basis. OOF and autoreply capability
is set at the Org level. yeah, it's stoopid.
-Original Message-
From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Forum
Conversation: Ex
Praetor
TumbleWeed
GFI Mail Essentials
you can find info on them on google.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recommendation please
Can someone recommend me what software I shou
bad experiences then?
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA
um. No.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Disc
Actually Double Take works for replication, however it is not High
Availability Solution as the developer NSI or Sunbelt promote it on their
site. But if you just want the data replicated then if you tweek it (and not
according to their support way's soultion) , it does the job.
Their other soluti
Is there is a way to install the Exchange aware version of ADUC, but not the
rest of the Win2k adminpak or Exchange System Manager?
We are going to install ADUC on our help desk staff's computers, but we'd
prefer not to "pollute" their PCs with stuff they don't need.
tracking.zip at http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm
Not nearly as swell as Promodag, but it's free ;-)
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox monitoring
I
Yyy.com.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: need help with setting up a recipient policy
When getting the bounce message which email address i
My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers by
taking a spare hard drive from a RAID 5 config home ever night.
Currently we are using a VAX tape drive to back up our systems. He seems
to think that the hard drive solution sounds like a great idea. I think
it's possibly the
Too many negative points to mention them all really...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup Hardware
My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers
Put a Linux box in front of your mail server and use this:
http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/more_information.plex
http://www.activestate.com/Products/PerlMx/PerlMx_v2.1.pdf
Optional Mail Filters
Mail Statistics PerlMx::MailStats gathers statistics about processed
messages, including
What? That is one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Now I
have heard people taking tapes home with them. What I would like to know
when he gets back to work does he put it back in or does he take one out and
put another in. This is too funny.
Almost as good as " Hey my System Id
He takes it home and puts it back in. I imagine the life of the HD is
pretty short from all that rebuilding.
I take the tapes home from my office to make sure their offsite in case
of a fire. Any problem with that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Not to mention, how many backups can you get on one drive? A couple, maybe
3?
That's not a lot of old backups to have around.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Ha
Certainly not the ideal scenario... that's for sure.
For starters, What if you lose the tape on your way home and someone else picks it up?
For a couple of hundred dollars a year... get the company to pay for proper offsite
storage services. It's their data, so they should want to be protectin
Now taking tapes home is normal. Depending on your backup schedule most
companies do this on a weekly bases. Bye the way taking one drive home does
no good at all. Think of it this way. Lets say the RAID box catches
fire/blows up. Do you really think one drive will allow a full rebuild. I
don't th
Ah we're a small business. Not cost effective. I looked into it once and
it would eat the majority of my budget
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Do it for free. Throw 'em in your bank's night drop.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Thursday, September 12, 2002 05:55 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Backup Hardware
> Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
>
>
What I meant to say taking tapes offsite is normal. Companies that have one
employee take them home.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hard
Ok any other reason I can throw in there besides the
Vibration/Temperature RAID box dying?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse
Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
Why a Linux box? Is this a special version of Perl that only runs on a Linux
box. Or is this an inexpensive way to run the software. Will have to look at
it I guess.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:27 PM
To: Ex
Hell just burn the business down after you upped the insurance to 5 million
dollars and retire.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
Do it for free. Throw 'em in
Well, for one, you're not paying for any version of Windows...
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring
Why a Linux box? Is this a s
I figured that was the reason. Free is good!
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox monitoring
Well, for one, you're not paying for any version of Windows...
-
Tell him there won't be any redundency when he takes the HD. Before
fire/flood can happen, you'll probably lose your RAID 5.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchan
I have a customer using X2K, who wants to keep a copy of all sent
messages from each user. Is there a way to send ALL sent messages
automatically to a central mailbox? The idea is not to use a Client
side rule so the users have no way NOT to archive the email. Thanks!
_
Yes you can do this on the server.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Automatic
Saw the sales presentation. Seems the company was started by a
professor I had at Berkeley. At the time I saw the presentation,
however, it wasn't in a form that would work for my customer's needs
yet.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PST
So how much time did you spend looking up that useless bit of trivia?!
I would have told you the correct answer had you asked. In fact, I
think I posted it recently.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Origina
No way. First, moving the mailbox doesn't affect the display name.
That would be established when you ran the connection agreement.
Second, ADC doesn't talk to the NT SAM. My guess is that the display
name got populated the way you see it from when you ran the ADMT, and
your connection agreement
Not granular enough for you?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Cameron
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:45 PM
To:
More importantly, it's very hard to determine if it does work. You have
to fail it over to tell, and do it enough times to be sure that it'll
really work when you do need it. That is, it might work five times you
test it, and then when the real event occurs, the database is corrupt.
In addition,
The supported way is to install the system tools. If you want to
experiment with which files you don't really need, then be my guest.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
Post the full NDR.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Varghese,
Wilson
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:29 AM
To: Excha
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo