RE: Shutting Down 5.5

Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which

RE: HelpDesk Software

You could try the Slipstick website http://www.slipstick.com/addins/mssampleapps.htm -Original Message- From: Benjamin, Bernie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 06:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HelpDesk Software A HelpDesk built as an Exchange server applicat

RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering

Like it! Do you mind if I borrow that phrase?! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 22:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering I tout the virtues of single-node clusters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Inter

RE: E2K question

Why not split the stores across 2 Storage Groups so there is one SG per tape? I'll second the vote for Laurion Burchall's session - excellent! -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 00:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question

RE: Advice on infrastructure design

Would you suggest all users connect with outlook in 'Exchange Mode' as opposed to POP3 retrieval? Our ADSL is capped at 256k upload from the central office, and in my experience, those who are configured to connect to the central server over ADSL (i.e. roaming laptop users) find it quite slow. At

RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering

Yes that is the theory, but there is a limit of 1900 users on an Active/Active cluster. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Act

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

It was alright I guess. I got sick also? I think food poisoning was the culprit in my case. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002 comments? Hm. It's almost Tuesday, and

RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering

Um, well, there is that one. Yeah. Gotta sell the bosses on it first. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL P

RE: Advice on infrastructure design

Set up all the remote users in MAPI (ie Exchange) mode, and set them to work offline, and to syncronize every 10-15 minutes. That will manage your connect time very well. I'd also spring for a real circuit at the central location, but that's just me - it might not fit the budget. ---

RE: stopping the SPAM

6) everyone is at MEC Lighten up! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Thursday, October 10

RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering

Well guys I enjoyed this conversation and thank you a lot for bringing me up to speed in the cluster part of Exchange. -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Ac

New Exchange user survey

Does anyone have a standard survey that could be applied to sizing a new Exchange amil user site. 1. How many users? 2. Store mail on user PC or exchange server? 3. How many messages each week per user? 4. Does user delete after reading or retain?? 5. How long an outage can user tolerate? On

RE: New Exchange user survey

Outage tolerance? Some can't wait even a minute. Even if it only happens once a year. -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange user survey Does anyone have a stan

RE: a wish

Well I tried to fudge Default message format and make it *.*, but it did not help. I also tried to fudge the SMTP Connector's address space - using ADSI Edit I was able to change it from * to *.*, but that did not help either. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, Octo

RE: New Exchange user survey

Compaq has some Exchange sizer tools http://www.compaq.com/partners/microsoft/utilities/storagesystem.html -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange user survey D

RE: New Exchange user survey

Ahh but is that tolerance = "Has an impact on their business process" or tolerance = "Whines to helpdesk cos the daily dilbert ain't arrived yet". -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 15/10/2002 13:52

webpopup

Apologies if this is totally off topic. All my exchange servers (could be conicidence) have shown "webpopup" messages, these are messages sent to the machine by ip address from who knows where, selling rubbish. How are they doing it? Using msg from command line requires terminal services which I

RE: webpopup

I believe this will clear it up for you. http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/answerstips/story/0,24330,3374542,00.html Stephen Grant IT/IM Officer Federal Superannuates National Association 1052 St. Laurent Blvd. Ottawa, ON K1K 3B4 tel: (613)745-2559 fax: (613)745-5457 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: webpopup

If port 139 is open on their firewall, they have bigger issues than Spam! -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup I believe this will clear it up for you. http://www.techtv

RE: Shutting Down 5.5

That was not the cause of the shutdown; the dependencies make sure of the correct order. It had to do with the IS and how it was flushing buffers which was addressed, finally, in SP3. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:35 AM

RE: webpopup

It isn't open!! Which is a concern... Thanks Vanessa -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 14:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: webpopup If port 139 is open on their firewall, they have bigger issues than Spam! -Original Me

RE: Shutting Down 5.5

Daniel, How come then you could shutdown a server quicker by specifying the shutdown order of the services in a batch file (as requested here) then shutting down SA? if that was the case then the batch file would make no difference. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants o

Services Failing to Start at Boot

OK I have found this event message at another site now. It seems that this problem appears after Exchange SP2 has been applied to the server and then restarted. The message below is an actual event (except for the computer name) from the server in question. This only happe4ns when the server is

Services Failing to Start at Boot

OK I have found this event message at another site now. It seems that this problem appears after Exchange SP2 has been applied to the server and then restarted. The message below is an actual event (except for the computer name) from the server in question. This only happe4ns when the server is

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

You're comparing _ANY_ MEC to Boston..??? Chriminey, I could've hosted MEC in my garage and it'd been better than Boston. Dallas was the second worst venue, imo. Search the archives for a rehash of reasons; I've instigated enough already. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Murray Ale

Event ID 8213

I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS. The following error message comes up once very 25 minutes: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date:

RE: New Exchange user survey

I bet on the second one ;-)) peter -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange user survey Ahh but is that tolerance = "Has an impact on their business process" or tol

RE: Shutting Down 5.5

Shut them down in any order you would like. The order in which they are shutdown really only depends on if you are doing a manual shutdown from the command line. Otherwise, stop the DS first, which will take down a couple of others services and then do the rest of manually. It is best to shutdo

viewer of PST

Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to see old messages. If there is none, can anyone suggest the best practice to perform this function? TIA -- KN __

RE: webpopup

Yes, strange behaviour if it isn't showing as open. I had a Messenger popup occur at home twice now even though a port scan shows 139 closed. I don't know how they are getting through. Steve > -Original Message- > From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15

RE: webpopup

Umm Ill throw in 2 cents What do you mean exactly by "Webpopup" the fore a mentioned NET SEND by others..I personally would not consider a "Webpopup", just a NET SEND message. I would consider a "Webpopup" like an annoying popup you get when "surfing" the web and you get the credit card thin

Exchange server migration

Hi. I need an advice on a server migration. Here is my situation. I actually have an exchange 2000 server in site B and all my users are in site A. I want to set up a new server with Exchange 2000 Server and move exchange data from site B to site A. After migration, I want to turn off site

Event ID 8213

I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 server that us running the RUS. The following error message comes up once very 25 minutes: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8213 Date:

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

Did you guys get sick from the MEC Party at CA? I had food poisoning on Friday morning as well, and thought that maybe I was the only one. Personally, I thought two things sucked about that party. 1.) I paid $100 for a ticket to that party, so that my wife could go...then she couldn't go on t

Re: MEC 2002 comments?

I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Content-wise I thought this one was great, especially with more 2000 experience under everyone's belt and more to talk about and report on. It seemed they skimped on all the "extra's" that us geeks (or just me perhaps) like so much such as: -- Som

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

I was thoroughly impressed, although this was my first and obviously last MEC. I will be in Dalls in June, however. Was my first trip to S. CA and was not impressed with it. Disney was disappointing for the fact that they had half the park closed off. Food was good and the free beer even better. H

RE: Event ID 8213

http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8213&source= Q296151 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 8213 I've been getting a repeating erro

RE: Event ID 8213

Oops.. Didn't mean to send that... You found the same article I did. My bad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 8213 I've been getting a repeat

RE: E2K question

Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular logging

RE: viewer of PST

Outlook, Exchange client -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst o

RE: viewer of PST

File, Open, Outlook Data File? -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their

RE: Permissions to modify mailbox information

You could do this with ADSI (go to www.msdn.microsoft.com and search for ADSI) this will allow you to pragmatically change mail box properties amongst other things, there is plenty of source code in the Exchange Server SDK as well to do this ! Regards, Carlos

RE: HelpDesk Software

Take a look at http://www.workflow.com.ar/welcome.htm, found the reference at http://www.helpdesks.com -Jorge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Benjamin, Bernie Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help

VB.NET Examples

Can anyone point me to the correct site where I can get vb.net examples on EXCHANGE 5.5 examples on how to create a mailbox from a client machine. I have checked the MS site everything is in VB6 and when trying to convert it , it gives lots of hassles ! Thank you. Regards, Carlos Magalhaes

RE: Orphaned Delegates?

DS/IS Consistency Adjuster Cheers > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, 12 October 2002 1:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Orphaned Delegates? > > Been there, done that, got that T-shirt more times than I care to th

RE: webpopup

It uses port 445, see discussion from other mailing list below: These links discuss port 445. It's apparently used by SMB over TCP/IP, and is a new feature in Windows 2000/Active Directory (the first link is an official Microsoft doc, the second is a pretty good "plain English" discussion): http

RE: viewer of PST

File -> open ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Khoi Nguyen Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user t

RE: viewer of PST

You don't have to import it, just use file/open in outlook > -Original Message- > From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 15 October 2002 15:25 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: viewer of PST > Sensitivity: Private > > Hi exchangers, > > Does anyone know of a utility th

RE: Services Failing to Start at Boot

http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7001&source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Brunt Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Services Failing to Start at Boot OK I have found this event me

RE: viewer of PST

Hmm.I believe this can be done in Outlook. Instead of using the "Import" option from the file menu, use the "Open", then "Personal Folder File". It should open it in another folder in Outlook, but not import the messages into your Inbox. John J. Steniger > -Original Message- >

RE: viewer of PST

Outlook works just fine -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Khoi Nguyen Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will all

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

Yeah, Friday morning. I was so sick. Damn Disney! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? Did you guys get sick from the MEC Party at CA? I had food poi

RE: viewer of PST

Outlook. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/15/2002 9:25 AM Subject: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private Hi exchangers, Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst off line without importing it into your current mailbox to se

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

That's why we all had breakfast at the Marriot in the AM. Ham Scrambles. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I have been to several Tech Eds and the last MEC. Conten

RE: a wish

[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the address I think. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- =

Re: Exchange server migration

If your in Native mode you could move the server in Site B to Site A. If your in mixed you can not. Mixed mode requires then rehoming PF and moving mailboxes using MS tools. - Original Message - From: "Albert Charron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Se

RE: viewer of PST

If you want to view a static .pst you can use Outlook to do this and configure the services to view Personal Folders (only). If you want something that synchronises you're probably looking at .ost's, but I've always preferred OWA myself. > -Original Message- > From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:

RE: E2K question

Not exactly. > -Original Message- > From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:08 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: E2K question > > > Hi There > > Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the > same question come up re

Eventid.net $$$

I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services. Not to complain it is inexpensive, but just another pain in the but. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: h

RE: E2K question

Wait a second If this is a test question, let us know next time. If you pulled this off a Microsoft test, you're in violation of the non disclosure you signed. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:08 AM

RE: viewer of PST

Hex editor? > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:10 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: viewer of PST > Sensitivity: Private > > > Outlook, Exchange client > > -Original Message- > From: Khoi Nguy

RE: viewer of PST

http://www.wickett.net/ have a nice solution for this. Look up WN Mailkeeper. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: viewer of PST Sensitivity: Private File, Open, Outlook Data File? -

RE: Exchange server migration

I had a similar migration going from sbs4.5 (site1) to sbs2k (site2) Used exmerge and it went like a dream but I din't have public folders and as far as i recall, public folders cannot be done. There are some articles on technet (see sbs2000 upgrade migration white papers) which tell you how to

RE: Orphaned Delegates?

That's an awefully big stick to be swinging at such a small problem. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Phil Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL P

RE: a wish

A null "from" field is compliant with the RFC's for a number of good reasons. Also, I don't think you would want to pound on your (or anybody else's) DNS servers to do something not related to packet delivery. Besides, it wouldn't buy you much. Just because you have a positive DNS resolution, it

RE: Bulk creating Exchange 2000 mailboxes with CSVDE or ???

Thanks for all the help! I got the users created with CSVDE. They start life with no passwords and "password must be changed at next logon" checked. I found an easy way to set all the passwords the same. I downloaded a 30 day eval of "Hyena" which let me select all the test accounts and uncheck

Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List

Hello Friends; I am having a heck of a time with the Address Lists in E2K. I have setup a few address lists for different domains that we are hosting on our system. On one domain in particular they want a distribution group setup to send to everyone in the domain. So far so good. I setup a

RE: viewer of PST

Also, if it is burned to a CD, you will have read only access to the .pst file. You will need to copy it to your hard drive or wherever, in order to do anything more than read. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002

RE: Eventid.net $$$

You might want to invest in the new Hotmail grammar checker first. ;* > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Eventid.net $$$ > > > I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a

RE: Eventid.net $$$

Been doing it for months -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Eventid.net $$$ I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee for there services. Not to co

RE: Eventid.net $$$

I recommend the "Precht Enterprise Subscription Service". Unlimited access to all events. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Eventid.net $$$ I just noticed that www.eventid.net now

RE: E2K question

Hi there OOppsss... Where did I error? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Not exactly. > -Original Message- > From: Etts, Russell [mailto

RE: Eventid.net $$$

Just like a drug pusher. They get you hooked on their product for free. Then when you're hooked they start charging you up the nose (pardon the pun). > -- > From: Tony Hlabse > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:04 > To: Exchange Dis

Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K

Exchange 2k, SP3 Win2k, SP3. I was running an Exchange2k server which needed to be rebuilt (server A). I moved all mailboxes across to another E2K server (server B) and rebuilt the original server which became the new main E2K server (server C). I then moved the mailboxes and public folders acros

RE: Services Failing to Start at Boot

Hate to say this, but that didn't help. I have experienced this before, but alas I could find no answer, I had to implement a vbs script to check ands see if the services had started and if not start them. On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, "David N. Precht" wrote: > > http://mail.altavista.co.uk/jump/http:

RE: a wish

I am not complaining about NUL "from" field. I want to cut down on the delivery queues to the domains that definitely do not exist like "aol" or"yahoo" (as opposed to aol.com or yahoo.com) -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002

RE: automated replies

Oh come on, Oh Great One. We know you're evil, demented, and disgusting, but you still wouldn't help _spammers_. -- be - MOS > -Original Message- > From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 11:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: au

Re: Viewer of PST - Thanks

Hi Exchangers, First of all, thank you so much for your advice on this question. I have tried your suggestion, and it worked perfectly. This is what I really wanted. Thanks again for your help. -- KN _ List posting FAQ: h

RE: E2K question

Well, one pendantic point and one possibly not so much... If you don't back up all of the databases within the same /storage group/ in a backup job, the logs won't be purged. And, disabling circular logging, while a nice option in general doesn't solve the original problem as stated... In fact i

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

Embassy Suites had great breakfasts as well...eggs cooked to order, french toast and pancakes, doughnuts...and it was free. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comment

Share address book with another company.

I am looking into sharing our Exchange address book with a company we work closely with. We both use Exchange 2000 and contact each other frequesntly. Is there an easy way to keep an updated list between 2 companies without joining Active Directory? Marty __

RE: Eventid.net $$$

Am I missing something? What does eventid.net provide that TechNet and Deja don't 10x over? I used it once or twice just out of curiosity (but didn't inhale), and found it to be less than useful. > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October

Re: Share address book with another company.

There are surprisingly few products that fall along these lines. As such, I will make a shameless plug for my own company's product, Furnace. http://www.infonition.com/furnace.shtml This product synchronizes two Exchange organizations' directory and free/busy information. We are also looking to a

Re: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K

I would suggest using ADSIEdit. 1. Start | Run | "mmc" | OK 2. Console | Add/Remove Snap-in 3. Add button | ADSI Edit | Add | Close 4. OK 5. Right click on ADSI Edit and choose "Connect to..." 6. Under "Naming Context" select "Configuration Container" | OK 7. Expand Configuration Container | expa

RE: Eventid.net $$$

On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, at 2:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am I missing something? What does eventid.net provide that TechNet and > Deja don't 10x over? Easier and more precise search capability, and a database tailored to the particular problem domain. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The

RE: Share address book with another company.

Simplesync, LDSU from Compaq and MMS from Microsoft will all do it, IIRC. In addition, you could just use LDAP queries. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Origina

RE: E2K question

Hi Chris Thanks for the answer. I appreciate it :) Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Well, one pendantic point and one possibly not so much...

RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K

ADSI Edit. If you know what you are doing. -Original Message- From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K Sensitivity: Private Exchange 2k, SP3 Win2k, SP3. I was running an E

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

I liked the '98 MEC in Atlanta. Because I stayed at the Ritz and had access to concierge lounge. :) -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? Embassy Suites

Re: E2K question

It is a sample question! Man what a mistake it was to post this. Give this list something to dwell on, & they will. - John Q - Original Message - From: "Etts, Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:05 AM Subject: RE:

RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K

I don't see ADSI Edit as an option. Where do I find/install it? Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K I

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

Let me say also that I probably enjoyed the List party most of all. I got to meet all of my heroes/heroines at one time. Thanks folks for accepting me as one of your own. People I now count as friends: Andy David, Andy Webb (BTW...thanks again for the hat), Darcy Adams, Martin Blackstone, Gary

RE: re-join a site MSX55 server

Original scenario 1MSX55 organization 1 site 2 servers (A+B) MSX55+SP4 then DL were rehomed from Server B to serverA, we forgot about the public folders. we removed server B from exchange site server B is still complete...how can we rejoin server B to the site or put back the public folders so us

Re: re-join a site MSX55 server

Sounds like a disaster recovery project. - Original Message - From: "Microsoft Exchange List Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:23 PM Subject: RE: re-join a site MSX55 server > Original scenario > 1MSX55 organizat

RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K

Then it may be too dangerous for you :) -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing Old Servers From Exchange 2K I don't see ADSI Edit as an option. Where do I find/install i

RE: Orphaned Delegates?

Hi Roger, Bigger the better :-) I'll have a look at Cleansweep, does it clean the Public Folder permissions too? Cheers > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 16 October 2002 2:19 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Orp

Re: MEC 2002 comments?

I thought it were the mints that Tom gave us or the scrambled toasts ? ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone"

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

What were those mints called again? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC 2002 comments? I thought it were the mints that Tom gave us or the scrambled toasts ? ;) --

RE: MEC 2002 comments?

Great Party! Thanks again Andy and Kim! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002 comments? Let me say also that I probably enjoyed the List party most of all. I got t

Re: MEC 2002 comments?

I'm 'so' not going to send that out .. most contentfilters would bounce my message ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Martin

  1   2   >