I'm sorry, i did get mixed up, i'm an idiot. it was supposed to go to samantha
bridges. I hit reply to your response to her message instead of replying to her
message. Thank goodness it's friday.
tom
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July
I think you got me mixed up with someone else. I'm already on E2k. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Carmila --
Here's a copy (below) of a message I posted 8/2/2002 about my Exchange
5.5 to Ex
Carmila --
Here's a copy (below) of a message I posted 8/2/2002 about my Exchange 5.5 to
Exchange 2k upgrade
It does not include the issues with OWA in Exchange 2k. OWA 2K is much prettier and
much more functional, but it is certainly MUCH slower. Also, you need to edit your
URLSCAN.INI fil
Does the recipient have mail delivery set to a PST file?
On 07/25/03 14:39, "Steve Sorenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are having a strange problem with one user's (we'll call her "User
> A") calendar and specifically with meeting requests. Here is the
> scenario:
>
> 1) User A
First off, if doesn't sound like an Exchange issue...it sounds like an
Outlook settings issue.
Second, have you checked User A's account for any delegates? Are there any
other people that have full "User" priveleges on this mailbox? Have you
checked the Outlook rules or the Tools/Options/E-mail
Hello,
We are having a strange problem with one user's (we'll call her "User
A") calendar and specifically with meeting requests. Here is the
scenario:
1) User A sends invitation to User B for a meeting.
2) User B accepts invitation.
3) A short while later (the time varies), User A will receive a
If you have deleted item retention on, you can delete the user object/mailbox in the
first domain, replicate then create the user object in the second domain, then run
Cleanup agent on the mailbox store where the mailbox is, and reconnect it to the new
user object in the second domain.
-Ori
Neil,
Thanks for the quick rundown, but none of those appear to be the
problem:
1. All DC's listed in RUS are available from the Exchange server. No
problem with connectivity either by FQDN or short name (netbios name).
2. I've checked all the way to the individual object in AD. Exchange
Ent
Thanks Guys, I will give it a try tonight and let you know if it works.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2000
Sounds like he's done all that.
My onl
Sounds like he's done all that.
My only suggestion would be to shut down, AND DISABLE all the stuff you
were going to shutdown, then reboot (That is to say, power off reset)
the server prior to starting the install of the SP.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Steven, thanks but we are on SP4 and according to the article this issue was
fixed in SP1. I had double checked this to see if it was possible to delete
a special folder (my Inbox), and I received the error "Unable to delete this
special folder".
Thanks,
Amy
-Original Message-
From: Dick
Hey ya all, this is really weird,
Had to reinstall the imc on Monday and asked everyone to log off which
this particular client says he did but after the server came up Outlook is
very sluggish in starting or will not start at all, get either the "retry,
work offline, or cancel" dialog box or t
Both GC's are in the same site. I checked ESM and exchange has
switched to the 2nd GC. I guess we just weren't patient enough. :)
Thanks guys!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Are both GCs in
I have seen cases when Exchange does not switch to another GC quickly
enough even if the other GC is in the same site as the original GC.
I think early builds of Exchange 2000 were susceptible to that. But I am
not convinced that it is completely fixed.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
If you use [EMAIL PROTECTED] format, make sure that everyone in your org
has first and last names, otherwise you will end up with a bogus address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Are both GCs in the same site? Outlook does keep the GC in the registry,
but it gets it from Exchange in a process known as "referral". Look in your
Exchange server's Properties pages, under Directory Access (I think it is;
it's known as DSAccess) and you can see which GCs your Exchange server us
The profile caches the information about GC that is provided to it by
Exchange server's Referral Service (RFR)
I think in theory it should switch to the other GC, but I guess it
doesn't always work.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25
Yeah, that's it. Deep.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange D
Is there a dependecy between Outlook 2002 and the global catalog server?
I took down one of the GC's for maintenance but we still have 1 other GC
that is up and running in the site. What I was thinking was, everything
would be okay since I don't have both GC's down. All of a sudden, users
are u
The default @someone.com is not required. Just change the default to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you don't want the default address any more. If you
want both, just add the new one.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Orig
OK, Thanks Ed.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA 5.5 issue
If you're on the latest service pack and can reproduce that, I would call
Microsoft PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet
Are you sure she's not just deleting her Inbox folder? Q215604.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discu
If you're on the latest service pack and can reproduce that, I would call
Microsoft PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lockmer
That's my preferred method of patching Exchange Servers too,
after I had some grief with Exchange 5.5 SP2.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL
I've gone as far as disabling services and rebooting sometimes.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 25 July 2003 16:20
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2000
Subject: RE: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2
Error code 5 is access denied. I'd try running either filemon or regmon
from sysinternals. Maybe that will shed some light on what is causing
the issue.
Also, don't you know you shouldn't install SP4. It's an even numbered
service pack. ;)
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
As stated in the original msg I did that.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2000
Shut down all extraneous services. Server agents, backup agents, a
Shut down all extraneous services. Server agents, backup agents, all AV
agents, etc.
Manually stop Exchange, and IIS as well.
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error Loading SP4 on Exchan
Windows 2000 SP3 Advanced Server
Exchange 2000 SP3 with Post SP3 Rollup
Trend Micro Scanmail 6.1
Trend Micro Server Protect 5.5
IIS Lockdown 2.1 using Exchange 2000/OWA template URL Scan Installed
When I install SP4 for Windows 2000 on this box I get the following errors:
Unable to write
The last couple of days we had a couple of incidents when an Exchange
2000 cluster node crapped out and did not fail over. We had to
completely shut it down in order for it to release resources and fail
over.
After the fact we checked the event logs and saw that it was having
problems seeing the d
Hello All,
User sent a message on 3rd July with a Deferred Delivery date of 31st July.
The message was sent on the 15th!
There was one server restart on the 7th. Can't see anything else that may
have done it. Has anyone seen this happen before with Exchange 5.5 Sp4 ?
Client is Outlook 2000.
Many
Hello all, I have a bizarre OWA 5.5 SP4 issue regarding hard deletes from
the Inbox. A user that uses OWA 5.5 exclusively marks items for deletion
from the Inbox, then selects the "Delete Marked Items" button. These items
will be moved to her Deleted Items folder. When she does this, though the
4 commons ways RUS can break are below. They may not all be appropriate
to you, but I've cut & pasted them from a word doc of mine. :-)
1) RUS configuration references a deleted DC or E2K server, or the
servers defined in RUS configuration are flakey at best. Browse both
entries and choose alte
You need Office service pack
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Time sync problem with other users' calend
Chris,
Thanks for the suggestion. Tried it this morning and Domainprep ran
quite quickly (much more quickly than I've ever seen it run when truly
prepping a domain for the first time)...
Unfortunately the problem persists. Further suggestions would be warmly
welcomed.
Joe Pochedley
Weiler's
Perzactly.
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: Time sync problem with other users' calendars
They may all be set to GMT, but is the little box for "Automatically
adjust
They may all be set to GMT, but is the little box for "Automatically
adjust clock for Daylight Savings" checked? There is still an option to
do that.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Poste
No, these are all set to GMT which is correct.
Subject: Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars
From: "Missy Koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:43:01 -0400
X-Message-Number: 29
Daylight savings time settings on the machines.
__
38 matches
Mail list logo
