Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4
Question:
Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following
error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion of the backup.
Final error code: a00084f8 HEX
Final error description: A
Can you back up the store from that same server using NTBACKUP?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec
Users are inadvertently sending to outside addresses when the email was
intended for internal use only.
Can Outlook or Exchange 2000 be set so the Outlook client ONLY
automatically resolves names from the Global Address List - although the
other local contacts list will be accessible?
How can
I suppose you could go to Tools | Services and edit the Outlook Address Book
service so that only the GAL is listed. (Remove Contacts, etc.)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original
Outlook will attempt to resolve through all lists provided as address lists,
but it will stop trying to resolve in the first address book that it finds a
match for (though it may report ambiguous resolution for names in other
lists). If the GAL is set as the first address book to be searched, it
A 3rd party product to sync a public contact folder to a personal folder
might meet the required objective. Personally, when my CEO tells me we have
a recurring meeting I add the event to my calendar so that I don't
double-book the timeslot.
:: Checks calendar :: Yep, it's still there.
One could
Check http://www.slipstick.com. There's information there how to create an
Outlook import for holidays; you could use the same technique to import any
meetings you want in addition to company holidays.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century.
Other than Andy's suggestion of trying NTBackup, have you looked to see that
the Backup Exec agent is running with sufficient rights?
SP4 for Win2k changes some of the permissions levels to better match
Win2k3's permissions model, and quite specifically it changes network
permissions. Windows
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Mr. Onuigbo Baldwin Gozie, Bank Manager of Diamond Bank, Lagos Branch. I have
urgent and very confidential business proposition for you Mr. Barry Kelly made a
numbered time (Fixed) deposited for twelve calendar months, valued at US$25,000,000.00
(Twenty-five Million
WOW! 25 Million Dollars! SIGN ME UP NOW!
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
From: Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onuigbo is my new buddy. Always wanted a lawyer friend called Onuigbo
From: Bob Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent Confidential
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:04:26 -0500
WOW! 25 Million Dollars!
Jim,
Thanks for the book reference. I will run out and get it.
I was trying to block Neena [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I used ew01.com
and that didn't block it. According to the rules, how would you have
blocked this junk mail?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim)
I'm trying to create a web app that will allow the helpdesk to set OOO
messages for our users. My one problem right now is this cmd option
galfind just brings up an empty page with this as the source? I am
using this path http://server/exchange/mailbox/?cmd=galfind
a:response xmlns:a=WM
Hmm... Works fine for me. Did you substitute an actual mailbox name for
/mailbox/? What does one do once they look up a name in the GAL to actually
set the OOF?
Considered http://www.selisoft.com/en/oof/ ? Seems like a lot less work than
reinventing the wheel.
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL
Yes I am using the actual mailbox name. Why spend money on something
when you can do it for free? I was just trying to see what the galfind
option looked like on its own and to see if maybe there was some way to
pass the click of a user to the OOO option. I'll probably just end up
making my
There's no such thing as free. I guess one can argue they'd like to do it
themselves just for the challenge, but the opportunity cost is not free.
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:40:57 -0400
To: Exchange
Hey all...
(2KSrv/EX2K Fully Spacked)
one of my users would like me to forward all of his mail to his personal email acct.
All I can find is to forward to an address in the gal, and the only other thing I have
found wanted me to delete his mailbox and create a mail enabled contact.
Just
Create a contact and forward it to that contact.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forwarding Email
Hey all...
(2KSrv/EX2K Fully Spacked)
one of my users would like me to forward
Create a mail enabled contact with his internet smtp address then
forward all internal mail to that contact.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Thank you Gentleman.
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
Glad I could help!
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forwarding Email
Thank you Gentleman.
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
hah hah.
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---
No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the
store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15
total) servers in one job.
Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still
waiting for
Blimy!
I had the same problems with 8.6. Different error message, but it would fail
at least 2 times a week when it was part of a bigger job.
I wound up separating it and by itself it ran fine. Forgot completely about
that.
Never could explain why.
- Original Message -
From: Ray
We get hundreds of those every day. How did he get on this list? Did he
subscribe?
Kind regards,
Kim Schotanus
===
Kim Schotanus
Information Systems Manager
INTAS
Avenue des Arts 58
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
T. +32 2 549 01 11
F. +32 2 549 01 56
Interesting. We were having occasional but rare problems with 8.6 but not specific to
any one server. Veritas kept pointing the finger at network problems but no real
useful information about what kind of problems. We would tweak here and change there
and the problems would go away for a while.
Sorry. I would, but I only deal with transactions larger then 50mil.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baldwin
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Urgent Confidential
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Mr.
Hundreds?
Wow! You could rolling in the cash if you just respond!*
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
*Note - I'm being factitious of course
There was an article a few months back in a local newspaper about some
people who reacted on a similar mail, they turn out to request headed
paper, bank account numbers, swift codes etc... In the end their savings
account was empty, and not the other way around...
K/
-Original Message-
Duh!
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent Confidential
There was an article a few months back in a local newspaper about some
people who reacted on a similar mail, they
Really? I can't believe that! I mean you have to believe there are
hundreds of banks with this very problem! Who in their right mind would
not take advantage to get all that money! You could be richer then Bill
Gates in no time!
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
Oh great. Now I suppose you're going to tell me that those pen*s
enlargement pills don't work.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent
What 'd you mean they don't work? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 18:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent Confidential
Oh great. Now I suppose you're going to tell me that those pen*s
They make your hands smaller
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent Confidential
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:16:03 -0700
Oh great. Now I suppose you're going to tell me that those
Guessing by those rules, @ew01.com
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:05 AM
Maybe just changing the order would work
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44
Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the changes to BEX9
includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is that, communications
failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail from that point. Example,
Exchange server third out of 15, first 2
Mike,
I have blocked that EXACT domain already by using: @ew01.com
~Jim
P.S. - I only have about 3,000 domain names in our company block list.
Every one of them *verified* spammers. ;0)
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003
You're being factitious or facetious?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent Confidential
Hundreds?
Wow! You could rolling in the cash if you just respond!*
Bob Sadler
Yea, we went through all that as well.
I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck.
Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds..
- Original Message -
From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27,
We're using BE9.0 as well and back up a total of about 10 servers. The
Exchange server is the last one on the list, and we have never had it
fail. Backup rate is SWEET! As well. Sitting pretty at about 850mb/min
with Exchange. Love that SDLT tape drive!
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner
Have you had such success from day one? Were there issues in the beginning and, if so,
what solutions did you put in place?
Thanks...Ray
Thought for the day:
A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires
you to wear a name tag, you've
We have not had any issues except at the very beginning, it was not
purging the log files. I can't remember exactly what we did, but we
called support and they stepped us through fixing what wasn't working.
I almost want to say that we had to use NTBackup once or something -
can't remember
Jim,
Send them to me so I can block also.. Please!!! So I want to block
@ew01.com Okay I will try that. Thanks.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message
Have you tried to uninstall the Agent then reinstall? Just a thought...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000
As W.C. Fields once said there's a sucker born every minute.
--
From: Bob Sadler
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent Confidential
Really? I can't believe that! I mean
Actually it was David Hannum, not W.C. Fields and not P.T. Barnum who
said it. But who's really keeping track.
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
UW - Green Bay
920.465.5014
[EMAIL
Yup.
Thanks...Ray
Thought for the day:
A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires
you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error.
--Dennis Miller
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael
Thanks for the correction. I always thought it was W.C., but never checked
it out. I am enlightened.
--
From: Kretche, Peter
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent
No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was
rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone
who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's,
but I thought the article was interesting.
There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft
finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted
everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended
to stop using relays.osirusoft.com
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
There have been lots of posts
Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution.
Its even cheap!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft
What do you mean, can everyone actually do that? Osirusoft is the one
that added the * to their DNSBL, so anyone who subscribes to them will
now block all mail. Best you can do is contact the admin of the place
your mail is getting rejected at, and let them know.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Has anyone done a white list for/in Trend IMSS where.the white list
would be populated from the exchange server? i.e. the valid smtp addresses
used/setup in the exchange server
just a Q
right now exch55sp4+post/nt4sp6a+post
thanks
bill
The other option is to upgrade to the 2003 family of products (Windows
2003 with AD 2003) and Exchange 2003 and use Query Based Distribution
Groups (you can then include all mailboxes and when a new one is
created it will automatically be a member). For the organisation I work
with the Query
Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes.
I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments
using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is
not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting
quarantined. This is
You have to turn off scan compressed, also if you password protect a zip,
then again another setting is to turf encrypted files, turn off that too. Or
go with RAR, I don't think NAV can read RAR's :)
-Original Message-
From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August
That is the nature of it. I don't belief that NAV checks the mime time so an
option would be to rename them i.e. .ex_ .ba_ etc. The other option is to
password protect the Zip files and then they will not be scanned.
-Dave Vantine
-Original Message-
From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL
So if I tell them to password protect the zip files, they will be left
alone? That would be good enough for me I think.
Cheers,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV
Well also you have to set in the registry not to turf encrypted files (or
something of that nature). I know for some areas, if they can't scan a zip,
it is turfed, that feature has to be disabled if you password protect a ZIP.
-Original Message-
From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL
And this setting within the registry is specific to NAV? If so, I'll start
searching on their site for this key. Thanks to both so far...
Cheers,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Does anybody know of a Trend discussion list?
_
MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
_
List posting FAQ:
Well I found this
(http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568180
069e1c0/1fc97a6e7009068388256bd0007e4f86?OpenDocumentprod=Norton%20AntiViru
s%20for%20Microsoft%20Exchangever=2.xsrc=entpcode=nav_exchangedtype=corp
svy=prev=miniver=nav-ms-exchange2) from NAV that says
Holy Wrap!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Well I found this
65 matches
Mail list logo
