They are not at the moment I think, but what if the smtp address it wants to
create already exists in my org?
regards
Uso
- Original Message -
From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:05 PM
Subject: RE: d
Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would
allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup?
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of
voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me
to
There are many reasons to enforce size limits in an
organization. Many reasons center around storage and
backup considerations. Performance can be hampered the
larger mailboxes are, too.
One very important yet frequently overlooked issue is
SECURITY. Without size limitations, and depending on
oth
I got SIX out-of-office notifications from you. You ought to extend your
vacation forever and resign as an Exchange administrator. You NEVER use a
reply rule as an out of office notification.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Bac
I have an odd request from a user, unfortunately he is our CIO.
He would like to see OWA open messages and replies to message in a
maximized IE window. I haven't been able to find anything in the KB or
via a Google search. Has anybody tried this or know how I might be able
to do this?
Thanks,
Did you remove the replica on the 5.5 server before shutting it down?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mo
Drag and drop.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RBHATIA
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Agreed. They shouldn't cause you any problem.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003
Take 284 instead.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:39 AM
To: Exchange Discuss
I can name that tune in three notes.
The Banana Boat Song
Harry Belafonte
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: M
Configure an SMTP Connector to use the first server's virtual server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raji Arulambalam
Sent: Mon
Hey All!
I am a network consultant with 4 years of network, infrastructure,
desktop, exchange 55 and 2000 experience( the last 3 years in legal
environment) looking for employment in the Chicago land area. Any leads
or assistance will be really appreciated.
Thanks
Raj
___
Check for @aa.com & [EMAIL PROTECTED] both are valid to turf the message.
You can temporarily rename the message to .eml and open it to check it out
for other details.
Regards, Michael
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003
Tom,
With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same
setup you are and have not experienced this to date.
I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is
causing this.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PR
I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from
american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was
rejected. Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted
the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the
Hi
I have a single Exchange 2000 server that used the default SMTP VS to
deliver and pick up internet mail from a smart host. Which worked fine.
I wanted to upgrade to E2k3, so installed a new second server and installed
E2k3 on this. Install worked fine. I moved a test user to the new server.
Thi
work all night and a drinka rum!
Day light come and me whanna go home
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits
Personal or standard Day0?
-Original Message-
Personal or standard Day0?
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits
Other than 0!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon
Ot
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits
It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get
loads of different answers to this sort of question. T
Other than 0!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits
It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get
loads of different answers to this sor
Hi Everyone,
I have one 5.5 server, which also happens to be the first server in the
site, that I would like to remove. I have two other Exchange 2000 servers
in the site. I followed the instuctions and made sure there was a replica
of the Free/Busy folder (among others) on one of the Exchange
Thanks for the info. I'm loading up a server right now to test.
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Information Technology
Sabic Americas, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
I am running it on W2K Advanced server (we are doing load balancing for
failover) although it will run nicely on W2K Server (what we initially
tested it on)
uses its own SMTP server .. can run on the machine that Exchange is on
or another one ... we run it as a service ...
our path looks somethin
Has anyone found any other method, other than using the Rule.dll component
from the Exchange 5.5 SDK, of creating rules automatically? For instance,
I want to create a rule for all my users without visiting all their
mailboxes manually.
K
__
Brent,
"Computers" isn't a container in AD - it's a folder and therefore can't have
a policy applied to it. The only policy that will apply to "Computers" is
the default domain policy so it doesn't matter where you move your Exchange
server the default domain policy will still be applied unless y
I have been looking around SlipStick for a solution to add items from a
Public Folder Calendar to a Personal Calendar automatically but couldn't
find anything simple (my users are a little non-technical).
I have a public folder calendar where staff post deadlines and upcoming
events related to the
It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get
loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right
or wrong answer.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible
Posted At: 03 November 2003
This is the first one, if you mean by "first" the admin exam, and
"second" the design exam.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:08
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange
Excuse me. Symantec said they weren't aware of any virus that can put dummy
addresses in the To and From fields? I find that hard to believe since the
Klez virus, among others, does this very thing and they are certainly aware
of that virus.
As for your original issue about the spam delete the m
Exchange 2000 SP3
Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and
on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and
200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some
"select" staff complained and corporate had me remove both
I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good.
Questions:
What operating system are you running it on?
Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its own?
If it needs another, what do you suggest?
Thanks,
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Informat
If your 80% on the tests, you'll have no probs.
- Original Message -
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:03 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Thanks, I'll run through those. After all the prac
Is this the first one or the second one? The second one was a pain in
the butt - very long with a lot of stuff to read through, plus it
crashed on me twice :)
The first one is pretty straightforward.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Origina
That's what the default recipient policy does and you probably should
not mess with it. Why do these SMTP and X.400 addresses bother you so
much?
Also if you really, really don't want you contacts to be stamped with
the policy's e-mail addresses, go to each contact's properties, click on
the E-mai
Thanks, I'll run through those. After all the practice tests and stuff
I am right at 80% which is passing. I am pressed to take the test at
the end of the month and I am trying to cram as much as possible, so
we'll see how it goes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
Get a good nights sleep.
> --
> From: Tony Hlabse
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2003 7:48 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exchange 70-224 Exam
>
> Don't be nervous
>
>
>
> From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Run through the test questions from http://www.transcender.com or other test
sites. Gives you the enviroment to expenct and usually 40 - 50% of the
questions too. Worked for me :)
Ali
- Original Message -
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PRO
Don't be nervous
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:39:22 -0500
Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so
Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm
kind of nervous. Thanks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=e
Ok it seems that when I reply to many messages from mailing lists via OWA the replied
message seems to have an attachment (and some new postings also) . At first we
noticed that all messages were using UTF-8 so found the setting to change it from that
to our regional setting.
That didn't solv
Hi
I had a similar problem as we have a lot of mobile users. Unfortunately the
authentication seemed temperamental depending on which ISP you were using,
so forced everybody to use the VPN and restricted routing to internal IP's
only.
I think that did the trick, but I wouldn't be surprised if the
Let me answer my own question. Those spammers were using authentication to
logon to SMTP server of our Exchange. Once we saw what user account was
being used and disabled it, problem went away. (Due to POP3 users, we have
to allow routing thru authentication.)
Jay Kulsh
Please visit http://www.ca
No.
I've covered some of the basic rules here:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/upgrading_to_ex.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Finnesey
Posted At: 03 November 2003 03:18
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
C
43 matches
Mail list logo
