This may seem like a weird question for this situation:
Are the clients in the same DHCP subnet?
Are the exchange servers in the same subnet?
I have experienced similar sorts of issues with a DC / file server...
MP
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts
Hi,
I have a really weird one here folks:
This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included
some names
Hi,
I have a really weird one here folks:
This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included some names that
he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a duplication of a contacts
folder in another persons mailbox. The same thing has happened for the calendar and
I'm guessing you have an external disk enclosure on your NF 4500... (and I'm assuming
you are running w2k)
If the enclosure's not full already, put 2 (or 3) more disks in the enclosure.
Using ServeRAID Manager (in windows) configure the 2 new drives into a new RAID 1
array (hotspare optional
Certainly not the ideal scenario... that's for sure.
For starters, What if you lose the tape on your way home and someone else picks it up?
For a couple of hundred dollars a year... get the company to pay for proper offsite
storage services. It's their data, so they should want to be protectin
Too many negative points to mention them all really...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup Hardware
My boss has a friend that has a company that backs up their servers
Are they in the same routing group?
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 26 August 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP for Multi server Environment.
Hi
The question is do I need to configure both SMTP servers to use the
Look in the user properties under Active Directory or in the x5.5 administrator.
E2k: Look on the exchange general tab of the user properties
x5.5: look for the home server attribute on the user's mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Luppens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Satur
Obviously BLB's don't work too well if you miss ""corrupted"" messages in the backup.
I think you've lost you're own argument for yourself
It sounds like no-one (i.e. none of the major backup s/ware vendors) have truly sorted
out the BLB interface properly yet...
-Original Message---
I'll second that.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 12:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
We have a number of the x series that support that configuration. Their
RAID controlle
ant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
I apologi
I apologise for the OT question...
Has anyone experienced issues with bad striping on a RAID5e disk array? (hardware RAID)
I have had this twice in the last 6 months. When a disk dies in the array it is
replaced ASAP. RAID5e should be able to handle this without error right?
When the RAID5e st
search technet "public folder replication"
-Original Message-
From: Cedric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving Public Folders
This may be a stupid question, how do you move public folders from one
exchange 2k server to a
Microsoft Product Support Services.
MP
-Original Message-
From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 May 2002 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: KMS administrator password
Who is PSS ???
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[E
Hi,
I am looking at implmenting a new e-mail policy for my organisation. Is anyone out
there who has a company policy for e-mail (exchange specific or SMTP is OK) already
written and are willing to share it with me?
Basically, rather than re-inventing the wheel, I am looking for a policy tha
Yes, Accept the meeting as being 'tentative' - with or without sending a response.
In the advanced e-mail option in Outlook, make sure the 'delete meeting request from
my inbox when responding' is selected.
MP
-Original Message-
From: Wei Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 1
Open the port in the ISA config
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 13 April 2002 8:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Instant messaging and ISA firewall clients
Clients behind an Exchange 2K - ISA server are able to send instan
Restart the MTA on affected servers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2002 6:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 9318 and 9322 bind and bindback errors
I've got a 5.5 organization, and the Exchange server in one of my sites
Atleast a set of mirrored disks for the logs for each storage group...
The rest is upto you and the finance committee...
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2002 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Configuration
ay, 5 February 2002 15:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The day after superbowl
Best of the best. Kind of like hiring an Exchange admin as opposed to
just
a network admin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Peoples
Sent: M
Not ones for multi-tasking are they?
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The day after superbowl
Yeah well MINIMUM wage in the NFL is about $220,000/yr. And perhaps
those
tough guys ou
le.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Disc
Look in the exchange administrator.
If you are using e5.5, open configuration container, servers container, the
server, information store and then check the logon's section. That will tell
you who last acessed the mailbox.
But Sakti is right...It'll be in the permissions.
-Original Message-
The Trend SMTP Interscan Messaging Security Suite product kicks butt for
this scenario. I am just in the final stages of evaluating it for a very
similar scenario and I am recommending it for implementation.
MP
BTW, The only drawback is - it's inbuilt reporting is a bit lacking...
but then agai
Thanks for all your feedback,
I am pretty sure the DNS settings are correct. I have checked them and
there's nothing amiss there.
The SMTP connectors both point to the same smart host (firewall) for
traffic.
The e2k SP2 option looks tempting and adds a 4th option to the possible
fixes:
1. re-c
MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.4
messages don't go
out the right path.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Peoples
Sent: Wednesday, J
Yes...
>Did you recalculate routing?
FTR, the routing table in site addressing (e5.5 admin) shows the e2k
server (with SMTP connector) as the routing server, but in the GWART,
the e5.5 IMC is the chosen SMTP route. It doesn't see the e2k SMTP
connector... "When i hit recalculate routing - nothin
n't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:53 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: X.400 problem...
>
>
> It may solve the problem... but I am just anticipating the
> consequences if
TP Connector on your Windows 2000 server. What do you
show under Connectors?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
RE: X.400 problem...
What makes you think that actually removing the server from the
organization
won't meet the desired objective?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark P
Behalf Of Mark Peoples
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: X.400 problem...
Hi,
I have an e2k server that routes internet-bound messages to the x400
connector and then to my E5.5 server for tranmission. When I disable the
MTA and IMC on the e5.5 server
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X.400 problem...
What's the design goal here?
-Original Message-----
From: Mark Peoples
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 1/30/2002 6:16 PM
Subject: X.400 problem...
Hi,
I have an e2k server t
Hi,
I have an e2k server that routes internet-bound messages to the x400
connector and then to my E5.5 server for tranmission. When I disable the
MTA and IMC on the e5.5 server, instead of messages travelling via SMTP
to another e2k server in the site (with an IMS), the messages sit in the
x400 q
over.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k
nope. there are no mailboxes on the e5.5 server.
-Original Message-
From: Barb McDonald [m
nope. It can be on a different server.
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA & Exchange 5.5
Planning on setting up OWA for our Exchange 5.5 server. I have a newbie
question - does OWA
still on the 5.5
server?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k
Also,
if I remove the e5.5 IMC, will e5.5 detect the IMC on the e2k server?
(the
E2K Server(s) are allowed to send/receive SMTP via Port 25.
Look at Q272314 and Q284148 for the detailed procedures for retiring the
5.5
server.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
e the
preferred route for Internet mail. Also make sure your Firewall
understands
that the E2K Server(s) are allowed to send/receive SMTP via Port 25.
Look at Q272314 and Q284148 for the detailed procedures for retiring the
5.5
server.
-Original Message-----
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[
Hi,
Although I have followed Q152959.. I still have an issue:
I have 2 e2k SP1 servers (one with a Internet mail connector) and 1 e5.5
SP4 server (second internet mail connector with cost=100).
The Routing Calculation Server is set to be the e2k server with the mail
connector. When I look at the
yep, finishing it for my production network as of tonight.
MP
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 19 January 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Going to Native mode in Exchange 2000
Yep... Done it in my lab several times. ;)
1. Backups. Stay on top of backups and DR.
There is a system mailbox for each information store. No need to open
it.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 21 January 2002 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Administration Advice
Hell
You would really only have a trouble if you turned off the first server
...
The *last job* I was at, I did what you will be doing and it caused a
bit of trouble on some clients - they needed there mail profile
re-created.
It may have been a registry setting somewhere on the client that caused
th
Simple,
Turn on message tracking for exchange.
Then use message tracking from within exhcange to see what the user sent
/ received.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Borgaila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: usage?
Is th
Hi,
This afternoon my e2k server decided to kill itself with a corrupted log
file. I received the following error in the application event log:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: ESE98
Event Category: General
Event ID: 486
Date: 1/3/2002
Time: 2:29:38 PM
User:
*suggestively* advise you manager that you follow orders...
Exmerge their mailbox and give it to the appropriate authority at your
company. Hence it becomes thier problem. Chnaces are whatever the
accused have sent is still in their sent / deleted items folders (even
better if you if you have d
-Original Message-----
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume
it is NOT unrestricted...
Can y
How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume
it is NOT unrestricted...
Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different
addresses? Are you able to break up the attachment into files that are
small enough to not warrant ftp'ing them? (hint)
MP
-Orig
I would say that whereever you are sending the message has a smaller mailbox
limit than the size of the message that is being sent... but a copy of the
NDR would certainly help with a precise answer...
MP
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 De
Trend.
I am looking at doing the same thing and Trend seems to be a nice way to
do it.
As Kelly said, Sybari look good too...
regards,
MP
-Original Message-
From: Network Issues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 7 December 2001 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Em
Manually??? Anything in the GAL should have a mail enabled AD account
associated with it (well except DL's of course)...
Try running the e2k cleanup agent... it will mark the duplicate entry
'mailboxes' with a red x and they will be deleted after the deleted
items retention period...
Open syste
If you can, add some more hard disks to the server...
Otherwise, to free the space you have reclaimed by deleting stuff - you
need to run an offline defrag of the information store. This will only
be a temporary solution though.
To run an offline defrag - eseutil /d /ispriv
-Original Messa
ication you're
describing.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Peoples
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 7:24 PM
To: E
exchange infrastructure.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 9:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2k in DMZ?
Hi,
I have been asked to look at putting an exchange server in the DMZ for
the sole purpose of mail
Hi,
I have been asked to look at putting an exchange server in the DMZ for
the sole purpose of mail routing. I have explored the e2k frontend /
backend topology documents but from what I have read (and please correct
me if I am wrong), the frontend server needs to in the same domain that
the back
I don't know if anyone else has noticed ... but this thread of
discussion is getting no-where really really fast. we can all sit here
and argue and go in circles for ever OR
We can just leave it at:
If you don't like outlook and funcionality that it provides when hooked
into an exchange b
Sounds like a DNS problem.
Check that your DNS is configured correctly on the exchange server...
-Original Message-
From: Adil Azad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 17 November 2001 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Network Error During Host Resolution
Hello!
In my ne
A work around - but instead of clicking insert, file... blah blah : try
simply copying the file using windows explorer and then pasting the file
into the body of the e-mail.
-Original Message-
From: Jin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 15 November 2001 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Dis
Jeff,
1. All looks OK.
2. I don't think so.
3. Be careful with the firewall. When I did a similar process the
firewall / mail relay was set to only accept outbound mail from the Exch
5.5 server. I had that changed to accept mail from both Exch 5.5 and E2k
boxes. Inbound mail defaults to the E2K bo
It's OK.
You don't have to do a thing. No fix required.
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 31 October 2001 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID 1221 ---> Is this normal?
Is this ok?
EVENT ID: 1221
So
gt;
>
> Mark,
> Jon raises the critical issues. It would be neat if we had a standard.
>
> Your CEO needs to be aware of these issues (not simply loss of data),
> prior to implementing any policy or software solution.
>
> Agreed, why don't we take this offline.
> Can we set
ED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Steve Rollings
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Encryption
>
>
> Mark,
> Jon raises the critical issues. It would be neat if we had a standard.
>
> Your CEO needs
oordination with all of his correspondents?
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
> All your base are belong to us.
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Be
of rant
>
> Some technical information...
>
> You can obtain a digital ID from VeriSign, or one of the
> other CAs, for
> signing email. Make sure your IMC is configured with the
> option "Clients
> support S/MIME" enabled. This is not enabled by default.
>
Hi,
I have checked the FAQ and have not found any suggestions... so I will put
it to the experts.
Does anyone have a preferred product or solution for e-mail encryption?
Management here are looking at installing PGP and are also looking at a
Verisign product. Does anyone have any good / bad expe
I hope someone can offer some advice...
I am running Win2k and Exchange 2k / Ex 5.5 mixed environment. I have one
user who was having all sorts of trouble with forms and accepting meetings
and errors coming up with reminders to meetings. After exhausting all other
avenues of trying to resolve the
Hi,
On one server I am running win2k and Exchange 5.5.One another server I am
running Win2K and Exchange 2K. Yes, I am in the middle of a migration from
5.5 to 2K...
I have been asked to change the GAL user details template to include a
custom attribute. Doing the actual form changes I am quite
I had this problem where I used to work...
The users were about as dumb as a post when it came to outlook and used it
store anything they could in their mailbox. If there were 10 of them in a
group all with access to the same file server - they would still manage to
e-mail the document to each ot
WINS.
If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is
preferred)
> -Original Message-
> From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??
69 matches
Mail list logo
