Does anyone know of a good wireless list group like this exchange list?
Thanks
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
Put server on bench hang new drives off to side on systems and use optimizer to move!
-Original Message-
From: Jees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 8:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk
No MB, I don't have two spare
80, 443 I think?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rsamman
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What ports to open
My OWA is working from within ( locally ), but I can't access it from
home
What
it during our
migrations.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, November
25, 2003 7:51 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: exmerge? 5.5
Subject: exmerge? 5.5
Is there a utility
like exmerge that can export out the public folders. They have a ton of
email with attachments and I would love to able to export out intact
just in case.
_
List posting FAQ:
data back in. Solved problem. Is there a utility
like exmerge that can export out the public folders. They have a ton of
email with attachments and I would love to able to export out intact
just in case.
-Original Message-
From: Matt
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange
that? Is there a way to do it via Active Directory
GPO's?
Thanks for any help,
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode
100 percent of cpu
Could be any number of things.
Search in Technet for an article called Troubleshooting High CPU
Utilization By Store.exe and see if that points to anything useful.
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM
Ca inoculate it v7. Supposedly no issues!!
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: store.exe takes 100 percent of cpu
Matt,
I'm curious as to what your anti-virus software
Hi all
I got a nt4.0 sp6a running exchange 5.5 sp4 and every eight hours the store.exe will
consume 100 percent of
cpu and evenually stop responding.
I can shut the services down manually and restart takes a looong time.
I have removed all antivirus products from server
there is pleanty of
the first and last names?
Basically I'd like to avoid having to do it individually for all my
users. I know the update service will take care of populating these
accounts with the addresses, I just need to have the system recognize
how I want the addresses formatted.
Thanks,
Matt
Ah, perfect!
That is exactly what I was looking for. Unfortunately, the help does
not appear to contain that info in a conveniently logical place.
Thanks!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Wednesday, November
Thanks for all your help!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
I would look into getting a new ISP. Not much you can do about other
people's systems
folders they have which are extensive. I have never
upgraded from 5.5 just set up nes ex2k boxes.
Thanks for any help
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm
using. Good/Bad experiences. Any help with
my product search would be great.
Thanks
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
in and browse to the path and then it finds
it.
Has anyone run into this before?
Thanks,
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
a hard time believing doesn't trip up a lot of people... Maybe
it's just me.
Oh well. Thanks for all the help, it looks like its working now!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:18 AM
Doesn't Exchange bounce back any type of message to the originator of
the message that the account no longer exists, though? Or really, maybe
I should say shouldn't it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Monday,
Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
No.
Is this an online backup?
Simply re-direct the info store restore to the recovery 5.5 server. You
don't need to restore the directory to get at the mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
with the patch option? Also what was the exact error
message you get in the event log. Search on that as it may have to do
with
changing the restore in progress setting.
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Is this an online or offline restore?
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25
server's OS and SP level do not match the
production's OS and SP level. In the DR whitepaper, use the section that
refers to Single Mailbox Recovery and you should be good to go.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
W2K servers yet.
So, we're back up and running and all our users have their email.
Thanks to all who helped me out with this, and sorry for any wasted time
on your parts.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
are having major panic attacks.
Thanks,
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe
would be great since my 15 lost users
are having major panic attacks.
Thanks,
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
Sorry about that. I was a bit flustered at the time and didn't realize
I had done so. You'll note that I did post the same message with a
different subject afterward...
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:56 PM
will not
pick up this 5.5 server??
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Mongo head hurt.
You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member
crossed... I'd really like to go home!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui
Transition
Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui
on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM
Hmmm... One more thing... Does the server I'm restoring to require the
same name as the old server? Not just the same org and site?
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
I
It encrypts the connection. Any Ideas would help.
Thanks
Matt
â²Úh²PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(ú«qïÞÅÈ_j¨mg{^özm§ÿâÊZ®Ib²×(÷
¸§þ\«Êez{^ì\
©àz¶j zV§éà+!N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³
§Ê
No, im only going by the padlock icon. Is there any other way to tell for sure with
out sniffing the conncetion. If not I guess I have to find my sniffing hat and wipe
off the dust.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23
and
it worked perfectly (and man oh man is OWA 2K SO much better than the 5.5
version).
Thanks in advance for any help or suggestions.
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http
Anyone know how (or if) you can fix a situation where the ADC was not
installed first before ForestPrep and DomainPrep were run?
Basically we cannot get the Public Folders to replicate because there's no
ability to set up an intersite connection.
Thanks,
Matt
Anyone know how (or if) you can fix a situation where the ADC was not
installed first before ForestPrep and DomainPrep were run?
Basically we cannot get the Public Folders to replicate because there's no
ability to set up an intersite connection.
Thanks,
Matt
My mistyped domain resulted in versigns page.What a travesty.
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
From Wired.com
don't want to do all my software
assignment through the Users - some stuff really needs to be set up to
install at the Computer level.
Thanks in advance for any assistance,
Matt Hoffman
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Argh!
Sorry about this, I meant to send it to the NT list. But, of course, if any
of you can help... ;)
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Computer GPO software
I want to know who I can call to make sure I'm getting my proper kickbacks.
That's money I'm losing out on Deckler!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 1:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book
Well, to look at your point about a Pfizer certification, don't mechanics
have different certifications based on what type of automobiles they work
on? I believe there's a Ford certification and something else... I'm not
real knowledgable on the subject.
Matt
-Original Message-
From
Hmmm. Oddly enough, I would have figured it to be the other way round; that
any person who attempts to keep me from being able to do my job freely with
no complications was a capitalist wage-slave owner, but's that's just my
particular set of thoughts...
Matt
-Original Message-
From
).
You tell me where we have such power.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is
that by his
This is just a problem when sending emails? Not when opening emails?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange or Outlook slow
I have a problem that is affecting two users
I know this is a bit off-topic, but what are you folks using to keep your
Outlook/Office installations up to date? Since there's no automatic
updates, and SUS supposedly doesn't support office updates... Are you using
third-party tools?
Thanks,
Matt
Does anyone else have this same setup and have you experienced any problems
with upgrading to Win2K SP 4?
Windows 2000, SP3 with all hotfixes, Exchange 5.5 SP 4
I'm just wondering about any major issues with Win2K SP4 interfering with
Exchange that anyone else has experienced.
Thanks,
Matt
had to
rebuild a server. Microsoft tech said there was going to be patch soon.
john
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Win2k SP 4 with Exchange 5.5
Does anyone else have this same
Bah. Helpful you are not - so says Yoda.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2k SP 4 with Exchange 5.5
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto
There is no M:\ Drive!
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive Removal
Alien abduction
-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
how do I install the Collaborative Data Objects package which is an
optional part of Outlook Setup
thanks in advance
matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm
how do I install the Collaborative Data Objects package which is an
optional part of Outlook Setup
thanks in advance
matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm
We had a similar problem with lock ups for no reason. Changed all the
ram problem went away. The ram did check out ok on a test!!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Trend Discussion
to enable allow automatic replies was checked in the system manager.
Is there another place to enable it? I have waited two days could it be a RUS thing?
Thanks for any input
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
the domains. It will cause you great distress further down the
road.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Posted
At: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:50 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Replication and Schema problem
Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication and Schema problem
Well, it already has. We just haven't been able to figure it out yet.
Likely
Admins make up their minds on that issue...
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication and Schema problem
You need to have a Global Catalog server in every AD Site that hosts
at the
DC's downtown for their time. Once that was completed, it looks like things
are replicating now.
By the way, thanks for all the help on this. It really has been helpful and
illuminating.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003
I thought trend scamail for exchange can handle is stores. I just
installed trend scanmail for exchange 2k and so far I think I'm quite
happy with it.
We bought the suite so next week will start installing the spam
filters. Any tips from the current users of scanmail a newbie should
know.
Matt
... I'm going to keep looking around for more info
myself.
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replication and Schema problem
Hopefully someone on this list will have a suggestion as to
what to do
Here is some more info on it. Should be an interesting afternoon.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32475.html
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=1211e=1u=/nm/20030822/tc_nm/tech_internet_virus_dcsid=95573372
-Original Message-
From: Lori Sagert [mailto:[EMAIL
Oh crap, I didn't think that anyone actually hooked Skynet up to the
internet.
T-Minus 30 minutes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
Do you have an SMTP gateway that you can use to filter out messages based on subject?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG.
Exchange
Is Xwall installed on the exchange server or a gateway? If its on the exchange server
then would it still solve his problem b/c mail is still hitting his server?
-Original Message-
From: PF: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 3:43 PM
To: Exchange
Make sure all of your services are running. Like remote registery.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
::: pops 3rd beer of the hour :::
How many AD
Thanks you hit the nail on the head. ISP shut down ports. Created VPN
with 2k real quick customer could login in. How do I know for sure I'm
Handling exchange traffic only?
Thanks again
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August
I have to support a temp server for 2 more weeks running win2k sp4 and
exchange 2k sp3. No firewall ( I know) All users are remote. OWA does
work.
Outlook worked yesterday not today. All of the sudden no one remotely
can login. I can login the server is my network. This server has been
running
about above? Any
specific pointers to give on this process?
Thank you very much,
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
it
completely. I've had too many such instructions leave out some critical
component that meant many more hours of hassle instead of a nice clean
install.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
reading the E2K3 help,
I'd strongly recommend migration to it over E2K.
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:37:33 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000
.
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot login
I have to support a temp server for 2 more weeks running win2k sp4 and
exchange 2k sp3. No firewall ( I know) All users are remote. OWA does
work
Samantha,
Thanks for the offer. If anything comes up I'll be sure to check with you.
And thanks for the vote of confidence in the whitepaper... My techie
paranoia alarms are just going off on this one.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Had same problem on one server. I changed all services (third Party)
veritas AV Web to manual rebooted and then applied svp 4
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error Loading SP4 on
I got the same problem on one server. Nt4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. Server
runs fine for 2 days then store.exe pegs at 100%. Server is not at my
location
So I don't know if I want to turn maint off
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003
How do you know online maint is not releasing the store.exe?
-Original Message-
From: Alberto Faccioli . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor
I have a similar problem, but not a solution
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5
Ok if I do this Do I need to rerun the exchange sp4? I think I am still
missing something because IIS should not give me the internal 500
, 2003 10:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5
You need to install SP6 for NT again before you go any further. Then ALL
security hot fixes.
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5
Reinstall SP6, then run the exchange setup again and select only the OWA
option(custom install)
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17
service pack
after running the install. It won't hurt it. I know there are OWA
updates in SP4
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5
Ok if I do this Do I need to rerun the exchange
-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5
I Understand Just wondering why the default.asp page will not run.
Not from OWA just from the default web server. Usually I would test the
web portion before moving
internal errors.
Thanks for any Help
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Ok got the go ahead to add 2 drives. I'll add the drives mirror and then run 5.5
exchange 5.5 sp4 nt 4.0 sp6 how much free space should remain on drive where edb's
are. I know to do an offline defrag you need space equal to the databases to perform
this function. Currently databases are 6 gb and 1 gb with only 1.5 gb free disk space
remaining. Store pegs cpu at 100% every 2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Posted At:
Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:34 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: hard drive space
Subject: hard drive space
exchange 5.5 sp4 nt 4.0 sp6 how much free space should remain on drive
This is a repost after trying answer to post. Exchange 5.5 nt sp6 exchange spk 4.0
Store still runs at 100%. Takes 2-3 days to max out. If I reboot server
everything ok for a couple of days. Shut down av sw. Databases are 1 gb and 6 gb.
Cannot not do an offline defrag because there is only 1.5 gb
CALs (isn't there a Exchange 2003 coming out? In that case
buy THOSE CALs), since a CAL is backwardly compatible.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Stew Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Licensing
Can anyone
This certainly could have changed, since Microsoft is famouse for altering
their licensing arrangements. At the time I bought CALs, we had to purchase
them one per user.
If MS really has made this change, then this is definitely a good thing.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Chris H
We used to use Netscape's mail server back when it was free for educational
use. At the time, we did have a closed relay system, but since our server
wouldn't respond with a 550, we got blacklisted. It took us quite a lot of
effort to get the various Anti-relay sites to accept that we were a
waited a few
days, have rebooted. I get no error message. Any thoughts?
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode
is correct, the computer that im
logging into OWA with time is correct. Looked on technet for wrong log
time with IIS and haven't found anything useful yet. I'm sure its some
newbie thing ive over looked.
Thanks for any input
Matt
Thanks for the help.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
IIS Log times are in GMT
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky
block POP. Is blocking incoming
POP something other company do? Is there some other way to secure
incoming POP mail?
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm
Thanks for all the replies. Death to POP!!! (evil laugh Ha. Ha. Ha.
.)
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP = Bad? -- SMTP = Good?
Your thinking is right
to update daily but if a new virus is able to make it in
via POP before my anti-virus software updates. BAM lots and lots
of work :(
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP
exchange server get their mail from the
main campus OpenBSD email server via POP. (the problem) Therefore bypassing my ability
to strip there harmful attachments.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: deji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Have you checked to see if the reply to address got changed on the users
account?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reply to bringing up wrong domain name.
We have one of our
Set exchange up in a hosting environment. You can keep 100's of
companies separate
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and AD Question
This question may be a little off the list
for the mailbox. 4.
import pst file into account needing restored. Are
these 4 steps all I need or are there additional
steps? Thanks for any input.
Matt
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http
. That seems like a little overkill.
How are you doing
your backups?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Matt
Plahtinsky
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help for a Newbe
I'm REALLY! new to exchange. I inherited
Quick questions. Running 5.5 sp3 nt4.0 sp6. Server was not behind
firewall running on public IP's. Yesterday installed
Firewall 15 wkstations (win98 outlook 2000) and server behind firewall.
Gave everyone Private Ips and a 1 to 1 nat for exchange ip address.
Everything works internally but
your DNS and WINS to make sure the
clients are routing properly
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Quick questions. Running 5.5 sp3 nt4.0 sp6. Server was not behind
firewall running on public IP's
1 - 100 of 439 matches
Mail list logo
