-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: 07 November 2002 18:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Computing issues like say... an RBL?
I meant lots of other computing issues as well as...
I applaud your amazing insight
Yes she is.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Yeah, Baker is okay too.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting
apparently so--you and others
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
*yawn*
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:JDillon;s-3.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07
Nothing has ever improved through apathy.
Andy David wrote:
| *yawn*
|
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:JDillon;s-3.com]
| Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:32 PM
| To: Exchange Discussions
| Subject: RE: RBL's
|
|
| The Republican Imperialist Evangelical Army
, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Drew was the one that showed me the whole story years ago.
I still think it's insane.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Drew Nicholson
Sent: Thursday
Lets talk about something else like making it illegal to smoke in
restaurants or bars
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Caution: Thread is hot.
-Original Message
Don't need to, it already works well here ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Exchange Discussions' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: RBL's
Lets talk about something else like making it illegal to smoke
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 15:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Please don't use the McDonalds lawsuit as some type of
example of the legal system gone bezerk. If you actually
understood
.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
At no time have I said that companies can't choose to implement RBLs;
simply
that they should be cognizant
[mailto:brett.finch;hrs.ualberta.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Can you say 'risk management'. If someone can drive up to a window,
order a coffee then take the lid off, drive over a speed bump and sue
someone else, anything is possible
I'll second that topic.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone;superioraccess.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Lets talk about something else like making it illegal to smoke
to eat.
Double yuck and good riddance!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone;superioraccess.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Lets talk about something else like making it illegal to smoke in
restaurants
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:rim;LutonSFC.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 4:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
It's a great example, however, of people jumping all over something
despite not understanding it much at all, which makes
Subject: RE: RBL's
Please don't use the McDonalds lawsuit as some type of
example of the legal system gone bezerk. If you actually
understood the history of the case, you'd find that the
judgment itself was well within the bounds of reason, even if
the monetary damages awarded appear
Yes I fully accept my redundant attempt to go the extreme.
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:DNicholson;rapidapp.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
If that is what had happened with the coffee, I suppose you might
Subject: RE: RBL's
If that is what had happened with the coffee, I suppose you might have
an actual point.
But it's not. So you don't. :)
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From
, November 07, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:rim;LutonSFC.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff
PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Personally, you can smoke in bars all you want...I don't go to bars, so
I don't care.
Smoking in restaurants however
What do you mean? Nothing but barren open spaces in SE Cali.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
That's the law
*yawn*
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:JDillon;s-3.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
The Republican Imperialist Evangelical Army has just seized the US Congress,
and we're STILL sweating RBLs?
Trust me
guffaw
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:JDillon;s-3.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
The Republican Imperialist Evangelical Army has just seized the US
Congress, and we're STILL sweating RBLs?
Trust me
, 2002 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
What do you mean? Nothing but barren open spaces in SE Cali.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Exchange
04, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Bravo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Walsh, Ric
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok your spelling
04, 2002 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Perhaps you should read your e-mails before you send them. Just cause
you wrote something down and it sounds one way in your head doesn't
meant that it will sound the same way on the other end.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
)
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Here's what SamSpade.org says about the XBL:
The XBL has been removed for a number of reasons. 1) It's run by a
total kook. 2) Nobody uses it. 3) It appears to list almost the entire
Internet.
LOL
Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I've watched this thread for a while. I don't buy the argument that a
ten million deal will fail because of a bounced email via RBL. It's just
as likely that a dept. with predominant females could sue for fifteen
million for sexual harassment in the fact the company
21:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I've never heard of a single instance where a lawsuit was initiated against
an organization based on incoming *spam*. Can you point to one? I can point
to deals which didn't get done because of RBLs which resulted in real
monetary loss, which would
were
interested.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
And in general, the business needs of a firm providing free web based
e-mail, vs. the business needs
over a speed bump and sue someone
else,
anything is possible :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 21:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I've never heard of a single instance where a lawsuit
: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Can you say 'risk management'. If someone can drive up to a window, order a
coffee then take the lid off, drive over a speed bump and sue someone else,
anything is possible :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris
Caution: Thread is hot.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
At no time have I said that companies can't choose to implement RBLs; simply
that they should
I agree with the facts in your short version. Still gripes me to have
somebody recover for their own stupidity, however.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
That's friggin crazy!!
Why don't they just turn the thing off?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Here's another reason not to use
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
The McDonalds coffee incident is typical of how the media grabs a story
and
presents only the sensationalized aspect of it ( Insane law system
gives
awards woman for being burned by hot coffee!).
There's quite a bit more to this story than what was ever
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: 04 November 2002 18:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Hu you being rude to someone elseimagine that?
You saying nothing of value AGAIN... Imagine that?
Robert Moir
IT Systems
: RE: RBL's
This is exactly the kind of stuff that happens. And when your boss comes
screaming to you that he missed an important email, he isn't likely to give
one bit of a damn about an RBL. He is more likely to give a damn about how
YOU screwed up and cost the company a deal.
-Original
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: David Gibbons [mailto:David.Gibbons;Calibercollision.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 6:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Mr
Yea. You would hope so.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I would hope that most administrators would have the approval of the
higher-ups before implementing any system
I just re-read his original posting. I really don't understand why he's
called rude.
I think he should have added that some RBL's don't even know what an RBL is
supposed to do. And they're clueless about the damage they can do when not
operated in The_Right_Way. Spews is a good example
to make technological
decisions regarding who can send me mail. I've found that the administrators
that like the RBL's tend to be very technical without a lick of business
sense. Their theory is that it is better to reject a few good mail messages
than to receive any spam. This is in complete opposite
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I just re-read his original posting. I really don't understand why he's
called rude.
I think he should have added that some RBL's don't even know what an RBL is
supposed to do. And they're clueless about the damage they can do when not
operated
for a
fact that legitimate mail is going to be blocked.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:clevis;appgeo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I can't send email from home to work for that very same reason... My boss
still
You following remark ... Seems to say ?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
depsite it's poor grammar ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I originally questioned about RBL's for exchange because we host a large
.com whose main stay of business is free web based email.
They have 100k plus users and get spammed to death. We have content
filtering tools, we can blacklist known spammers, and we can even shut down
ip's at the router
, November 05, 2002 3:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I just re-read his original posting. I really don't understand why he's
called rude.
I think he should have added that some RBL's don't even know what an RBL is
supposed to do. And they're clueless about the damage they can do
;Calibercollision.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Mr. Scharff,
I understand that you're currently a bit jaded with this topic (or you
could be enjoying yourself not sure... The email intonation module on my
pc is broken *grin*). But, would you mind
.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I originally questioned about RBL's for exchange because we host a large
.com whose main stay of business is free web based email.
They have 100k plus
.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I would hope that most administrators would have the approval of the
higher-ups before implementing any system that utilized a RBL
on the other end.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded
Here's another reason not to use RBL's. I just did a SamSpade search on the
IP's for our Mail servers...and we were listed in OrbzIn and OrbzOut! Wanna
know why? Here's why:
Why am I listed in ORBZ? Currently, every IP on the Internet is listed in
ORBZ. This was done to encourage
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
And in general, the business needs of a firm providing free web based
e-mail, vs. the business needs of a Fortune 500 company are a tad different.
So are the usage patterns and a host of other factors. My only comment about
RBLs as it related to your question
The delete key works here
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Baker,
Jennifer
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 16:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Cripes. How many people do I have to blacklist before
Sam Adams?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of King, John
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 15:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Never listen to sales schmucks anyways...
RBL = Real Boston Lager
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you
That's friggin crazy!!
Why don't they just turn the thing off?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Here's another reason not to use RBL's. I just did a SamSpade
:13 PM
Subject: RE: RBL's
Mr. Hummert, I send more than 8k responses per year to various online
forums. If you and Mr. Walsh choose to misinterpret some miniscule
percentage of my posts as rude (some of them, like this one are
intentionally rude) quite honestly, I don't give a rat's ass
Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
And in general, the business needs of a firm providing free web based
e-mail, vs. the business needs of a Fortune 500 company are a tad
different.
So
: RE: RBL's
Very true..We have hosted exchange for business and we get the sh-t spammed
out of us. But we do not block any email! That may change as our customers
are complaining bitterly. The best solution we would like is a filter on the
client side and not the server side. MacAfee spam kill
Subject: RE: RBL's
I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you this
morning.
I'd suggest that the spelling remark was only rude to a subset of
the
32% of admins who actually could spell RBL and thus understood the
barb.
As a journalism major, with an English
Shut The Fr*ntpage Up.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of John Q Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RBL's / STFU
What is STFU?[1]
- John Q Jr.
[1] I just HAD
back to a would be spammer seems to work as well as anything.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Very true..We have hosted exchange for business and we get the sh
: RBL's
I'd guess 68% or more of mail admins are unable to even spell RBL. The
majority of the remainder is unable to comprehend the implications of the
functionality on their environment, whether they understand how it
actually
works or not.
-Original Message-
From: William
?
[1] Close personal friends who wouldn't take offense at my comments even if
they had been directed at them.
-Original Message-
From: Walsh, Ric
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 10/31/2002 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that. Have
you
Hu you being rude to someone elseimagine that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok what makes you such a wizard
You're about as useful as a chocolate teapot.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Hu you being rude to someone elseimagine that?
-Original Message
being rude to someone elseimagine that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok what makes you such a wizard
Mr. Scharff = kettle
Mr. Hummert = pot
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I asked for clarification from Mr. Walsh that I might learn to curb my
apparently
, November 04, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok what makes you such a wizard?
The cool pointy hat and eye of newt in my toolkit.
Who exacty was I rude to? The two people in the thread who I directly
replied to?[1] Or did I offend those mail
What is RBL? :P
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Oh wait
He's so vain, he thought the post was about him... He's so vain... :P
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Oh wait. Never mind Mr. Hummert. I finally understand
Reddish Brown Lint???
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
What is RBL? :P
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Google.com?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Oh wait. Never mind Mr. Hummert. I finally understand what is going
Its like running with scissors. No matter how careful you are, someone is
gonna get hurt.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
What is RBL? :P
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Reddish Brown Lint???
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
What is RBL? :P
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that. Have you
though of taking an anger management class?
Ric Walsh
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
Never listen to sales schmucks anyways...
RBL = Real Boston Lager...
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
OH! So we are talking about what's stuck in Chris' beard! Now I
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Oh wait. Never mind Mr. Hummert. I finally understand what is going on.
You took my general statements regarding the number of mail
administrators who couldn't spell RBL or who didn't fully understand its
implications as some kind of a personal
remark despite it's poor grammar seems to say that the rest
of
us are dumber that you. I'd have to say that it was ALL rude.
Ric Walsh
-Original Message-
From: Walsh, Ric
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: RBL's
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok your spelling remark was rude to all of us.
You following remark despite it's poor grammar seems to say that the rest of
us are dumber that you. I'd have to say that it was ALL rude.
Ric Walsh
-Original Message-
From: Walsh, Ric
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002
] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you this morning.
I'd suggest that the spelling remark was only rude to a subset of the
32% of admins who actually could spell RBL and thus
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you this morning.
I'd suggest that the spelling remark was only
Cuz your kiss, your kiss, is on my list.
Can I get on *that* list?
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:jen;fluke.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Cripes. How many people do I have to blacklist before this ends
;noghri.net]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Perhaps you should read your e-mails before you send them. Just cause
you wrote something down and it sounds one way in your head doesn't
meant that it will sound the same way on the other end
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you this morning.
I'd suggest that the spelling remark was only
As long as you buy me a beer next time I'm in Austin, I'll continue to be
your friend. ;)
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok what makes you such a wizard
: RBL's
Mr. Scharff,
I understand that you're currently a bit jaded with this topic (or you could
be enjoying yourself not sure... The email intonation module on my pc is
broken *grin*). But, would you mind taking a moment to explain or send
links to previous explanations as to why RBL
I'll jump in here.
Thus far RBL's have been run by individuals. Seems some had axes to grind,
others refused to consider that their understanding of the RFCs was wrong
and others were just plain incompetent or lazy. An acquaintance of mine had
a dispute with one such list and wound up having
: RBL's
I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you this morning.
I'd suggest that the spelling remark was only rude to a subset of the
32% of admins who actually could spell RBL and thus understood the barb.
As a journalism major, with an English minor I am quite concerned
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you this morning.
I'd suggest
I love it when you're harsh. :o)
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 5:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Mr. Hummert, I send more than 8k
-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 5:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Hopefully this e-mail message will get through. I fear that the most
technically useful portions of this thread may have been blocked by your
company's
depsite it's poor grammar ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Walsh, Ric
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok your spelling remark was rude to all of us.
You following
30, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
For as long as I've been the person responsible for checking the
postmaster mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
For as long as I've been the person responsible for checking the postmaster mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Have they always been?
William
Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I'm surprised - I've never had any problems with SPAMCop.
We've had relay problems, which I was able to resolve to
their satisfaction
, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Perzactly - and in general they display the specific email message(s) that
won you the honor of being on their list.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly
, 2002 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
That was part of the problem...we went to the link on their site for our IP
address, but no information was available on the specific message. It just
gave a date that showed when we were first blacklisted. We spent about 2
days trying to get
and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcoleman;state.mt.us]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
That was part of the problem...we went to the link on their
site for our IP
address
I'm thinking there's a connection between SPAMCop and George Custer :-)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Maybe someone had a bad experience in Montana?
We're
I'm thinking that someone does not check the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox.
;)
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcoleman;state.mt.us]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I'm thinking there's a connection between SPAMCop
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
