Moving mailboxes using the Active Directory, Exchange Tasks submenu. Move
mailbox command. From what I understand, you can not use the Exchange
Move Server tool if the servers are in the same site.
_
List posting FAQ:
] On Behalf Of Stephen Schwarz
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 To 2000 Move Mailbox Issue
Moving mailboxes using the Active Directory, Exchange Tasks submenu. Move
mailbox command. From what I understand, you can not use the Exchange Move
Check the account you're using and be sure that it has the correct Exchange
permissions.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Are you moving it from the Excchange 5.5 admin or the ESM?
Doesn't work from 5.5 Admin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Schwarz
Sent: Tuesday, 30 December 2003 2:56 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 To 2000 Move
You can, but you might find your rules acting funny if you use any of the
O2k3 rules...
I use OL2k3 most always, but I was recently relegated to dial-up on a
business trip and had to use Citrix instead where we have OL2k2 installed...
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam
Yes they can.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raji Arulambalam
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 to access their mailbox on
I have seen it screw up rules, and at times blow them completely out.
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both
I had a blow out last night
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
I have seen it screw up rules
Madre Del Dios!!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
I had a blow out last night
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Aye carumba!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Madre Del Dios!!
-Original Message-
From
You didn't SP the OWA box did you? Install SP4 for Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PEter
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server
I getting this
Yes, but I would recommend adding a second drive to your current box if
possible instead. Routing to a different drive across the network will at
minimum double the time it takes to run this.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Guy Fortin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December
yes
- Original Message -
From: Guy Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:13 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IS has reached the 16GB limit
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=185457
I want to do an eseutil to defragment the IS,
You can also move the database files to another machine and run ESEUTIL
there.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Fortin
Sent:
Does the dev server have McAfee installed on it as well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Patch KB829418 - STORE.EXE GPF
I have applied recent MS Patch
Yes, identical version of McAfee GroupShield.
Only difference seems to be loading - dev server has very little traffic -
production is busy.
Thanks
Dave
Does the dev server have McAfee installed on it as well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guys,
good news, I did the eseutil /d /priv on my exchange box and now have
regained my space back.
thanks for the help
Pat
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
no prob
--
From: pat karr
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Guys,
good news, I did the eseutil /d /priv on my exchange box and now
Of pat karr
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Guys,
good news, I did the eseutil /d /priv on my exchange box and now have
regained my space back.
thanks for the help
Pat
Nate, Andy, and Ben,
thanks for all of your help concerning this issue. I finally received a
1221 message from the server at 6 pm last night. It told me I have 6509
Megabytes of space free. Very cool. I will be doing another eseutil /d
/priv over the weekend and another backup.
Once again
My first question is on the second ESEUTIL run di you run a defrag or did
you run some other switch with it? If you did not run a second defrag after
you cleaned out the accounts then that is your issue. MS Exchange does
defrag automatically, but it does not compress automatically. In order to
Set the Deleted Item Retention time for messages to 0 and IS maintenance to
always and let that puppy run for awhile. Also, check the 1221 events in
the app log and see how much space has been freed up. The 1221's will give
you the min amount you can reclaim after defragging with eseutil again.
I ran the util with the /d command switch. Was this correct?
pat
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
private stores and purging
Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
I ran the util with the /d command switch. Was this correct?
pat
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface
Andy,
I went into the IS Maintenance and did what was requested. I also went and
set the deleted file retention to 0 and removed the check box that
relates to keeping the message until a backup is done.
In the app log I see a bunch of 1003 and 1006 messages stating that
messages and attachments
, 2003 12:12 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Andy,
I went into the IS Maintenance and did what was requested. I also went
and set the deleted file retention to 0 and removed the check box
Thanks Ben. So far the only 1221's that are showing up are the one's for
the MSExchangePub but none for the MSExchange Private. Will it show some
type of progress message? All I keep seeing are the messages relating
deleting messages and attachments.
what do you think?
Pat
Where would I find my recipient policies? Thanks for the help, this is my
first time working with Exchange
--Norbert
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer
Where would I find my recipient policies? Thanks for the help, this is my
first time working with Exchange
--Norbert
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22
That would unfortunately be me. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer
Ask your Exchange administrator.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Of Norbert Phillips
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer
That would unfortunately be me. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange
Are they both using the same domain name? So when you send a message to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED], is the Exchange server also using that same domain
name?
-Original Message-
From: norbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Yes they are both using the same domain.
--Norbert
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer
Are they both using the same domain name? So when you
and the listserv would be @listserv.domain.com
-Original Message-
From: Norbert Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer
Yes they are both using the same domain.
--Norbert
-Original Message
, 2003 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer
That's why it bounces.
The listserve may be [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when you send an email to it
from Exchange, Exchange is looking at the local recipients and not seeing it
as a valid email address.
The best solution
Of Norbert Phillips
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer
They actually are using different domains then, sorry about that, one is
lists.mydomain.org and the other mydomain.org. I was thinking that made
them part of the same domain
Mary, for me it usually means that the nic card on the server/switch/media
server are mismatched. I.e one is set to auto and one is set to 100full or
100 half...
john
-Original Message-
From: Mary McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 4:14 AM
To: Exchange
I experienced this once, and it was because the RAID card was set to NO
CACHE for WRITE. A common thing done back in the olden days with
Exchange, but not what you want when doing a restore.
Brent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary
, 2003 6:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003 - upgd/mig...
Q to all...after reading part of this thread and being in the boat of
starting to plan my migration and just reading some of the FAQ's
with regard to:
Exchange 2003 server. And the only other option
thanks Ed. Guess Ill just kinda be Leaping
(History Of the World Part I ... comes into mind)
thx
bill
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003
, September 25, 2003 5:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003
Exchange 5.5 is not supported on Windows 2003 server. I don't even know if
it would work.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003
1. Yes
2. No
3. You cant directly upgrade Exchange 5.5 to 2003. If you need to keep
Exchange on the same hardware you will need to upgrade the OS to W2K, then
upgrade 5.5 to 2000, then upgrade 2003 to 2003, the upgrade the OS to 2003
if you choose.
The better solution would be to get a new
Structure
and moving to AD.
Thanks,
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003
1. Yes
2. No
3. You cant directly upgrade Exchange 5.5 to 2003
-
From: Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003
1. Yes
2. No
3. You cant directly upgrade Exchange 5.5 to 2003. If you need to keep
Exchange on the same hardware you will need to upgrade the OS to W2K
like RPC over HTTP, you will need Windows
2003.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003
Martin,
Thanks for your response. Another Question: When
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
select 2003 faq
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 26/09/2003 9:14:49 a.m.
Have a few questions:
We are currently about to start a Migration to AD. We have a Exchange 5.5
Server on a Windows NT 4 box. We are moving the Exchange 5.5 Server to a
Windows 2000 Box due
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003
You are going to need to get your AD infrastructure in place before you
think about upgrading your Exchange server to anything other than 5.5.
So the simple answer is no. You must have AD.
As for your other question, Exchange 2003
Exchange 5.5 is not supported on Windows 2003 server. I don't even know if
it would work.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003
Martin,
I guess I
: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2003
Exchange 5.5 is not supported on Windows 2003 server. I don't even know if
it would work.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5
Kinda sounds like a service is not shutting down properly. Try manually
shutting down all services for Exchange then try.
From: Jose Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box
I tried manually stopping the IIS services but, it didn't help. Outlook Web
Access is the only exchange app installed on this box :(
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5
Not sure maybe shutdown any antivirus programs running
From: Jose Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :(
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:44:37 -0400
I tried
, September 10, 2003 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 questions
This will allow you to recover hard deleted items from any folder
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/q178/6/30.aspNoWebContent=1
, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 questions
What about messages deleted from the 'recover deleted Items' folder?
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Email Tracking = Journaling
Avoiding Hard Deletes = Enable Deleted Items Retention
Backup software = NT Backup will meet your needs. Backup Exec is another
alternative
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:38 AM
To:
What about messages deleted from the 'recover deleted Items' folder?
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 questions
Email Tracking = Journaling
Avoiding Hard
Journaling.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Staub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:03 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange 5.5 questions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 questions
What about messages deleted from the 'recover deleted Items' folder?
Adam
Using newprof?
- Original Message -
From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP
workstations.
We must be using newprof. I never set it up. Is it necessary?
Does everybody else use it?
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
Using newprof
No and no.
- Original Message -
From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:35 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
We must be using newprof. I never set it up. Is it necessary?
Does everybody else
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McCready,
Robert
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
We must be using newprof. I never set it up. Is it necessary? Does
everybody else use
%20Kit%20Tools.pdf
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McCready,
Robert
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
We must be using newprof. I never set it up
How old was the restored backup?
- Original Message -
From: Sean Brandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 server sending and receiving previously processed me
ssages
Hi All,
A few days ago some
I would suspect the system is replaying the queue.dat file found in the imcdata
folder. I would hazard a guess that all the messages being replayed if you
will are all SMTP. Stop the Internet mail service then rename/move/delete the
queue.dat file and then restart the service. This should
: Exchange 5.5 server sending and receiving previously processed
me ssages
How old was the restored backup?
- Original Message -
From: Sean Brandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 server sending
Sorry, to clarify my first post: We rebuilt the disk array not the server.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Brandt
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server sending and receiving previously processe d
me ssages
It was just one disk
Did you try accessing the 3 different user from a computer that does not
have this issue?
From: Shawn Connelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange (5.5) server not available
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003
It may be unrelated, but always helps: make sure your DNS is working
correctly and those windows 2000 clients can resolve the name of the
exchange server (NSLOOKUP exchsvrname)
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 19,
What machine name is in the Requesting dialog box. That might tell you
something as well.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
19, 2003 6:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available
It may be unrelated, but always helps: make sure your DNS is working
correctly and those windows 2000 clients can resolve the name of the
exchange server (NSLOOKUP exchsvrname)
-Kevin
-Original Message
I don't think it would, since Groupshield scans the store, not SMTP
traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
I know this is not a 100% exchange
scans = trashes
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy I. Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
I don't think it would, since Groupshield scans the store, not SMTP
traffic
I made no promises as to how well it works on the store..
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
scans = trashes
- Original Message -
From
Ok when I used to run GS45 on my exch55..
1.) It scanned everything in the system...I believe it was at the IS type
level...SO it scanned every internal message sent and every incoming and out
going from Exchange...
SO If I had aliases..which I had a couple..it scanned for me
It
I've had the same problem with a couple of my workstations herecan do
nslookup to exchange server, ping, map a drive, via unc, changed rpc binding
order on the workstation, can have the user move to another machine in same
office works fine, move to another xp machine works fineetc,
, 2003 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available
I've had the same problem with a couple of my workstations herecan do
nslookup to exchange server, ping, map a drive, via unc, changed rpc binding
order on the workstation, can have the user move to another
tried that...still did not fix it for us..made it worse for the particular
client
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available
We recently
when in dough ghost a known good, over right known bad?
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available
tried that...still did not fix it for us..made
Run the Task Manager on your Exchange Server and see what's eating up
all the CPU Pocesses.
We have this problem occasionally with mssdmn.exe running 100%
utilization. We just kill this process and things go back to normal.
As of yet, no one at MS has been able to explain why this occurs.
Until recently, our Exchange 5.5 Server has been running
smoothly. Lately however, it has been running S..L..O..W
on occasions.
The only thing that's changed is we
have recently started upgrading some of our NT 4.0
workstations to Windows XP workstations.
Almost all those users
Running fine for us in a mixed nt/2k/xp area. We have about 800 users on a
PIII-450 Xeon with 1gig of ram and 3 arms. No performance problems for any
of the users. Have you checked your DNS and WINS setting on the XP systems,
how does name resolution to your exchange server work from the cmd
Administrator
Central Community College - Grand Island, NE
(V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age
Just to give you a comparison, I'm running a Dell PE 6600, 2 Gigs RAM,
dual 1.4 GHz processors, 900 users spread over 3 Message Databases and
two RAID arrays. We still get the flag. I get the flag when I'm sitting
still too, no manual activity on the laptop that I'm using.
The flag is set by
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 08:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.
Just to give you a comparison, I'm running a Dell PE 6600, 2 Gigs RAM, dual
1.4 GHz processors, 900 users spread over 3 Message Databases and two RAID
arrays. We still get
What Windows SP?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question
Sorry if this comes in a second time. Tried posting and
Does your CPU peg at 100% when this happens?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question
Sorry if this comes in a
Windows 2000 SP3
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question
What Windows SP?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn
]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:57 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Active Directory
If you're doing an inplace upgrade, Exchange will function as normal.
You'll
want to do some research on the ADC...etc
Cheers,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Read up on Active Directory Connector and Site Replication Connectors.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5/Active Directory
Hello All.
We are going to upgrade our NT
If you're doing an inplace upgrade, Exchange will function as normal. You'll
want to do some research on the ADC...etc
Cheers,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange
MS Exchange 5.5 Standard edition limit is 16GB.
MS Exchange 5.5 Enterprise edition limit is only limited by the amount of
hard drive space you have.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASPNoWebContent=1 documents this
- Original Message -
From: Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Technic al)
Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http
]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnic al)
Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to
mamangement.
Is there any type of Best Practices or any Limitations due
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical)
Sorry
: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
feasible
then I would say maybe there's the load on the disk array...maybe...
and so on
bill
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended
would be happy to send out a consultant to write this up
for you.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:11 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnic al
5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5
1 - 100 of 556 matches
Mail list logo
