Hi all
Have anyone experienced the same thing as we have: It's just floating
through NAI's WebShield SMTP - both the attachment blocking and the virus
scan, but is detected by GroupShield in the store
Ole Soegaard
TV 2/Denmark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin
Title: Creation of offline adressbook
Hi all,
We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6a
Now we've a problem to create the off-line adressbook on our clients that are running OL2K SR1a
At the end of the synchronisation we're getting the error message :
12:35:28 Off line adresboek van
Title: Creation of offline adressbook
Anything in the app event log? I've seen this error in Exchange2000
before.
William
-Original Message-From: mark verschaeve
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001
1:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesCc: Admin Issues
You da man.
Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
;)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: woensdag 28 november 2001 10:40
Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Onderwerp: RE: OT : What SP of Exchange ?
Oh it's just a bit of
Did you hear about the Buddhist who refused Novocain during a
root canal? He wanted to transcend dental medication.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2001 14:41
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments
Since when
Its just like some ducks quakking on a fools joke called TINA and sc***
up the mail servers...
:-)
Sonu Singh
Customer Support Executive
Softcell Technologies Limited
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - +91-22-4606969 Ext. 248
Fax - + 91-22-4224912
I'm writing a little vbs script now... I will forward it to Trend and see if
I can't get it called W32.Tina.A. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Sonu Singh/MUM/IN/STTL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tina
Its
Does anybody know crash recovery software for Exchange
2000 that will work the same way Backup EDGE for UNIX works?
Mark Tishin
Information Technology Services
Maryland Public Television
voice (410) 581-4373
fax (410) 581-4357
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ at:
Yeah that will be a great new Idea.
;-)
Sonu Singh
Customer Support Executive
Softcell Technologies Limited
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - +91-22-4606969 Ext. 248
Fax - + 91-22-4224912
Hi Dave
I have recently got OWA going on a server which I installed non default
as you did. I have disabled the default OWA virtual server and installed
a new virtual server for a group of peoples mailboxes on a new web
instance in non default directories. This gives me complete control over
all
We had similar slowdowns, 5 to 30 seconds, at one point on a few of our
servers, Exchange 5.5 NT4. We went back and forth with Microsoft for about
6 months, Finally somebody suggested trying to increase the default number
of minimum and maximum information store threads. Default is min-10 and
Title: Message
Thats about where I think well be. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001
6:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: compacting IS (was
Large Exchange Store)
175mb warning
250mb
Could
be more specific about what you mean by "same way"?
Itested backupedge/recoveryedge on my home system and have found it
lacking many features and Microlite was no help with support thus I
suspect just about any piece of backup software will do.
ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area
No that's Linux, but i'll grant you a close enough ;)
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
--
begin 744 Ill_bet_this_looks_like_a_real_attachment.vbs
It really isn't tho, if you can see this you'll know it's nothing ;)
end
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Title: Message
Norton
as gotten better so more like a Chevy.
With
Norton you are completely at their disposal for updateswith Antigen
you can use a variety of companies and you can even create your own virus
filtering system. Because Norton is sometimes overwhelmed for updates
Anyone ever hear from Tina or anyone form Printexcel?
-Original Message-
From: Sonu Singh/MUM/IN/STTL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tina
Yeah that will be a great new Idea.
;-)
Sonu Singh
Customer
Not lately no, I think when she saw her mailbox after she got back to
work on monday, it scared her enough to finally try and find out how to
properly use OO replies first ;)
Bob ten Berge
deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
We are using Backup EDGE on our Web servers. With a
last full backup tape and a floppy we can restore system from scratch. Here is the
link: http://www.microlite.com
We are small shop (350users), moving from ccMail to
Exchange 2000. All our user accounts are on the
Title: Nachricht
Hi
!
we
have exchange server 55 and want to protect our system from internet mail from
specials adressen.
wehre can i do that?
Susanne,
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Here's the deal:
Windows 2000 sp2
Exchange 2k sp1
2 back-end exchange servers
1 front-end exchange server
Installed the OWA server in the same domain and subnet as all of the
other servers. Installed exchange and prior to making it a front end
server, I could http to it and log in using
These are new terms to me-- what is the difference between a front- and
back-end exchange server? Do you mean on the inside and outside of your
firewall?
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
No... in Exchange 2k you can opt to make a traditional exchange server a
front-end server. All requests are sent to it and then it handles all
communications with any back-end server (production exchange servers)
needed. Once it grabs the info... it displays it to the user.
-Original
Crystal clear. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k and OWA...
No... in Exchange 2k you can opt to make a traditional exchange server a
front-end
very strangecould be very useful for 'Internal Use Only' mails - I can
send fine internally, but send to an external address and it bounces
straight off WebShield
-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 November 2001 14:33
To: MS-Exchange Admin
I have NT 4.0 Exchange 5.5. I want to block all emails originating from .RU
or .AU domains. I have added a Custom Recipient with *.ru and under IMS
select reject emails from *.ru
I am not sure if it is going to work or if there is any other way of doing
it.
Any suggestions.
Anwar
List Charter
o.k. I figured out that I needed to turn on basic authentication on the
back end server as well. The initial authentication prompt was passing
the OWA server but then being stopped on the backend. So now that I
enable basic auth on the backend this is what is happening:
http://owa/exchange
Title: Message
BENT
with IDR with do the trick. You can save the info to a floppy, CD, or
share on a different machine. Then do a full restore with the backup tape and
that information. I have done all three and like CD restore the best. It seems
to be the fastest and smoothest.
ellery
Okay, my boss had an NT account, with an Exchange account. I just noticed
that it was deleted, and yet he was still able to access his outlook, and
get out to the internet through our proxy. Is there anyway to find out
who and when it was deleted?!?
List Charter and FAQ at:
Title: Message
Thank you very much, I will check it out.
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:17 AM
Posted To: MS
Exchange List
Conversation: Backup EDGE for
Exchange2000?
Subject: RE: Backup EDGE for
did you check TechNet?
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q247/6/54.ASP?LN=EN-USSD=g
nFR=0qry=e0010004rnk=6src=DHCS_MSPSS_gn_SRCHSPR=MSALL
-Original Message-
From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 09:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q153/4/80.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q157/0/10.asp
Either of these relevant? What version of Exchange are you running?
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Hi,
Sorry if this is a silly question but does anyone
know of a quick way to find a mailbox if you only havean email
address?
Thanks in advance.
Gian Sartor
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
If it is an audited procedure (which most people do not) then it would be in
the logs.
BTW, you do not need a domain account to access Outlook or get out to the
internet. It really depends on what DHCP is doing, the OS, and how the
exchange was originally set up.
What account is the outlook
Greetings,
I recently rebuilt my Exchange 5.5 Server (Thank you NIMDA). In the
process I exported mailboxes using the Exmerge Utility. I then formated
the server and reinstalled everything from the OS on up. After installing
the Exchange server and setting up the Organization and sites I
Title: Message
Start
a new mail. Type in the email addy. Hit Ctrl-K and it will resolve to the user
name.
-Original Message-From: Gian Sartor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:23
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Searching
Hi,
Do you
mean what location as in ipaddress or what email address is linked to what
exchange account?
ellery julyTechnical LeadNorthwest Area
Foundation332 Minnesotae-1201St. Paul, MN 55101email -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]phone - 651-225-3895fax - 651-225-7695
-Original Message-From:
You allowed all permissions to be put on directories?
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: UPDATE! RE: Exchange 2k and OWA...
o.k. I figured out that I needed to turn on
In
Exchange Administrator
Tools,
Find Recipients...
-Mensaje original-De: Ellery July
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Enviado el: Wednesday, November 28, 2001
11:32 AMPara: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesAsunto: RE:
Searching
Do
you mean what location as in ipaddress or what
Hrm... I'm confused... could you rephrase and expand on that please.
What permissions and what directories?
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: UPDATE! RE: Exchange 2k and
I look after two servers for clients with Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 installed.
Recently, one of the server's STORE.EXE process (lets call it SERVER1)
started going out of control with respect to memory utilization. It starts
at a reasonable 5M to 10M of memory used, then gradually climbs to about
I'm running 5.5 , sp4. No the exception codes and parameters are different
in my error. I found a couple of other articles but none with the right
parameters in the message and/or the right exception code. My boss can't
believe that it's not out there on microsoft support pages. And to tell
this is from the microsoft knowledge base (if you dont subscribe to
Technet, I suggest you start...) I hope this helps.
PSS ID Number: Q265172
Article last modified on 06-13-2001
:5.5
==
when you set up the permission for those directories what permissions did
you give them?
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: UPDATE! RE: Exchange 2k and OWA...
Hrm...
Yea we are getting a lot. All FROM different folk, but TO the same
person every time.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm
We are catching it at
BOOO!
No Zoup for you!
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28,
they probably sent the offender a bunch of mail. BadT. mails it's self to
every message in the inbox that hasn't been read.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:25 AM
Ditto for us.
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 317-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
What do these people think they can just play on email all day?? :)
-Original Message-
From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm
they probably sent the offender a bunch of
Slap that boy silly. That was awful.
I'll be passing that around
| -Original Message-
| From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 02:56
| To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
| Subject: OT: Blocking attachments
|
|
| Did you hear about the
Ssshhheeeyaw. as if. (they had anything better to do.)
©ح©
╰︶╯ M
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:42 AM
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm
What do these people
Ive been looking all over for any information on how
to allow users access to OWA on a w2k sp2 x2k sp1
server. I would think the knowledgebase would have tons of material on this,
but I havent had any luck. Does anyone know of a specific kb article or
another source that could help me with
I have done as a MS Q-article has suggested to ensure that mail relay is
shut down then tested with an outside source (via a SamSpade utility) and
don't believe that either server can be used as mail relays.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: Nachricht
Internet Mail Service -- Connections tab and look
for Message Filtering. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
@domain.com.
-Original Message-From: Wetzel, Susanne
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001
6:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
This is common. STORE.EXE will use all available memory unless manually
limited in the Optimizer.
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Waycik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Information Store memory utilization is out
Last time I looked there were a few messages in queue, but they seem to
clear out after some time. My thought on this was that they were trying to
get to servers that were down or not available, but there were only three
messages there. The messages were from valid users.
Why do you ask?
Title: Message
Which
is IMHO a great solution.
I use
Trend everywhere because I bought the neatsuite, but would happily use Norton on
the desktops, but never on my Exch box.
-Original Message-From: Fred Valdez
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November
28, 2001
Try this: Domain Security PolicyAdd Domain
Users to Logon Locally. User needs to have logon locally
rights on the machine running OWA
-Original Message-
From: Randy Lauritzen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:12 PM
Posted To: MS
Exchange List
True, but he says after a time the memory usage crashes his box, so it
must be going overboard.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store memory utilization
So then he needs to limit it using the optimizer.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store memory utilization is out of control
True, but he says after a
Ok...
do you add that just to the Front-End server or to the back end servers as
well. I posted earlier today with this same problem. I can
authenticate to the front-end and it relays the info to the back-end... and
when it tries to start loading the page... it prompts for
But so much that it kills the server? I read Q182505 and from this it looks
like Exchange server will use TotalRAM/4, so in the case of the server witn
512M, Exchange will use up to 128M. Am I miss-reading something there? I
have not used perfomrance optimizer yet, but will.
Thanks.
Let us know what happens after you run the optimiser :-)
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Waycik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: November 28, 2001 2:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store memory utilization is out of control
But so much that it kills the
Only http 1.1 basic authentication will work in that scenario. What
authentication are you using? Have a look at the Exchange 2000 Front-end and
Back-end Topology white paper in Tech Net, there
is probably some good info there for
you.
-Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares
We had an issue in the passed that began with a drastic performance hit and
the message queues had several hundred messages waitingnot the same
issue, therefore, I won't continue.
:)
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Waycik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001
Or figure out where the real problem is. Exchange by itself should not
under any circumstance crash a server unless it is screwed somehow.
I'd immediately look at Ejac-U-Late or ArcServe and see if the problem
is in one of those. Either can cause Exchange to dig itself into a hole.
Has ArcServe
So...
if I http to http://owa1/exchange and log in
it works fine. If I http to http://owa1.domain.local/exchange.
It doesnt work. Someone for the lvoe of god share some
insight.
-Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:40 PMTo:
I have only one Exchange 2000 server. Maybe
more experienced admins can answer your question,
sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:40 PM
Posted To: MS
Exchange List
Conversation: OWA Permission
I did see an article about that. It said To resolve this behavior, enable the Log on Locally and Access this Computer from the Network user
right on the proxy member server for the OWA users. Although its
not specifically about my problem, I tried giving both these permissions to all
I will. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store memory utilization is out of control
Let us know what happens after you run the optimiser :-)
Have a look at IIS directory browsing permissions for the exchweb, as I
think you will find playing with these settings will help. But test access
before you roll. If I understand correctly, you are wanting to use OWA
internally?
I know the error is access denied, but what is the http
w00t!!! I found the problem. The virtual
directory Exchweb is not listed in Exchange System Manager... so I hadn't set
authentication for it. I went into the IIS Manager and set exchweb to use
basic auth and it is working fine now.
Thanks
all!
Preston Craig Jeffares
Network Engineer
It shouldn't use so much that it will kill the server, but what you read is
wrong. Don't limit the amount of RAM used via Optimizer. That is
band-aiding the real problem. Store.exe will use ALL available memory if it
can and needs it. My server has 1gb of mem and Store.exe is humming happily
And this isn't something that everyone should be attemtpting unless you are
well versed in using these utilities and know the risks. Bottom line, if
you aren't sure what is going on, or what is causing the problem, call PSS.
It will be worth the $245 you spend for the call. And you will learn a
No! As I mentioned earlier, this is a band-aid. It's not solving the
actual problem.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:40 PM
To:
General question on this thread: I do online backups of my Exch. 5.5 SP4
server daily. What exactly constitutes an offline backup? Does this mean you
stop all the Exchange services first or just make sure no users are
connected to the server? What is the easiest way to ensure it is an offline
You are correct, offline is when no one is connected. Your back up
software should have some sort of agent add-on that allows you to back
up while online tho.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: November 28, 2001 4:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Groupsheild is in use and we haven't had any issues...have you experienced
many problems?
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store memory
I just finished setting up exchange 2000 on a existing exchange 5.5 site.
I have been playing around with the smtp and have had any luck to
correctly setting up so it interacts with IMC for 5.5.
Here is basically what I want:
For outgoing, use the new exchange 2000 virtual smtp server to
Groupshield has been known to cause STORE.EXE to do exactly what you are
describing. I'm wondering if there were occaisions where a lousy DAT
file would cause that.
Check NAI's site.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001
This may be a dumb question, but have you installed the active directory
connector on the 5.5 box?
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: November 28, 2001 4:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: smtp virtual server and smtp connector
I just
What are some good tools or software to measure the amount of bandwidth used
over time across.
ellery
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
MRTG and it's free.
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/
Bruce Briggs
System Administration
State University of NY
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What
Title: RE: What tools are good to measure bandwidth across a internet ro uter
I heard MRTG is good at this although I haven't used it yet.
www.mrtg.org
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange
Its not a dumb question. I have installed the active directory connector.
The test account came from exchange 5.5 so I know it is working properly
as I'm using that to send and receive emails from/to internet as well as
locally to the exchange 5.5 mailbox not yet migrated to the exchange 2000
Check out Cybergauge - www.cybergauge.com.
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What tools are good to measure bandwidth across a internet
ro uter
What are some good tools or
Does active directory have to be installed in exchange 5.5 also??
Its not a dumb question. I have installed the active directory connector.
The test account came from exchange 5.5 so I know it is working properly
as I'm using that to send and receive emails from/to internet as well as
as far as i know, no, just as long as you have the AD connector on 5.5
to get you through to the AD itself.
on your IMC for the 5.5 box, there is a setting in there to forward mail
to a specific host, I cannot remember it correctly as I have been using
2000 for the past while, so have forgotten
CPU is fine and no Groupshield.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store memory utilization is out of control
It shouldn't use so much that it will kill
By fine, I mean it sits at 0 to 5% most of the time, even when memory is out
of control.
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Waycik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store memory utilization is out of
Try
www.Dslreports.com
quick and pretty close to actual #'s - I think the button to push on it is
dlstools
--Forrest
Forrest H. Swick
Manager, Midrange Services
Information Technology Network Services
U. of Northern Colorado
Greeley, CO 80639-0019
Tele: 970.351.1379
-Original
OK but I get to keep the remote control OK? ;)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 22:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT : What SP of Exchange ?
Just for that, YOU get to be the man today. Wayne, give him
NetIQ, Microsoft Operations Manager works.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
Title: Message
DNS
ok?
-Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001
14:53To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA Weirdness
abounds...
So... if I http to http://owa1/exchange and log in it works
fine. If I
Title: Message
Same
here... never a file based scanner on exchange
-Original Message-From: Fred Valdez
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November
28, 2001 14:10To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Antigen vs. Nortons
My
Sentiments exactly...I use
Whats the deal with the double messages today?
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 13:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: UPDATE! RE: Exchange 2k and OWA...
when you set up the permission for those directories
2 Copies of everything from 9am to a little while ago
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 20:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: UPDATE! RE: Exchange 2k and OWA...
What double messages?
-Original
Check your rules...I have had this happen
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: UPDATE! RE: Exchange 2k and OWA...
2 Copies of everything from 9am to a little while ago
Me too.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen vs. Nortons
Same here... never a file based scanner on exchange
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez
Title: RE: OWA Weirdness abounds...
Have you verified the SMTP address space?
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q293/3/86.ASP
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q284/8/48.ASP
Terry Lynch
Internal Network Administrator
Vendaria, Inc.
316 Occidental Avenue
No rules...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 20:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: UPDATE! RE: Exchange 2k and OWA...
Check your rules...I have had this happen
-Original Message-
From: David N.
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
