So your E2k server still sees an IMS that doesn't exist. I seem to
remember doing something similar in a test lab, but fortunately I did a
simple reinstall. I'm not sure of the ramifications of deleting the
connector using, say, ADSIEdit, so maybe a call to PSS is in order here
to get the offic
Hi all,
I suspect the answer is no but I will ask anyway .. is it possible to customize
the test in NDRs?
Exchange 2000 SP2
Thanks
Stu
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
pptp to a watchguard firebox. With exchange in the
trusted
--- Garland Mac Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> What kind of VPN are you using?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:29 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin I
I am trying to use the above utilities to fix the problem described in Q192540.
I was able to download profinst from MS, but can't find the gwclient at MS or on the
Exchange CD.
Does anyone know where I can get gwclient or another approach to fix the same problem?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http
Title: Message
How is this High Importance
?
How
is this related to MS Exchange Issues ?
-Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel
E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002
15:07To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Hiding Start
Bar in Windows NT 4.0Import
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q279616
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q290290
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 18:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Unable to bind to
Yes and no.
You probably could with a HEFTY bill from Microsoft
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 06:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Customizing NDRs
Hi all,
I suspect the answer is no but I will ask anyway ..
that would be a no then, hefty bills aren't too popular here and it's really not that
important an issue
Thanks
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 13:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs
Yes and no.
You pr
WTF? Nice post
-Original Message-
From: Rene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 00:22
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter a
I can remember PSS sending this to me once, so you might like to try
them. I'm sure it would be free.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:15
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Pr
Made more sense than half the ones you post.
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Move Mailbox is hosed - the latest
WTF? Nice post
-Original Message-
From: Rene [m
By the way, one would think that with the number of times this is
requested (here and other groups/lists) that Microsoft would come up
with the goods. Perhaps you should email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
request too (the more the merrier)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [m
I dont know Neil, I have the feeling that if easy customization was allowed,
we would have to wade through thousands of paragraph-long NDRs with
disclaimers and such.. :)
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange
That's a fair comment. Maybe if they restricted it to a 64 character
field or something. But one thing they should allow to be customisable
is the annoying storage warning limit advising users to use PSTs.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At:
Who is PSS?
-Original Message-
From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540
I can remember PSS sending this to me once,
Microsoft's Product Support Services
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Joe Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 June 2002 13:57
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Profinst Q192540
Subject: RE: Clean MTS-IN/Out Using gwclient and Pro
Title: Message
He
must want to do this on his Exchange server. Just a
guess.
-Original Message-From: Precht, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:32
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Hiding Start
Bar in Windows NT 4.0
How is this High Im
Title: Message
I have
very similar problem. If I run Consistency adjuster the mailbox is restored
after being deleted.
-Original Message-From: Le Hong Phong
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:54
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: How to remove
Title: Message
Maybe.
-Original Message-From: Mark
Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002
09:13To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Hiding Start
Bar in Windows NT 4.0
He
must want to do this on his Exchange server. Just a
guess.
-Origina
Title: Message
Change
the shell
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon
shell =
-Original Message-From: Precht, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:57
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Hiding Start
Bar
Here is an article that about software that replicates from one server
to the other for exchange. So that would take care of the store problem.
http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=24890
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursda
Title: Message
I'm getting
the following events in the event log of a customer's Exchange 2000 server. I
have done as the event test suggested and removed and then re-added the Exchange
server to the "Exchange Domain Servers" group. The event log continues to show
these events.
I don't kno
Not sure if the List would recomend that you have PSS on the phone when
using this for the first time, but I seem to remember having to get it from
here before (I think a Google search will also show a few possible places
to get it) if you happen for some odd reason to save these old CD's (check
Title: Message
First question, not necessarily addressing the 9186 problem, is whether
the new users are getting their addresses stamped by the RUS. Have you
checked this?
Neil
-Original Message-From: Jason Loven
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 June 2002
15:05Po
Title: Message
Pardon
my ignorance. RUS?
-Original Message-From: Neil Hobson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002
10:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange2000 Event ID 9186 and 9187
First question, not necessarily addressing the 9186 p
Title: Message
Recipient Update Service, the process that stamps your user accounts with
their email addresses.
Neil
-Original Message-From: Jason Loven
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 June 2002
15:11Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange ListConversation:
Exchange2000 Ev
They charge for me for telling me to there is a problem and they can't
figure it out and to reinstall Exchange over itself, I am going to sue.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
Title: Message
Within
a few moments of creating the users their email addresses appear in AD U&C.
Both a SMTP and X.400 address in the addresses tab and a smtp-style address in
the general user properties.
-Original Message-From: Neil Hobson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: F
Any feedback on this product? Anyone using it?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
We have a group of users who open their own mailbox and a second mailbox.
The users get the little envelope in the system tray when mail arrives in their
mailbox but when mail arrives into the second mailbox.
Is there anyway to show the lil evelope when mail arrives into either mailbox?
Exchan
You might find something over at Slipstick.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Supp
Are the users set as Author on the second mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 15:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: One of those little things users complain about.
We have a group of users who open their own mailbox and
They have full rights over the mailbox
-Original Message-
From: Kahn, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 16:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: One of those little things users complain about.
Are the users set as Author on the second mailbox?
-Original M
How about Ronaldo...or Beckham (the guy who married one of the Spice girls)
or Maradonna? I'm a hockey fan through and through and I've heard of those
guys...and then there is that goalie from the US who wears his hair in
dreadsdunno his name though.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz
The names ring a bell once you name them, but I'd be hardpressed to name
them on my own.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Force Logoff of OWA
How about Ronaldo...or Beckham (the
Title: Message
I have
two exchange 5.5 servers in a site. I want to remove the first server. The
following are the steps I am planning to take. .
1.
Move all the mailboxes to second server
2.
Follow steps in KB Q152959 (how to remove first exchange server in
site)
3.
Move OWA web site
4.
Title: Message
Supplement your list with this:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm
and
you should be ok.
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com
We bring innovation to interactive
communication. Advertising.com --
Superior Technology.
You'll have to write a COM Add-in or a macro to do this. If you can't find
anything at www.slipstick.com, I'm sure I could write one for you quite
quickly.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 15:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subj
Title: Message
First
about ESEUTIL
You
only need to run ESEUTIL /p just once in in repair mode in order to get final
results, running it more than once does nothing and here is
why.
Eseutil scans the database looking at the data sections. Exchange
databases are totally blocked and divide
Title: Message
What
Service Pack level are you at on Exchange and Win2k?
-Original Message-From: Jason Loven
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:24
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange2000
Event ID 9186 and 9187
Within a few moments of c
Title: Message
Windows 2000 SP2 and Exchange 2000 SP2.
I'm
just at a loss as to where to debug this. The event log doesn't indicate
anything other than these 9186 and 9187 errors and the SMTP log shows 550 errors
but no details as to why. I have no idea how to trace (logwise or otherwise) a
I have a user that is getting this error on Outlook 2000 startup. I've
checked the RPC binding order (Q163576) and I've verified that check names
works in the Exchange Server properties. Any suggestions?
client: W2k/Outlook2000
server: Exchange 5.5/sp4 W2k/sp2
Jim Busick
Database Network Analyst,
Hello,
I have an exchange server that was just implemented within a company. The company
already has an Exchange 5.5 server and the new server is Exchange2k. Port 25 on the
router is forwarded to the 5.5 server so it can't be forwarded to the 2k server. The
domains that the 5.5 server was h
Title: Message
Good
answer and very informative...thanks Mike
-Original Message-From: Dopps, Mike
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:49
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: How to remove
permanent mailbox
First about ESEUTIL
You
only ne
Title: Message
Happy Friday
everyone, came up with a thought this morning and was wondering if anyone knew
the answer to the following situation.
1. Exchange
5.5
2. Outlook
2000 clients
3. No
PST's.
User A sends 1 100
Megabyte file to ten users. Because of SIS only 100 Megs of spac
Title: Message
That could be one
way of measuring it, but what about this.
You email the
100MB attachment to 10 people and it costs each one 10MB by your scale. All but
one delete it. Now he has to pay 100. Is that really fair that one person should
be penalized for keeping the attachment?
Title: Message
If
there is a file like that...I just get the user to stick it on a file
sharenot email huge attachments all over the place (especially within the
company).
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,
June 14, 2002
Would it stop you from deploying Exchange if they didn't? If not, it won't
be changed until they "have a free moment". I agree that is one thing that
just about every admin would love to change. Simple reason is I could add
the URL for my intranet that walks a user on how to clean their mailbox an
Title: Message
I would kick
someone's a** for emailing a 100MB file.
-Original Message-From: Steve Ens
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:02
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Theoretical
question concerning SIS
If
there is a file like
Title: Message
Without SIS there would be 10 separate 100MB files each charged
individually to the users. The same as if you had sent the file to only
one user...
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002
1:02 PMTo: MS-Exc
Or perhaps you charge only the sender 10x100 !
-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Theoretical question concerning SIS
Without SIS there would be 10 separate 100MB files each cha
Title: Message
Not
really. The user themselves is not concerned with how much storage is used by
Exchange, they only care about their mailbox and how much they are using. In
your scenario, a user with a 200MB limit could find that they are being hit for
a 100MB file because others deleted th
Title: Message
But
when the others deleted their mail, the one persons mailbox size would
skyrocket. SIS is for the benefit of IT, not the end users.
[1]
[1]
Technically they do benefit as you are able to have less storage required to
handle more users. That reduces the amount of $$ charg
Title: Message
Plus end users
would have a helova time grasping this concept.
-Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:12
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Theoretical
question concerning SIS
But
when th
Title: Message
How
would their mailbox skyrocket? They are already being charged with
100 Megs of space from the moment the attachment is sent, even thought they are
all collectively pointing to the same object.
It
would seem that the the very last user to have the attachment should be
Well, since I have the same POS WG FW here, do you have internal WINS and
DNS servers specified on the WG?
D
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: vpn and exchange
pptp to a watch
I haven't had those troubles with my XP machines... Whether or not they
were a member of the domain...
-Original Message-
From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: vpn and exchange
Attaching To An Exchan
Title: RE: vpn and exchange
Me either. You may need to add the ANY rule to your Watchguard Firebox.
Enable and allow ANY from TRUSTED to DVCP_NETS and vice versa. Might want to start there and see if it makes a difference, that will take protocol/port nonsense out of the picture.
-Ori
I've noticed it when my consultants go to a client location and try to join
their laptops to the client network. They go to the client network fine, but
when they try to jump back to access our VPN is when it hoses it up. Even if
they use netwswitcher, it still requires an authorative server to go
Title: Message
Yes,
but also the user that sent the file would share in this because it is sitting
in their Sent Mail folder, unless they were smart enough to delete from
there. Since we know that this does not happen, the user that sent the
file would be the final one taking the full load
Why do they try to join their laptops to the client network? I don't join
mine to anyone's network, but mine own and I can do work on other networks
just fine.
D
-Original Message-
From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Ad
Because they are Oracle consultants and they like to make my life
interesting. Officially, because the client doesn't always provide them with
a PC, so they attach their laptops.
What do I know, I'm just the Admin they don't listen to me..
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[
we have used this product for three years now. we have had mixed experience
with the product and very bad service support even though they charge you an
arm and a leg for the service.
To make this product work, you will need good hardware and lots of memory,
patience and virtually forgetting to ge
Thanks, that's what I like blunt and point blank
> -Original Message-
> From: M2web [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:59 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Double Take
>
> we have used this product for three years now. we have had mixed
> exper
Hello:
We are needing to create a failover option for a calendar that is
currently in a mailbox. I am wanting to do this via public folders and
create a replica on a differnt public folder server to access incase the
home server is unavailable.
I have not been able to find a way to import the da
One off or continual synch needed? If it's just a one-off, switch the
Calendar view to something like Categories in the client mailbox, then
right-click and drag the contents to the Public Folder.
If synch is needed.. don't know.
-Original Message-
From: Pete Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
We recently began receiving spam from our own domain. A quick look at the
headers and I can tell that the message is coming from the outside. I have
sent the headers to my ISP but, my rep says that I'll probably have to
contact an attorney for any recourse. I would like some help to make sure
It just looks like someone is using your email server as a relay server but
I'll let the experts answer...that's just my opinion.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:44 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:
Nope, I'm sure we're not an open relay.
Brad J. Peer
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help, somebody is spoofing my domain name?
It just looks like someone is using your ema
There is a virus going around that creates it's own smtp server from what I
understand. We've had quite a bit of people sending us email telling us to
stop spamming them but the email didn't come from us... You can look it up
on the symantec site.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECT
There are third party product that claim success in this.
And there is no way anything from CA is going on my servers. Funny how
they had to change the name of the product called SurviveIT.
-Original Message-
From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 20
Yes. It's sinkable.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Customizing NDRs
Hi all,
I suspect the answer is no but I will ask anyway .. is it possible
to customize the test in N
Hmmm, so I'll assume you don't use ArcServe?
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:05 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Clustering
>
> There are third party product that claim success in this.
>
>
Double take is what I did when I got to the price.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Double Take
Any feedback on this product? Anyone using it?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://w
Storage limits warnings, I agree.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 5:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs
That's a fair comment. Maybe if they restricted it to a 64 character
field or something.
That would be Klez
http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_KLEZ.H&V
Sect=T
Though you may be getting spam. I would ask your upstream providr to block
net.tw or ethome.net.tw and see what happens
-Original Message-
From: William Colucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Title: RE: Help, somebody is spoofing my domain name?
It's called email address spoofing, they make the email appear to have come from a [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a common tactic used by spammers. Junk mail it in Outlook and get used to it.
As was discussed earlier in the week, if you have e
Title: RE: Help, somebody is spoofing my domain name?
That does not stop the spammer from using
your email address or domain...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:11
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sub
TIA---
I am looking for a bit of help on the antivirus problems I am having
today.
Today there seems to be heavy virus activity regarding email with an
attachment "decrypt-password.exe" These files are being blocked at the
exchange gateway. Only the "alert.txt message comes through with the
orig
Title: RE: Help, somebody is spoofing my domain name?
Not
much you can do about that, aside from threatening legal action IF (big if)
you can figure out who is doing it AND they happen to be a resident of a
country that might be interested in enforcing such action.
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE
How about de-selecting Preview Pane in the View Menu?
-Original Message-
From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: VIRUS HELL ...help?
TIA---
I am looking for a bit of help on the antivirus problems I am having
to
Unfortunately, as soon as you click on the inbox, you get a Dr. Watson
error and then Outlook closes!
> How about de-selecting Preview Pane in the View Menu?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:24 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Iss
As this was cross-posted on the sysadmin list, here's my response from that
list - only thing I could find on technet -
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q195712
On an interesting side note, I also found this little tidbit regarding
vbscripts with the preview pane .
James,
You get the GOLD STAR!! That was exactly what I needed. Thanks again.
aci
> As this was cross-posted on the sysadmin list, here's my response from that
> list - only thing I could find on technet -
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q195712
>
> On an in
I served my time, damnIT.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering
Hmmm, so I'll assume you don't use ArcServe?
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [SMT
Title: Message
Thanks for the comments. Internally it's not such a big deal, I can
explain that it is just spam and to just delete it. I am concerned that
these messages are being sent to a much broader audience. I have not
received any complaints but, that is one of my worries.
Brad J
Title: Message
Because it doesn't make sense. SIS is a cost savings to IT not to the end
users.
Your
second paragraph doesn't make sense. How would Exchange decide who would have
the attachment last? VPN to the Psychic Network?
-Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert
[ma
Title: Message
Based
on that, someone's mailbox size could grow 90MB without them sending or
receiving additional data.
You
are hoping to reconcile the mailbox contents to the byte to store
size?
-Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Title: Message
Oops. Sorry.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,
June 14, 2002 10:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: Theoretical question concerning
SIS
I would kick
someone's a** for emailing a 100MB file.
Title: Message
This
is what happened William:
I was
continuing my war on Pst's and touted the value of SIS as one of my
weapons. My boss asked me,"If SIS works like that, why does everyone's
mailbox get incremented equally when one user sends 1 attachment to many
recipients? If you a
LOL!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Theoretical question concerning SIS
Or perhaps you charge only the sender 10x100 !
-Original Message-
From: Chris Norris [mailt
Title: Message
Answer: Because
this is the way MS did it. Now can we stop arguing semantics and get on with
what's important?
-Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14,
2002 2:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
T
Title: Message
Fair
enough. But you want the individual mailbox size to be representitive of
reality if that mailbox was separated from the store. The individual
mailbox size is not intended to reconcile to store size. SIS is a storage
benefit at the server.
If you
really wanted, you c
Title: Message
Right.
So, buy allowing PST's a 100 MB mail to 10 people would take 1000MB of disk
space on a file server/hard drive somewhere. It only takes 100MB on your server.
That's a savings to IT of 900MB of storage.
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics [mailto:[EM
Title: Message
Rodents of Unusual Size? I don't think they
exist.
-Original Message-From: Jason Loven
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:11
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange2000
Event ID 9186 and 9187
Pardon my ignorance. RUS?
Title: RE: Any way to import calendar data to a public folder?
Don't import. Do a "Copy To" with the view set to Categories and all items selected.
-Original Message-
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sub
Bah dun ching
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 15:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Customizing NDRs
Yes. It's sinkable.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: Message
Only
in the Fireswamp.
-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:41
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange2000
Event ID 9186 and 9187
Rodents of Unusual Size? I don't think they
exist.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, at 5:27pm, Micciche, Robert wrote:
> I am in the middle of a holy war regarding pst's and mailbox restrictions.
> ... these damn users don't give up!
Document the problems with PST and unlimited mailbox usage, including the
fact that data will eventually be lost. Copies of
Title: Message
If you
ever have to do disaster recovery and 'break' SIS for WHATEVER reason, then you
will have a massive growth of your database.
If any
one makes a SINGLE change to the received file, then that is a separate instance
of 100MB
It's
bad practice and results in poor mail
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
