I'd quit too if that was my job.
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: View Postmaster
I had an admin that was supposed to be monitoring the postmaster email account.
They have left the job and I took
hehehe
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: View Postmaster
I'd quit too if that was my job.
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Run mailbox manager on that mailbox only to delete older than XX number of
days.
On Jan 28, 2008 8:48 AM, David W. McSpadden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had an admin that was supposed to be monitoring the postmaster email
account.
They have left the job and I took the account over and found
Try using OWA or download them into a PST using POP3.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: View Postmaster
I
They are different. Notice the difference between 08CA20E15AD3A8FD and
08CA20E15AD3A8FF.
You need to find the denial conversation in the log to examine for us to
make any guesses about the other.Perhaps it has something to do with IMF or
Junk Mail on the recipients computer?
Regards,
Hey all,
I'm having an issue with a newsletter not being delivered. Other newsletters
from the same company get through OK to the same user! The sending server for
all of the newsletters is the same. Just to make sure I put the IP address in
the IP Allow List on our Edge servers
I had an admin that was supposed to be monitoring the postmaster email account.
They have left the job and I took the account over and found 38000 emails.
I can not view them though. I keep getting time issues.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~
Views, filters, rules...
-Original Message-
From: Jim von Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 12:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Missing messages
We have a smallish organization (100 users) using AD integrated Exchange
2003 on Win 2003 Std, in a
This means that while waiting to receive the next block of data from the
sending server your local server timed out. That is, it gave up because it
had waited too long.
So, just because Olly brought this up recently, are you running Server 2003
sp2 on our Exchange Servers and if so, have you
Ah...that makes sense. I was so wrapped up in looking at IP's I didn't notice
the email ID.
Further down in the log I found a whole bunch of the bolded lines (every 5
seconds)...and then finally a Connection Timed Out error.
I received the newsletter at my personal road runner account (and
Outlook rule? Look again, carefully. That is usually what this is.
-Original Message-
From: Jim von Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Missing messages
We have a smallish organization (100 users) using AD
We have a smallish organization (100 users) using AD integrated Exchange
2003 on Win 2003 Std, in a Win 2003 domain, all fully patched and
updated. We're noticing a bit of strangeness. We have a mail-enabled
global security group called Information Services. There are two
members, my assistant and
That one is well hidden. In Exchange System Manager expand that server, then
expand protocols then expand SMTP. Right click Default SMTP Virtual Server.
Then properties. On the delivery tab hit advanced. You want the masquerade
domain.
-Original Message-
From: Victor Rodriguez
WARNING: One or more of your mailservers is claiming to be a host other than
what it really is (the SMTP greeting should be a 3-digit code, followed by a
space or a dash, then the host name). If your mailserver sends out E-mail using
this domain in its EHLO or HELO, your E-mail might get
Gee only 8 OOOs.
It's been posted innumerable times in innumerable places how to correctly
configure one's MUA/MTA to NOT DO THIS and yet it continues due to
standard human behavior (which is don't change a thing until I'm forced to
because change is bad/uncomfortable and I might have to learn
Gee a little testy are we Jason?
Sorry, I'm old school ;) For the love of all that is good, this is an
administrators list not some AOL chatroom. I know it's MS related but
still...
As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have
the luxury of configuring their
Make sure you get the information the first time. I think you're
allowed one lookup per day...
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 3:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Could someone tell me where i can find this
Delegates are a specialized rule type, and an entry on the AD objects
involved (one for back-link).
If there are a lot of rules already, it may be the generic MAPI error
resolution, trying to tell you more than 32K of associated messages
already exist. Outlook /clean rules will take care of
Not on Exchange, it's reverse dns entry. Try doing a Google search on the
first line of this message and see what hits you come up with.
On Jan 28, 2008 2:54 PM, Victor Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING: One or more of your mailservers is claiming to be a host other
than what it
And he wonders why people arent listing to him and doing what he tells
them. ;-)
On Jan 28, 2008 4:08 PM, Sherry Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee a little testy are we Jason?
As has been posted here innumerable times some mail admins don't have the
luxury of configuring their
We are not looking at an NDR. We are looking at the results of some outside
testing. What looks like a testing website saying your server is not identifing
itself upon connection properly.
His server acknowledges the connection to incoming email with:
220 idfmailprd01.idf.local ESMTP Service
Thank you, you are right.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Could someone tell me where i can find this setting in
exchange 2003
That one is well hidden. In Exchange
It's a Reverse DNS (RDNS) problem. I'm curious who is telling you your
email server has to start with a three digit code. It doesn't have to
of course unless some other service provider has that requirement. Do
you have AV or AS filtering provided to you by third party? Anyway,
Google RDNS and
He may have that problem too, but his helo is invalid.
mx2.idfllc.comhttp://mx2.idfllc.com claims to be non-existent host
idfmailprd01.idf.local
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 3:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Could someone
That one is well hidden. In Exchange System Manager expand that
server, then expand protocols then expand SMTP. Right click Default
SMTP Virtual Server. Then properties. On the delivery tab hit
advanced. You want the masquerade domain.
Not the Fully-Qualified domain name setting in the same
Symantec has been heavy on the client and the server for quite a while.
Avoid it if you can. It's particularly heinous on the server, IMHO. As
far as policies, you build those so scheduling is up to you as to when
etc. It's wise to disallow the user any actions against the client.
Cheers.
I dont let users perform any type of manual scans. They could
unexpectedly put a load on anything.
On Jan 28, 2008 3:16 PM, Boggis, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have Symantec installed out on users PC's with the outlook plugin? I
am concerned about the load put on the server if a
Anyone have Symantec installed out on users PC's with the outlook
plugin? I am concerned about the load put on the server if a user does
a manual scan of all their email. In my mind this is going to pull down
all their attachments and go through them one by one. If some default
policy is set to
But what is keeping the data block from downloading? Since I'm able to get the
same newsletter at my RR account and since the vender isn't having problems
with their other customers (that's they've admitted to anyway) I'm left
believing it's a setting on our Edge servers.
Yes, we are using
Well, anything older than 3 months or so isn't really going to be very
helpful today, is it?
Joe Heaton
From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: View Postmaster
How many out there are not even using front end security for OWA? I
don't use it on my home OWA and haven't had problems, just run a
firewall/router that protects against DOS type attacks. Keep your IIS
hardened and passwords strong, https, etc.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine
Darned if I know. All Exchange tells us is that it timed out waiting.
Given only that clue - I recommend the SNP change. It's affected lots of
people in strange ways.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Brown, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL
That's an SMTP banner response problem. You need to change/set the
masquarade domain configured for that SMTP virtual server.
.local is not a valid TLD, and does not fit within your public name space.
On Jan 28, 2008 3:54 PM, Victor Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING: One or more of
You've been told how to do it via the GUI, but I like the command-line better.
:-)
I'm gonna write a blog post on this. Hmmm. I might could expand it to a full
blown print article Anyway:
cscript adsutil.vbs set smtpsvc/1/FullyQualifiedDomainName mx2.idfllc.com
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Hmm, good point (about solicited) - I don't like 'em either but can deal
with them.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Symantec Outlook Plugin and server load
Just
Go to www.dnsstuff.com , find the MX record check section, put your
email domain in there (mail.yerDomain.com) and check it out. That's the
information to which they are referring, I'll bet.
Cheers.
-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January
OK...thanks for your help.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SMTPReceive Log
Darned if I know. All Exchange tells us is that it timed out waiting.
Given only that clue - I recommend the SNP change.
Just because you dont like OOO's doesn't mean something is broken or
out of spec.
And I think the point of unsolicited could be argued in court that
it very well was solicited by posting to a very public list.
On Jan 28, 2008 4:20 PM, Jason Gurtz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless, the
This is how I do it too, used to use some editor initially. I also like to
blank out pop3/smtp/imap banner messages.
Keep in mind the script provided is for the 1st (1)
Smtpsvc, if you have others you want to change that to a 2 or whatever # is
relevant for your needs.
-Original
That's assuming monitoring means deleting :)
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 7:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: View Postmaster
Run mailbox manager on that mailbox only to delete older than XX number
of days.
On Jan 28,
Outlook 2003
Exchange 2003
We've just upgraded from Outlook 2002 to Outlook 2003 and when setting
up delegate rights for a user through Tools, Options, Delegates we get
the following error message when trying to apply the permissions: The
Delegates settings were not saved correctly. Unable to
I have it installed, but manual scans do not force an Outlook scan (nor
do scheduled ones). The outlook pluggin is realtime only.
(open/Send/Receive, etc).
You really want an Exchange aware scanner that can scan your entire
database. (Not file level scanners!).
Like other said, use the admin
Well, all I know is Jason needs to configure some rules to easily
eliminate those pesky OOO's or he may not live much longer due to heart
failure.
Lighten up a little J, one of the things I enjoy on this list is the
camaraderie between all of us, especially when we pick on Shook and TVK,
Oh and,
Unless it was a bounce on an outgoing bikini babe picture.
John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8000
VoSIP - (308) 431 -
Iridium - 717.633.3823
A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group
in America has
44 matches
Mail list logo
