We use Policy Patrol from Red earth software, very customizable not sure about
the multiple location management. Offers spam filters as well. If you plan to
go to e2k7 no probs, but no support for e2k10 just yet.
From: Sherry Abercrombie [saber...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Just don't forget about Exmerge's 2GB limitation (which is really less
than that) if you do the whole mailbox. I think it's pretty safe if
you only copy and don't delete, but I hosed a good bit of a user's
mailbox about 18 months ago b/c I tried to archive out too much old
'stuff'. I don't rememb
I'm doing it from IE8. Thank you.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 7:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E2K10 OWA Woes
What happens from IE8 with https://localhost/owa ??
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://
What happens from IE8 with https://localhost/owa ??
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 7:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E2K10 OWA Woes
All-
I just ins
All-
I just installed E2K10 into an E2K3 Exchange organization. I'm trying to test
OWA access when I go into IIS 7 Manager and run the owa VD from IIS Mgr. I
click open 443 and I get the login page. After I fill out my credentials for
my test account. I get the following error message.
So
Agree totally. I'd investigate other solutions - a web page that tracks views,
maybe sharepoint.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 1:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Email receipt/acknowledgement
If you're using
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, David W. McSpadden wrote:
> I have been given the green light to research bringing all mail in house
> onto the Exchange 2003 server.
And there was much rejoicing!
> I have a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain. I have an ASA firewall and
> an Ironport for e
Well, you basically need to configure exchange 2003 as per any good exchange
2003 book...it does seem as if you've hit the high points tho.
If owa isn't working, you should be receiving some event log messages...
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.
Not sure what we are using for our Call Centers, but I believe it is a Cisco
product. In our case the Call Center routing is done outside the
Unity/Voicemail realm so no interaction with Exchange. Once the Call Manager
decides the call is not answered and the DID is configured for voicemail it
Oh yeah one other thing that was a plus for Exchange 2010 UM: We have
journaling enabled so we can archive all inbound/outbound messages. We did not
want to archive user voice mail. Exchange 2007/2010 has that bypass built-in.
If we used Unity we were going to have to put in some rules on th
Do you have the Cisco Call Center IPCC (UCCX) ? Just wondering how
exchange 2010 plays with it.
jb
From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM?
We actually did a P
Just about, but we control the BES server. Unity would be under the control of
the telecom group and the Unity Console had the ability to add/modify/delete
users; BES does not.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issue
Do you have Blackberries? :-P
The Unity permissions are just about the same as the BES permissions. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Ad
We actually did a POC of Exchange 2010 to Unity. Currently we have Unity setup
in a standalone forest so it is completely separate from our Exchange side.
Management is wanting to integrate VM into the users mailbox so we have Unified
Messaging. Me as the AD/Exchange guy I did not like the id
If you're using Outlook (up to 2003, don't know about later versions)
with the preview pane, and set Outlook so that selecting a message
doesn't mark it as read, it will not send the read receipt unless and
until the message is marked as read, and you can read the message all
day long without trigg
We just implemented ACEmessage to provide some sort of "guaranteed"
delivery to internal client machines. It's a standalone program to
create desktop pop-up messages that can be set to require user
intervention to close.
http://www.spydaman.com/
Die dulci fruere!
Roger Wright
___
On Mon, M
GPO, but would need one for each version of Outlook running, if running
multiple versions.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
Our Personnel department is trying to depend on the "read receipt"
within Outlook... of course the recipient has the ability to simply
ignore the request for a receipt, which defeats the department's need.
I've been asked to see if this feature can be modified to provide
feedback on the receipt
Take a look at our sponsors product Vipre Email Security for Exchange.
I'm using the older version called Ninja and it's great!
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Email-Security/Exchange/
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Celone, Mike wrote:
> We are currently running Exchange 2003 a
Take a look at http://www.codetwo.com/exchange-rules/. I played with
this product early last year and it was pretty easy to implement. I'm
not sure it will provide a central solution for all your servers,
though.
Die dulci fruere!
Roger Wright
___
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Celone, Mi
So exmerge the mailbox out, exmerge the PST back in deleting that
message? Will this bring in all calendar entries, etc. without
corrupting the original dates?
Die dulci fruere!
Roger Wright
___
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Orland, Kathleen wrote:
> In the process of Exmerge, on the "I
We are currently running Exchange 2003 and need to start adding
disclaimers to our outgoing emails. I started looking into software for
this but there are so many of them out there I don't know where to
start. I have looked at GFI Mail Essentials already (just the free
product for doing disclaime
In the process of Exmerge, on the "Import Procedure" tab select "Archive
Data To Target Store". This is the procedure that will delete the message
from the selected mailbox.
You can also specify what message to look for based upon the message title
and/or any attachment found in that message.
---
I can't open it from another user's profile so I don't think a new
profile would help.
I can exmerge the user's mailbox okay. How would that get this one
message out of the mailbox?
Die dulci fruere!
Roger Wright
___
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Orland, Kathleen wrote:
> More suggest
Nope... can't open the message to edit. Deleted Items already empty.
Seems to be a bad item in the mailbox.
Die dulci fruere!
Roger Wright
___
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Orland, Kathleen wrote:
> Clear the Deleted Items folder and try to delete the message again.
>
> OR
>
> 1.. Open
No go with Safe Mode.
Die dulci fruere!
Roger Wright
___
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Carol Fee wrote:
> How about Outlook Safe Mode ?
>
> CFee
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:14 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Is
More suggestions:
1. create a new Outlook profile and attempt to delete the email there.
2. move the mailbox to a different mail store and see if the email message
follows.
If it's still not removable, try to extract the message via exmerge.
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Wright"
Heh.
I'd be surprised if anyone who was actually using Unity for anything outside of
very simple voicemail would replace it with Exchange UM. The product is
improving, but it has VERY few features.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Web
Clear the Deleted Items folder and try to delete the message again.
OR
1.. Open the message by double clicking on it
2.. Choose Edit-> Edit message
3.. Type in or remove some characters (eg: 3 spaces)
4.. Save and close the message
5.. Try to delete the message again
- Original Mes
How about Outlook Safe Mode ?
CFee
-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Can't Open/Delete/Move an Email Message
Exchange 2003 / Outlook 2007
I have a user who has a single message that
Exchange 2003 / Outlook 2007
I have a user who has a single message that can't be opened, moved, or
deleted. She gets a "message has already been moved or deleted, or
access denied" error message.
We've tried via OWA and connecting to the mailbox as another user - same result.
Suggestions?
Di
It takes some people a very long time to drop a bad habit. J
Webster
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:john.bars...@igt.com]
Subject: Drop Unity for Exchange 2007/2010 UM?
Curious if anyone has dropped Unity like a bad habit in favor of Exchange
2007/2010 UM? If so what was your experien
Well unfortunately we wont be moving to 2010 at least for a year. Does anyone
know of any solutions with 2007, even if it is a 3rd party solution?
Thanks
Shay
From: Andrew Levicki [mailto:and...@levicki.me.uk]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: MS-Exchange Admi
Curious if anyone has dropped Unity like a bad habit in favor of Exchange
2007/2010 UM? If so what was your experience like? Happier now or wish you
would have stuck with Unity?
Thanks,
JB
I've got a list of about 20 "gotchas" now, some big, some small.
If I have a maintenance window ALREADY, I don't mind taking the restart hit(s)
all very quickly one after the other. But, again, I'm old, gnarly, and set in
my ways. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http:/
I can't say that I've had that personally and it's another bunch of service
restarts on the production E2K3 servers that I could probably do without -
but I take your point. Perhaps another E2K10 gotcha? ;)
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 29 March 2010 12:13
To: M
I am cross posting to the Exchange list as well.
I have and Exchange server (2003) that is basically underused. (Internal mail
only and some calendaring.)
I have a third party hosting my external mail (MailAnyone.net).
I have been given the green light to research bringing all mail in house ont
I like that. We’re in the planning phase of moving to 2010 now and I’ll bring
it up at the next meeting.
From: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 10:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vi
My response. If you want to contribute 5% of your budget along with everyone
else to the IT budget for this so you can do zero cleanup on your own then I
will comply, otherwise…that usually quiets them down. Once they see how it
impacts them financially everything changes..
From: Maglin
Oh no. We do have limits. But then they complain when they fill up the
mailbox like it’s somehow our fault. Again, another facet of human nature.
“I don’t know.”
“I don’t care.”
“It’s not my fault.”
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 201
Im confused. Is that what you are forced to do? You have no limits?
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 6:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper
That’s the problem with letting the typical us
That’s the problem with letting the typical users run amok with technology.
They have no clue and they do not care. And even if you train them, they still
don’t care until it impacts them. It’s human nature. You see it everywhere,
not just IT. But I digress, and will move my attention to th
Absolutely. But (and this isn't philsopical it's financial) 99.9% of the end
users have no clue as to what the cost of that clutter is nor do they care. In
our case (a non profit) we have very finite ( and shrinking) resources so
limits must be imposed and when those limits are met they know som
And of course the backup discussion is now very interesting during customer
workshops when considering the native Exchange 2010 data protection with
multiple database copies.
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 March 2010 14:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
And that's a key factor - not all businesses have the same needs, and what
makes sense to a medium or large organization may (probably won't!) not make
sense to a small organization.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Martin Blackstone [
Exactly…..
From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 6:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper
We're getting into a philosophical discussion :)
On the flip side if the mfg says "we have designed our product to do XYZ",
then responsibly doing XYZ with it may not be such a bad thing. Also just
because the product will do XYZ doesn't mean you have to do it.
Obviously YMMV, but in my environment we allow people to have large
mailboxes. We hav
We're getting into a philosophical discussion :)
I think the intent of the paper was that you could use Exchange 2010 and
cheap disks to give your users larger mailboxes at the same cost.
I do understand that other costs can increase, etc. I was just wondering if
anyone had the read the paper men
The users also don't pay for the storage - if they were charged by the Mb I can
guarantee they would keep their mailboxes a lot slimmer.
From: Maglinger, Paul
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Mon Mar 29 08:53:28 2010
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Visi
The users have a obligation to use the technology responsibly. Don't we
have a likewise obligation?
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 6:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper
B
An Exchange server is NOT a file server. And note, I said "useless
cr*p". It's the same routine. I get calls from users complaining that
the mailbox is full. I remind them that the way to check their mailbox
is documented on the intranet, but we still go over it. We sort by age,
we sort by siz
I know it SAYS that in the documentation (what Neil said), but I've run into
the classic "link state bounce" issue at two clients during migrations.
Disabling it is now part of my standard process for all migrations. (As is
installing KB 922817 and KB 937031.)
It only takes a minute and it can
That's only actually required if you have multiple paths between the E2K3
and E2K10 routing groups. In the original post, only a single E2K3 server
and a single E2K10 server was quoted, so I personally wouldn't bother with
this.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 26 M
53 matches
Mail list logo
