On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:27, Paul Steele wrote:
> I actually had this all working in my ESXi test environment but due to some
> disk issues I lost my VMs. I thought I remembered how I had configured
> things but obviously I don’t have a very good memory. I’ve gotten totally
> confused about what
Understood. I've made some of those changes w/PSS on the line so I know of
which you speak. Cool well here goes.
Cheers.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> It doesn’t hurt anything as long as no one has manually changed
> permissions (and something requires those changes
It doesn't hurt anything as long as no one has manually changed permissions
(and something requires those changes).
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:26 PM
And hey thanks or the response.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Stephan Barr wrote:
> Yes I'm aware of the InetOrg issue. The Exchage 2003 is running on Windows
> 2003. Just no WIndows 2003 DCs. As I recall it doesn't damage anything to
> run adprep and such multiple times. True?
>
> On Tue, Ma
Yes I'm aware of the InetOrg issue. The Exchage 2003 is running on Windows
2003. Just no WIndows 2003 DCs. As I recall it doesn't damage anything to
run adprep and such multiple times. True?
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> No, it does not.
>
>
>
> Exchange 2003 would r
No, it does not.
Exchange 2003 would run on Windows 2000, with somewhat limited functionality
(for example, RPC/HTTP requires that Exchange run on Windows 2003). Exchange
2003 only required a mixed-mode AD (i.e., one directly upgraded from Windows
NT).
You could, in fact, run into schema colli
A Windows 2000 AD network with an Exchange 2003 server by definition has to
already have Windows 2003 ADPREP run right? Client company has this network
running but it has no Windows 2003 DCs. I'm I right in thinking that adding
Windows 2003 DCs is safe since the Exchange 2003 Server is running fin
Why does this not surprise me?
Kurt
-- Forwarded message --
From: Core Security Technologies Advisories
Date: Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:26
Subject: [Full-disclosure] [CORE-2010-0427] Windows SMTP Service DNS
query Id vulnerabilities
To: full-disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk
-BEGI
Only a limited amount of archiving solutions from the 80+ that Michael mentions
actually support Exchange 2010. EV is indeed a bit late to the game. Mimosa
NearPoint supports Exchange 2010 for what it is worth.
Martin
MVP Exchange
From: Cameron Cooper [ccoo..
Too many uncommitted logs?
From: Maglinger, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store unmounts
Forgot to mention also that we're running Enterprise, so no such limitation.
__
Transaction log sequence numbers...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/830408
- Sean
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Maglinger, Paul wrote:
> Forgot to mention also that we're running Enterprise, so no such
> limitation.
>
> --
> *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich.
Ok, I read your Windows IT Pro article, which was very good.
Unfortunately it didn't help and I'm officially *very* frustrated now.
After fiddling with send/receive connectors for last couple of days, I
still haven't gotten mail to flow within our new Exchange 2003/2010
organization properly. My ul
Forgot to mention also that we're running Enterprise, so no such
limitation.
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 3:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Information Store unmounts
Boy, I haven't seen that one f
Forgot to mention that. I checked that too and there was plenty (as in
gigs) of free space.
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 3:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store unmounts
Disk s
Do you guys have an alternative to efax that you have used and would recommend
for 1-off faxes that need to be received via email.
David
Boy, I haven't seen that one for a long time. What version of Exchange
2003? SP2? IIRC Microsoft upped the max database size for Exchange 2003
Standard in SP2 from 16GB to 75GB, but you still had to modify the registry
to make it work.
A quick Google search brings up the following kb article.
+1
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Information Store unmounts
Disk space
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 1:09 PM
Disk space
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 1:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Information Store unmounts
Has anyone seen any instances where the Private and Public Stores in
Exchange 2003 just unmounts without any apparent reason? So far
Has anyone seen any instances where the Private and Public Stores in
Exchange 2003 just unmounts without any apparent reason? So far it's
only happened once (knock on wood). With my diagnostic logging for
MSExchangeIS System General set at Medium, Private General at Maximum,
the only thing I saw
The article does ring some truth and we are moving away from redoing the
servers every year - as we didn't do them last year, because we knew R2 and
E2k10 would be out this year - along with Office 2k10. All of which we're
upgrading to in July.
Hopefully after this, I can go for a few years wi
I worked for Higher Ed for a while, and we never used that approach either.
It is definitely extreme. There is certainly more than one way to skin a
cat, but this definitely isn't the way I would choose.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Jason Gurtz wrote:
> Schools are a unique I.T. environment
I just lot the KB article that tells you what EMS commands to run to verify all
the virtual directories URL's are correct.
I've been looking for this stuff all morning :(
John Bowles
From: Paul Steele [paul.ste...@acadiau.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:34 PM
I'm glad other people make mistakes too! :)
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: May-04-10 3:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues
This sounds awfully familiar ;-)
John Bowles
From: Mic
This sounds awfully familiar ;-)
John Bowles
From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 1:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 to 2010 issues
You will have to edit the ExternalURLs on all the Exchange virt
You will have to edit the ExternalURLs on all the Exchange virtual directories.
Personally, I find this easier to do via EMS; but most of them can be edited on
the Server Configuration -> Client Access tabs.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
I've just discovered that I made a mistake during the installation
process. In the install wizard when it asks for the Internet facing name
for the server I put in smtp.acadiau.ca instead of exchange.acadiau.ca.
I'm not exactly sure what issues this mistake will cause, but it
definitely messes up t
Schools are a unique I.T. environment to be sure, but wow they sure don't
use this rebuild-from-scratch approach at the schools around here!
I've found software development to be amazingly similar to the practice of
I.T. There's a guy out there (used to work in the Excel bus. unit at MS)
who has
I'm not even sure where I would need to go to disable that function ;-)
John Bowles
From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Setting up Active Sync on E2K10
It says that “OPTION
Fair enough...
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Shields, Anthony <
ashie...@epsteinatlanta.org> wrote:
> It’s what we do in the school to maintain and improve our technology. We
> rebuild, recreate and improve on what we had, deploy new hardware/software,
> improve infrastructure.
>
>
>
> Inste
No, this was a very basic install. All roles on one server installation.
John Bowles
From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Setting up Active Sync on E2K10
It says that “OPTI
Indeed oops! One reason for errorss after everything else seems ok... can be
non default security permissions on the user accounts. But why this would
change for everyone over night is beyond me. A quick test would be to go to the
security settings for the user you are testing with and set the s
It says that "OPTIONS" isn't allowed. Have you disabled that verb?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Setting up Ac
I think Auto discovery (dns settings) is there to simplify setting up
devices/applications and to allow for smooth transitions between legacy and new
servers.
The bottom line is your phone...needs to connect to the server acting as the
front end for active sync. If this is being blocked active
It's what we do in the school to maintain and improve our technology. We
rebuild, recreate and improve on what we had, deploy new hardware/software,
improve infrastructure.
Instead of tacking things on down the road-during the year, we rebuild
-incorporating all of those things during the summ
Disregard the first test.. I forgot to specify the AS server :-/ The error is
at the very end. Thanks.
Testing Exchange ActiveSync
Exchange ActiveSync test Failed
Test Steps
Attempting to resolve the host name owa.company.com in DNS.
Host successfully resolved
Additional Details
IP(s) ret
It doesn't. Mr. Cooper was correct that port/DNS issues are the problem, but he
picked the wrong segment. This is the problem:
Attempting to test potential AutoDiscover URL
https://autodiscover.company.com/AutoDiscover/AutoDiscover.xml
Failed testing this potential AutoDiscover URL
Test Steps
My suggestion would be to not rebuild the domain. What are the reasons
behind this?
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Shields, Anthony <
ashie...@epsteinatlanta.org> wrote:
> Nearly every summer we rebuild our domain from scratch, including
> Exchange. This year, we will be upgrading several th
My question to you is, why does it need port 443 open for the server hosting
the domain evolvent.com? This is a seperate server than the server hosting
autodiscovery.
John Bowles
From: Dan Cooper [d...@180amsterdam.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:29 AM
To:
Nearly every summer we rebuild our domain from scratch, including Exchange.
This year, we will be upgrading several things including Win2k8 R2 and E2k10
server.
Typically when we do this, we exmerge the existing store - in this case a E2k7
- to PST files, which are then exmerged into the new s
So I'm following the steps to migrate from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007.
I've done this successfully in my test environment, but my production
environment just won't move the public folder replicas.
I have confirmed that all my public folders only have my exch2007 as the
only replica.
The next s
Thanks for your response. I tried your suggestion. But no success.
After some googling I found the article
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961940/en-us. I guess it is something to do
with the malformed MIME content as per the KB. This is only applicable to
mails coming from one client. I do
Testing TCP Port 443 on host company.com to ensure it is listening and open.
The specified port is either blocked, not listening, or not producing the
expected response.
Tell me more about this issue and how to resolve it
Additional Details
A network error occurred while communicating with re
Testing Exchange ActiveSync
Exchange ActiveSync test Failed
Test Steps
Attempting AutoDiscover and Exchange ActiveSync Test (if requested)
Failed to test AutoDiscover for Exchange ActiveSync
Test Steps
Attempting each method of contacting the AutoDiscover Service
Failed to contact the AutoDi
try this site:
https://www.testexchangeconnectivity.com/
Let us know what errors you get
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: dinsdag 4 mei 2010 15:35
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Setting up Active Sync on E2K10
I'm following this article when opening up ex
I'm following this article when opening up external ports... the ports are open
for AS, AutoDisc etc. I'm just curious as to why it would work one day and not
the next if no changes were made?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb331973.aspx
John Bowles | 301.473.2260
___
All-
I've setup AS on my E2K10 server. We were pointing all the devices to the
externalURL on the CAS server. Everything was working fine, came in this
morning and all the devices are not working. I blew away my account on my
phone and then tried to set it back up, and I'm getting verificatio
I had a similar issue with urlscan many years ago where the trailing period
"." Was in the ini and stopped attachment downloading. Very frustrating until I
tracked it down and sorted it out. Got me a job offer though !!! :)
Regards
[cid:image001.jpg@01CAEB75.9F588500]
Peter Johnson
I.T Archite
47 matches
Mail list logo
