RE: Named Property Limit

2009-03-20 Thread Schwartz, Jim
For those running Exchange 2007. http://www.codeplex.com/HeaderFilterAgent Header filter agent that will strip all x-headers from incoming internet email. From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 12:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: ¿lıɐɯ-ǝ ɹoɟ ǝsn oʇ ɹǝʇɔɐɹɐ ɥɔ pılɐʌ ɐ sıɥʇ sı

2009-01-29 Thread Schwartz, Jim
For a second I thought I fell off my bar stool. -Original Message- From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) [mailto:john.matte...@afghan.swa.army.mil] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ¿lıɐɯ-ǝ ɹoɟ ǝsn oʇ ɹǝʇɔɐɹɐɥɔ pılɐʌ ɐ

RE: databse currpted

2008-10-09 Thread Schwartz, Jim
I have an idea. Call Microsoft. -Original Message- From: Nirav Doshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 1:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: re: databse currpted just want to confirm that to overcome this issue i have one idea i.e i dismount the store i

RE: Allowing external forwards

2008-10-08 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Yes. Go get him a BlackBerry or Windows Mobile or something else to access his email remotely. Forwarding to the internet automatically = bad. From: Devin Meade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Allowing external

RE: databse currpted

2008-10-08 Thread Schwartz, Jim
I suggest that you call Microsoft. -Original Message- From: Nirav Doshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 8:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: databse currpted Dear All we have sbs server 2003 with exchange 2003 sp2. backup was not happened last

RE: Activesync errors

2008-08-14 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Would they all be using the same provider? I've seen the provider cause this issue as well. From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Activesync errors Yesterday I started receiving 3033 errors from

RE: Teneros

2008-06-20 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Martin is an authority on being easy. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 5:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Teneros But nowhere near as easy! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Exchange Management Shell killed the CDO star

2008-03-20 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Yeah. If I wanted to be a *nix guy, I would have stopped showering daily and let my hair grow long. -Original Message- From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange

RE: Exchange Management Shell killed the CDO star

2008-03-20 Thread Schwartz, Jim
FTFY ;-) -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 2:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Management Shell killed the CDO star On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah. If I wanted

RE: Exchange Management Shell killed the CDO star

2008-03-20 Thread Schwartz, Jim
your time machine back to the future. On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah. If I wanted to be a *nix guy, I would have stopped showering daily and let my hair grow long. -Original Message- From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT

RE: NDR attachment stripping or recipient filtering - which is better?

2008-03-18 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Doctor, it hurts when I do this. Stop doing that. The less crud you accept that you will not end up delivering, the less email you will NDR. Recipient filtering goes a long, long way to prevent blowback. Since the bad emails are coming from lots of different IP, tar pitting won't work as

RE: ESE Event ID 507 - Anyone Ever Seen This One Before?

2008-02-27 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Or your SAN guys doing something they shouldn't be. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESE Event ID 507 - Anyone Ever Seen This One Before? Yes; this almost

RE: distinguish sales emails from other emails

2008-01-07 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Exchange 2007 From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: distinguish sales emails from other emails Not rules, but Automatic Formatting. I do the same stuff: Messages from

RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion

2007-12-28 Thread Schwartz, Jim
3. Do you use OWA? From: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:27 PM To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion 1) yes, and

RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion

2007-12-28 Thread Schwartz, Jim
externally - through a reverse proxy with 2 factor authentication or VPN. - Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Fri Dec 28 06:50

RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion

2007-12-28 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Interesting discussion. The old Coke vs. Pepsi, Ford vs. Chevy question for the techs. We recently deployed BlackBerry and it been a major PITA for a number of users. Bad provisioning by the carrier, bad devices, lack of knowledge. My trouble calls for BB outnumber my normal calls 2 to 1 and I

RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion

2007-12-28 Thread Schwartz, Jim
ATT and Verizon keep sending me phones to eval so I've used most of the BB's and a bunch of the WM. If I had to go BlackBerry I think I'd go with the Curve first and one of the 88x0's second. WM. BlackJack II (in hand now) is really nice. So is the Palm 750. I'm not a huge fan of the slide

RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion

2007-12-28 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Web / intranet access on the BB stinks. From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 12:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: EAS vs. BB - new thread for less confusion Agreed - it depends on your needs. What we

RE: Exchange escalation engineer (OT)

2007-12-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Exchange MVP's go both ways? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange escalation engineer (OT) You need to ask question like work-life balance from a MSFT employee. I

RE: Exchange escalation engineer (OT)

2007-12-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 8:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange escalation engineer (OT) Exchange MVP's go both ways? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: Outlook over HTTP Problem

2007-12-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
I've always been puzzled as to why people would never roll their own cert for a web site but are more than glad to do so with everything else. TLS for instance. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange

RE: Take a moment to read this. You have nothing to lose.

2002-08-02 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message No, but reporting attempted mail fraud is. So very nice of them to include mailing addresses so the Postal Inspectors office can go knocking on doors. -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:57

RE: Report tool?

2002-08-02 Thread Schwartz, Jim
If you use journaling you have a copy of every e-mail. If you use message tracking then you have the activity of the user. The logs are purged based on what you've set on the SA. Crystal Reports (shudder) is available on the BORK. It can get that information off of the tracking logs if you want.

RE: Report tool?

2002-08-02 Thread Schwartz, Jim
, 2002 5:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Report tool? Interesting, why do you shudder over crys reports? jlc -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 4:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Report tool? If you

RE: Help with SPAM!

2002-07-29 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message Interesting to note that if you don't secure your AS/400 it will relay just a well as a misconfigured Exchange or Sendmail box. So much for relay proof out of the box. -Original Message-From: Purviance, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29,

RE: Problem in sending mail to specific host

2002-07-26 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Yes, as do some older versions of Sendmail. Most of the time it just takes it a while to figure out where it is supposed to go. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 3:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Problem in

RE: Exchange SP4

2002-07-25 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Tut tut Phil. Don't install the Post-SP4 fixes unless you have a need to or are experiencing the issue that is solved by installing the SP. -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:

RE: Exchange SP4

2002-07-25 Thread Schwartz, Jim
whatsoever with the Post-SP4 fixes. Cheers, Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 July 2002 16:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: =====Instant messenger and archiveing

2002-07-23 Thread Schwartz, Jim
I can attest to that. NDA = Non-Disclosure Agreement For the acronym impaired. [1] http://www.acronymfinder.com/ [1] Hi Missy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: =Instant

RE: IT staff behavior

2002-07-17 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Mm... Not so much. Just about any large corporation would have a trouble ticket system. Besides this one persons issues, you've also seen what can happen when the problem is ignored. The loss of confidence in the messaging system by the rest of the department has a tremendous impact on the

RE: IT staff behavior

2002-07-17 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Then, if you get asked that question more than a few times (this is really where tracking trouble calls is useful) you should create and publish documentation on how the user can correct their problem. Do you have a list of your top ten trouble calls related to messaging? If you do, you can

RE: Backup Server !!SOLVED!!

2002-07-17 Thread Schwartz, Jim
And we asked for a syrup warmer for our waffles, but have yet to hear anything about that. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Backup Server !!SOLVED!! I don't know that I'd

RE: IT staff behavior

2002-07-17 Thread Schwartz, Jim
: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: IT staff behavior U Your users actually read your documentation? MINE REFUSE. They call no matter what. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: IT staff behavior

2002-07-17 Thread Schwartz, Jim
behavior Subject: Re: IT staff behavior U Your users actually read your documentation? MINE REFUSE. They call no matter what. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:50 AM Subject: RE

RE: malbox not created

2002-07-17 Thread Schwartz, Jim
I thought it was 200mg of Lithium? Follow the advice William gave you, but keep an eye on the RUS is it doesn't show up. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: malbox not

RE: Dumb one

2002-07-15 Thread Schwartz, Jim
One copy of Windows ME coming your way. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Dumb one I'd like Windows 3.1 with SP12 please... -Original Message- From: Andy David

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-10 Thread Schwartz, Jim
09, 2002 5:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Spam Control Then from the next cubicle comes... Net send jschwartz Hey Jim! 2 for 1 at New York Pasta and Pizza! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:50 PM To: MS

RE: Exchange Conference

2002-07-09 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Yankee = Not from the South Da*# Yankee = Person who moved to the South G-d Da*# Yankee = Person who moved South and married Southern girl. Now don't think that if y'all move down South and have little'ns that they be Southerners. That's like saying if a cat had kittens in the oven, they'd be

RE: Exchange Conference

2002-07-09 Thread Schwartz, Jim
That's why we hang out there. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference HEY! I prefer seedy dive bars too. ~

RE: Exchange Conference

2002-07-09 Thread Schwartz, Jim
and will soon enough be number 3 :P Cept for my sutherner is originally from TX. Though she moved to NYC and then migrated south again when I moved here to NC... -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange

RE: Spam Control

2002-07-09 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Sure you can. Disconnect from the internet. You need to weigh the costs of the time it takes your users to delete the ones that get through vs. the time that it takes you to administer the content filter. When the costs of your time and equipment become greater, you've done too much.

RE: remote

2002-07-08 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message I've heard heroin users say the same thing. -Original Message-From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote Why are you so against this? We use it, and love it.

RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5

2002-07-03 Thread Schwartz, Jim
I always blame the network. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Note on moving Exch 5.5 Well, its always a workstation thing isnt it? If the workstation is trying to resolve a

RE: McAfee The final Results.

2002-07-03 Thread Schwartz, Jim
You're a brave man. I trust none of the anti-virus vendors enough for them to automatically install code on any machine with at least the most basic of testing. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: McAfee The final Results.

2002-07-03 Thread Schwartz, Jim
? We don't need no steeenking testing!!! :P -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. You're a brave man. I trust none of the anti-virus vendors enough

RE: McAfee The final Results.

2002-07-03 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Monday morning before the users get in! :P -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 1:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: McAfee The final Results. I install all my service packs on Friday at 5:30 so I can go home and sleep

RE: OWA Apology

2002-07-01 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Apology I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA

RE: OWA Apology

2002-07-01 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Luckily, you prefer Coors Lite, so it wont cost him that much. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Are you going to the MEC? If you are, that's a lot of beer you're

RE: OWA Apology

2002-07-01 Thread Schwartz, Jim
buy you a six-quack and we call it even? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Apology Don't you owe me like 30 of those things now? Why not combine that into a 12 pack of Sam

RE: OWA Apology

2002-07-01 Thread Schwartz, Jim
was a contributer to that thread, not the creator, so my apology was not to whoever was right, but the poor soul I may have confused. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:48 PM Subject: RE: OWA

RE: Exchange dilemma

2002-07-01 Thread Schwartz, Jim
10 pound tweaking tool. The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand that was their tweaking tool. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma

RE: Exchange dilemma

2002-07-01 Thread Schwartz, Jim
- Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma Ahh yes, otherwise known as the persuader. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: Exchange dilemma

2002-07-01 Thread Schwartz, Jim
dilemma Hmm, egos can weight that much? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma Only certain parts of me

RE: Two Issues

2002-06-26 Thread Schwartz, Jim
That's just Martin standing behind you. -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Two Issues You know there are days I would think that people on this list just don't get

RE: Looking for More Advice

2002-06-26 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message Funny, you don't look like Kelly McGillis. -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice LT., I have top secret clearance.

RE: Defrag

2002-06-26 Thread Schwartz, Jim
On target. Fire for effect. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Defrag Yes a month has flown by already. So on the topic of defragmentations, exchange does this nightly because

RE: Looking for More Advice

2002-06-25 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message Your [sic] lucky he isn't. -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice Oops... Les isn't on this list. I mean

RE: Looking for More Advice

2002-06-25 Thread Schwartz, Jim
: Looking for More Advice Ahem -Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:40To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice Your [sic] lucky he isn't. -Original Message-From

RE: Exchange 5.5 on W2K

2002-06-25 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message Can you hear me now? -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on W2K Gee Jerome, I'm like really glad to get this input from you

RE: Appointments.

2002-06-25 Thread Schwartz, Jim
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - EC -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it

RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded?

2002-06-25 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Wasn't that back in the 5.0 days. About half the people said yes, the other half said no. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DCs, Exchange and not recommemnded? It is

RE: E2k Hardware Opinion

2002-06-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Except if you read the question he was asking about OWA not mailboxes. If the OWA and Exchange mailboxes are to be located on the same server I would be more concerned with the spindle layout than the size of the storage. -Original Message- From: Precht, David N. [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Compacting

2002-06-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
If you want some in depth reading about it see below. Ed Woodrick wrote this and posted to another list a few months back. Ed comments First in looking at the arguments, it helps to understand what you are arguing. Somewhat as stated, your team is right defragmentation should be done on a

RE: Compacting

2002-06-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Yeah, it took me 5 or 6 e-mail to beat that into YOUR head. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting O crap. Are you nutz? You are trying to defend running ESEUTIL

RE: Compacting

2002-06-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Here fishy fishy. Fresh fish. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Ive been an eXch admin for almost 6 months now, so I think I know what I am doing. -Original

RE: Compacting

2002-06-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Issues Subject: Re: Compacting Yes I know. It is a learning process!!! I have never stated that I know everything, unlike this FREAK just did. Thanks again. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24

RE: Compacting

2002-06-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
: RE: Compacting Pay attention in class, else you will learn only half. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting That freak was the one holding you down while I beat you

RE: Compacting

2002-06-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
: Mal Sasalu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Compacting Pay attention in class, else you will learn only half. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:09

RE: Compacting

2002-06-24 Thread Schwartz, Jim
-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Compacting I respect your opinion. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Zen master? I

RE: Customizing NDRs

2002-06-14 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Would it stop you from deploying Exchange if they didn't? If not, it won't be changed until they have a free moment. I agree that is one thing that just about every admin would love to change. Simple reason is I could add the URL for my intranet that walks a user on how to clean their mailbox and

RE: Theoretical question concerning SIS

2002-06-14 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message Not really. The user themselves is not concerned with how much storage is used by Exchange, they only care about their mailbox and how much they are using. In your scenario, a user with a 200MB limit could find that they are being hit for a 100MB file because others deleted

RE: Theoretical question concerning SIS

2002-06-14 Thread Schwartz, Jim
of the original attachment in SIS. -Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Theoretical question concerning SIS But when the others deleted their mail, the one persons mailbox

RE: Theoretical question concerning SIS

2002-06-14 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message Right. So, buy allowing PST's a 100 MB mail to 10 people would take 1000MB of disk space on a file server/hard drive somewhere. It only takes 100MB on your server. That's a savings to IT of 900MB of storage. -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics

RE: Clustering

2002-06-13 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Gack, Buy good hardware. Maintain it. Beat any admin who is thinking about touching the server and you'll get uptime a plenty. Two largest hardware based failures are disk drives, and power supplies so be redundant there. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: ? @ Multiple SMTP Addresses during Migration.

2002-06-13 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Let it out William. I feel your pain. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ? @ Multiple SMTP Addresses during Migration. The multiple SMTP addresses are replicated from

RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Not sure, but I think Boeing or Texaco has the largest Exchange environment in the US. Well over 100K seats. Soon to blow all of those away is this one: http://www.microsoft.com/australia/presspass/news/pressreleases/microsoft+de

RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim
to get things running again. With all the firepower, technology, and gurus... the Exchange server went down at the Microsoft Exchange Conference. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE

RE: Poll time

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Poll time So what are you trying to say? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Poll time It went down on the first release of a brand new

RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim
That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me. -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as

RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim
that it exists concerns me. ;) -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me. -Original Message- From: Preston

RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim
It can't be that bad or you'd already be using the words that Martin has in his list. 1018 errors tend to make me profane and I can swear like a merchant seaman when I get worked up. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:18

RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Crikey! You must get a ton of spam to get all those listed. Some of those subject lines will have Andy running to the server room I'll wager. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:

RE: Content Filtering

2002-06-11 Thread Schwartz, Jim
: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Content Filtering Crikey! You must get a ton of spam to get all those listed. Some of those subject lines will have Andy running to the server room I'll wager

RE: Rule Capacity in Outlook 2000

2002-06-10 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Don't bother. Create an empty DL and add the SMTP address. If you need/want to review the messages, send it to a PF that will delete the message after x days. -Original Message- From: William Colucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: SMTPSvc logging

2002-06-07 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Yeah, you get a ton of log files when you do that. It looks like digital vomit but it provides all the information you need. You should be able to code something to give you a summary of the log. -Original Message- From: Kevin Loney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06,

RE: For Kevin Miller

2002-06-06 Thread Schwartz, Jim
want some of that "cheese"! :o) -Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: For Kevin Miller Like I said. I've seen contracts for a whole hell of a lot

RE: For Kevin Miller

2002-06-06 Thread Schwartz, Jim
: For Kevin Miller Well, where are these high paying jobs at. I'm underpaid! I want some of that "cheese"! :o) -Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Iss

RE: SMTP relay - Windows/Exchange 2000 upgrade

2002-06-05 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Just make sure to turn off 8bitmine. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP relay - Windows/Exchange 2000 upgrade If you are going to maintain the IIS relay in the DMZ

RE: For Kevin Miller

2002-06-05 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message And those of us with hiring authority do make it a practice to look into these lists and decide who is an idiot, who is new and trying to learn and who knows how to fix broke a$$ sh!t. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: a mistake was made

2002-06-05 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Don't forget that Exmerge that it does a soft delete of the message. If you have deleted items retention turned on, it will be recoverable by the Outlook Client. Depending on how sensitive that message is will dictate your actions. -Original Message- From: Kreisa, George (NBC, KNTV)

RE: For Kevin Miller

2002-06-05 Thread Schwartz, Jim
: For Kevin Miller Then you must be having authority to pay $150/hour as well. That's what Kevin said, he will be charging J -Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: For Kevin Miller

2002-06-05 Thread Schwartz, Jim
was talking about your authority to hire him or somebody like him. -Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: For Kevin Miller You're cheap. [1] [2] [1

RE: Symantec or McAfee

2002-06-04 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Mmmm... That's kind of like asking what I would like better, a hot poker in my ear or my eye. If I absolutely had to chose I think I'd go with Symantec. I've had enough with SlackAfee not knowing how to run their own software and am very tired of trying to get them to understand large enterprise

RE: Testing

2002-06-04 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message Since he didn't make any effort to hide the header information in the mail he sent, I would say it was more a comment about someone incessantly asking OS and SP than trying to hide behind a false name. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: How much Bandwidth?

2002-06-03 Thread Schwartz, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How much Bandwidth? Its called intranet sites.. If they want to see them ... DOWNLOAD THEM, don't email them Hey, that's corporate for ya -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim

RE: Auto Archive

2002-06-03 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Q260211 -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Auto Archive What version of Outlook? -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,

RE: filtering spam

2002-05-31 Thread Schwartz, Jim
Title: Message It's made from all the words Martin uses to do his searches on Kazaa. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:03 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: filtering spam You are wasting time.

RE: How much Bandwidth?

2002-05-31 Thread Schwartz, Jim
One other issue you may want to look at is the anti-virus client on the workstation. Many of them are MAPI aware so when the client get the new mail notification it goes and checks the new mail for an attachment and if one exists it may download the attachment and scans it for a virus. Where you

RE: How much Bandwidth?

2002-05-31 Thread Schwartz, Jim
: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: How much Bandwidth? One other issue you may want to look at is the anti-virus client on the workstation. Many of them are MAPI aware so when the client get the new

RE: Black listed

2002-05-30 Thread Schwartz, Jim
: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Black listed Jim, Is there a place with an FAQ or something that explains how to read the results of the look up info? -Original Message-From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:29 PMTo

  1   2   >